Description: Tags: 2008-019
Description: Tags: 2008-019
Description: Tags: 2008-019
[Access to the World and Its Languages - International Education Programs Service: see graphic of African woman]
FULBRIGHT-HAYS
FACULTY RESEARCH ABROAD PROGRAM
Thank you for your interest in applying for a grant under the Fulbright-Hays Faculty Research
Abroad (FRA) program. Included in this application booklet are the program introduction,
instructions, and forms needed to submit a complete application package to the U.S.
Department of Education.
Institutional grants awarded under the FRA program provide fellowships to enable faculty
members of institutions of higher education to conduct research overseas in the fields of
modern language and area studies for 3-12 months.
This letter highlights a few items in the Fiscal Year (FY) 2008 application package that will be
important to you in applying for grants under this program. You should review the entire
application package carefully before preparing and submitting your application. Information on
the FRA Program is accessible at the U.S. Department of Education (Department) Web site at:
http://www.ed.gov/programs/iegpsfra/index.html
Applicants should pay particular attention to the section entitled “Competition Highlights” that
outlines the absolute and competitive priorities as well as other program and competition details.
A FRA application must be submitted on behalf of the applicant faculty member by a U.S.
institution of higher education (IHE). In order for institutions to apply electronically,
representatives from institutions of higher education (e.g., project directors) must register in the
e-Application system. Project directors who have not already registered must submit the
following information, via e-mail, to: [email protected]: first and last name of the project
director, university, and e-mail address. We recommend that applicant IHEs submit this
information as soon as possible to ensure that applicant IHEs obtain access to the e-Application
system well before the application deadline date. We suggest that applicant IHEs send this
information no later than August 29, 2007, in order to facilitate timely submission of their
electronic applications.
A list of FRA institutions and project directors who have registered in e-Application in previous
years is included in this application. If an institution is not listed, or the project director has
changed, you are still welcome to apply. Please contact Amy Wilson, FRA program officer with
the above information as soon as possible.
The Department of Education is requiring that applications for FY 2008 grants under the FRA
program be submitted electronically using the Department’s e-application system. The e-
application system is accessible through its portal page at:
http://e-grants.ed.gov/egWelcome.asp
The application must be submitted on or before the deadline date. Electronic submission of
applications is required; therefore, you must submit an electronic application unless you follow
2
the procedures in the Closing Date Notice and qualify for one of the exceptions to the electronic
submission requirement. If you think you may need an exception you are urged to review the
requirements promptly. Applications submitted late will not be accepted. The Department is
required to enforce the established deadline to ensure fairness to all applicants. No changes or
additions to an application will be accepted after the deadline date.
You are reminded that the document published in the Federal Register (the Closing Date
Notice) is the official document, and that you should not rely upon any information that is
inconsistent with the guidance contained in the official document.
We look forward to receiving your application and appreciate your efforts to promote excellence
in international education.
Sincerely,
3
Competition Highlights
1. Please note the following program priorities:
Please note that these priorities are explained in detail in the Closing Date
Notice contained in this application package. You are urged to fully review the
Closing Date notice carefully before preparing your application.
2. The application must be received on or before the deadline date and time.
Please note that U.S. Department of Education grant application deadlines fall at
4:30pm EST. Late applications will not be accepted. The Department is required
to enforce the established deadline to ensure fairness to all applicants. No
changes or additions to an application will be accepted after the deadline date
and time.
4. All applicants are required to adhere to the 10-page limit for the Project Narrative
and 2-page limit for the bibliography portion of the application.
5. A font standard in the notice regulates that you use one of the following fonts:
Times New Roman, Courier, Courier New or Arial. Applications submitted in any
other font (including Times Roman, Arial Narrow) will not be accepted.
Applications for grants under this program must be submitted electronically using the
Electronic Grant Application System (e-Application) available through the Department’s
e-Grants system.
5
4000-01-U
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Overview Information
Notice inviting applications for new awards for fiscal year (FY)
2008.
Dates:
663.21(d)).
not eligible.
priority.
families.
81, 82, 84, 85, 86, 97, 98, and 99. (b) The regulations for
7
Estimated Available Funds: The Administration has requested
$1,395,000 for new awards for this program for FY 2008. The
notice.
months.
the Department.
8
Internet. To obtain a copy via the Internet, use the following
address:
http://www.ed.gov/programs/iegpsfra/applicant.html
8339.
with the forms you must submit, are in the application package
9
● Double space (no more than three lines per vertical
accepted.
narrative.
limits.
10
System (e-Application) available through the Department’s e-
11
unless an IHE qualifies for an exception to this requirement in
and the faculty applicant will be entering data online that will
to us.
12
the process; however, all applicants should review and follow
the faculty and submit them to the IHE’s project director using
electronically.
13
application deadline date. The e-Application system will not
are 6:00 a.m. Monday until 7:00 p.m. Wednesday; and 6:00 a.m.
14
other than the three file types specified above or submits a
steps:
15
(3) Place the PR/Award number in the upper right hand
competition; and
minutes or more between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 3:30 p.m.,
16
elsewhere in this notice under For Further Information Contact
the Internet; or
Application system;
and
date (14 calendar days or, if the fourteenth calendar day before
next business day following the Federal holiday), the IHE mails
of the two grounds for an exception prevent the IHE from using
17
later than two weeks before the application deadline date. If
receive the faxed statement no later than two weeks before the
notice.
Department. The IHE must mail the original and two copies of
or
18
Regardless of which address the IHE uses, the IHE must show
commercial carrier, or
mailing:
Service.
IHE must deliver the original and two copies of the application,
19
by hand, on or before the application deadline date, to the
20
section VII in this notice. If the Department provides an
this competition are from 34 CFR 663.21 and are as follows: The
21
theoretical issues in the field, and the project’s originality
for research prior to going overseas, and the kinds, quality and
22
cultural context, as evidenced by the applicant’s previous
send the IHE a Grant Award Notifice (GAN). We may notify the
23
4. Performance Measures: Under the Government Performance
8339.
24
(PDF) on the Internet at the following site:
www.ed.gov/news/fedregister.
PDF, call the U.S. Government Printing Office (GPO), toll free,
1530.
www.gpoaccess.gov/nara/index.html.
Dated:
_____________________________
Diane Auer Jones
Assistant Secretary
Office of Postsecondary Education.
25
Higher Education Programs; 34 CFR Parts 606, 607, 611, 637, 648, 656, 657, 658, 660, 661, 662, 663,
664, and 669; Final regulations. [OPE]FR Doc 05-5547
[Federal Register: March 21, 2005 (Volume 70, Number 53)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 13371-13377]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr21mr05-14]
Download:
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
34 CFR Parts 606, 607, 611, 637, 648, 656, 657, 658, 660, 661, 662,
663, 664, and 669
SUMMARY: These final regulations remove all references to points in the selection criteria the
Department of Education (Department) uses to evaluate applications submitted under the higher
education discretionary grant programs. We are taking this action because the current point assignments
are outdated and do not permit sufficient flexibility to establish important program objectives. Taking this
action allows us that flexibility and ensures that grant awards are made to high quality applicants.
The final regulations also remove the requirement that in competitions for grants under the Partnership
and Teacher-Recruitment components of the Teacher Quality Enhancement Grants Program, the
Secretary hold a two-stage competition in which applicants must submit a pre-application and a full
application. The current structure did not prove effective in producing high quality applications for this
program. Removing the requirement for a pre-application reduces burden on applicants and the
Department and allows both to target their resources on the full application stage.
There are some amendments in these final regulations that are purely technical corrections to the
regulations.
DATES: These regulations are effective April 20, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lorraine Kennedy, U.S. Department of Education, 1990 K
Street, NW., room 8018, Washington, DC 20006-8544. Telephone: (202) 502-7762. Pamela Maimer,
U.S. Department of Education, 1990 K Street, N.W., room 8014, Washington, DC 20006-8544.
Telephone: (202) 502-7704.
If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD), you may call the Federal Relay Service (FRS)
at 1-800-877-8339.
Individuals with disabilities may obtain this document in an alternative format (e.g., Braille, large print,
audiotape, or computer diskette) on request to either contact person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On December 22, 2004, the Secretary
[[Page 13372]]
published a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for 34 CFR parts 606, 607, 611, 637, 648, 656, 657,
658, 660, 661, 662, 663, 664, and 669 in the Federal Register (69 FR 76636). In the preamble of the
NPRM, the Secretary discussed on pages 76636 and 76637 the major changes proposed to the current
regulations. These are as follows:
The Secretary proposed removing the mandatory point values from the selection criteria in the regulations
associated with the application process for discretionary grant programs. These amendments provide the
Secretary with the flexibility to select specific point values from year to year to address current priorities
for the programs.
The Secretary also proposed amending 34 CFR part 611, which governs the Teacher Quality
Enhancement Grants (TQE) program. This amendment makes discretionary the existing requirement that
in competitions for grants under the program’s Partnership and Teacher-Recruitment components, the
Secretary conduct a two-stage process for selecting applicants involving the submission and review of
pre-applications and full applications.
There were no differences between the NPRM and these final regulations.
26
Analysis of Comments
In response to the Secretary’s invitation in the NPRM, the Department did not receive any comments on
the changes to the TQE program. Several parties submitted comments on the proposed regulations
regarding removal of mandatory point values. An analysis of the comments follows.
Generally, we do not address technical and other minor changes—and suggested changes the law does
not authorize the Secretary to make.
Analysis of Comments and Changes
Comments: Several commenters believed that the elimination of points will result in some institutions
being denied the opportunity to compete for grants because they will not have enough time to prepare
because of the change.
Discussion: The Secretary does not agree that eliminating specific point values from the regulations will
reduce the opportunity for potential grantees to compete for grants. The regulations continue to specify
the criteria used in making the grants in each program. Moreover, the points to be awarded for each
criteria will be specified in a Federal Register notice or in the application package, which will be available
in enough time for potential applicants to prepare their applications.
Change: None.
Comment: Several commenters wrote that eliminating points from the
criteria will result in a reduced focus on institutions that serve disadvantaged students or programs that
serve a particular group.
Discussion: The Secretary understands the concerns of the commenters. We do not believe that the
proposed change will lead to reduced focus on institutions that serve disadvantaged students or particular
groups of students. Removing point values from the regulations does not change the selection criteria or
otherwise change the focus of the programs.
Change: None.
Comment: Several commenters stated that the elimination of points
would result in a preference for four-year institutions over two-year institutions.
Discussion: We have no reason to believe that the removal of points from the regulations will result in a
preference for four-year institutions over two-year institutions in grant awards. The selection criteria will
remain the same, so the removal of points will not effect the selection of applicants.
Change: None.
We have reviewed these final regulations in accordance with Executive Order 12866. Under the
terms of the order we have assessed the potential costs and benefits of this regulatory action.
The potential costs associated with the final regulations are those resulting from statutory
requirements and those we have determined to be necessary for administering these programs
effectively and efficiently.
In assessing the potential costs and benefits—both quantitative and qualitative—of these final
regulations, we have determined that the benefits regulations justify the costs.
We have also determined that this regulatory action would not unduly interfere with State, local, and
tribal governments in the exercise of their governmental functions.
2. Summary of Potential Costs and Benefits
We discussed the potential costs and benefits of these final regulations in the preamble to the NPRM
in the section titled Supplementary Information.
Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification
The Secretary certifies that these final regulations will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. Small entities affected by these regulations are small institutions
of higher education. The changes will not have a significant economic impact on the institutions
affected.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 does not require you to respond to a collection of information
unless it displays a valid OMB control number. We display the valid OMB control numbers assigned
to collections of information in these final regulations at the end of the affected sections of the
regulations.
