MRF MBA Project Report
MRF MBA Project Report
MRF MBA Project Report
CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION
1.1.1 INTRODUCTION
Training is act of increasing the knowledge and skill of employees for performing a particular job. The major outcome of training is learning, a trainee learns new habits, refined skills, and useful himself for a higher job. knowledge during the training that helps him to improve the performance. It enables an employee to do his present job efficiently and prepare
Training definition
Flippo has defined training as the act of increasing the skills of an employee Training and development need = standard performance actual performance for during a particular job Training is the most important technique of human resources development. At started earlier no organization can get a candidate who exactly matches with the job and organizational requirements; hence it is important to development employee and make him suitable to job. The success of any organization to a greater extend depends on the amount qualitative and timely training provided by organization.
Development
Any activity designed to improve the performance of existing managers and to provide for a planned growth of managers to meet future original requirements is management development..
education. employees.
Organization as a choice of whether to train its employees or not; the only choice that method the primary concern of viability, and hence efficiency training impacts skills and knowledge to employees in order to that contribute to efficiency and able to copy up with pressures of changing environment. It can play the following roles in an organization. 1. Increase in efficiency Training plays active role in employees, it increasing skills for doing a job better way. Employees can learn many things while he puts a job. 2. Increase in moral of employees Morale is a mental condition of an individual or group which determines the willingness to co-operative. High morale is evidenced by employee enthusiasm voluntary conformation with regulations and willingness to co-operative with other to achieve organizational objectives. 3. Better human relation Training attempts to increase the quality of human relations in an organization. Growing complexity of organization as led to various human problems like alienation inter-personal and inters-group problems. It can overcome many of these problems.
4. Reduce supervision
Trained employees require less supervision. They required more autonomy and freedom. It can given is the employees are trained properly handle their job without the help of supervision with reduced supervision a manger can increase his span of management.
Method of training
1. 2. On the job training Off the job training
1. b)
c)
Coaching The trainee is placed under a particular supervisor function as a coach in trainee the individual. The supervisor provides feed back to the trainee on his performance and offers his some of duties and responsibilities of coach and relieves him of his burden.
d)
Job instruction This method is also known as training through step by step under this method trainer explains the trainee the way of doing jobs, knowledge and skills and allows him to do the job.
e)
Community assignment Groups of trainees are given and asked to solve and actual organizational problem it develops team work
2.
a)
Role playing This is defined as a method of human interaction that involves realistic behavior in imaginary situation, it involves action doing and practice. The participants play role certain characters such as manager, mechanical engineer, superintendents, maintenance engineer, quality control inspector, foreman and workers.
b) Lecture method It is a traditional and direct method of instruction; the lecture must motivate and create interest among the trainees. An advantage is direct and can be used for a large of group of trainees, cost and time are reduced. c) Conference of discussion It is a method in training the clerical professional and supervisory personnel. A group of people who pose idea examine and share facts. Discussion has distinct advantage over lecture method that discussion involves two way communications and hence feedback is provided. The participants free to speak in a small group. d) Programmed instruction In recent year this method has become popular. Subject matter to be learned is presented in series of carefully planned sequential units this unit is complex levels of instruction, this units by answering questions or filling the banks this method is expensive and time consuming.
MRF the largest products of pre products retreated. It is an active to as 65 countries with in India MRF straddles the sub continent with a country with a distribution network of over 2005 outlets.
become more strigent tyres to be tested on the most torturous tracing for this purpose.
Product range
Automotive tyres are main products of the company Truck tyres Light truck tyres Special tyres Tyres for industrial applications Agricultural tractor and tiller tyres Off road tyres Passenger tyres bias ply and radial Two, three wheeler tyres Specialized tyres for motor rallies
To enhance the mixing capacity Ban bury 11D size with a capacity of 54 meter per day was established in 1972. The number of tube presses was increased to 45 presses. A fourth Ban bury 11D size was installed in 1978 to meet the increasing demand for mix. At present 6000 toned of various compounds are dispatched to different units. The level of the tube production has been technology and now it has touched a level of 3 lack number per month. The present turnover of finished goods of kottayam units as Rs = 350 crores per annum & present lack of production is 450 mt of PCTR per month. The working capital per month more than Rs 20 crores.
