IMDb-BEWERTUNG
5,4/10
4311
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Die ultimative Waffe, die für die Menschheit ungefährlich sein sollte, hat globale Nebenwirkungen wie Zeitverschiebungen und Verschwinden.Die ultimative Waffe, die für die Menschheit ungefährlich sein sollte, hat globale Nebenwirkungen wie Zeitverschiebungen und Verschwinden.Die ultimative Waffe, die für die Menschheit ungefährlich sein sollte, hat globale Nebenwirkungen wie Zeitverschiebungen und Verschwinden.
- Auszeichnungen
- 4 Nominierungen insgesamt
Terri Treas
- Computer Voice
- (Synchronisation)
Handlung
WUSSTEST DU SCHON:
- WissenswertesThe "futuristic" car that Dr. Buchanan (Sir John Hurt ) drives is a 1988 Italdesign Aztec concept car.
- PatzerWhen Dr. Buchanan (John Hurt) runs across the three slaughtered sheep in the woods at the beginning, closer inspection reveals that not only are they still alive, but asleep and breathing, and the supposed entrails are actually placed strategically on the sheep and not coming out from inside them.
- Zitate
The Monster: You think that you have killed me. But I will be with you forever. I am unbound.
- Alternative VersionenThe Japanese Laserdisc release features 2 scenes of violence cut from U.S. theatrical & video prints: A shot of a man's heart pulled out (Side A at 34 min 11 seconds) and a graphic shot of a woman's chest ripped open (Side B at 13 min 4 seconds).
- VerbindungenFeatured in In Search of Frankenstein (1996)
Ausgewählte Rezension
With the recent passing of John Hurt, I decided to take another look at his movie "Frankenstein Unbound", despite the fact that I remembered that it disappointed me greatly when I first saw it as a teenager more than twenty five years ago.
Sadly, my opinion upon seeing the movie again wasn't that much more positive than when I first saw it. The best that I can say about it is that the acting is pretty good (especially by Hurt and Raul Julia), and the movie does bring up some ideas and themes that are intriguing and full of promise. But in the end, the movie puts far too much on its plate, and most of these good ideas and themes are either not fully explored or are treated in a pretty disappointing fashion.
As the movie's director (and co-writer of the screenplay), Roger Corman has to shoulder much of the blame for the above problem. But another problem he generates is that often that there is a matter- of-fact feeling to what we are seeing. The tone is aloof and lacking enough conviction and power that could grab an audience. It doesn't help that the production values are highly inconsistent, with the movie wavering between a fairly slick look and feel to one that comes across as cheap and shoddy.
To sum up, it doesn't take long upon watching the movie to figure out why 20th Century-Fox didn't give it much of a theatrical release, and why Corman to date has not sat in the director's chair again after this movie. If you want to see a John Hurt movie or a Roger Corman movie, there are much better choices out there.
Sadly, my opinion upon seeing the movie again wasn't that much more positive than when I first saw it. The best that I can say about it is that the acting is pretty good (especially by Hurt and Raul Julia), and the movie does bring up some ideas and themes that are intriguing and full of promise. But in the end, the movie puts far too much on its plate, and most of these good ideas and themes are either not fully explored or are treated in a pretty disappointing fashion.
As the movie's director (and co-writer of the screenplay), Roger Corman has to shoulder much of the blame for the above problem. But another problem he generates is that often that there is a matter- of-fact feeling to what we are seeing. The tone is aloof and lacking enough conviction and power that could grab an audience. It doesn't help that the production values are highly inconsistent, with the movie wavering between a fairly slick look and feel to one that comes across as cheap and shoddy.
To sum up, it doesn't take long upon watching the movie to figure out why 20th Century-Fox didn't give it much of a theatrical release, and why Corman to date has not sat in the director's chair again after this movie. If you want to see a John Hurt movie or a Roger Corman movie, there are much better choices out there.
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
- How long is Frankenstein Unbound?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Erscheinungsdatum
- Herkunftsländer
- Offizieller Standort
- Sprache
- Auch bekannt als
- Frankenstein Unbound
- Drehorte
- Produktionsfirmen
- Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen
Box Office
- Budget
- 11.500.000 $ (geschätzt)
- Bruttoertrag in den USA und Kanada
- 334.748 $
- Eröffnungswochenende in den USA und in Kanada
- 37.017 $
- 4. Nov. 1990
- Weltweiter Bruttoertrag
- 334.748 $
- Laufzeit1 Stunde 25 Minuten
- Farbe
- Sound-Mix
- Seitenverhältnis
- 1.85 : 1
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen
Oberste Lücke
By what name was Roger Corman's Frankenstein (1990) officially released in India in English?
Antwort