0% found this document useful (0 votes)
10 views1 page

Cut&Fill3 CLAY

This report compares two digital terrain models (topo1.dtm and pit_clay_3.dtm) within a boundary defined by the file pit_clay_3.str and string 1, finding a cut volume of 1,506,028 cubic meters and no fill volume, resulting in a net volume of -1,506,028 cubic meters for the area changed between the two DTMs within the defined boundary.

Uploaded by

Fadlin Idrus
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
10 views1 page

Cut&Fill3 CLAY

This report compares two digital terrain models (topo1.dtm and pit_clay_3.dtm) within a boundary defined by the file pit_clay_3.str and string 1, finding a cut volume of 1,506,028 cubic meters and no fill volume, resulting in a net volume of -1,506,028 cubic meters for the area changed between the two DTMs within the defined boundary.

Uploaded by

Fadlin Idrus
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

DTM CUT AND FILL VOLUME REPORT

First DTM: topo1.dtm Second DTM: pit_clay_3.dtm Upper DTM object ID: 1 Upper DTM trisolation ID: 1 Lower DTM object ID: 1 Lower DTM trisolation ID: 1 Boundary file: pit_clay_3.str Boundary string: 1 Number of segments: 1 Density: 1.000

Nov 20, 2012

DTM Extents
X Minimum Topo1.dtm Pit Clay 3.dtm 330372.493 330759.154 X Maximum 331681.839 331418.564 Y Minimum 9153988.663 9154215.765 Y Maximum 9155041.634 9154749.770 Z Minimum 65.000 65.000 Z Maximum 195.000 185.000

Volumes
Cut Vol 1506028 Cut Area 19914 Fill Vol 0 Fill Area 0 Nett Vol -1506028 Nett Tonnage -1506028 Common Area 0

Page 1 of 1

You might also like