Assessment of Educational Impact
In the NPRM we requested comments on whether the proposed regulations would require
transmission of information that any other agency or authority of the United States gathers or makes
available.
27
Based on the response to the NPRM and on our review, we have determined that these final
regulations do not require transmission of information that any other agency or authority of the United
States gathers or makes available.
Electronic Access to This Document
You may view this document, as well as all other Department of Education documents published in
the Federal Register, in text or Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) on the Internet at the
following site:
http://www.ed.gov/news/fedregister.
To use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available free at this site. If you have
questions about using PDF, call the U.S. Government Printing Office (GPO), toll free, at 1-888-293-
6498; or in the Washington, DC, area at (202) 512-1530.
Note: The official version of this document is the document published in the Federal Register. Free
Internet access to the official edition of the Federal Register and the Code of Federal Regulations is
available on GPO Access at:
http://www.gpoaccess.gov/nara/index.html.
List of Subjects
34 CFR Parts 606 and 607
Colleges and universities, Grant programs—education, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
34 CFR Part 611
Colleges and universities, Elementary and secondary education, Grant programs—education.
[[Page 13373]]
34 CFR Part 637
Colleges and universities, Educational study programs, Equal educational opportunity, Grant programs—
education, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Science and technology, Women.
34 CFR Part 648
Colleges and universities, Grant programs—education, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements,
Scholarships and fellowships.
34 CFR Part 656
Colleges and universities, Cultural exchange programs, Educational study programs, Grant programs—
education, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
34 CFR Part 657
Colleges and universities, Cultural exchange programs, Educational study programs, Grant programs—
education, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Scholarships and fellowships.
34 CFR Part 658
Colleges and universities, Cultural exchange programs, Educational study programs, Grant programs—
education.
34 CFR Part 660
Colleges and universities, Cultural exchange programs, Educational Research, Educational study
programs, Grant programs—education.
34 CFR Part 661
Business and industry, Colleges and universities, Educational study programs, Grant programs—
education, Student aid.
34 CFR Part 662
Colleges and universities, Educational Research, Educational study programs, Grant programs—
education, Scholarships and fellowships.
34 CFR Part 663
Colleges and universities, Educational Research, Educational study programs, Grant programs—
education, Scholarships and fellowships, Teachers.
34 CFR Part 664
Colleges and universities, Educational Research, Educational study programs, Grant programs—
education, Teachers.
34 CFR Part 669
Colleges and universities, Educational Research, Educational study programs, Grant programs—
education, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Teachers.
Dated: March 16, 2005.
Sally L. Stroup,
Assistant Secretary for Postsecondary Education.
28
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Secretary amends parts 606, 607, 611, 637, 648, 656,
657, 658, 660, 661, 662, 663, 664, and 669 of title 34 of the Code of Federal Regulations as follows:
PART 606--DEVELOPING HISPANIC-SERVING INSTITUTIONS PROGRAM
1. The authority citation for part 606 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1101 et seq., unless otherwise noted.
2. Section 606.20 is amended by—
A. Revising paragraph (b);
B. In paragraph (c)(1), removing the words “scores at least 50
points” and adding, in their place, the words “meets the
requirements”; and
C. Removing paragraph (c)(2)(i) and redesignating paragraphs (c)(2)(ii) and (c)(2)(iii) as
paragraphs (c)(2)(i) and (c)(2)(ii), respectively.
The revision reads as follows:
Sec. 606.20 How does the Secretary choose applications for funding?
*****
(b) The Secretary informs applicants of the maximum possible score for each criterion in the application
package or in a notice published in the Federal Register.
*****
3. Section 606.21 is amended by—
A. Removing all of the parentheticals that end in “points)”; and
B. Revising the introductory text to read as follows:
Sec. 606.21 What are the selection criteria for planning grants?
The Secretary evaluates an application for a planning grant on the basis of the criteria in this
section.
*****
4. Section 606.22 is amended by—
A. Revising the introductory text;
B. Removing all of the parentheticals that end in “points)”;
C. In paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2), removing the punctuation “.”; and
D. In paragraph (a)(3), adding the word “and” after the punctuation “;”.
The revision reads as follows:
Sec. 606.22 What are the selection criteria for development grants?
The Secretary evaluates an application for a development grant on the basis of the criteria in this section.
*****
5. Section 606.23 is amended by—
A. Removing all of the parentheticals that end in “point)”; and
B. Revising the introductory text of paragraphs (a) and (b) to read as follows:
Sec. 606.23 What special funding consideration does the Secretary provide?
(a) If funds are available to fund only one additional planning grant and each of the next fundable
applications has received the same number of points under Sec. 606.20 or 606.21, the Secretary
awards additional points, as provided in the application package or in a notice published in the
Federal Register, to any of those applicants that—* * * * *
(b) If funds are available to fund only one additional development grant and each of the next fundable
applications has received the same number of points under Sec. 606.20 or 606.22, the Secretary
awards additional points, as provided in the application package or in a notice published in the
Federal Register, to any of those applicants that—
*****
Sec. 607.22 What are the selection criteria for development grants?
The Secretary evaluates an application for a development grant on the basis of the criteria in this section.
*****
10. Section 607.23 is amended by—
A. Removing all of the parentheticals that end in “point)”; and
B. Revising the introductory text of paragraphs (a) and (b) to read as follows:
Sec. 607.23 What special funding consideration does the Secretary provide?
(a) If funds are available to fund only one additional planning grant and each of the next fundable
applications has received the same number of points under Sec. 607.20 or 607.21, the Secretary
awards additional points, as provided in the application package or in a notice published in the
Federal Register, to any of those applicants that—
*****
(b) If funds are available to fund only one additional development grant and each of the next fundable
applications has received the same number of points under Sec. 607.20 or 607.22, the Secretary
awards additional points, as provided in the application package or in a notice published in the
Federal Register, to any of those applicants that—
*****
PART 611--TEACHER QUALITY ENHANCEMENT GRANTS PROGRAM
11. The authority citation for part 611 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1021 et seq. and 1024(e), unless otherwise noted.
Sec. 611.2 [Amended]
12. Section 611.2 is amended by, in paragraph (a), removing the words “paragraphs (a)(1), (a)(2)(iii),
or (a)(3)(iii) of Sec. 611.3” and adding, in their place, the words “paragraphs (a)(1), (a)(2)(i)(B), (a)(2)(ii),
(a)(3)(i)(B), or (a)(3)(ii) of Sec. 611.3”.
13. Section 611.3 is amended by—
A. Revising paragraphs (a)(2) and (a)(3); and
B. In paragraph (b), removing the words “paragraphs (b)(2)(ii) and
(b)(3)(ii)” and adding, in their place, the words “paragraphs (a)(2)(i)(A) and (a)(3)(i)(A)”.
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 611.3 What procedures does the Secretary use to award a grant?
*****
(a) * * *
(2) For the Partnership Grants Program, the Secretary may use a two-stage application process
to determine which applications to fund.
30
(i) If the Secretary uses a two-stage application process, the
Secretary uses—
(A) The selection criteria in Sec. Sec. 611.21 through 611.22 to evaluate pre-applications submitted
for new grants, and to determine those applicants to invite to submit full program applications;
and
(B) For those applicants invited to submit full applications, the selection criteria and competitive
preference in Sec. Sec. 611.23 through 611.25 to evaluate the full program applications.
(ii) If the Secretary does not use a two-stage application process, the Secretary uses the
selection criteria and competitive preference in Sec. Sec. 611.23 through 611.25 to evaluate
applications.
(3) For the Teacher Recruitment Grants Program, the Secretary may use a two-stage
application process to determine which applications to fund.
(i) If the Secretary uses a two-stage application process, the
Secretary uses—
(A) The selection criteria in Sec. 611.31 to evaluate pre-applications submitted for new grants, and
to determine those applicants to invite to submit full program applications; and
(B) For those applicants invited to submit full applications, the selection criteria in Sec. 611.32 to
evaluate the full program applications.
(ii) If the Secretary does not use a two-stage application process, the Secretary uses the
selection criteria in Sec. 611.32 to evaluate applications.
*****
PART 637--MINORITY SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
14. The authority citation for part 637 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1067-1067c, 1067g-1067k, 1068, 1068b, unless otherwise noted.
15. Section 637.31 is amended by—
A. Revising paragraph (b); and
B. Removing paragraph (c) and redesignating paragraphs (d)(1), (2), and
(3) as paragraphs (c)(1), (2), and (3), respectively.
The revision reads as follows:
31
Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1135-1135ee, unless otherwise noted.
18. Section 648.30 is amended by—
A. Revising paragraph (b); and
B. Removing paragraph (c).
The revision reads as follows:
Sec. 648.30 How does the Secretary evaluate an application?
*****
(b) The Secretary informs applicants of the maximum possible score for each criterion in the
application package or in a notice published in the Federal Register.
*****
19. Section 648.31 is amended by—
A. Removing all of the parentheticals that end in “points)”; and
B. Revising the introductory text to read as follows:
Sec. 648.31 What selection criteria does the Secretary use?
The Secretary evaluates an application on the basis of the criteria in this section.
*****
PART 656--NATIONAL RESOURCE CENTERS PROGRAM FOR FOREIGN LANGUAGE
AND AREA STUDIES OR FOREIGN LANGUAGE AND INTERNATIONAL STUDIES
20. The authority citation for part 656 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1122, unless otherwise noted.
21. Section 656.20 is amended by revising paragraph (b) to read as follows:
Sec. 656.20 How does the Secretary evaluate an application?
*****
(b) The Secretary informs applicants of the maximum possible score for each criterion in the
application package or in a notice published in the Federal Register.
*****
22. Section 656.21 is amended by—
A. Removing all of the parentheticals that end in “points)”; and
B. Revising the introductory text to read as follows:
Sec. 656.21 What selection criteria does the Secretary use to evaluate an application for a
comprehensive Center?
The Secretary evaluates an application for a comprehensive Center on the basis of the criteria in
this section.
*****
23. Section 656.22 is amended by—
A. Removing all of the parentheticals that end in “points)”; and
B. Revising the introductory text to read as follows:
Sec. 656.22 What selection criteria does the Secretary use to evaluate an application for an
undergraduate Center?
The Secretary evaluates an application for an undergraduate Center on the basis of the criteria in
this section.
*****
PART 657--FOREIGN LANGUAGE AND AREA STUDIES FELLOWSHIPS PROGRAM
24. The authority citation for part 657 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1122, unless otherwise noted.
25. Section 657.20 is amended by—
A. In paragraph (a), adding the word “institutional” before the word
“application”; and
B. Revising paragraph (b) to read as follows:
Sec. 657.20 How does the Secretary evaluate an institutional application for an allocation of fellowships?
*****
(b) The Secretary informs applicants of the maximum possible score for each criterion in the
application package or in a notice published in the Federal Register.
*****
26. Section 657.21 is amended by—
A. Removing all of the parentheticals that end in “points)”; and
B. Adding introductory text to read as follows:
Sec. 657.21 What criteria does the Secretary use in selecting institutions for an allocation of
fellowships?
The Secretary evaluates an institutional application for an allocation of fellowships on the basis of
the criteria in this section.
32
*****
PART 658--UNDERGRADUATE INTERNATIONAL STUDIES AND FOREIGN LANGUAGE
PROGRAM
27. The authority citation for part 658 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1124, unless otherwise noted.
