Scribd
Upload
318 views3 pages

Xlstat 14

The document summarizes the results of a chi-square test of independence performed on a 2x4 contingency table. The test found no significant relationship between the rows and columns at an alpha level of 0.05, so the null hypothesis of independence was not rejected. Several association coefficients were also calculated to further describe the relationship in the table.

Uploaded by

Ehsan Qadir
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
318 views3 pages

Xlstat 14

The document summarizes the results of a chi-square test of independence performed on a 2x4 contingency table. The test found no significant relationship between the rows and columns at an alpha level of 0.05, so the null hypothesis of independence was not rejected. Several association coefficients were also calculated to further describe the relationship in the table.

Uploaded by

Ehsan Qadir
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

XLSTAT 2012.6.08 - Tests on contingency tables (Chi-square...

) - on 28/11/2012 at 10:16:05 PM Contingency table: Workbook = Book2 / Sheet = Sheet1 / Range = Sheet1!$K$1:$O$3 / 2 rows and 4 columns

Test of independence between the rows and the columns (Chi-square):

3.355 7.815 3 0.340 0.05

Chi-square (Observed value) Chi-square (Critical value) DF p-value Alpha

Test interpretation: H0: The rows and the columns of the table are independent. Ha: There is a link between the rows and the columns of the table. As the computed p-value is greater than the significance level alpha=0.05, one cannot reject the null hypothesis H0. The risk to reject the null hypothesis H0 while it is true is 34.01%.

Association coefficients (1):

Value 0.104 0.103 0.104 0.079 0.011 0.003 Pearson's Phi Contingency coefficient Cramer's V Tschuprow's T

Coefficient

Goodman and Kruskal tau (R/C) Goodman and Kruskal tau (C/R)

Association coefficients (2): Upper bound 95% 0.097 0.055 0.061 0.049 0.061 0.025 0.015 0.018 Lower bound 95% -0.274 -0.154 -0.172 -0.138 -0.172 -0.009 -0.005 -0.007

Standard deviation 0.095 0.053 0.059 0.048 0.060 0.009 0.005 0.006

Value -0.089 -0.050 -0.055 -0.044 -0.055 0.008 0.005 0.006

Coefficient Goodman and Kruskal Gamma Kendall's tau Stuart's tau Somers' D (R/C) Somers' D (C/R) Theil's U (R/C) Theil's U (C/R) Theil's U (Symmetric)

Contingency table:

strongly disagree 19 16

disagree 21 14

uncertain 30 40

agree 80 90 50 40

Chi-square by cell: strongly disagree 0.252 0.236 0.488

Total 1.732 1.623 3.355

disagree 0.975 0.915 1.890

uncertain 0.442 0.415 0.857

agree 0.062 0.058 0.120 Total 50 40

Residuals (Pearson): strongly disagree 0.502 -0.486

disagree 0.988 -0.956

uncertain -0.665 0.644

agree -0.249 0.241 50 40

Residuals (Adjusted): strongly disagree 0.741 -0.741

disagree 1.460 -1.460

uncertain -1.052 1.052

agree -0.516 0.516 Values displayed in bold are significant at the level alpha=0.05 50 40

Residuals (Adjusted)
1.5 1 0.5 0 -0.5 -1 -1.5
strongly disagree

disagree 40 50 agree uncertain

Rows

Columns

Observed frequencies: strongly disagree 19 16 35

Total 150 160 310

disagree 21 14 35

uncertain 30 40 70

agree 80 90 170 Total 50 40

Theoretical frequencies: strongly disagree 16.935 18.065 35

Total 150 160 310

disagree 16.935 18.065 35

uncertain 33.871 36.129 70

agree 82.258 87.742 170 Total 50 40

You might also like