Scribd
Upload
117 views3 pages

Experiment No-8: SBHS3: Feedback Control of Temperature Using Heater Input-An Experimental Study

The document reports on an experiment studying the feedback control of temperature using a heater and PID controller. It provides the PID parameters of Kc, Tau i, and Tau d for a third step change from 20 to 25 degrees. Varying each parameter resulted in different effects on the settling time, overshoot, and oscillations compared to the expected effects. Increasing Tau d decreased the settling time as expected but did not affect overshoot or oscillations as expected.

Uploaded by

Rahul Pancholi
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
117 views3 pages

Experiment No-8: SBHS3: Feedback Control of Temperature Using Heater Input-An Experimental Study

The document reports on an experiment studying the feedback control of temperature using a heater and PID controller. It provides the PID parameters of Kc, Tau i, and Tau d for a third step change from 20 to 25 degrees. Varying each parameter resulted in different effects on the settling time, overshoot, and oscillations compared to the expected effects. Increasing Tau d decreased the settling time as expected but did not affect overshoot or oscillations as expected.

Uploaded by

Rahul Pancholi
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

Rahul Pancholi (09001012)

Experiment No-8
SBHS3: Feedback Control of Temperature using heater input- An Experimental Study
A value for which variation is done is of third step change from 20 to 25. Values of Kc, Tau i and Tau d for PID in third step change are

For PID controller variation of Kc variation of Tau i variation of Tau d 8.297 34.674 5.413 16.594 69.348 10.826 4.1485 17.337 2.7065

Variation of Kc

Rahul Pancholi (09001012) Variation of Tau i

Variation of Tau d

Rahul Pancholi (09001012) Results and Conclusion Increasing Kc: Should decrease settling time (not evident) Should decrease overshoot (not evident) Should increase oscillations (evident)

Increasing Tau i: Should increase settling time (not evident) Should increase over shoot (not evident) Should decrease oscillations (evident)

Increasing Tau d: Should decrease settling time (evident) Should decrease over shoot (not evident) Should decrease oscillations (evident)

You might also like