Añade un argumento en tu idiomaA former prisoner exonerated on murder charges kills another man. He claims he wouldn't have done it if he wasn't wrongfully imprisoned in the first place, so prosecutors must prove that he ... Leer todoA former prisoner exonerated on murder charges kills another man. He claims he wouldn't have done it if he wasn't wrongfully imprisoned in the first place, so prosecutors must prove that he had a prior history of criminal behavior.A former prisoner exonerated on murder charges kills another man. He claims he wouldn't have done it if he wasn't wrongfully imprisoned in the first place, so prosecutors must prove that he had a prior history of criminal behavior.
- Dirección
- Guión
- Reparto principal
Imágenes
- DA Arthur Branch
- (as Fred Dalton Thompson)
Reseñas destacadas
This episode showed us a detective acting as a vigilante in order to make peace with himself. Anyway in the past when the DNA tests were not so accurate, this situation occurred frequently and abuse of power was easier than now.
When Warshofsky is arrested for the right murder it's one big legal tangle for the District Attorney's offivce, Giancarlo Esposito as Warshofky's attorney who got him sprung on the first murder is also similarly perplexed.
Bolger's career as a cop is circling the bowl. No doubt he framed Warshofsky, but he and all police are human.
You have to see how this one comes out.
"Vendetta" for me is not one of the best 'Law and Order' episodes or even one of the best of Season 14, which on the whole was re-watching it recently is very solid. It is still a good if uneven episode, that has a lot to like with the best things being great but also a few frustrations that could have been avoided. Really did like the idea for "Vendetta" and there was a great outing in there somewhere that doesn't quite make it.
Beginning with what could have been better, "Vendetta" did feel rather incomplete. Some of the storytelling was on the rushed and jumpy side and the resolution is not much of one. The victim is also very underdeveloped.
Elisabeth Rohm continues to be stiff and emotionless.
However, a lot works. The production values are slick and have a subtle grit, with an intimacy to the photography without being too claustrophobic. The music isn't used too much and doesn't get too melodramatic. The direction is sympathetic but also alert. The acting is very good from almost everyone, David Warsofsky plays an interesting character with conviction and Sam Waterston stands out particularly here of the regulars.
Writing is very thought-provoking and felt real. It is also taut, intelligent and well balanced, and while the story is a long way from perfect it does engross and doesn't come over as obvious. The legal portion has the right amount of tension.
Overall, pretty good but not great. 7/10.
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesThis episode appears to be based on two separate cases/incidents:
- The 1987 Fred Zain and Glen Woodall cases.
- The 2003 Steve Bartman incident. While the initial event that sparks the story is based on the Steve Bartman incident in the 2003 Nation League Playoff Series, the rest of the episode is not. For the record, after failing to record an out on the foul ball, the Cubs fell apart and allowed the Marlins to score eight runs. This was game six of a seven game series, and the Cubs had the opportunity to win the next day, but they again squandered a lead (without Bartman) and lost the series to the Marlins, who went on to beat the New York Yankees in the World Series.
- Citas
Dr. Judy Waxman: You're telling me this guy got killed because he tried to catch a foul ball?
Detective Lennie Briscoe: And the suspect list is the greater New York phone book.
- ConexionesReferences Mister Magoo (1960)