28. Section 658.30 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 658.30 How does the Secretary evaluate an application?
(a) The Secretary evaluates an application from an institution of higher education or a combination of
such institutions on the basis of the criteria in Sec. Sec. 658.31 and 658.32. The Secretary
informs applicants of the maximum possible score for each criterion in the application package or
in a notice published in the Federal Register.
(b) The Secretary evaluates an application from an agency or organization or professional or
scholarly association on the basis of the criteria in Sec. Sec. 658.31 and 658.33. The Secretary
informs applicants of the maximum possible score for each criterion in the application package or
in a notice published in the Federal Register.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1124)
33
The Secretary evaluates an application for a project under this program on the basis of the
criteria in this section. The Secretary informs applicants of the maximum possible score for each
criterion in the application package or in a notice published in the Federal Register.
*****
35. Section 660.32 is amended by—
A. Removing all of the parentheticals that end in “points)”; and
B. Revising the introductory text to read as follows:
Sec. 660.32 What additional selection criteria does the Secretary use for an application for a
research project, a survey, or a study?
In addition to the criteria referred to in Sec. 660.31, the Secretary evaluates an application for a
research project, study, or survey on the basis of the criteria in this section.
*****
36. Section 660.33 is amended by—
A. Removing all of the parentheticals that end in “points)”; and
B. Revising the introductory text to read as follows:
Sec. 660.33 What additional selection criteria does the Secretary use for an application to
develop specialized instructional materials?
In addition to the criteria referred to in Sec. 660.31, the Secretary evaluates an application to
develop specialized instructional materials on the basis of the criteria in this section.
*****
PART 661--BUSINESS AND INTERNATIONAL EDUCATION PROGRAM
37. The authority citation for part 661 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1130-1130b, unless otherwise noted.
38. Section 661.30 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 661.30 How does the Secretary evaluate an application?
The Secretary evaluates an application for a grant under this program on the basis of the criteria in
Sec. 661.31. The Secretary informs applicants of the maximum possible score for each criterion in
the application package or in a notice published in the Federal Register.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1130a)
39. Section 661.31 is amended by—
A. Removing all of the parentheticals that end in “points)”;
B. In paragraph (e), adding the punctuation “.” after the word
“resources”; and
C. Revising the introductory text to read as follows:
Sec. 661.31 What selection criteria does the Secretary use?
The Secretary evaluates an application for a grant under this program on the basis of the criteria
in this section.
*****
PART 662--FULBRIGHT-HAYS DOCTORAL DISSERTATION RESEARCH ABROAD
FELLOWSHIP PROGRAM
40. The authority citation for part 662 continues to read as follows:
Authority: Section 102(b)(6) of the Mutual Educational and Cultural Exchange Act of 1961 (Fulbright-
Hays Act), 22 U.S.C. 2452(b)(6), unless otherwise noted.
41. Section 662.21 is amended by—
A. Removing all of the parentheticals that end in “points)” and removing the parentheticals “(10)”,
“(15)”, and “(5)” wherever they appear;
B. In paragraph (c)(2), removing the word “a”; and
C. Revising paragraph (a) to read as follows:
Sec. 662.21 What criteria does the Secretary use to evaluate an application for a fellowship?
(a) General. The Secretary evaluates an application for a fellowship on the basis of the criteria in this
section. The Secretary informs applicants of the maximum possible score for each criterion in the
application package or in a notice published in the Federal Register.
*****
PART 663--FULBRIGHT-HAYS FACULTY RESEARCH ABROAD FELLOWSHIP PROGRAM
42. The authority citation for part 663 continues to read as follows:
Authority: Sec. 102(b)(6) of the Mutual Educational and Cultural Exchange Act of 1961 (Fulbright-
Hays Act), 22 U.S.C. 2452(b)(6), unless otherwise noted.
43. Section 663.21 is amended by—
A. Removing all of the parentheticals that end in “points)” and removing the parentheticals “(10)”,
“(15)”, and “(5)” wherever they appear; and 0
B. Revising paragraph (a) to read as follows:
34
Sec. 663.21 What criteria does the Secretary use to evaluate an application for a fellowship?
(a) General. The Secretary evaluates an application for a fellowship on the basis of the criteria in this
section. The Secretary informs applicants of the maximum possible score for each criterion in the
application package or in a notice published in the Federal Register.
*****
PART 664--FULBRIGHT-HAYS GROUP PROJECTS ABROAD FELLOWSHIP PROGRAM
44. The authority citation for part 664 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 22 U.S.C. 2452(b)(6), unless otherwise noted.
45. Section 664.30 is amended by—
A. Revising paragraph (a);
B. Removing paragraph (b); and
C. Redesignating paragraphs (c) and (d) as paragraphs (b) and (c), respectively.
The revision reads as follows:
Sec. 664.30 How does the Secretary evaluate an application?
(a) The Secretary evaluates an application for a Group Project
Abroad on the basis of the criteria in Sec. 664.31. The Secretary informs applicants of the maximum
possible score for each criterion in the application package or in a notice published in the Federal
Register.
*****
46. Section 664.31 is amended by—
A. Removing all of the parentheticals that end in “points).” and
removing the parenthetical that ends in “points)”; and
B. Revising the introductory text to read as follows:
Sec. 664.31 What selection criteria does the Secretary use?
The Secretary uses the criteria in this section to evaluate applications for the purpose of recommending to
the J. William Fulbright Foreign Scholarship Board Group Projects Abroad for funding under this part.
*****
PART 669--LANGUAGE RESOURCE CENTERS PROGRAM
47. The authority citation for part 669 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1123, unless otherwise noted.
48. Section 669.20 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 669.20 How does the Secretary evaluate an application?
The Secretary evaluates an application for an award on the basis of the criteria contained in Sec.
Sec. 669.21 and 669.22. The Secretary informs applicants of the maximum possible score for each
criterion in the application package or in a notice published in the Federal Register.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1123)
49. Section 669.21 is amended by—
A. Removing all of the parentheticals that end in “points)”;
B. In paragraph (c), removing the symbol “Sec. “; and
C. Revising the introductory text to read as follows:
Sec. 669.21 What selection criteria does the Secretary use?
The Secretary evaluates an application on the basis of the criteria in this section.
*****
[FR Doc. 05-5547 Filed 3-18-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P
35
Federal Register: August 31, 1998 (Volume 63, Number 168)
Rules and Regulations [Page 46357-46368]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access wais.access.gpo.gov
Part VI Department of Education
_______________________________________________________________________
34 CFR Parts 662, 663 and 664
Fulbright-Hays Doctoral Dissertation Research Abroad Fellowship Program, Fulbright-
Hays Faculty Research Abroad Fellowship Program, and Fulbright-Hays Group Projects
Abroad Program; Final Rule
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
34 CFR Parts 662, 663, and 664 RIN 1840-AC53
Fulbright-Hays Doctoral Dissertation Research Abroad Fellowship Program, Fulbright-Hays
Faculty Research Abroad Fellowship Program, and Fulbright-Hays Group Projects Abroad
Program
AGENCY: Office of Postsecondary Education, Department of Education.
ACTION: Final regulations.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Secretary amends the regulations governing the Higher Education Programs
in Modern Foreign Language Training and Area Studies--Doctoral Dissertation Research
Abroad Fellowship Program, Faculty Research Abroad Fellowship Program, and Group Projects
Abroad Program. These amendments are needed as a result of changes in terminology
applicable to these programs and changes in the selection criteria. The final regulations change
the names of these programs, remove obsolete references, modify the selection criteria, and
make other technical changes.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karla Ver Bryck Block, U.S. Department of
Education, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Suite 600C Portals Building, Washington, DC
20202-5331. Telephone: (202) 401-9774. Individuals who use a telecommunications device for
the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern time, Monday through Friday. Individuals with disabilities
may obtain this document in an alternate format (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, or
computer diskette) on request to the contact person listed in the preceding paragraph.
36
663.41 What are a fellow's responsibilities after the award of a fellowship?
663.42 How may a fellowship be revoked?
Authority: Sec. 102(b)(6) of the Mutual Educational and Cultural Exchange Act of 1961
(Fulbright-Hays Act), 22 U.S.C. 2452(b)(6), unless otherwise noted.
Subpart A--General
Sec. 663.1 What is the Fulbright-Hays Faculty Research Abroad Fellowship Program?
(a) The Fulbright-Hays Faculty Research Abroad Program is designed to contribute to the
development and improvement of modern foreign language and area studies in the United
States by providing opportunities for scholars to conduct research abroad.
(b) Under the program, the Secretary awards fellowships, through institutions of higher
education, to faculty members who propose to conduct research abroad in modern foreign
languages and area studies to improve their skill in languages and knowledge of the culture of
the people of these countries.
(Authority: 22 U.S.C. 2452(b)(6))
Sec. 663.2 Who is eligible to receive an institutional grant under this program?
An institution of higher education is eligible to receive an institutional grant.
(Authority: 22 U.S.C. 2452(b)(6), 2454(e)(1))
Sec. 663.3 Who is eligible to receive a fellowship under this program?
An individual is eligible to receive a fellowship if the individual--
(a)(1) Is a citizen or national of the United States; or
(2) Is a permanent resident of the United States;
(b) Is employed by an institution of higher education;
(c) Has been engaged in teaching relevant to his or her foreign language or area studies
specialization for the two years immediately preceding the date of the award;
(d) Proposes research relevant to his or her modern foreign language or area specialization
which is not dissertation research for a doctoral degree; and
(e) Possesses sufficient foreign language skills to carry out the research project.
(Authority: 22 U.S.C. 2452(b)(6), 2454(e)(1))
Sec. 663.4 What is the amount of a fellowship?
(a) The Secretary pays--
(1) Travel expenses to and from the residence of the fellow and the country or countries of
research;
(2) A maintenance stipend for the fellow related to his or her academic year salary; and
(3) An allowance for research-related expenses overseas, such as books, copying, tuition
and affiliation fees, local travel, and other incidental expenses.
(b) The Secretary may pay--
(1) Emergency medical expenses not covered by the faculty member's health and accident
insurance; and
(2) The costs of preparing and transporting the remains of a fellow or dependent who dies
during the term of the fellowship to his or her former home.
(c) The Secretary announces the amount of benefits expected to be available in an
application notice published in the Federal Register.
(Authority: 22 U.S.C. 2452(b)(6), 2454(e) (1) and (2))
Sec. 663.5 What is the duration of a fellowship?
(a) A fellowship is for a period of not fewer than three nor more than twelve months.
(b) A fellowship may not be renewed.
(Authority: 22 U.S.C. 2452(b)(6))
Sec. 663.6 What regulations apply to this program?
The following regulations apply to this program:
(a) The regulations in this part 663; and
(b) The Education Department General Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) (34 CFR parts
74, 75, 77, 81, 82, 85, and 86).
(Authority: 22 U.S.C. 2452(b)(6))
Sec. 663.7 What definitions apply to this program?
37
(a) Definitions of the following terms as used in this part are contained in 34 CFR part 77:
Applicant, Application, Award, EDGAR, Fiscal year, Grant, Secretary
(b) The definition of institution of higher education as used in this part is contained in 34 CFR
600.4.
(c) The following definitions of other terms used in this part apply to this program:
Area studies means a program of comprehensive study of the aspects of a society or
societies, including the study of their geography, history, culture, economy, politics, international
relations, and languages.
Binational commission means an educational and cultural commission established, through
an agreement between the United States and either a foreign government or an international
organization, to carry out functions in connection with the program covered by this part.