Trade unions
MRFEU- MRF Employees union MRFEU- MRF Employees association
International certifications
ISO 901 : 2000 ISO 14001 : 1996 ISO TS : 16949 CQC
Brand ambassadors
Indian opening batsman GAUTHAM GAMBIR is the main celebrity endorser of MRF Ltd.
List of training program offered 1. Attitude training program 2. Behavioral training program 3. Motivational training program 4. Performance training program 5. Employees training program 6. Society training program
10
11
12
13
Market share
24% 22% 17% 6% 2% 29% 100%
1.
2.
Innovativeness
Several innovations were introduced to apply international technologies to manufactures tyres suitable for Indian road condition.
3.
Exports
14
Sustained export for over a decade to more than 50 countries. All large tyre companies are exporting tyres of which 30% export is to USA.
4.
Technological progression
Within a span of 4 decades, technology had progressed as well as the tyre industry had moved from cotton to high performance radical tyres.
5.
6.
15
16
LITERATURE REVIEW
A review of literature on evaluation of training was conducted to identify methods of effectiveness evaluation for training programs. Five definitions of evaluation were identified in the literature. Phillips (1991) defined evaluation as a systematic process to determine the worth, value, or meaning of something. Holli and Calabrese (1998) defined evaluation as comparisons of an observed value or quality to a standard or criteria of comparison. Evaluation is the process of forming value judgments about the quality of programs, products, and goals. Boulmetis and Dutwin (2000) defined evaluation as the systematic process of collecting and analyzing data in order to determine whether and to what degree objectives were or are being achieved. Schalock (2001) defined effectiveness evaluation as the determination of the extent to which a program has met its stated performance goals and objectives. Stufflebeam (2001) defined evaluation as a study designed and conducted to assistsome audience to assess an object's merit and worth.Stufflebeam's (2001) definition of evaluation was used to assess the methods of evaluation found in this literature review. The reason for selecting Stufflebeams definition was based on the applicability of the definition across multiple disciplines.Based on this definition of evaluation, the Kirkpatrick Model was the most frequentlyreported model of evaluation. Phillips (1991) stated the Kirkpatrick Model was probably the most well known framework for classifying areas of evaluation. This was confirmed in 1997 when the America Society for Training and Development (ASTD) assessed the nationwide prevalence of the importance of measurement and evaluation to human resources department (HRD) executives by surveying a panel of 300 HRD executives from a variety of types of U.S. organizations. Survey results indicated the majority
17
(81%) of HRD executives attached some level of importance to evaluation and over half (67%) used the Kirkpatrick Model. The most frequently reported challenge was determining the impact of the training (ASTD, 1997). Lookatch (1991) and ASTD (2002) reported that only one in ten organizations attempted to gather any resultsbased evaluation. In 1952, Donald Kirkpatrick (1996) conducted doctoral research to evaluate a supervisory training program. Kirkpatricks goal was to measure the participants reaction to the program, the amount of learning that took place, the extent of behavior change after participants returned to their jobs, and any final results from a change in behavior achieved by participants after they returned to work. From Kirkpatricks doctoral research, the concept of the four Kirkpatrick measurement levels of evaluation emerged. While writing an article about training in 1959, Kirkpatrick (1996) referred to these four measurement levels as the four steps of a training evaluation. It is unclear even to Kirkpatrick how these four steps became known as the Kirkpatrick Model, but this description persists today (Kirkpatrick, 1998). As reported in the literature, this model is most frequently applied to either educational or technical training. Kirkpatricks first level of measurement, reaction, is defined as how well the trainees liked the training program. The second measurement level, learning, is designated as the determination of what knowledge, attitudes, and skills were learned in the training. The third measurement level is defined as behavior. Behavior outlines a relationship of learning (the previous measurement le vel) to the actualization of doing. Kirkpatrick recognized a big difference between knowing principles and techniques and using those principles and techniques on the job. The fourth measurement level, results, is the expected outcomes of most educationa l training programs such as reduced costs, reduced turnover and absenteeism, reduced grievances, improved profits or morale, and increased quality and quantity of production (Kirkpatrick, 1971). Numerous studies reported use of components of the Kirkpatrick Model; however,no study was found that applied all four levels of the model. Although level one is the least complex of the measures of evaluation developed by Kirkpatrick, no studies were found that reported use of level one as a sole measure of training. One
18
