GENERIC RUBRIC: MASTER'S MARK ALLOCATION FRAMEWORK
Not yet competent 0-49% Basic competence 50-59% Competent 60-69% Well-rounded competence 70-74% Advanced competence 75% +
Not at masters level. There is poor or confused understanding of the topic/theory. Subject matter of the assignment is inadequate, too briefly presented, or important aspects have been omitted. The assignment is basically descriptive, with inadequate understanding of or critical insight into the topic and theory. No diagrammatic illustrations/models.
Meets master's level, but: The assignment covers only the core of the topic/theory. The assignment answer is mainly descriptive and uncritical. A depth of knowledge and informed and critical understanding of theory are still lacking. The topic has been correctly interpreted and the assignment shows understanding of the basic problems of the topic; the facts are generally correct. Lack of diagrams/ models to illustrate viewpoints
Informed and critical understanding of the subject matter and more insight into the topic are evident. A more critical, evaluative approach to sources is apparent. A comprehensive and systematic knowledge base is evident. Diagrams and models included to illustrate viewpoints.
The favourable factors mentioned in the 5069% categories are present at a higher level, but the additional factors required for a distinction are absent. This assignment shows a comprehensive and systematic knowledge base of theory. The problem is well understood and discussed with clarity and confidence; informed and critical understanding is evident. Ability to identify, analyze and deal with concrete and abstract problems using evidence-based solutions and theorydriven arguments is evident. Viewpoints illustrated with models/ diagrams.
In order to achieve a distinction, the following should be apparent in addition to the qualities described in the 70-74% section: Superior factual knowledge based on wide reading is evident (comprehensive and systematic knowledge based on the discipline, specialist knowledge). Superior organization and presentation of ideas (compliance with academic/professional discourse requirements). The sources consulted were analyzed and critically evaluated, and alternative viewpoints objectively considered (critical
analysis, synthesis and independent evaluation of quantitative/ qualitative data).
GENERIC RUBRIC: MASTER'S MARK ALLOCATION FRAMEWORK
Not yet competent 0-49% Integration of the subject matter is weak/nonexistent. Basic competence 50-59% The quality of the discussion is adequate and opinions are explained and substantiated to an acceptable degree. Competent 60-69% Emphasis is placed on discussion, critical analysis, synthesis and evaluation of quantitative and/or qualitative data. The assignment is much more than merely descriptive. Well-rounded competence 70-74% Application of appropriate research methods, techniques and technologies. The discussion is well rounded and extends to implications and consequences of the factors discussed. Sources are evaluated and used critically, indicating advanced information retrieval and processing skills. Advanced competence 75% + Application of appropriate research methods, techniques and technologies are applied with insight and creativity. The discussion is well rounded and extends to a critical evaluation of implications and consequences of the factors discussed. Sources are evaluated and used critically, indicating advanced information retrieval and processing skills. Work is professionally organised, scientific method having been applied successfully (technical and academic standards met). Sources have been correctly quoted and acknowledged. Expanded sources/ references. Latest scientific research acknowledged. Professional editing. High-quality work Academic standards met.
No logical flow of information (intro, discussion, summary). Lack of headings/ subheadings. Numbering deficient. Reference technique is seriously flawed. Too few reference shave been used.
Discussion follows a logical structuring of points.
Discussion follows a logical structuring of points.
Sources have been correctly quoted and acknowledged. Adequate number of references.
Sources have been correctly quoted and acknowledged. Adequate number of references.
The work is very well organised, the scientific method having been applied successfully (technical and academic standards met). Sources have been correctly quoted and acknowledged. Expanded source references.
Technical and academic standards not met.
Technical and academic standards are not fully met.
Technical and academic standards met.
Professional editing/academic standards met.
GENERIC RUBRIC: MASTER'S MARK ALLOCATION FRAMEWORK
Not yet competent 0-49% Self-evaluation is deficient/non-existent. Basic competence 50-59% Self-evaluation too basic (lacks depth and proper explanations). Competent 60-69% Self-evaluation has proper explanations. Well-rounded competence 70-74% Self-evaluation shows capacity to manage learning tasks autonomously. Depth of explanation/ critical self-reflection. Advanced competence 75% + Self-evaluation shows capacity to manage learning tasks professionally and autonomously; an attitude of continuous learning is evident.