Dependent means any of the following individuals who accompany the recipient of a
fellowship under this program to his or her training site for the entire fellowship period if the
individual receives more than 50 percent of his or her support from the recipient during the
fellowship period:
(1) The recipient's spouse.
(2) The recipient's or spouse's children who are unmarried and under age 21.
J. William Fulbright Foreign Scholarship Board means the presidentially-appointed board that
is responsible for supervision of the program covered by this part.
(Authority: 22 U.S.C. 2452(b)(6), 2456)
Subpart B--Applications
Sec. 663.10 How does an individual apply for a fellowship?
(a) An individual applies for a fellowship by submitting an application to the Secretary through
the institution of higher education at which the individual is employed.
(b) The applicant shall provide sufficient information concerning his or her personal and
academic background and proposed research project to enable the Secretary to determine
whether the applicant--
(1) Is eligible to receive a fellowship under Sec. 663.3; and
(2) Should be selected to receive a fellowship under subparts C and D of this part.
(Authority: 22 U.S.C. 2452(b)(6))
Sec. 663.11 What is the role of the institution in the application process?
An institution of higher education that participates in this program is responsible for-
(a) Making fellowship application materials available to its faculty;
(b) Accepting and screening applications in accordance with its own technical and academic
criteria; and
(c) Forwarding screened applications to the Secretary through a request for an institutional
grant.
(Authority: 22 U.S.C. 2452(b)(6), 2454(e)(1))
38
(f) The Secretary presents recommendations for recipients of fellowships to the J. William
Fulbright Foreign Scholarship Board, which reviews the recommendations and approves
recipients.
(Authority: 22 U.S.C. 2452(b)(6), 2456)
Sec. 663.21 What criteria does the Secretary use to evaluate an application for a
fellowship?
(a) General. (1) The Secretary uses the criteria in this section to evaluate an application for a
fellowship.
(2) The maximum score for all of the criteria is 100 points. However, if priority criteria
described in paragraph (c) of this section are used, the maximum score is 110 points.
(3) The maximum score for each criterion is shown in parentheses with the criterion.
(b) Quality of proposed project. (60 points) The Secretary reviews each application to
determine the quality of the research project proposed by the applicant. The Secretary
considers--
(1) The statement of the major hypotheses to be tested or questions to be examined, and the
description and justification of the research methods to be used;
(2) The relationship of the research to the literature on the topic and to major theoretical
issues in the field, and the project's importance in terms of the concerns of the discipline;
(3) The preliminary research already completed or plans for research prior to going overseas,
and the kinds, quality and availability of data for the research in the host country or countries;
(4) The justification for overseas field research, and preparations to establish appropriate and
sufficient research contacts and affiliations abroad;
(5) The applicant's plans to share the results of the research in progress with scholars and
officials of the host country or countries and the American scholarly community; and
(6) The objectives of the project regarding the sponsoring institution's plans for developing or
strengthening, or both, curricula in modern foreign languages and area studies.
(c) Qualifications of the applicant. (40 points) The Secretary reviews each application to
determine the qualifications of the applicant. The Secretary considers--
(1) The overall strength of applicant's academic record (teaching, research, contributions,
professional association activities);
(2) The applicant's excellence as a teacher or researcher, or both, in his or her area or areas
of specialization;
(3) The applicant's proficiency in one or more of the languages (other than English and the
applicant's native language), of the country or countries of research, and the specific measures
to be taken to overcome any anticipated language barriers; and
(4) The applicant's ability to conduct research in a foreign cultural context, as evidenced by
the applicant's previous overseas experience, or documentation provided by the sponsoring
institution, or both.
(d) Priorities. (1) The Secretary determines the extent to which the application responds to
any priority that the Secretary establishes for the selection of fellows in any fiscal year. The
Secretary announces any priorities in an application notice published in the Federal Register.
(2) Priorities may relate to certain world areas, countries, academic disciplines, languages,
topics, or combinations of any of these categories. For example, the Secretary may establish a
priority for--
(i) A specific geographic area or country, such as East Asia or Latvia;
(ii) An academic discipline, such as history or political science;
(iii) A language, such as Hausa or Telegu; or
(iv) A topic, such as religious fundamentalism or migration.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1840-0005)
(Authority: 22 U.S.C. 2452(b)(6), 2456(a)(2))
Sec. 663.22 How does the J. William Fulbright Foreign Scholarship Board select fellows?
The J. William Fulbright Foreign Scholarship Board selects fellows on the basis of the
Secretary's recommendations and the information described in Sec. 663.20(e) from binational
commissions or United States diplomatic missions.
(Authority: 22 U.S.C. 2452(b)(6), 2456(a)(1))
39
Subpart D--Post-award Requirements for Institutions
Sec. 663.30 What are an institution's responsibilities after the award of a grant?
(a) An institution to which the Secretary awards a grant under this part is responsible for
administering the grant in accordance with the regulations described in Sec. 663.6.
(b) The institution is responsible for processing individual applications for fellowships in
accordance with procedures described in Sec. 663.11.
(c) The institution is responsible for disbursing funds in accordance with procedures
described in Sec. 663.4.
(d) The Secretary awards the institution an administrative allowance of $100 for each
fellowship listed in the grant award document.
(Authority: 22 U.S.C. 2452(b)(6), 2454(e)(1))
40
OMB No. 1840-0005
Exp. Date 07/31/2010
Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated at an average of 24 hours for each faculty member and 40
hours for each project director, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and
maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden
estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to the U.S.
Department of Education, Information Management and Compliance Division, Washington, D.C. 20202-4651; and to the Office
of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project 1840-0005, Washington, D.C. 20503.
Instructions for Institution's Project Director
Responsibilities of the Institution's Project Director
The Project Director at the applying college or university is responsible for:
(a) Registering in e-Application as a Project Director for the Fulbright-Hays Faculty Research Abroad
program.
(b) 1. Screening individual faculty applications, in accordance with the institutions’ own technical and
academic criteria and the program's eligibility requirements. Project Directors can review
individual faculty applications once they have been submitted, by going to “Item 22” and clicking
on the individual names. The individual name is the link to the application materials.
2. On the Education Supplemental Information for SF 424, indicate whether or not Human Subjects
Approval (IRB) is required. If required, include each individual applicant’s response to question 3
on ED Supplemental Information for SF424 form.
3. Accepting applications to include in the institutional submission, by going to “Item 22”, and
checking the box next to the individual applicants’ names BEFORE submitting the institutional
portion.
(c) Transmitting in a single submission, all recommended individual Faculty Research Abroad
applications, including the Application for Federal Assistance (Standard Form 424), the ED
Supplemental for SF424, the Assurances -- Non-Construction Programs (ED Form 424B); and
Drug-Free Workplace Requirements to the U.S. Department of Education in accordance with the
guidelines published in the notice inviting applications for new awards and contained in the
transmittal instructions.
(d) Announcing the preliminary results of the competition to individual applicants (i.e., principle
candidate status, alternate status, non-selection). An executed copy of the Grant Agreement
between the U.S. Department of Education (ED) and the higher education institution listing
fellowship holders and award benefits will constitute the official announcement of the award. The
announcement will be made between April and June.
(e) Administering the grant and disbursing funds.
Supplemental Instructions for the Application for Federal Assistance (Standard Form 424) The
Federal forms that accompany this electronic submission MUST be filled out on paper and faxed to
ED within 3 business days of the Closing Date. Please complete the forms below, complete them,
and fax them to ED’s Application Control Center at 202-245-6272.
The instructions for the items below are to be used in conjunction with the general instructions contained
in this application booklet.
Item 1. Select “Application”
Item 2. Select “New”
Item 3. Mark “X”
Item 4. Mark “X”
Item 5. Mark “X”
Item 6. Mark “X”
Item 7. Mark “X”
Item 8. A. Enter the legal name of the institution of higher education
B. Enter the tax identification number as assigned by the Internal Revenue Service
C. Provide the institution’s Data Universal Numbering System (D-U-N-S) number. You can
obtain your D-U-N-S number at no charge by calling 1-800-333-0505 or by completing a D-U-
N-S Number Request Form. The form can be obtained via the Internet at the following URL:
http://www.dnb.com/dbis/aboutdb/intlduns.htm.
D. Enter the address of the institution of higher education.
E. Enter the organizational unit (department or division) that will undertake the funding
activity.
F. Enter the name of the Project Director. The Project Director should be the higher education
institution's representative who will be responsible for the daily administration of the program
while the researcher is overseas. State title, organizational affiliation, telephone and fax
numbers and email address of the project director.
Item 9. Select “H. – Public/State Controlled IHE” OR “O. -. Private IHE”.
Item 10. Enter “US Department of Education”.
Item 11. Enter “84.019A, Fulbright-Hays Faculty Research Abroad Program”.
Item 12. Mark “X”.
41
Item 13. Mark “X”.
Item 14. Enter “N/A”.
Item 15. Enter “Fulbright-Hays Faculty Research Abroad Program”.
Item 16. Enter applicant institution’s district.
Item 17. A. Enter 07/01/08
B. Enter 12/31/09
Item 18. Enter total amount of federal funds requested for all applicants.
Item 19. Check, “C. Program not covered by E.O. 12373”.
Item 20. Self-Explanatory
Item 21. Self-Explanatory to be completed by the IHE’s authorized representative.
Item 22. Will populate automatically as individual applicants submit their portion of the application to
the project director.
The following forms can be found in the Standard Instructions and Forms Section:
42
Frequently Ask Questions – Institution’s Project Director (PD)
Q. How does the Project Director (PD) register in the e-Application system?
A. The registration process for the PD involves two (2) steps. The PD must first request access
to the FRA PD screens from US/ED program officers. The PD must submit the following
information to program officers by the date specified in the published Closing Date Notice:
name, institution, and e-mail address. Once the PD is informed by US/ED program officers that
access has been granted, the PD can register in the e-Application system. Obtaining access to
the system and registering in the e-Application system are two separate steps.
Q. How many sections are there to the application and who fills out what section?
A. There are two major sections to the e-application – the individual faculty applicant’s section
and the Project Director’s (PD) section. Upon completion of the individual component of the
application, the faculty member submits all portions of the application (narrative, cv, individual
budget, etc.) to the PD. The PD is responsible for reviewing all individual faculty applications,
including the submitted institutional support statement and language reference form(s)
submitted by the referees, of his/her institution and submitting them in a single submission,
along with the required institutional components, to the U.S. Department of Education (US/ED).
Only the PD can submit an application to US/ED.
Q. How does the PD review and approve the faculty applications for submission to
US/ED?
A. The PD is able to review only applications that have been submitted to him/her by individual
faculty applicants employed at his/her institution. To review an individual application he/she
should consult “Item 22” on Application for Federal Assistance (SF 424) and click on the faculty
member’s name. This will link him/her to that individual’s application. After the review of all
individual applications have been completed, the PD indicates his/her approval of each
application by clicking the acceptance box next to each name. Only PD-approved applications
are included in the institutional submission to US/ED.
Q. Whom should the PD contact in the event of technical problems with e-application
(e.g., pulling up a form?
A. If the PD experiences any technical difficulties, he/she should contact the e-application help
desk at 1-888-336-8930 (TTY: 1-866-697-2696, local 202-401-8363) Monday-Friday from 8:00
a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Washington DC time.
43
Q. If the PD has a question specific to the Fulbright-Hays Faculty Research Abroad
(FRA) program (e.g., eligibility requirements) whom should he contact?
A. If the PD has program specific questions, he/she should contact Ms. Amy Wilson at (202)
502-7689; [email protected].