application of the second level of evaluation, knowledge, was reported by Alliger and Horowitz (1989). In this study the IBM Corporation incorporated knowledge tests into internally developed training. To ensure the best design, IBM conducted a study to identify the optimal test for internally developed courses. Four separate tests composed of 25 questions each were developed based on ten key learning components. Four scoring methods were evaluated including one that used a unique measure of confidence. The confidence measurement\ assessed how confident the trainee was with answers given. Tests were administered both before and after training. Indices from the study assisted the organization to evaluate the course design, effectiveness of the training, and effectiveness of the course instructors. The development of the confidence index was the most valuable aspect of the study. Alliger and Horowitz stated that behavior in the workplace was not only a function of knowledge, but also of how certain the employee was of that knowledge. Phillips and Pulliam (2000) reported an additional measure of training effectiveness, return on investment (ROI), was used by companies because of the pressures placed on Human Resource Departments to produce measures of output for total quality management (TQM) and continuous quality improvements (CQI) and the threat of outsourcing due to downsizing. Great debate was found in the training and development literature about the use of ROI measures of training programs. Many training and development professionals believed that ROI was too difficult and unreliable a measure to use for training evaluation (Barron, 1997). One study was found by a major corporation that measured change in productivity and ROI of a training program (Paquet, Kasl, Weinstein, & Waite, 1987).
19
20
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
There are two basic approaches to research, viz quantitative approach and qualitative approach. The former involves the generation of data in quantitative form which can subjected to rigorous quantitative analysis in a formal and rigid fashion. This approach can be further sub classified into inferential, experimental and simulation approaches to research. The purpose of inferential approach to research is to form a database from which to infer characteristics or relationships of population. This usually means survey research where a sample of population is studied to determine its characteristics. Experimental approach is characterized by much greater control over the research environment and in this case some variables are manipulated to observe their effect on other variables. Simulation approach involves the construction of an artificial environment within which relevant information data can be generated. This permits an observation of the dynamic behavior of a system (or its sub- system) under controlled conditions. Simulation approach can also be useful in building models for understanding future conditions. Qualitative approach to research is concerned with subjective assessment of attitude, opinion and behavior. Research in such a situation is function of researchs insights and impression. Such an approach to research generates results either in nonquantitative form or in the form, which are not subjected to rigorous quantitative analysis.
21
1. Primary Source
The primary sources of data used in this project are direct observation and questionnaire. Questionnaire is given and interviewed officer and employees of the organization.
2. Secondary Source
Secondary source of data used in this project is company publications, reports and records of training and development activities done by the organization.
22
3.4 QUESTIONNAIRE
A questionnaire consists of a number of questions printed in a definite order on a set of forms. The respondents have to answer to questions.
3.5.1Percentage Analysis
In this project percentage method test was used. The percentage method is used to know the accurate percentages of the data we took, it is easy to graph out through the formula No of respondent Percentage of respondent = Total no. of Respondents 100 From the above formula, we can get percentages of the data given by the respondents.
3.5.2 CORRELATION
Correlation is the statistical tool which studies the relationship between two variables, and correlation analysis involves various methods and techniques used for studying and measuring the extent of the relationship between two variables.
dxdy r=
X2 = [O-E]
Chi- square is applicable to a very large number of problems in practice. With the help of test we can find out whether two or more attributes are associated or not.
23
24
Figure -4.1
Inference The above table shows that 53% of employees belong to tyre department and 26% employees belong to Pc tyre department and rest belongs to tube department.
Table 4.2
25
No 1 2 3
12.3
Inference
The above table shows that majority (56.55%), of the employees are age above35, and (31.15%) of employees are in the age between 25-35 years and (12.3%) of employees are in the age of below 25 years.
26
Inference
The above table shows that the 60.66% of respondents have an experience of above 10 years, 27.05 % respondents have an experience of 5 to 10 years and 12.29%
27
respondents have an experience of below 5 years. From this we can understand that majority of the respondents have the experience of more than 10 years.
0.00% yes no
100.00%
Inference:
Above table shows that 100% of respondents having awareness of the training programmes.
28
0.00%
Yes No
100.00%
Inference
Graph clearly indicates that 100% of employees are attended the training programmes.
