mediatext
Joined Dec 2001
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.
Badges2
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Reviews7
mediatext's rating
THE AUTHORS OF THE SCRIPT CERTAINLY ARE NOT VERY WELL INFORMED ABOUT THE TIME PERIOD AND LEAST OF ALL ABOUT THE STORY OF FASHION DURING THAT ERA. THEY ARE WRONG IN MANY, MANY ASPECTS, FROM THE DETAILS (CHRISTIAN DIOR WAS B A L D, TOTALLY BALD SINCE HE WAS VERY YOUNG, THEY SHOULD HAVE RESPECTED THAT JUST FOR THE PURPOSE OF VEROSIMILITUD) TO THE MOST IMPORTANT POINTS IN FRENCH HISTORY, AND THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE FASHION WORLD, THE NAZIS AND THE FRENCH GOVERNMENT OF THE TIME. ITS A PITY AMERICAN MOVIE WRITERS AND PRODUCERS ARE ALWAYS SO IGNORANT ABOUT THE HISTORY OF OTHER COUNTRIES, ABOVE ALL WHEN DEALING WITH CULTURE OR ART. OH, AND ANOTHER THING: THEY ARE CALLING CHURCHILL "SIR WINSTON"... AND HE HAD NOT BEEN KNIGHTED YET!!!! READ A LITTLE HISTORY BEFORE YOU TRY TO TALK ABOUT IT...
Oh, my God, $11 and almost 2 hours lost in the stupid story of a group of unfunny assholes! Not a terrible movie, somewhat creative, good acting, not badly written, but... are the 4 dumbest guys in history worth giving them attention, time and money?
Incredibly, this movie is even worse than the other pics of this director. I can't fathom why any money and effort should be spend in this kind of 'production'.
