3/2/2012 11:20:00 PM [Ch.1] Introduction to Evidence Law D. The Trial Judges Discretion 1. US v. Walton 2. Bandera v. City of Quincy [Ch.

h.2] Relevance A. Relevance and Irrelevance FRE 401 FRE 402 1. Knapp v. State 2. United States v. Dominguez 3. State v. Larson

B. Probative value and Prejudice FRE 403 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. US v. Noriega US v. Flitcraft Abernathy v. Superior Hardwoods, Inc. Us v.McRae Old Chief c. US

C. Conditional Relevance FRC 104(b) 1. State v. McNeely [Ch.3] Hearsay A. The Hearsay Rule and Its Rationale (1) Introduction 1. Leake v. Hagert (2) Nonhearsay Uses of Out-of-court Statements FRE 801(c) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Lyons Partnership c. Morris Costumes,Inc. US v. Parry Subramaniam v. Public Prosecutor Southerland v. Sycamore Community School District US v. Johnson US v. Jefferson US v. Saavedra

8. Hanson v. Johnson

9. Creaghe v. Iowa Home Mutual Casualty Co. 10. US v. Montana (3) Implied Assertions 1. US v. Zenmi 2. State v. Dullard B. Hearsay and Confrontation 1. Crawford v. Washington 2. Davis v. Washington C. Exceptions to the Hearsay Rule (1) Prior Statements by Witnesses FRE 801(d)(1) 1. albert v. McKay & Co. 2. United States v. Owens (2) Admissions by Party-Opponenets a. Direct Admissions i. Generally FRE 801(d)(2) 1. Salvitti v. Throppe 2. United States v. McGee 3. United States v. Phelps ii. Admissions and Multiple Hearsay 1. Reed v. McCord 2. Foster v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue iii. Admissions and Completeness 1. Beech Aircraft Corp. v. Rainey b. Adoptive admissions FRE 801(d)(2)(B) 1. United States v. Fortes 2. Southern Stone Co. v. Singer c. Authorized Admissions

FRE 801(d)(2)(C) 1. Hanson v. Waller d. Agent and Employee Admissions FRE 801(d)(2)(D) 1. Mahlandt v. Wild Canid Survival & Research Center, Inc. 2. Sea-Land Service, Inc. v. Lozen International, LLC e. Co-Conspirator Admissions FRE 801(d)(2)(E) 1. Bourjaily v. United States (3) Spontaneous and Contemporaneous Statements FRE 803 1. US v. Obayagbona 2. Bemis v. Edwards 3. US v. Elem (4) State of Mind a. Generally FRE 803(3) 1. US v. Harris b. The Hillmon Doctrine 1. Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Hillmon 2. Shepard v. US FRE 803(3) 3. US v. Houlihan (5) Injury Reports FRE 803(4) 1. Rock v. Huffco Gas & Oil Co. 2. State v. Moses (6) Recorded Recollection FRE 803(5) 1. Fisher v. Swartz 2. United States v. Riccardi

(7) Business Records a. Generally FRE 803(6) 1. State v. Acquisto b. Qualifying Businesses 1. Keogh v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue 2. US v. Gibson c. Qualifying Records FRE 803(6) 1. Palmer v. Hoffman 2. Lewis v. Baker d. Sources of Information FRE 803(6) 1. Wilson v. Zapata Off-shore Co. e. Absence of Record FRE 803(7) 1. US v. Gentry (8) Public Records FRE 803(8) 1. Beech Aircraft Corp. v. Rainey 2. US v. Oates 3. US v. Brown 4. US v. Orozco 5. State v. Forte 6. Hinojos-Mendoza v. People (9) Former Testimony FRE 804 1. US v. Bollin 2. Kirk v. Raymark Industries, Inc. 3. Clay v. Johns-Manvill Sales Corp. 4. US v. Salerno

(10) Dying Declarations 1. Shepard v. United States 2. US v. Sacasas FRE 804(b)(2) 3. State v. Lewis (11) Declaration Against Interest FRE 804(b)(3) 1. US v. Duran Samaniego 2. US v. Jackson (12) Forfeiture by Wrongdoing FRE 804 Giles v. California (13) Residual Exception FEE 807 1. US v. Laster D. Hearsay and Due Process 1. Chambers v. Mississippi 2. Fortini v. Murphy [Ch.4] Character Evidence A. The Basic Rule and Its Exceptions 1. People v. Zackowitz 2. Cleghorn v. New York Central & Hudson River R.R. Co. 3. Berryhill v. Berryhill 4. Larson v. Klapprodt FRE 404(a) B. Methods of Proving Character 1. Michelson v. US FRE 405 FRE 803(21) 2. Governmenr of the Virgin Islands v. Roldan 3. US v. Krapp

4. US v. Setien C. Other Uses of Specific Conduct (1) Permissible Purposes 1. US v. Beechum 2. US v. Boyd 3. US v. DeJohn 4. Lewis v. US 5. US v. Crocker 6. US v. Dossey 7. US v. Wright FRE 404 FRC 404(b) (2) Requisite Proof 1. Huddleston v. US D. Character and Habit FRE 406 1. Loughan v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. 2. Burchett v. Commonwealth E. Sexual Assault and Child Molestation (1) Character of the Victim 1. Graham v. State FRE 412 2. US v. Saunders 3. Olden v. Kentucky (2) Character of the Defendant 1. US v. LeCompte 2. US v. Cunningham [Ch.5] Other Forbidden Inferences A. Subsequent Remedial Measures FRE 407 1. Clausen v. Storage Tank Development Corp. 2. In re Asbestos Litigation

