0% found this document useful (0 votes)
47 views1 page

Description: Tags: Nevada

This document provides information on fiscal year 2002 Title I grants to local educational agencies in Nevada. It lists the school districts in Nevada and the amount of Title I funding each received, along with the maximum amounts they would be required to spend on choice-related transportation and supplemental educational services. It also provides the maximum per-child expenditure amount for supplemental educational services for each district. The Clark County School District, which serves the Las Vegas area, received the largest allocation at over $28 million.

Uploaded by

anon-323489
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
47 views1 page

Description: Tags: Nevada

This document provides information on fiscal year 2002 Title I grants to local educational agencies in Nevada. It lists the school districts in Nevada and the amount of Title I funding each received, along with the maximum amounts they would be required to spend on choice-related transportation and supplemental educational services. It also provides the maximum per-child expenditure amount for supplemental educational services for each district. The Clark County School District, which serves the Las Vegas area, received the largest allocation at over $28 million.

Uploaded by

anon-323489
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Fiscal Year 2002 Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies - NEVADA

Maximum Required
Expenditures For
Choice-Related Maximum Per-Child
Transportation Expenditure For
FY 2002 Title I And Supplemental Supplemental
LEA ID District Allocation * Educational Services** Educational Services ***

3200390 CARSON CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT 826,231 165,246 708.60


3200030 CHURCHILL COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 465,737 93,147 691.00
3200060 CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 28,840,530 5,768,106 929.92
3200090 DOUGLAS COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 516,121 103,224 699.35
3200120 ELKO COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 716,947 143,389 704.27
3200150 ESMERALDA COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 35,749 7,150 812.47
3200180 EUREKA COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 40,834 8,167 995.95
3200210 HUMBOLDT COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 300,114 60,023 683.63
3200240 LANDER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 133,309 26,662 676.70
3200270 LINCOLN COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 146,554 29,311 814.19
3200300 LYON COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 783,682 156,736 835.48
3200330 MINERAL COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 191,308 38,262 817.55
3200360 NYE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 765,317 153,063 830.96
3200420 PERSHING COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 108,523 21,705 669.90
3200450 STOREY COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 20,767 4,153 769.14
3200480 WASHOE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 6,220,589 1,244,118 884.23
3200510 WHITE PINE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 258,927 51,785 814.24
3299999 PART D SUBPART 2 319,634 63,927 0.00

* Actual amounts received by LEAs will be smaller than shown here due to State-level adjustments to Federal Title I allocations. States adjust
allocations, for example, to reflect LEA boundary changes or the creation of new LEAs, including charter school LEAs, that are not accounted
for in the Department's calculations. States also are permitted to reserve up to 1 percent of allocations for administration and must reserve
2 percent of allocations (rising to 4 percent in fiscal year 2004) for school improvement activities. These adjustments will reduce the actual
amounts available under all three columns of the table.

** An LEA must use up to an amount equal to 20 percent of its Title I, Part A allocation (the “20-percent reservation”) received from the State
to cover choice-related transportation costs for students who exercise a choice option and to pay for supplemental educational services for
students whose parents request such services. The 20-percent reservation may include Title I, Part A funds or funding from other Federal,
State, local, and private sources. The amount shown in this column is the Department’s estimate of the amount that affected LEAs - those
with schools identifed for improvement, corrective action, or restructuring - may have to spend to meet this requirement. Actual
expenditures will depend on such factors as the number of students exercising either a choice option or supplemental educuational services and
the costs of satisfying these requests. An LEA has discretion to determine the allocation of these funds between choice-related transportation
and supplemental educational services, except that it must spend at least one-quarter of the 20-percent reservation - or an amount equal to
5 percent of its Title I, Part A allocation - on each activity if there is demand for both from students and their parents.

*** An LEA that must arrange for supplemental educational services is required to pay, for each child receiving services, the lesser of the actual cost
of the services or an amount equal to the LEA’s Title I, Part A allocation received from the State divided by the number of poor students in the
LEA, as determined by estimates produced by the US Bureau of the Census. Thus the amount shown in this column reflects the statutory “cap”
on per-child expenditures for supplemental educational services.

You might also like