Q. How are the Language Reference Form and Institutional Support Statement
submitted?
A: The faculty applicant will submit, via the e-Application, the referees’ names and e-mail
addresses. The referees will then receive e-mails, which are automatically generated by the e-
Application system, with directions for completing and returning the reference forms. The e-
mails will contain links to the forms and Personal Identify Numbers (PINs) for the referees. The
referees must click on the links and provide the PINs in order to be linked to the faculty
member’s reference forms. Once the forms are completed, the referees click the submit
buttons. After the referees hit the submit buttons, the forms have been submitted to the PD.
Both the faculty member and the PD can monitor the submission of, but cannot review, the
reference forms by checking the icon next to the reference forms. An icon for a submitted form
is a blank piece of paper with a check mark on it. Reference forms must be submitted BEFORE
the PD submits the application to US/ED. We suggest that internal deadlines be set by the PD
for the submission of references.
Q. Can the PD set his/her own institutional deadline so that he/she can meet the closing
date published in the FEDERAL REGISTER?
A. Yes! The PD should set an institutional deadline for faculty members and referees so that
he/she will have ample time to review the individual application material, solve technical
problems and submit a complete institutional application in a timely fashion as specified in the
Federal Register.
44
A. The PD is responsible for submitting all documents electronically, including the Application
for Federal Assistance (SF 424), and all necessary assurances and certifications. With in three
days after submitting the electronic application, the PD MUST fax a signed copy of the SF 424
to the Application Control Center after obtaining the institution’s Authorizing Representative’s
signature. We ask that Project Directors place the PR/Award Number the PD received
electronically upon submission in the upper right hand corner of the hard copy signature page of
the SF 424. US/ED may request original signatures on other forms at a later date
45
E-Application Registered FRA Project Directors
Please check with the listed contact BEFORE completing your application as Project Directors
may have changed.
46
Marilyn Morrissey William Long
Colorado State University Georgia Institute of Technology
[email protected] [email protected]
47
Erik Thelen Joanna Kukielka-Blaser
Marquette University Ohio State University
[email protected] [email protected]
48
David Deaderick Norey Laug
St. Mary’s College of Maryland Tulane University
[email protected] [email protected]
49
Robert Boehmer Mark Tessler
University of Dayton University of Michigan
[email protected] [email protected]
50
William O’Neill Dan Nordquist
University of San Diego Washington State University
[email protected] [email protected]
Stephen Williams
Wake Forest University
[email protected]
51
MB NO. 1840-0005
Exp. Date: 07/31/2010
According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless
such collection displays a valid OMB control number. The valid OMB control number for this information collection is 1840-
0005. The time required to complete this information collection is estimated to average 24 hours per response, including the
time to review instructions, search existing data resources, gather the data needed, and complete and review the information
collection. If you have any comments concerning the accuracy of the time estimate(s) or suggestions for improving this
form, please write to: U.S. Department of Education, Washington, D.C. 20202-4651. If you have comments or concerns
regarding the status of your individual submission of this form, write directly to FRA Program IEPS/OPE. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW (1990 K St, NW, 6th Floor), Washington, DC 20202-4651.
53
Item 24d: Enter and justify in detail your needs for this allowance which may include expenses such as
books, copying, informants, tutoring, translating and interpreting fees, tapes, film, travel within host
countries, affiliation fees, etc. This allowance does not cover costs such as hotels and per diem while in
the host country(ies), and costs incurred in the United States such as, expenses of passports including
photographs or medical expenses such as malaria pills or vaccinations.
The cost of health and accident insurance for a Faculty Research Abroad award recipient and
contributions for faculty retirement must be borne by the individual or his/her institution.
Item 24e: Fixed $100 administrative fee paid to institution.
Item 24f: The e-application will automatically compute the sum of 24a-24e.
Item 25: Self-explanatory.
Item 26: A curriculum vitae needs to be attached to your application through the e-application. The c.v.
should be brief and address those previously cited evaluation criteria focused on the qualifications of the
individual applicant. You should list relevant course work dealing with your language and area studies
specialization; indicate fellowships and honors received; describe your publications record and any other
items which, in your opinion, give a panel of scholars a comprehensive view of your past achievements,
ability to successfully complete the particular research described in this proposal, and overall promise as
a teacher and/or research scholar
Item 27: The project narrative and bibliography needs to be attached to your individual application
through the e-application. Please note the page limitations specified in the closing date notice published
in the Federal Register.
You should develop your narrative taking into account the evaluation criteria provided in the
sample Technical Review Form. Given the fact that, in addition to language and area studies scholars,
non-specialists are included in the evaluation process and that host country officials will review your
application and ultimately decide whether research permission is granted, you may also wish to consider
the following factors when developing your project description:
a. Host country sensitivities and interests.
b. The use of English, which can readily be understood by well-educated non-specialists.
Awards are not made to applicants planning to conduct research on topics that are determined to
be politically sensitive by the host country or unfeasible. It should also be noted that the U.S.
Department of Education will not submit to the host country any "dummy" proposal (i.e., proposals which
do not accurately reflect the research purpose in the hope of avoiding difficulties with host country
acceptance of the proposal).
54
accept the award is offered. A completed statement must be submitted via the web by the referee to the
institution’s Project Director.
USED urges fellows to begin the clearance process as soon as possible, and to understand that they
may have to be flexible with regard to when they begin their research.
You must check with your institution to determine if your institution will be submitting all
applications via e-grants as required in the Federal Register, or if it has been granted a waiver
from that requirement. All of the institution’s applications must be submitted in the same format.
1) Fulbright-Hays Training Grants Application Form(s) submitted by the individual faculty members,
via the a-Application.
2) One (1) Fulbright-Hays Foreign Language Reference Form, for each language needed to
conduct the research outlined, submitted by your referee via e-Application
3) One (1) Fulbright-Hays Faculty Institutional Support Form submitted by your referee via e-
Application.
A complete institutional application to the Faculty Research Abroad Program is the sum of all completed
individual application packets submitted with the Application for Federal Education Assistance (Standard
Form 424), the ED Supplemental Information for SF424, the Assurances -- Non-Construction Programs
(Standard Form 424B); and Certification Regarding Lobbying; and Drug-Free Workplace Requirements;
to the U.S. Department of Education. Failure to meet the deadline published in the Federal Register
will mean rejection of the application without consideration. There is no appeal of this
requirement.
55
OMB No. 1840-0005
Form Expires: 07/31/2010
US Department of Education
Fulbright-Hays Faculty Research Abroad Program
1. Last Name, First, Middle
56
OMB No. 1840-0005
Form Expires: 07/31/2010
17. Name(s) of Accompanying Dependent(s) Relationship Age
Date
For Official US/ED Use Only - do not write in the section below
57
OMB No. 1840-0005
Form Expires: 07/31/2010
24. Budget Request
a. International Economy Travel and Baggage $
Itinerary:
$ ________________ / 9 = $ __________________
c. Duplicating Support ($ )
Please indicate any duplicating support received (e.g., foundation grants, fellowships, sabbatical
pay, etc.)
d. Project Allowance $
f. Total $
25. Certification
I certify that all information provided on this form is correct to the best of my knowledge.
Name of Applicant Date
58
OMB No. 1840-0005
Form Expires: 07/31/2010
26. Curriculum Vitae
59
OMB No. 1840-0005
Form Expires: 07/31/2010
27. TITLE PAGE
Typed essay may not exceed the limits specified in the Closing Date Noticed as published in
the Federal Register.
Title:
60
OMB No. 1840-0005
Form Expires: 07/31/2010
To be completed by a college/university language teacher and sent to the project director at the applicant's college or
university. Under Section 552a(d) of the Privacy Act, the content of this form is subject to review by the applicant and
others accompanying him/her, upon request.
Signature Date
61
OMB No. 1840-0005
Form Expires: 07/31/2010
62
TECHNICAL REVIEW - FACULTY RESEARCH ABROAD
International Education Programs Service • US Department of Education
Indicate above the cumulative scores for the three categories found on the following
pages. Add the scores from the three boxes on the left and place the total in the large
box to the right. The sum of the Reader Totals will constitute the Panel's final judgment.
63
PAGE TWO
TECHNICAL REVIEW - FACULTY RESEARCH ABROAD RATING SCALE
Score this application in terms of the Rating Scale. Indicate your score for If total points are: 5 10 15
each criterion in the box to the right. Do not use decimal points. Add the Outstanding 5 10 15
scores of the criteria and enter the sum in the box marked Total Points. Very Good 4 8 12
Transfer the Total Points to the appropriate block in Section II on page one. Good 3 6 9
Average 2 4 6
Poor 1 2 3
Unacceptable or 0 0 0
not described
(10)
2. The relationship of the research to the literature on the topic and to major
theoretical issues in the field, and the project's importance in terms of the
concerns of the discipline.
YOUR COMMENT:
(10)
(10)
64
PAGE THREE
TECHNICAL REVIEW - FACULTY RESEARCH ABROAD RATING SCALE
Score this application in terms of the Rating Scale. Indicate your score for If total points are: 5 10 15
each criterion in the box to the right. Do not use decimal points. Add the Outstanding 5 10 15
scores of the criteria and enter the sum in the box marked Total Points. Very Good 4 8 12
Transfer the Total Points to the appropriate block in Section II on page one. Good 3 6 9
Average 2 4 6
Poor 1 2 3
Unacceptable or 0 0 0
not described
(10)
5. The applicant's plans to share the results of the research in progress with
scholars and officials of the host country or countries and the American
scholarly community.
YOUR COMMENT:
(10)
6. The objective of the project regarding the sponsoring institution’s plans for
developing or strengthening or both curricula in modern foreign languages and
area studies.
YOUR COMMENT:
(10)
65
PAGE FOUR
TECHNICAL REVIEW - FACULTY RESEARCH ABROAD RATING SCALE
Score this application in terms of the Rating Scale. Indicate your score for If total points are: 5 10 15
each criterion in the box to the right. Do not use decimal points. Add the Outstanding 5 10 15
scores of the criteria and enter the sum in the box marked Total Points. Very Good 4 8 12
Transfer the Total Points to the appropriate block in Section II on page one. Good 3 6 9
Average 2 4 6
Poor 1 2 3
Unacceptable or 0 0 0
not described
(10)
(10)
3. The applicant's proficiency in one or more of the languages (other than English
and the applicant's native language) of the country or countries of research, and
the specific measures to be taken to overcome any anticipated language
barriers.
YOUR COMMENT:
(15)
(5)
TOTAL
QUALIFICATIONS OF THE APPLICANT POINTS:
(Please record this total in Section II on page one) (0-40)
66
PAGE FIVE
TECHNICAL REVIEW - FACULTY RESEARCH ABROAD RATING SCALE
Score this application in terms of the Rating Scale. Indicate your score for 5
each criterion in the box to the right. Do not use decimal points. Add the Meets the 5
scores of the criteria and enter the sum in the box marked Total Points. competitive priority
Transfer the Total Points to the appropriate block in Section II on page one.
Does not meet the
competitive priority 0
67
Frequently Asked Questions - Faculty Applicants
Q. How many sections are there to the e- Application and who fills out what section?
A: There are two primary sections to the e-Application – the faculty member’s individual
section and the section to be completed by the PD. Upon completion of his/her section, the
faculty member submits all components of the faculty member section (parts 1-4) to the PD.
The PD is responsible for reviewing the faculty member’s section and submitting it, along with
the PD section, which contains the required federal forms, to the U.S. Department of Education.
Included in this submission are the language reference form and institutional support statement
that were transmitted to the PD by the referees. Only the PD can submit an application to
US/ED.
