Screening hospital employees for measles immunity is more cost effective than blind immunization

Ann Intern Med. 1992 Jun 15;116(12 Pt 1):982-4. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-116-12-982.

Abstract

Objective: To examine alternative strategies in developing a cost-effective program to assure measles immunity among hospital employees.

Design: Observational.

Setting: Referral teaching hospital.

Participants: Eighteen hundred "established" hospital employees with potential patient contact and 630 newly hired hospital employees.

Interventions: Established employees born after 1 January 1957 and all newly hired employees were screened for serologic evidence of measles immunity and immunized if necessary.

Measurements: Cost analysis.

Results: The cost of screening and directed immunization of established employees was $3.98 per employee compared with a potential cost of $10.03 to $42.80 per employee if all employees were "blindly" immunized with monovalent measles vaccine or trivalent mumps-measles-rubella vaccine. The cost of the screening and directed immunization of new employees was $2.42 per employee compared with potential costs of $8.30 to $39.34 per employee for blind immunization. These analyses assumed that varying percentages of employees would be able to produce documentation of having received a previous dose of vaccine or of having had measles.

Conclusions: In a large referral hospital, screening for measles immunity followed by directed immunization was considerably less expensive than immunizing all potentially susceptible employees.

MeSH terms

  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Hospital Bed Capacity, 500 and over
  • Hospitals, General
  • Humans
  • Infection Control / economics*
  • Infection Control / methods
  • Mass Screening / economics*
  • Measles / economics*
  • Measles / prevention & control*
  • New York
  • Personnel, Hospital / economics*
  • Serologic Tests / economics
  • Vaccination / economics*