%0 Journal Article %@ 1438-8871 %I JMIR Publications %V 26 %N %P e49794 %T The Dual Task Ball Balancing Test and Its Association With Cognitive Function: Algorithm Development and Validation %A Greene,Barry %A Tobyne,Sean %A Jannati,Ali %A McManus,Killian %A Gomes Osman,Joyce %A Banks,Russell %A Kher,Ranjit %A Showalter,John %A Bates,David %A Pascual-Leone,Alvaro %+ Linus Health, 280 Summer St, Boston, MA, 02210, United States, 1 851682046, kmcmanus@linus.health %K cognitive function %K dual task %K inertial sensors %K mHealth %K tablet %K MCI %K Alzheimer %K dementia %K motor %K older adults %K cognitive impairment %K balance
 %D 2024 %7 19.8.2024 %9 Original Paper %J J Med Internet Res %G English %X Background: Dual task paradigms are thought to offer a quantitative means to assess cognitive reserve and the brain’s capacity to allocate resources in the face of competing cognitive demands. The most common dual task paradigms examine the interplay between gait or balance control and cognitive function. However, gait and balance tasks can be physically challenging for older adults and may pose a risk of falls. Objective: We introduce a novel, digital dual-task assessment that combines a motor-control task (the “ball balancing” test), which challenges an individual to maintain a virtual ball within a designated zone, with a concurrent cognitive task (the backward digit span task [BDST]). Methods: The task was administered on a touchscreen tablet, performance was measured using the inertial sensors embedded in the tablet, conducted under both single- and dual-task conditions. The clinical use of the task was evaluated on a sample of 375 older adult participants (n=210 female; aged 73.0, SD 6.5 years). Results: All older adults, including those with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer disease–related dementia (ADRD), and those with poor balance and gait problems due to diabetes, osteoarthritis, peripheral neuropathy, and other causes, were able to complete the task comfortably and safely while seated. As expected, task performance significantly decreased under dual task conditions compared to single task conditions. We show that performance was significantly associated with cognitive impairment; significant differences were found among healthy participants, those with MCI, and those with ADRD. Task results were significantly associated with functional impairment, independent of diagnosis, degree of cognitive impairment (as indicated by the Mini Mental State Examination [MMSE] score), and age. Finally, we found that cognitive status could be classified with >70% accuracy using a range of classifier models trained on 3 different cognitive function outcome variables (consensus clinical judgment, Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test [RAVLT], and MMSE). Conclusions: Our results suggest that the dual task ball balancing test could be used as a digital cognitive assessment of cognitive reserve. The portability, simplicity, and intuitiveness of the task suggest that it may be suitable for unsupervised home assessment of cognitive function. %M 39158963 %R 10.2196/49794 %U https://www.jmir.org/2024/1/e49794 %U https://doi.org/10.2196/49794 %U http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39158963