Supreme Court of India
Supreme Court of India
Supreme Court of India
NEW DELHI
Impeachment of a Judge
Grounds: Proved Misbehaviour or Incapacity Procedure:
A Motion addressed to the President signed by 100 members of Loksabha or 50 members of Rajyasabha Investigation by Judges Inquiry Committee Motion carried in each House by majority of the total membership and by a majority of at least two thirds members present and voting Presidents order for removal of the Judge
6
Independence of Judges
Appointment of Judges after Consulting Judges Removal by Special Majority: Very difficult Salaries and Pensions cannot be varied to their disadvantage Salaries charged on the Consolidated Fund of India Discussion of the conduct of Judges forbidden in Parliament After retirement prohibition to plead in Court Power to punish for its Contempt
7
Original Jurisdiction
Dispute between:
1. 2. 3. Govt. of India and any State Two or more States inter se Govt. of India and any State on one side and any other State on other side
Subject matter of Dispute: Any question of Law or Fact on which extent of legal right depends. Exceptions:
1. Pre-Constitution Treaties, Agreements
2. Inter-State Water disputes
10
existence or
Enforcement of Fundamental Rights: Art. 32 Habeas Corpus Mandamus Prohibition Certiorari Quo Warranto
11
Habeas Corpus
To have a body Object: To set free a person illegally detained Producing Body in Court Necessary? Petition by friend/Relative also. Locus Standi liberalised Writ addressed to:
Government An Official Private Person
Mandamus
Mandamus = A Command Order to do something: demands some activity Command to perform Public or Quasi-public duty Writ available against:
Government
Public Servant Judicial Body
Prohibition
Order to stay a judicial Proceeding When?
Excess of Jurisdiction No Jurisdiction
Certiorari
To whom: Judicial or Quasi-Judicial Authority Object: To quash order or decision (Cure) When?
Court or Tribunal acts without jurisdiction Principles of Natural Justice not followed:
Bias: Personal, Pecuniary Audi Alteram Partem Speaking Order
Quo Warranto
Quo Warranto = What authority? Court inquires into legality of claim to Public Office Court ousts incumbent if claim not well founded Object: To prevent usurpation of Public Office (Constitutional or Statutory) When?
Disqualified for the post Procedure not followed Irregular appointment
18
In re Delhi Laws Act case (1951) In re Berubari Union (1960) Keshav Singhs case (1965) Cauvery Water Disputes Tribunal (1992) Ismail Faruqui v. Union of India (Ram Janma Bhumi case) (1994)
21
Revisory Jurisdiction
To review any judgment pronounced or order made Subject to Law passed by Parliament When?
Discovery of new important matters of evidence
Mistake or error on the face of the record Any other sufficient reason
Court of Record
A court of record is a court whose judgments are recorded for evidence and testimony .The judgments are in the nature of precedents. The High courts and other courts are bound to give a similar decision in a similar case . The Supreme Court of India shall be a Court of Record and shall have all powers of such a court to punish for contempt of itself.
23
Contempt of court
The Supreme Court enjoys the authority of imposing fine or imprisonment for violating the orders of the court .
Example Chief Secretary to the Government of Karnataka , S.Vasudevan was imprisoned in 1996 for not implementing the orders of the Supreme Court of India .
24
25
Miscellaneous
Transfer of Cases, Appeals from one High Court to another Withdrawal of cases from High Court Precedent: Law declared by Supreme Court binding on all courts. (Art. 141) Art. 142: Doing complete justice Rule making power Interpretation of the Constitution Power of Judicial Review (Invalidating laws and executive actions)
26
On 1 February 1970, the Supreme Court invalidated the government-sponsored Bank Nationalization Bill that had been passed by Parliament in August 1969.
The Supreme Court also rejected as unconstitutional a presidential order of 7 September 1970, that abolished the titles, privileges, and privy purses of the former rulers of India's old princely states.
27
CONCLUSION
The independence of judiciary was severely curtailed on account of powerful central government ruled by Indian National Congress. This was during the Indian Emergency of Indira Gandhi. The constitutional rights of imprisoned persons were restricted under Preventive detention laws passed by the parliament. But the judiciary is the guardian of the constitution , protector of the fundamental rights and our only source of justice.
28
29
30