Experiment No 7
Experiment No 7
Experiment No 7
7
Title of the Experiment:
To determine the loss factors for flow through a range of pipe fittings including bends, a contraction, an enlargement and a gate-valve.
Method:
By measurement of head differences across each of a number of fittings connected in series, over a range of steady flows.
Apparatus:
The F1-10 Hydraulics Bench to measure flow by timed volume collection. The F1-22 Energy Losses in Bends and Fittings Apparatus. A stopwatch to allow us to determine the flow rate of water Clamps for pressure tapping connection tubes. Spirit level Thermometer
Apparatus Overview:
The accessory is designed to be positioned on the side channels of the hydraulics bench top channel. The following fittings are connected in a series configuration to allow direct comparison: long bend. area enlargement area contraction elbow bend short bend valve fitting mitre bend Flow rate through the circuit is controlled by a flow control valve. Pressure tappings in the circuit are connected to a twelve bank manometer, which incorporates an air inlet/outlet, valve in the top manifold. An air bleed screw facilitates connection to a hand pump. This enables the level in the manometer bank to be adjusted to a convenient level to suit the system static pressure A clamp which closes off the tappings to the mitre bend is introduced when experiments on the valve fitting are required. A differential pressure gauge gives a direct reading of losses through the gate valve
Apparatus Diagram:
Technical Data:
The following dimensions from the equipment are used in the appropriate calculations. If required these values may be checked as part of the experimental procedure and replaced with your own measurements. Internal diameter of pipework d = 0.0183 m
Nomenclature:-
Theory:
The energy loss which occurs in a pipe fitting (so-called secondary loss) is commonly expressed in terms of a head loss (h, metres) in the form:
K = the loss coefficient v = mean velocity of flow into the fitting. Because of the complexity of flow in many fittings, K is usually determined by experiment. For the pipe fitting experiment, the head loss is calculated from two manometer readings, taken before and after each fitting, and K is then determined as
Due to the change in pipe cross-sectional area through the enlargement and contraction, the system experiences an additional change in static pressure. This change can be calculated as:
To eliminate the effects of this area change on the measured head losses, this value should be added to the head loss readings for the enlargement and the contraction. Note that (h1 - h2) will be negative for the enlargement and negative for the contraction. will be
For the gate valve experiment, pressure difference before and after the gate is measured directly using a pressure gauge. This can then be converted to an equivalent head loss using the equation 1 bar = 10.2 m water The loss coefficient may then be calculated as above for the gate valve. Reynolds number is a dimensionless number used to compare flow characteristics. A full investigation of Reynolds number, and typical flow variation as it changes, can be found in experiment Reynolds Apparatus or in a suitable fluids text book.
and the test rig flow control valve. Next, open the air bleed screw slightly to allow air to enter the top of the manometers, re-tighten the screw when the manometer levels reach a convenient height. Check that all manometer levels are on scale at the maximum volume flow rate required (approximately 17 liters/minute). These levels can he adjusted further by using the air bleed screw and the hand pump supplied. The air bleed screw controls the air flow through the air valve, so when using the hand pump, the bleed screw must be open. To retain the hand pump pressure in the system, the screw must be closed after pumping
Procedure:
It is not possible to make measurements on all fittings simultaneously and, therefore, it is necessary to run two separate tests Exercise A measures losses across all pipe fittings except the gate valve, which should be kept fully open. Adjust the flow from the bench control valve and, at a given flow rate, take height readings from all of the manometers after the levels have steadied. In order to determine the volume flow rate, carry out a timed volume collection using the volumetric tank. This is achieved by closing the ball valve and measuring (with a stopwatch) time taken to accumulate a known volume of fluid in the tank, which is read from the sight glass. Collect fluid for at least one minute to minimize timing errors. Repeat this procedure to give a total of at least five sets of measurements over a flow range from approximately 8 - 17 liters per minute. Measure the outflow water temperature at the lowest flow rate; this together with the table detailing the Kinematic Viscosity of Water at Atmospheric Pressure is used to determine the Reynolds number. Exercise B measures losses across the gate valve only. Clamp off the connecting tubes to the mitre bend pressure tappings (to prevent air being drawn into the system). Start with the gate valve closed and open fully both the bench valve and the test rig flow control valve. Now open the gate valve by approximately 50% of one turn (after taking up any backlash). For each of at least 5 flow rates, measure pressure drop across the valve from the pressure gauge; adjust the flow rate by use of the test rig flow control valve. Once measurements have started, do not adjust the gate valve. Determine the volume flow rate by timed collection.
FITTINGS
h1 (m)
h2 (m)
Velocity v (m/s)
v2 / 2g
MITRE ELBOW SHORT BEND LONG BEND ENLARGE MENT CONTRAC TION
2.26e -4
2.26e 2.26e 2.26e 2.26e
-4
0.86
0.86 0.86 0.86 0.50
-4
0.034
0.001
-4
0.015
-4
GRAPHS:
0.045 0.04 0.035 0.03 0.025 0.02 0.015 0.01 0.005 0 0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 Series1
2 1.5 1 0.5 Series1 0 0.00E+00 -0.5 -1 -1.5 5.00E-05 1.00E-04 1.50E-04 2.00E-04 2.50E-04
X=AXIS VOLUME FLOW RATE Y=AXIS CONSTANT K CONCLUSION:There isnt any relationship between any of the values, there is no dependence on head losses across pipe fittings upon velocity Yes it is justifiable to treat the loss coefficient as constant for a given fitting
Source of errors:
Error in reading can occur due to
Careless attitude while noting the readings. Rounding off the values in calculations.