Q. How are the Language Reference Form and Institutional Support Statement
submitted?
A: The faculty applicant will submit, via the e-Application, the referees’ names and e-mail
addresses. The referees will then receive e-mails, which are automatically generated from the
e-Application system, with directions for completing and returning the reference forms. The e-
mails will contain links to the forms and Personal Identify Numbers (PINs) for the referees. The
referees must click on the links and provide the PINs in order to be linked to the faculty
member’s reference forms. Once the forms are completed, the referees click the submit
buttons. After the referees hit the submit buttons, the forms are submitted to the PD. Both the
faculty member and the PD can monitor the submission of the reference forms by checking the
icon next to the reference forms. An icon for a submitted form is a blank piece of paper with a
check mark on it. Reference forms must be submitted BEFORE the PD submits the application
to US/ED. It is suggested that internal deadlines be set by the PD for the submission of
references. The Project Director and the reference writers do not have to be the same person.
Q: When the faculty member clicks the “submit” button in the e-Application system,
where does his application go?
A: The faculty member’s application is transmitted to his/her institution’s PD for review and
submission to US/ED. A faculty applicant is not able to transmit his/her application directly to
US/ED.
68
Q: Can a faculty applicant be designated as a Project Director (PD)?
A: No! The PD is the individual at the institution who will administer the grant, disburse funds,
and complete the reporting requirements in accordance with the terms and conditions of the
grant should a faculty applicant be selected for a fellowship. He/she is the institutional point of
contact for both the FRA fellow and US/ED. He/she can be the chair of a department, a person
in the sponsored research/grants office or any other employee so designated by the “authorized
representative” of the institution.
Q: How will a faculty member know that his PD has access to his application?
A: After the faculty member has submitted his/she e-application, he/she will receive an e-mail
that stating that his/her application has been received by the PD at his/her institution. The PD
will be copied on the e-mail notification; nevertheless, the faculty member may want to contact
the PD in addition to the e-mail notification. If the PD did not receive this e-mail, please contact
US/ED’s Help Desk immediately.
Q. Who should write the institutional support statement? Should the PD?
A: The institutional support statement may be written by the PD, but does not have to be. It
should be written by an administrator of the institution who is knowledgeable about the
applicant’s abilities and the institution’s language and area studies resources. It should
describe how the project will contribute to the institution’s plans for developing and
strengthening its program in foreign languages and area studies. It should explain how the
institution plans to utilize the faculty member’s experience upon completion of the fellowship and
must endorse the project on the basis of the candidate’s professional competence, personal
suitability and availability to accept the award if offered. This reference will be submitted via the
e-Application.
Q: How important is the page limit cited in the Closing Date Notice?
A: The page limit is extremely important. If the faculty member’s application narrative exceeds
the page limit, the application will be disqualified and will not be reviewed for funding. Please
adhere strictly to the page limit guidelines contained in the published Closing Date Notice.
Q: What if a faculty member proposed to use a much less commonly taught language
and cannot find someone to evaluate his foreign language proficiency?
A: Please call Amy Wilson at 1-202-502-7689. We will gladly assist you in finding a qualified
evaluator. An application is significantly less competitive if a foreign language reference form is
not included.
69
Q: Should Letters of Affiliation from overseas host institutions or organizations be
included in an application?
A: Yes, these letters are helpful to the panel in evaluating an application. Please upload to the
appropriate place in the e-Application. These letters may not be mailed.
Q. Does the international travel allowance provide funds for dependent’s travel?
A: No, it does not.
Q: Must a faculty member apply for his own visa and research clearance?
A: Yes.
70
STANDARD INSTRUCTIONS AND FORMS
ATTENTION ELECTRONIC APPLICANTS: Please note that you must follow the Application
Procedures as described in the Federal Register notice announcing the grant competition. Some
programs may require electronic submission of applications, and those programs will have
specific requirements and waiver instructions in the Federal Register notice.
If you want to apply for a grant and be considered for funding, you must meet the following deadline
requirements:
Fulbright-Hays FRA Faculty applicants may access e-Application on the e-Grants web site and construct
their applications. When faculty applicants submit their application via e-Application, the application IS
NOT TRANSMITTED to the U.S. Department of Education; rather, it becomes available to the faculty
applicant’s university Project Director for review and submittal. It is the institution’s Project Director who is
responsible for transmitting all faculty applications to the U.S. Department of Education via e-Application
by the Closing Date. Faculty applicants should contact their university’s Project Director well in advance
of the deadline to ensure that the Project Director has received all of the faculty member’s required
application materials.
Project Directors must submit the grant application through the Internet using the software provided on
the e-Grants Web site (http://e-grants.ed.gov) by 4:30 p.m. (Washington, DC time) on the application
deadline date. The regular hours of operation of the e-Grants website are 6:00 a.m. Monday until 7:00
p.m. Wednesday; and 6:00 a.m. Thursday until midnight Saturday (Washington, DC time). Please note
that the system is unavailable on Sundays, and after 7:00 p.m. on Wednesdays for maintenance
(Washington, DC time). Any modifications to these hours are posted on the e-Grants Web site.
If an institution submits its application through the Internet via the e-Grants Web site, the institution will
receive an automatic acknowledgment when we receive its application.
You must mail the original and two copies of the application on or before the deadline date to.
To help expedite our review of your application, we would appreciate your voluntarily including an
additional 2 copies of your application.
71
If you mail an application through the U.S. Postal Service, we do not accept either of the following as
proof of mailing:
An applicant should note that the U.S. Postal Service does not uniformly provide a dated postmark.
Before relying on this method, an applicant should check with its local post office.
Special Note: Due to recent disruptions to normal mail delivery, the Department encourages you
to consider using an alternative delivery method (for example, a commercial carrier, such as
Federal Express or United Parcel Service; or U. S. Postal Service Express Mail) to transmit your
application for this competition to the Department. If you use an alternative delivery method,
please obtain the appropriate proof of mailing under “Applications Sent by Mail,” then follow the
mailing instructions under the appropriate delivery method.
Applications that are delivered by commercial carrier, such as Federal Express, United Parcel Service,
etc. should be mailed to the:
You or your courier must hand deliver the original and number of copies requested of the application by
4:30 p.m. (Washington, DC time) on or before the deadline date.
To help expedite our review of your application, we would appreciate your voluntarily including an
additional 2 copies of your application.
The Application Control Center accepts application deliveries daily between 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m.
(Washington, DC time), except Saturdays, Sundays and Federal holidays.
10/04
72
OMB Number: 4040-0004
Expiration Date: 01/31/2009
*1. Type of Submission: *2. Type of Application * If Revision, select appropriate letter(s)
Preapplication New
*Other (Specify)
Application Continuation
8. APPLICANT INFORMATION:
d. Address:
*Street 1:
Street 2:
*City:
County:
*State:
Province:
*Country:
e. Organizational Unit:
f. Name and contact information of person to be contacted on matters involving this application:
Middle Name:
*Last Name:
Suffix:
Title:
Organizational Affiliation:
*Email:
73
OMB Number: 4040-0004
Expiration Date: 01/31/2009
*Other (Specify)
CFDA Title:
*Title:
Title:
74
OMB Number: 4040-0004
Expiration Date: 01/31/2009
*a. Federal
*b. Applicant
*c. State
*d. Local
*e. Other
*f. Program Income
*g. TOTAL
*19. Is Application Subject to Review By State Under Executive Order 12372 Process?
a. This application was made available to the State under the Executive Order 12372 Process for review on
b. Program is subject to E.O. 12372 but has not been selected by the State for review.
c. Program is not covered by E. O. 12372
*20. Is the Applicant Delinquent On Any Federal Debt? (If “Yes”, provide explanation.)
Yes No
21. *By signing this application, I certify (1) to the statements contained in the list of certifications** and (2) that the statements herein
are true, complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge. I also provide the required assurances** and agree to comply with any
resulting terms if I accept an award. I am aware that any false, fictitious, or fraudulent statements or claims may subject me to
criminal, civil, or administrative penalties. (U. S. Code, Title 218, Section 1001)
** I AGREE
** The list of certifications and assurances, or an internet site where you may obtain this list, is contained in the announcement or
agency specific instructions
Authorized Representative:
* Email:
The following should contain an explanation if the Applicant organization is delinquent of any Federal Debt.
76
ITEM 22
Human Subjects
Name of Individual Countries of
Discipline Approval (check if Amount Requested
Applicants Research
required)
77
78
79
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
REQUIRED FOR
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
1. Project Director:
Address:
* Street1:
Street2:
* City:
County:
* Phone Number (give area code) Fax Number (give area code)
Email Address:
2. Applicant Experience:
Are any research activities involving human subjects planned at any time during the
proposed project Period?
Yes No
Are ALL the research activities proposed designated to be exempt from the regulations?
80
INSTRUCTIONS FOR
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FOR SF 424
1. Project Director. Name, address, telephone and fax numbers, and e-mail address of the person to be contacted on
matters involving this application.
2. Novice Applicant. Check “Yes” or “No” only if assistance is being requested under a program that gives special
consideration to novice applicants. Otherwise, leave blank.
Check “Yes” if you meet the requirements for novice applicants specified in the regulations in 34 CFR 75.225 and included on
the attached page entitled “Definitions for Department of Education Supplemental Information for SF 424.” By checking “Yes”
the applicant certifies that it meets these novice applicant requirements. Check “No” if you do not meet the requirements for
novice applicants.
3. Human Subjects Research. (See I. A. “Definitions” in attached page entitled “Definitions for Department of Education
Supplemental Information For SF 424.”)
If Not Human Subjects Research. Check “No” if research activities involving human subjects are not planned at any time
during the proposed project period. The remaining parts of Item 3 are then not applicable.
If Human Subjects Research. Check “Yes” if research activities involving human subjects are planned at any time during the
proposed project period, either at the applicant organization or at any other performance site or collaborating institution. Check
“Yes” even if the research is exempt from the regulations for the protection of human subjects. (See I. B. “Exemptions” in
attached page entitled “Definitions for Department of Education Supplemental Information For SF 424.”)
3a. If Human Subjects Research is Exempt from the Human Subjects Regulations. Check “Yes” if all the research
activities proposed are designated to be exempt from the regulations. Insert the exemption number(s) corresponding to one or
more of the six exemption categories listed in I. B. “Exemptions.” In addition, follow the instructions in II. A. “Exempt Research
Narrative” in the attached page entitled “Definitions for Department of Education Supplemental Information For SF 424.”
3a. If Human Subjects Research is Not Exempt from Human Subjects Regulations. Check “No” if some or all of the
planned research activities are covered (not exempt). In addition, follow the instructions in II. B. “Nonexempt Research
Narrative” in the page entitled “Definitions for Department of Education Supplemental Information For SF 424
3a. Human Subjects Assurance Number. If the applicant has an approved Federal Wide (FWA) on file with the Office for
Human Research Protections (OHRP), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, that covers the specific activity, insert
the number in the space provided. If the applicant does not have an approved assurance on file with OHRP, enter “None.” In
this case, the applicant, by signature on the SF-424, is declaring that it will comply with 34 CFR 97 and proceed to obtain the
human subjects assurance upon request by the designated ED official. If the application is recommended/selected for funding,
the designated ED official will request that the applicant obtain the assurance within 30 days after the specific formal request.
Note about Institutional Review Board Approval. ED does not require certification of Institutional Review Board approval with
the application. However, if an application that involves non-exempt human subjects research is recommended/selected for
funding, the designated ED official will request that the applicant obtain and send the certification to ED within 30 days after the
formal request.
