From the course: Programming Foundations: Open-Source Licensing
Unlock the full course today
Join today to access over 23,400 courses taught by industry experts.
Open-source licenses vs. the public domain
From the course: Programming Foundations: Open-Source Licensing
Open-source licenses vs. the public domain
- [Voiceover] One of the biggest misconceptions about Open Source Software is because it's free and freely available is that it's part of the Public Domain. Nothing can be further than the truth. Public domain as to some creative work means that its intellectual property protections have lapsed whether they've expired or cannot be ascertainable, and that means that in order to use something in the public domain, well we're free to do so because there is no need for a license because there are no intellectual property rights anymore. And it has nothing to do with whether something is free. Examples of creative works that have lapsed in the public domain or things like the works of William Shakespeare, Beethoven, and of course any works by the government because anything that the government produces by law is excluded from copyright law. Now if you recall from our earlier discussion on copyrights, when they're created, a copyright attaches immediately upon creation. When something is…
Contents
-
-
-
-
(Locked)
What is a software license?1m 30s
-
(Locked)
The first open-source license: BSD2m 2s
-
(Locked)
Open-source licenses vs. the public domain1m 33s
-
(Locked)
The three basic licenses: GPL6m 52s
-
(Locked)
The three basic licenses: MIT2m 56s
-
(Locked)
The three basic licenses: Apache1m 34s
-
(Locked)
Permissive vs. copyleft open-source licenses2m 25s
-
(Locked)
Choosing the right open-source license1m 48s
-
(Locked)
-
-