From: | Liudmila Mantrova <l(dot)mantrova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
---|---|
To: | Alexey Kondratov <a(dot)kondratov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, vladimirlesk(at)yandex-team(dot)ru, dsarafan(at)yandex-team(dot)ru |
Subject: | Re: [Patch] pg_rewind: options to use restore_command from recovery.conf or command line |
Date: | 2019-07-26 17:43:40 |
Message-ID: | [email protected] |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 7/1/19 5:20 PM, Alexey Kondratov wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> On 01.07.2019 15:02, Thomas Munro wrote:
>
>> Hi Alexey,
>>
>> This no longer applies. Since the Commitfest is starting now, could
>> you please rebase it?
>
> Thank you for a reminder. Rebased version of the patch is attached.
> I've also modified my logging code in order to obey new unified
> logging system for command-line programs commited by Peter (cc8d415117).
>
>
> Regards
>
Hi Alexey,
I would like to suggest a couple of changes to docs and comments, please
see the attachment.
The "...or fetched on startup" part also seems wrong here, but it's not
a part of your patch, so I'm going to ask about it on psql-docs separately.
It might also be useful to reword the following error messages:
- "using restored from archive version of file \"%s\""
- "could not open restored from archive file \"%s\"
We could probably say something like "could not open file \"%s\"
restored from WAL archive" instead.
On a more general note, I wonder if everyone is happy with the
--using-postgresql-conf option name, or we should continue searching for
a narrower term. Unfortunately, I don't have any better suggestions
right now, but I believe it should be clear that its purpose is to fetch
missing WAL files for target. What do you think?
--
Liudmila Mantrova
Technical writer at Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v8-0001-pg_rewind-options-to-use-restore_command.patch | text/x-patch | 20.0 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2019-07-26 18:26:00 | Re: Optimze usage of immutable functions as relation |
Previous Message | Konstantin Knizhnik | 2019-07-26 16:27:43 | Re: Built-in connection pooler |