29
18.85%
Inference
30
The above table shows that majority of the employees are attended training programme below 5 times (56.56%), 24.59% of the employees are attending in the training programme between 5-10 times and 18.85% of the employees are attending in the above 10 times.
Inference
31
The table shows that 90.16% responded that the company conducted on the job training, 09.84% responded that the company conducted off the job training, the majority of the respondents attending on the job training programme.
percentage
56.56%
43.44%
Yes No
0.00%
20.00%
40.00%
60.00%
80.00%
100.00% 120.00%
32
Inference
Above table shows that 56.56% of employees say that training programme help to develop your personality and 43.44% says that training programme not help to develop your personality. Majority of respondents says training programme help to develop their personality
Table-4.9 Employees opinion on training programs effectiveness in creating relationship to employers and employees.
No: 1 2 Category Yes No Total No: of employees 95 27 122 % 77.87 22.13 100
Figure -4.9 Employees opinion on training programs effectiveness in creating relationship to employers and employees.
77.87% 80.00% 70.00% 60.00% 50.00% 40.00% 30.00% 20.00% 10.00% 0.00% 22.13% Yes No
Inference
33
Above table shows that 77.87% of employees says that good relationship between employer and employees and 22.13% says that not a good relationship between employer and employees. Majority of respondents good relationship between employers and employees in the training programme.
Table -4.10 Opinion on training and development effectiveness in setting their goal.
No: 1 2 Category Yes No Total No: of employees 43 79 122 % 35.25 64.75 100
Figure -4.10 Opinion on training and development effectiveness in setting their goal.
35.25%
Yes No
64.75%
Inference
34
Above table shows that 35.25% of employees say that training programme help to set goal properly and 64.75% says that training programme not help to set goal properly. Majority says that training programme not help to set goal properly
Inference
35
38.53%of employees evaluate that objective and scope of training are good for them and 20% of employees finds it as poor ,17% of employees evaluates it as very poor and 16% finds it as average and rest belongs to very good.
48.36% 50.00% 40.00% 30.00% 20.00% 10.00% 0.00% Verygood 9.84% 24.59% 16.39% 0.82% Verypoor Average Verygood Good Average Poor Verypoor
Inference
From the above table shows that 09.84% of respondents are very good opinion about the rate of effectiveness in training materials, 48.36% have a good opinion about the
36
rate of effectiveness in training materials, 24.59% have an average opinion about the rate of effectiveness in training materials, 16.39% have poor opinion about the rate of effectiveness in training materials, and 00.82% are very poor about the rate of effectiveness in training materials.
No 1 2 3 4 5
No of employees 11 45 40 21 5 122
Inference
The table show that the 9.02 % of respondets have very good Satisfaction in training programmers meet your needs, 36.88 % responds that good Satisfaction in training programmers meet your needs and 32.79 % have the average Satisfaction in
37
training programmers meet your needs and 17.21% have the poor Satisfaction in training programmers meet your needs, 4.1% have the opinin of very poor Satisfaction in training programmers meet your needs.
30.33
36.89
32.78
dissatisfied
Inference
The table shows that the trainers in MRF are very good in query handling of trainees.36.89 % of respondents are satisfied in query handling procedure and 32.78 % are less satisfied, 30.33% are dissatisfied. None of them are highly satisfied or
38
highly dissatisfied. It represents that the trainers in MRF are effective in query handling.
Inference
The table shows that 5.72 % of respondents think that the coordination among trainer and trainee are very good in MRF and 45.92% think that it is good. And 40.98% respond that it is average, 7.38%respond that are very poor. None of them have the opinion of very poor
39
Table-4.16 Opinion on the class room training which help the practical work
No 1 2
No of employees 50 72 122
Figure -4.16 Opinion on the class room training which help the practical work
no
59.02 %
yes
40.98
10
20
30
40
50
60
Inference
The table shows that the 40.98% employees are say that the class room training help the practical work and 59.02% of employees are say that the class room training not helps the practical work, the majority of respondents says that the class room training not help the practical work
40
Inference
The table shows that the 56.56% employees are say that Satisfy with the method of training and 43.44% of employees are not Satisfy with the method of training. The majority of employees are say that Satisfy with the method of training
41
arrangements etc Figure -4.18 Availability of facilities used for training like LCD, Seating arrangements etc
Inference
The table shows that the, 77.87% respondents say that LCD, seating arrangements facilities are used in training programme and, 22.13% responded says that not used the facilities, the majority of respondents arrangements facilities are used in training programme say that LCD, seating
42
No 1 2
Respondents 74 48 122
Inference The table shows that 60.66% responded says that the company is taking feedback from them, while 39.34% responded that the company is not taking feedback after the training programme. The majority responded that the company is taking feedback after the training programme.