PAPERWORK BURDEN STATEMENT. ACCORDING TO THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT OF 1995, NO PERSONS ARE REQUIRED TO
RESPOND TO A COLLECTION OF INFORMATION UNLESS SUCH COLLECTION DISPLAYS A VALID OMB CONTROL NUMBER. THE VALID OMB
CONTROL NUMBER FOR THIS INFORMATION COLLECTION IS 1890-0017. THE TIME REQUIRED TO COMPLETE THIS INFORMATION COLLECTION
IS ESTIMATED TO AVERAGE BETWEEN 15 AND 45 MINUTES PER RESPONSE, INCLUDING THE TIME TO REVIEW INSTRUCTIONS, SEARCH
EXISTING DATA RESOURCES, GATHER THE DATA NEEDED, AND COMPLETE AND REVIEW THE INFORMATION COLLECTION. IF YOU HAVE ANY
COMMENTS CONCERNING THE ACCURACY OF THE ESTIMATE(S) OR SUGGESTIONS FOR IMPROVING THIS FORM, PLEASE WRITE TO: U.S.
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, WASHINGTON, D.C. 20202-4700. IF YOU HAVE COMMENTS OR CONCERNS REGARDING THE STATUS OF
YOUR INDIVIDUAL SUBMISSION OF THIS FORM WRITE DIRECTLY TO: JOYCE I. MAYS, APPLICATION CONTROL CENTER, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF
EDUCATION, POTOMAC CENTER PLAZA, 550 12TH STREET, S.W. ROOM 7076, WASHINGTON, D.C. 20202-4260.
81
DEFINITIONS FOR
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FOR SF 424
(ATTACHMENT TO INSTRUCTIONS FOR SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FOR SF 424)
Definitions:
The regulations define human subject as “a living individual
Novice Applicant (See 34 CFR 75.225). For discretionary about whom an investigator (whether professional or
grant programs under which the Secretary gives special student) conducting research obtains (1) data through
consideration to novice applications, a novice applicant intervention or interaction with the individual, or (2)
means any applicant for a grant from ED that— identifiable private information.” (1) If an activity involves
obtaining information about a living person by manipulating
• Has never received a grant or subgrant under the that person or that person’s environment, as might occur
program from which it seeks funding; when a new instructional technique is tested, or by
communicating or interacting with the individual, as occurs
• Has never been a member of a group application, with surveys and interviews, the definition of human
submitted in accordance with 34 CFR 75.127- subject is met. (2) If an activity involves obtaining private
75.129, that received a grant under the program information about a living person in such a way that the
from which it seeks funding; and information can be linked to that individual (the identity of
the subject is or may be readily determined by the
• Has not had an active discretionary grant from the investigator or associated with the information), the
Federal government in the five years before the definition of human subject is met. [Private information
deadline date for applications under the program. includes information about behavior that occurs in a
For the purposes of this requirement, a grant is context in which an individual can reasonably expect that
active until the end of the grant’s project or funding no observation or recording is taking place, and information
period, including any extensions of those periods which has been provided for specific purposes by an
that extend the grantee’s authority to obligate individual and which the individual can reasonably expect
funds. will not be made public (for example, a school health
record).]
In the case of a group application submitted in accordance
with 34 CFR 75.127-75.129, a group includes only parties B. Exemptions.
that meet the requirements listed above.
Research activities in which the only involvement of
human subjects will be in one or more of the following six
PROTECTION OF HUMAN categories of exemptions are not covered by the
regulations:
SUBJECTS IN RESEARCH
(1) Research conducted in established or commonly
I. Definitions and Exemptions accepted educational settings, involving normal
educational practices, such as (a) research on regular and
A. Definitions. special education instructional strategies, or (b) research
on the effectiveness of or the comparison among
A research activity involves human subjects if the activity is instructional techniques, curricula, or classroom
research, as defined in the Department’s regulations, and management methods.
the research activity will involve use of human subjects, as
defined in the regulations. (2) Research involving the use of educational tests
(cognitive, diagnostic, aptitude, achievement), survey
—Research procedures, interview procedures or observation of public
behavior, unless: (a) information obtained is recorded in
The ED Regulations for the Protection of Human Subjects, such a manner that human subjects can be identified,
Title 34, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 97, define directly or through identifiers linked to the subjects; and (b)
research as “a systematic investigation, including research any disclosure of the human subjects’ responses outside
development, testing and evaluation, designed to develop the research could reasonably place the subjects at risk of
or contribute to generalizable knowledge.” If an activity criminal or civil liability or be damaging to the subjects’
follows a deliberate plan whose purpose is to develop or financial standing, employability, or reputation. If the
contribute to generalizable knowledge it is research. subjects are children, exemption 2 applies only to
Activities which meet this definition constitute research research involving educational tests and observations
whether or not they are conducted or supported under a of public behavior when the investigator(s) do not
program that is considered research for other purposes.
participate in the activities being observed. Exemption
For example, some demonstration and service programs 2 does not apply if children are surveyed or
may include research activities. interviewed or if the research involves observation of
public behavior and the investigator(s) participate in
—Human Subject
82
the activities being observed. [Children are defined as designated exemption(s) are appropriate. The narrative
persons who have not attained the legal age for consent to must be succinct.
treatments or procedures involved in the research, under
the applicable law or jurisdiction in which the research will B. Nonexempt Research Narrative.
be conducted.]
If you marked “No” for item 3 a. you must provide the
(3) Research involving the use of educational tests “nonexempt research” narrative. The narrative must
(cognitive, diagnostic, aptitude, achievement), survey address the following seven points. Although no specific
procedures, interview procedures or observation of public page limitation applies to this section of the application, be
behavior that is not exempt under section (2) above, if the succinct.
human subjects are elected or appointed public officials or
candidates for public office; or federal statute(s) require(s) (1) Human Subjects Involvement and Characteristics:
without exception that the confidentiality of the personally Provide a detailed description of the proposed involvement
identifiable information will be maintained throughout the of human subjects. Describe the characteristics of the
research and thereafter. subject population, including their anticipated number, age
range, and health status. Identify the criteria for inclusion
(4) Research involving the collection or study of existing or exclusion of any subpopulation. Explain the rationale for
data, documents, records, pathological specimens, or the involvement of special classes of subjects, such as
diagnostic specimens, if these sources are publicly children, children with disabilities, adults with disabilities,
available or if the information is recorded by the persons with mental disabilities, pregnant women,
investigator in a manner that subjects cannot be identified, prisoners, institutionalized individuals, or others who are
directly or through identifiers linked to the subjects. likely to be vulnerable
(5) Research and demonstration projects which are (2) Sources of Materials: Identify the sources of research
conducted by or subject to the approval of department or material obtained from individually identifiable living human
agency heads, and which are designed to study, evaluate, subjects in the form of specimens, records, or data.
or otherwise examine: (a) public benefit or service Indicate whether the material or data will be obtained
programs; (b) procedures for obtaining benefits or services specifically for research purposes or whether use will be
under those programs; (c) possible changes in or made of existing specimens, records, or data.
alternatives to those programs or procedures; or (d)
possible changes in methods or levels of payment for (3) Recruitment and Informed Consent: Describe plans
benefits or services under those programs. for the recruitment of subjects and the consent procedures
to be followed. Include the circumstances under which
(6) Taste and food quality evaluation and consumer consent will be sought and obtained, who will seek it, the
acceptance studies, (a) if wholesome foods without nature of the information to be provided to prospective
additives are consumed or (b) if a food is consumed that subjects, and the method of documenting consent. State if
contains a food ingredient at or below the level and for a the Institutional Review Board (IRB) has authorized a
use found to be safe, or agricultural chemical or modification or waiver of the elements of consent or the
environmental contaminant at or below the level found to requirement for documentation of consent.
be safe, by the Food and Drug Administration or approved
by the Environmental Protection Agency or the Food (4) Potential Risks: Describe potential risks (physical,
Safety and Inspection Service of the U.S. Department of psychological, social, legal, or other) and assess their
Agriculture. likelihood and seriousness. Where appropriate, describe
alternative treatments and procedures that might be
II. Instructions for Exempt and Nonexempt Human advantageous to the subjects.
Subjects Research Narratives
(5) Protection Against Risk: Describe the procedures for
If the applicant marked “Yes” for Item 3 of Department of protecting against or minimizing potential risks, including
Education Supplemental Information for SF 424, the risks to confidentiality, and assess their likely effectiveness.
applicant must provide a human subjects “exempt Where appropriate, discuss provisions for ensuring
research” or “nonexempt research” narrative. Insert the necessary medical or professional intervention in the event
narrative(s) in the space provided. If you have multiple of adverse effects to the subjects. Also, where
projects and need to provide more than one narrative, be appropriate, describe the provisions for monitoring the data
sure to label each set of responses as to the project they collected to ensure the safety of the subjects.
address.
(6) Importance of the Knowledge to be Gained: Discuss
A. Exempt Research Narrative. the importance of the knowledge gained or to be gained as
If you marked “Yes” for item 3 a. and designated a result of the proposed research. Discuss why the risks to
exemption numbers(s), provide the “exempt research” subjects are reasonable in relation to the anticipated
narrative. The narrative must contain sufficient information benefits to subjects and in relation to the importance of the
about the involvement of human subjects in the proposed knowledge that may reasonably be expected to result.
research to allow a determination by ED that the
83
(7) Collaborating Site(s): If research involving human
subjects will take place at collaborating site(s) or other
performance site(s), name the sites and briefly describe
their involvement or role in the research.
84
OMB Approval No. 0348-0040
Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 15 minutes per response, including time for
reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the
collection of information. Send comments regarding the burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information,
including suggestions for reducing this burden, to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0348-0040),
Washington, DC 20503
PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET. SEND IT TO
THE ADDRESS PROVIDED BY THE SPONSORING AGENCY.
Note: Certain of these assurances may not be applicable to your project or program. If you have questions, please contact the
awarding agency. Further, certain Federal awarding agencies may require applicants to certify to additional assurances. If such is the
case, you will be notified.
As the duly authorized representative of the applicant I certify that the applicant:
1. Has the legal authority to apply for Federal assistance, and of age; (e) the Drug Abuse Office and Treatment Act of
the institutional, managerial and financial capability 1972 (P.L. 92-255), as amended, relating to
(including funds sufficient to pay the non-Federal share of nondiscrimination on the basis of drug abuse; (f) the
project cost) to ensure proper planning, management, and Comprehensive Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism
completion of the project described in this application. Prevention, Treatment and Rehabilitation Act of 1970
(P.L. 91-616), as amended, relating to nondiscrimination
2. Will give the awarding agency, the Comptroller General of on the basis of alcohol abuse or alcoholism; (g) §§523 and
the United States, and if appropriate, the State, through any 527 of the Public Health Service Act of 1912 (42 U.S.C.
authorized representative, access to and the right to §§290 dd-3 and 290 ee 3), as amended, relating to
examine all records, books, papers, or documents related confidentiality of alcohol and drug abuse patient records;
to the award; and will establish a proper accounting system (h) Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C.
in accordance with generally accepted accounting §§3601 et seq.), as amended, relating to nondiscrimination
standards or agency directives. in the sale, rental or financing of housing; (i) any other
nondiscrimination provisions in the specific statute(s)
3. Will establish safeguards to prohibit employees from using under which application for Federal assistance is being
their positions for a purpose that constitutes or presents the made; and (j) the requirements of any other
appearance of personal or organizational conflict of nondiscrimination statute(s) which may apply to the
interest, or personal gain. application.
