Implemented by | User threads are implemented by user-level libraries. | Kernel threads are implemented by Operating System (OS). |
Recognize | The operating System doesn't recognize user-level threads directly. | Kernel threads are recognized by Operating System. |
Implementation | Implementation of User threads is easy. | Implementation of Kernel-Level thread is complicated. |
Context switch time | Context switch time is less. | Context switch time is more. |
Hardware support | No hardware support is required for context switching. | Hardware support is needed. |
Blocking operation | If one user-level thread performs a blocking operation then the entire process will be blocked. | If one kernel thread performs a blocking operation then another thread can continue execution. |
Multithreading | Multithreaded applications cannot take full advantage of multiprocessing. | Kernels can be multithreaded. |
Creation and Management | User-level threads can be created and managed more quickly. | Kernel-level level threads take more time to create and manage. |
Operating System | Any operating system can support user-level threads. | Kernel-level threads are operating system-specific. |
Thread Management | Managed by a thread library at the user level. | The application code doesn't contain thread management code; it's an API to the kernel mode. |
Example | POSIX threads, Mach C-Threads. | Java threads, POSIX threads on Linux. |
Advantages | Simple and quick to create, more portable, does not require kernel mode privileges for context switching. | Allows for true parallelism, multithreading in kernel routines, and can continue execution if one thread is blocked. |
Disadvantages | Cannot fully utilize multiprocessing, entire process blocked if one thread blocks. | Requires more time to create/manage, involves mode switching to kernel mode. |
Memory management | In user-level threads, each thread has its own stack, but they share the same address space. | In kernel-level threads have their own stacks and their own separate address spaces, so they are better isolated from each other. |
Fault tolerance | User-level threads are less fault-tolerant than kernel-level threads. If a user-level thread crashes, it can bring down the entire process. | Kernel-level threads can be managed independently, so if one thread crashes, it doesn't necessarily affect the others. |
Resource utilization | Limited access to system resources, cannot directly perform I/O operations. | It can access to the system-level features like I/O operations. |
Portability | User-level threads are more portable than kernel-level threads. | Less portable due to dependence on OS-specific kernel implementations.
|