43
Table -4.20 Revision of training programmes based on the feedback from the trainee.
No 1 2 Particulars Yes No Total Respondents 38 84 122 Percentage 31.15 68.65 100
Figure -4.20 Revision of training programmes based on the feedback from the trainee
68.65% 70.00% 60.00% 50.00% 40.00% 31.15% % 30.00% 20.00% 10.00% 0.00% yes AxisT itle no
Inference
The table shows that the ,31.15% responded that the feedback collected by the company has been revised properly for the next training programmer, 68.65% responded that the feedback collected by the company has not been revised properly for the next training programmers .
e l t T s i x A
Table-4.21
44
Figure -4.21 Satisfaction level of employees on the training program available in MRF
Inference
The table shows that 3.28 % of the respondents are highly satisfied with the training programmes and 65.58 % of the respondents are satisfied with the training programmes, 13.11% of the respondents are less satisfied with the training programmes, 13.39% of the respondents are dissatisfied with the training programmes and 1.64% of the respondents are highly dissatisfied with the training programmes
45
Problem showing the relationship how the effectiveness of training materials meet the training needs of respondents. 6Effectiveness of training material used in MRF X 12 59 30 20 1 122 CALCULATION OF CORRELATION dxdy r= X 12 59 30 20 1 122 Y 11 45 40 21 5 122 dx -12.4 34.6 5.6 -4.4 -23.4 Dy -13.4 20.6 15.6 -3.4 -19.4 dx2 153.76 1197.16 31.36 19.36 547.56 1949.2 dy2 179.56 424.36 243.36 11.56 376.36 1235.2 Dxdy 166.16 712.76 87.36 14.96 453.96 1435.2 Training programmes meet your needs Y 11 45 40 21 5 122
Correlation =0.92
Interpretation
The tables clearly show that the training material meets the training needs of the respondents. The required answer is exactly in between -1 and +1.Therfore it states that company give more importance for meeting the training needs.
46
47
good 2 3 4 9
5 10 32 47
3 10 7 20
2 8 15 25
Poor 3 2 16 21
15 33 74 122
H(o) = There is no significant relationship between experience of the workers and satisfactory level of of respondents. H(1) = There is a significant relationship between experience of the workers and satisfactory level of of respondencts. Degree of Freedom (C-1) (R-1) (5-1) (3-1) 4*2=8 5% significant level of table value = 15.507 The Calculate Value = 5.197 The Table Value = 15.507
Chi-Square Table Observed Frequencies 2 5 Expected Frequencies 0.491 5.778 O-E 1.509 -0.778 O-E2 2.278 0.605 (O-E)2/E 4.639 0.105
48
3 2 3 3 10 10 8 2 4 32 7 15 16 Total
2.459 3.073 2.581 2.434 12.713 5.409 6.762 5.680 5.459 28.508 12.131 15.163 12.737
0.541 -1.073 0.419 0.566 -2.713 4.591 1.238 -3.68 -1.459 3.492 -5.131 -0.163 3.263
0.293 2.375 0.176 0.320 7.360 21.077 1.533 13.542 2.129 12.194 26.327 0.027 10.647
0.119 0.772 0.068 0.131 0.579 3.896 0.226 2.384 0.389 0.427 2.170 0.002 0.836 16.746
Interpretation
Here the Calculated value is 16.746 and table value is 15.507. Since the table value is less than calculated value so the Null Hypothesis is rejected. I.e. there has no significant relation between experience of the workers and satisfactory level of employees.
49
5.1 FINDINGS The researcher found that the 53% of employees belong to tyre department. The majority 56.55% of the respondents are age above35. The researcher found that 60.66% of respondents have an experience of above 10 years, 27.05 % respondents have an experience of 5 to 10 years.