4. Will initiate and complete the work within the applicable 7. Will comply, or has already complied, with the
time frame after receipt of approval of the awarding requirements of Titles II and III of the uniform Relocation
agency. Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of
1970 (P.L. 91-646) which provide for fair and equitable
5. Will comply with the Intergovernmental Personnel Act of treatment of persons displaced or whose property is
1970 (42 U.S.C. 4728-4763) relating to prescribed acquired as a result of Federal or federally-assisted
standards for merit systems for programs funded under one programs. These requirements apply to all interests in real
of the 19 statutes or regulations specified in Appendix A of property acquired for project purposes regardless of
OPM's Standards for a Merit System of Personnel Federal participation in purchases.
Administration (5 C.F.R. 900, Subpart F).
85
8. Will comply, as applicable, with the provisions of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended, (P.L. 93-
Hatch Act (5 U.S.C. §§1501-1508 and 7324-7328) which 205).
limit the political activities of employees whose principal
employment activities are funded in whole or in part with 12 Will comply with the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act of 1968
Federal funds. (16 U.S.C. §§1721 et seq.) related to protecting
components or potential components of the national wild
9. Will comply, as applicable, with the provisions of the and scenic rivers system.
Davis-Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. §§276a to 276a-7), the
Copeland Act (40 U.S.C. §276c and 18 U.S.C. §874) and 13. Will assist the awarding agency in assuring compliance
the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act (40 with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act
U.S.C. §§327-333), regarding labor standards for federally of 1966, as amended (16 U.S.C. §470), EO 11593
assisted construction subagreements. (identification and protection of historic properties), and
the Archaeological and Historic Preservation Act of 1974
10. Will comply, if applicable, with flood insurance purchase (16 U.S.C. §469a-1 et seq.).
requirements of Section 102(a) of the Flood Disaster
Protection Act of 1973 (P.L. 93-234) which requires 14. Will comply with P.L. 93-348 regarding the protection of
recipients in a special flood hazard area to participate in human subjects involved in research, development, and
the program and to purchase flood insurance if the total related activities supported by this award of assistance.
cost of insurable construction and acquisition is $10,000 or
more. 15. Will comply with the Laboratory Animal Welfare Act of
1966 (P.L. 89-544, as amended, 7 U.S.C. §§2131 et seq.)
11. Will comply with environmental standards which may be pertaining to the care, handling, and treatment of warm
prescribed pursuant to the following: (a) institution of blooded animals held for research, teaching, or other
environmental quality control measures under the National activities supported by this award of assistance.
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (P.L. 91-190) and
Executive Order (EO) 11514; (b) notification of violating 16. Will comply with the Lead-Based Paint Poisoning
facilities pursuant to EO 11738; (c) protection of wetlands Prevention Act (42 U.S.C. §§4801 et seq.) which prohibits
pursuant to EO 11990; (d) evaluation of flood hazards in the use of lead-based paint in construction or rehabilitation
floodplains in accordance with EO 11988; (e) assurance of of residence structures.
project consistency with the approved State management
program developed under the Coastal Zone Management 17. Will cause to be performed the required financial and
Act of 1972 (16 U.S.C. §§451 et seq.); (f) conformity of compliance audits in accordance with the Single Audit Act
Federal actions to State (Clear Air) Implementation Plans Amendments of 1996 and OMB Circular No. A-133,
under Section 176(c) of the Clear Air Act of 1955, as "Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit
amended (42 U.S.C. §§7401 et seq.); (g) protection of Organizations."
underground sources of drinking water under the Safe
Drinking Water Act of 1974, as amended, (P.L. 93-523); 18. Will comply with all applicable requirements of all other
and (h) protection of endangered species under the Federal laws, executive orders, regulations and policies
governing this program.
86
CERTIFICATION REGARDING LOBBYING
The undersigned certifies, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that:
(1) No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any
person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of
Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with
the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal Loan, the
entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or
modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan or cooperative agreement.
(2) If any funds other Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for
influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an
officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal
contract, grant, loam or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form
– LLL, “Disclosure of Lobbying Activities,” in accordance with its instructions.
(3) The undersigned shall require that the language of this certification be included in the award documents
for all subawards at all tiers (including subcontracts, subgrants and contracts under grants, loans, and
cooperative agreements) and that all subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly. This certification is
a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or
entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction
imposed by section 1352, title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be
subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure.
The undersigned states, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that:
If any funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer
or employee or any agency, a member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress or an employee of
a Member of Congress in connection with this commitment providing for the United States to insure or
guarantee a loan, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, “Disclosure of Lobbying
Activities,” in accordance with its instructions. Submission of this statement is a prerequisite for making or
entering into this transaction imposed by section 1352, title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the
required statement shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000
for each such failure.
Applicant’s Organization
Signature Date
ED 80-0013 08/05
87
Approved by OMB
0348-0046
Disclosure of Lobbying Activities
Complete this form to disclose lobbying activities pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 1352
(See reverse for public burden disclosure)
Name and Address of Reporting Entity: If Reporting Entity in No. 4 is Subawardee, Enter Name
____ Prime _____ Subawardee and Address of Prime:
Tier______, if Known:
$
10. a. Name and Address of Lobbying Registrant b. Individuals Performing Services (including address if
(if individual, last name, first name, MI): different from No. 10a)
(last name, first name, MI):
88
INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETION OF SF-LLL, DISCLOSURE OF LOBBYING ACTIVITIES
This disclosure form shall be completed by the reporting entity, whether subawardee or prime Federal recipient, at the initiation or
receipt of a covered Federal action, or a material change to a previous filing, pursuant to title 31 U.S.C. section 1352. The filing of
a form is required for each payment or agreement to make payment to any lobbying entity for influencing or attempting to
influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a
Member of Congress in connection with a covered Federal action. Complete all items that apply for both the initial filing and
material change report. Refer to the implementing guidance published by the Office of Management and Budget for additional
information.
1. Identify the type of covered Federal action for which lobbying activity is and/or has been secured to influence the outcome of
a covered Federal action.
3. Identify the appropriate classification of this report. If this is a followup report caused by a material change to the information
previously reported, enter the year and quarter in which the change occurred. Enter the date of the last previously submitted
report by this reporting entity for this covered Federal action.
4. Enter the full name, address, city, State and zip code of the reporting entity. Include Congressional District, if known. Check
the appropriate classification of the reporting entity that designates if it is, or expects to be, a prime or subaward recipient.
Identify the tier of the subawardee, e.g., the first subawardee of the prime is the 1st tier. Subawards include but are not limited
to subcontracts, subgrants and contract awards under grants.
5. If the organization filing the report in item 4 checks “Subawardee,” then enter the full name, address, city, State and zip code
of the prime Federal recipient. Include Congressional District, if known.
6. Enter the name of the federal agency making the award or loan commitment. Include at least one organizational level below
agency name, if known. For example, Department of Transportation, United States Coast Guard.
7. Enter the Federal program name or description for the covered Federal action (item 1). If known, enter the full Catalog of
Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) number for grants, cooperative agreements, loans, and loan commitments.
8. Enter the most appropriate Federal identifying number available for the Federal action identified in item 1 (e.g., Request for
Proposal (RFP) number; Invitations for Bid (IFB) number; grant announcement number; the contract, grant, or loan award
number; the application/proposal control number assigned by the Federal agency). Included prefixes, e.g., “RFP-DE-90-001.”
9. For a covered Federal action where there has been an award or loan commitment by the Federal agency, enter the Federal
amount of the award/loan commitment for the prime entity identified in item 4 or 5.
10. (a) Enter the full name, address, city, State and zip code of the lobbying registrant under the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995
engaged by the reporting entity identified in item 4 to influence the covered Federal action.
(b) Enter the full names of the individual(s) performing services, and include full address if different from 10(a). Enter Last
Name, First Name, and Middle Initial (MI).
11. The certifying official shall sign and date the form, print his/her name, title, and telephone number.
According to the Paperwork Reduction Act, as amended, no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it
displays a valid OMB control Number. The valid OMB control number for this information collection is OMB No. 0348-0046.
Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 10 minutes per response, including time for
reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing
the collection of information. Send comments regarding the burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information,
including suggestions for reducing this burden, to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0348-
0046), Washington, DC 20503
89
GOVERNMENT PERFORMANCE AND RESULTS ACT (GPRA)
What is GPRA?
The Government Performance and Results Act of 1993 (GPRA) is a straightforward statute that requires all
federal agencies to manage their activities with attention to the consequences of those activities. Each
agency is to clearly state what it intends to accomplish, identify the resources required, and periodically
report their progress to the Congress. In so doing, it is expected that the GPRA will contribute to
improvements in accountability for the expenditures of public funds, improve Congressional decision-
making through more objective information on the effectiveness of federal programs, and promote a new
government focus on results, service delivery, and customer satisfaction.
As required by GPRA, the Department of Education has prepared a strategic plan for 2007-2012. This plan
reflects the Department’s priorities and integrates them with its mission and program authorities and
describes how the Department will work to improve education for all children and adults in the U.S. The
Department’s goals, as listed in the plan, are:
Goal 1: Increase student achievement, reward qualified teachers, and renew troubled schools so that
every student can read and do math at grade level by 2014, as called for by the No Child Left Behind Act.
Goal 2: Encourage more rigorous and advanced coursework to improve the academic performance
of our middle and high school students.
Goal 3: Work with colleges and universities to improve access, affordability, and accountability, so
that our higher education system remains the world’s finest.
The performance indicators for the International Education Programs are part of the Department’s plan for
meeting Goal 3.
What is the Performance Indicator for the Fulbright Hays Faculty Research Abroad Program?
The Fulbright-Hays Faculty Research Abroad (FRA) program provides grants to institutions of
higher education to fund faculty to maintain and improve their area studies and language skills by
conducting research abroad for periods of 3- to- 12 months.
a. The average language competency score of Fulbright-Hays Faculty Research Abroad program
recipients at the end of their period of instruction minus their average language competency at
the beginning of the period..
The information provided by grantees in their performance reports submitted via the electronic International
Resource Information System (IRIS) will be the source of data for this measure.
90
.
APPLICATION CHECKLIST
1 Electronic Language Reference for each language of research – initiate the e-mail to your
referee
INSTITUTION CHECKLIST
SF-424
NOTE: This form MUST also be printed, completed and faxed to US/ED’s
Application Control Center at 202-245-6272 within 3 days of the Closing Date.
Item 22 will automatically populate with a list of faculty members applying, their discipline(s),
country(ies) of research and amount(s) requested once they have submitted their individual
applications. Project Directors must indicate whether or not Human Subjects Clearance (IRB) is
necessary for each individual applicant.
Ensure that all individual applications, along with their references, are submitted
BEFORE the institutional portion is submitted
You must submit your grant application through the Internet using the software provided on the e-
Grants Web site (http://e-grants.ed.gov) by 4:30 p.m. (Washington, DC time) on the application deadline
date. The regular hours of operation of the e-Grants website are 6:00 a.m. Monday until 7:00 p.m.
Wednesday; and 6:00 a.m. Thursday until midnight Saturday (Washington, DC time). Please note that
the system is unavailable on Sundays, and after 7:00 p.m. on Wednesday for maintenance (Washington,
DC time). Any modifications to these hours are posted on the e-Grants Web site.
Attention: For additional information on e-grants, including the requirements for requesting a waiver,
please consult the Notice of Closing Date published in the Federal Register and contained in this
application packet.
91