B. Settlement Efforts (1) Civil Cases FRE 408 1. Ramada Development Co. v. Rauch 2. Carney v. American University (2) Criminal Cases FRE 410 1. US v. Mezzanatto 2. US v. Mezzanatto: Using Plea STMT at Trial C. Medical Payments and Liability Insurance FRE 409 FRE 411 1. Charter v. Chleborad 2. Higgins v. Hicks Co. [Ch.6] Trial Mechanics A. Order of Proof (1) Generally FRE 611 1. Stone v. Peacock 2. Elgabri v. Lekas 3. US v. Wilford 4. US v. Carter (2) Rule of Completeness FRE 106 B. Mode of Questioning FRE 611 1. US v. Nabors 2. Ellis v. City of Chicago C. Sequestering Witnesses FRE 615 US v. Machor

D. Questioning by Judge FRE 614 US v. Tilghman E. Questioning by Jurors 1. US v. Hernandez 2. State v. Fisher [Ch.7] Impeachment and Rehabilitation A. Introduction B. Character for Untruthfulness (1) In General FRE 608 FRE 610 1. US v. Lollar 2. US v. Rosa 3. US v. Ling 4. US v. White 5. US v. Aponte (2) Prior Criminal Convictions a. Admissible and Inadmissible convictions 1. US v. Wong 2. US v. Amaechi 3. US v. Sanders 4. US v. Oaxaca 5. US v. Hernandez b. Preserving Claims of Error 1. Luce v. US 2. Ohler v. US C. Prior Inconsistent Statements FRE 613 1. US v. Lebel 2. US v. Dennis 3. US v. Ince

4. US v. Webster 5. People v. Freeman D. Bias and Incapacity 1. US v. Abel 2. US v. Sasso 3. Henderson v. Detella E. Specific Contradiction 1. Simons, Inc. v. Pinkertons, Inc. 2. Us v. Copelin F. Rehabilitation (1) In General 1. US v. Lindemann (2) Character for Truthfulness FRE 608 1. Beard v. Mitchell 2. US v. Danehy 3. US v. Drury 4. US v. Murray (3) Prior Consistent Statements 1. Tome v. US 2. US v. Simonelli [Ch.8] Competence A. In General 1. Rosen v. US FRE 601 2. US v. Lightly B. Personal Knowlege FRE 602 1. US v. Hickey C. Oath or Affirmation 1. US v. Ward 2. US v. Allen J.

D. Dead Man Statutes E. Competence and the Constitution 1. Rock v. Arkansas F. Judges, Jurors, and Lawyers FRE 605 FRE 606 1. Tanner v. US 2. People v. Fleiss 3. US v. Ewing [Ch.9] Opinions, Experts, and Scientific Evidence A. Lay Opinions FRE 701 FRE 704 1. US v. Meling 2. Government of the Virgin Islands v. Knight 3. Robinson v. Bump 4. US v. Peoples 5. US v. Ayala-Pizarro B. Expert Testimony (1) Permissible Subjects and Scope FRE 702 1. Hatch v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. FRE 703 2. State v. Lewis (2) Reliability a. Court-Appointed Experts FRE 706 1. LeBlanc v. PNS Stores, Inc. b. Judicial Screenign of Party-Approved Experts i. Introduction ii. The Daubert Rebolution

1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 2. General Electric Co. v. Joiner 3. Kumho Tire Company, LTd. V. Carmichael (3) The Current Legal Landscape FRE 702 1. Marsh v. Valyou [Ch.10] Privileges A. In General B. Attorney-Client Privilege (1) Introduction 1. Swidler & Berlin v. US (2) Elements of the Privilege a. Communication 1. US v. Kendrick 2. Tornay v. US b. In Confidence 1. 2. 3. 4. US v. Gann US v. Evans US v. Lawless Smithkline Beecham Corp. v. Apotex Corp.

c. Between Attorney and Client 1. US v. Kobel 2. US v. McPartlin 3. Pasteris v. Robillard 4. Upjohn Co. v. US d. 1. 2. 3. To Facilitate Legal Service Hughes v. Meade US v. Davis Us v. Rowe

(3) Waiver 1. US v. Bernard

2. Tasby v. US 3. Hollins v. Powell 4. In re von Bulow (4) Crime-Fraud Excpetion 1. Us v. Zolin C. Spousal Privileges 1. Trammel v. US D. Other Privileges 1. Jaffee v. Redmond 2. In re Grand Jury [Ch.11] Physical Evidence A. Authentication FRE 901 1. US v. Long 2. Bruther v. General Electric Co. 3. US v. Casto 4. US v. Grant B. The Best Evidence Rule (1) Scope and Purpose 1. Meyers v. US FRE 1001-1002 2. US v. Gonzales-Benitez (2) Exceptions FRE 1003-1008 1. US v. Stockton 2. US v. Standing Soldier 3. Seiler v. Lucasfilm, Ltd. C. Demonstrative Evidence 1. US v. Weeks 2. US v. Humphrey 3. Roland v. Langlois

4. US v. Wood 5. Bannister v. Town of Noble, Oklahoma [Ch.12] Burdens, Presumptions, and Judicial Notice A. Burdens and Presumptions in Civil Cases 1. In re Yoder Co. B. Burdens and Presumptions in Criminal Cases 1. Patterson v. New York 2. County Court of Ulster County v. Allen 3. Sandstrom v. Montana C. Judicial Notice FRE 201 1. US v. Gould 2. US v. Lewis 3. Carley v. Wheeled Coach 4. US v. Bowers 5. US v. Bello

3/2/2012 11:20:00 PM

3/2/2012 11:20:00 PM