Andrew Landolfi

Andrew Landolfi

Arlington, Virginia, United States
582 followers 500+ connections

Join to view profile

Activity

Join now to see all activity

Experience

  • Worldwide Golf Shops Graphic

    Worldwide Golf Shops

    Bethesda, Maryland, United States

  • -

    Bethesda, Maryland, United States

  • -

    Washington, District of Columbia, United States

  • -

    Annapolis, Maryland, United States

  • -

    New York, New York

  • -

    Washington, District Of Columbia

  • -

    New York, New York

  • -

    Washington, District Of Columbia

  • -

    Newark, New Jersey

  • -

    Washington, District Of Columbia

  • -

  • -

    Hamden, CT

  • -

Education

  • The George Washington University Law School Graphic

    The George Washington University Law School

    -

    Activities and Societies: Order of the Coif

  • -

    Activities and Societies: Member of the National English Honors Society Member of the National Communications Honors Society

Licenses & Certifications

Volunteer Experience

Publications

  • Reframing the Question: Why Chevron - And Not a One Size Fits All Interpretation of 'Substantially the Same' - Should Guide a Court’s Interpretation of the CRA’s Limitations on Future Rulemaking

    Campbell Law Review

    The Congressional Review Act (the “CRA”) is a Congressional oversight tool used to overturn rules issued by federal agencies. Beyond the immediate effect of blocking an undesirable agency rule, the CRA bars an agency from issuing another rule in “substantially the same form” as the disapproved rule. But the scope of this provision’s future effect on agency rulemaking remains unclear: the statute is silent as to what criteria should be considered in evaluating whether or when a subsequent rule…

    The Congressional Review Act (the “CRA”) is a Congressional oversight tool used to overturn rules issued by federal agencies. Beyond the immediate effect of blocking an undesirable agency rule, the CRA bars an agency from issuing another rule in “substantially the same form” as the disapproved rule. But the scope of this provision’s future effect on agency rulemaking remains unclear: the statute is silent as to what criteria should be considered in evaluating whether or when a subsequent rule falls into the “substantially the same” category, and the provision has gone untested in court.

    Rather than proposing a uniform interpretation of "substantially the same," this Article proposes courts adopt a case-by-case approach to allegations that an agency is barred from enacting a particular rule due to a prior CRA resolution. Specifically, the Article argues that courts should apply Chevron and, where appropriate, defer to an agency's conclusion that a rule is not substantially the same as a rule blocked by an earlier CRA resolution. In reaching this conclusion, the Article contends a CRA resolution effectively amends an agency's organic statute, thereby permitting courts to apply Chevron to an agency's determination of whether a rule does or does not fall within the CRA's prohibitive scope.

    Other authors
    See publication

More activity by Andrew

View Andrew’s full profile

  • See who you know in common
  • Get introduced
  • Contact Andrew directly
Join to view full profile

Other similar profiles

Explore collaborative articles

We’re unlocking community knowledge in a new way. Experts add insights directly into each article, started with the help of AI.

Explore More

Others named Andrew Landolfi

4 others named Andrew Landolfi are on LinkedIn

See others named Andrew Landolfi

Add new skills with these courses

See all courses