50
The 100% of respondents having awareness of the training programmes. The 100% of employees are attended the training programmes The employees are attended training programme below 5 times (56.56%). The 90.16% respondents that the company conducted on the job training. The 56.56% of respondents say that training programme help to develop your personality. The 77.87% of respondents says that good relationship between employer and employees. The researcher 64.75% says that training programme not help to set goal properly. 38.53%of respondents evaluate that objective and scope of training are good for them. The researcher found that 48.36% have a good opinion about the rate of effectiveness in training materials.
36.88 % respondents that good Satisfaction in training programmers meet
your needs The trainers in MRF are very good in query handling of trainees.36.89 % of respondents are satisfied in query handling procedure. Respondents think that the coordination among trainer and trainee are very good in MRF, 45.92% think that it is good.
The 40.98% respondent are say that the class room training help the practical
work and 59.02% of respondent are say that the class room training not helps the practical work The 56.56% respondents are say that Satisfy with the method of training The researcher found that 77.87% respondents say that LCD facilities are more available in the company. The 60.66% respondent says that the company is taking feedback from the available training. The 68.65% responded that the feedback collected by the company has not been revised properly for the next training programmers.
51
The 65.58 % of the respondents are satisfied with the training programmes. Therefore it states that company gives more importance for meeting the training needs. There is no significant relation between training methods and satisfactory level of employees.
5.2 SUGGESTIONS
52
The departments head should assess the Training and Development needs of subordinates. This assessment may increase the level of training effectiveness by the enhancement of good inter-personal relationship. Identification of employees for Training and Development programmes should be done more objectively. Introduce more training programmes which will benefit for both employer & the employee. Importance should be given for training to lower level employees by including subjects like Communication skill. The Management should endeavor to bring trainers from highly talented companies and thereby it helps to promote unique talents among employees. Visit to related companies will help to know the methods of training adopted by them to deliver high potentials. Introduce training programmes on quality control manufactured products. Latest training techniques of learning internet etc. The Company can explore to include online training programmes for understanding latest developments in the industry. must be used through LCD, CDs, to improve quality of
53
5.3 CONCLUSION The employee in every organization works for the betterment of the organization and so is MRF Pvt Ltd. It is a pioneer in the tyre industries, and has embedded its name in the field of Human Resources and its practices. The study concluded that the overall effectiveness of the training program, is good and it can also achieve the level of excellence in the future by making some possible changes in its training. Employees are benefiting by attending Effective training programmes in the organization. The organization also benefits by having employees with more skills who are more productive. And the company lays good foundation for career growth of the employees through Training & Development programmes. More emphasis should be given for quality control methods in the training programmes. The introduction of new or innovative process of Training Programme one to the existing level will surely help this organization to reach greater heights in the years to come.
54
ANNEXURE
QUESTIONNAIRE FOR TO EVALUATE THE TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES IN MRF PVT LTD Name Department Designation Age Gender Experience : : : : Below 25 : Male 25-35 Female 5-10 Above 10 years Above 35
: Below 5 years
Yes 2.
no
Both
55
Yes
No
..
6.
Do you think that the training available in MRF helps you to develop personally and professionally? Yes No
7. Do you think that the training programme can create a good relation with
8. The training need can be identified only if we set our goals properly. Did you
How clearly the objectives are communicated in MRF training programmes? Very good Good Average Poor Very poor
Very good
Good
Average
Poor
Very poor
56
11. The training programme should meet the training needs of the participants.
How well the programmes in MRF meet your needs? Very good Good Average Poor Very poor
12. Are you satisfied with the query handling method of your trainers at the time
of training?\
Very good
Good
Average
Poor
Very poor
14.
Are you satisfied with the Class room training in helping practical work? Yes No
15. Are you satisfied with the training Facilities like LCD, Seating arrangements etc... Yes Yes No No 16. Are you satisfied with the method of training implemented?
57
17. Are you been asked to given training feedback after the Training and Development Programmes? Yes No
18. Did the company revised training programmes based on the feedback from the trainee Yes No
19. How do you evaluate the training programme available to you in MRF? Highly satisfied satisfied less satisfied dissatisfied 20. Other comments for improving your training programmes dissatisfied highly
BIBLIOGRAPHY Books
C. R KOTHARI Research Methodology second revised edition in 2004
published by new age international publishers in new Delhi. Company Record Training Records
58