Everand Logo

Welcome to Everand!

  • Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

    From $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

    The U.S Court 101
    The U.S Court 101
    The U.S Court 101
    Ebook153 pages1 hour

    The U.S Court 101

    By Peregrine Peverell

    ()

    Read preview

    About this ebook

    "The U.S. Court 101" offers a comprehensive guide to the American justice system, demystifying its complex machinery for a general audience. This illuminating book explores three key areas: the structure of the U.S. court system, the roles of court personnel, and the journey of cases through the judicial process. By tracing the evolution of American jurisprudence from its English common law roots to landmark cases like Marbury v. Madison, the book provides essential historical context for understanding modern courts.

    The book's central argument is that an informed citizenry is crucial for the proper functioning of the judicial branch. It progresses logically, starting with an introduction to federal and state court systems, then delving into the roles of judges, lawyers, and other court officials, before walking readers through the life cycle of criminal and civil cases.

    What sets this book apart is its use of real-world examples and hypothetical scenarios to illustrate abstract legal concepts, making it engaging and relatable. Written in an accessible style that balances academic rigor with conversational tone, "The U.S. Court 101" serves as an invaluable resource for students, journalists, and civic-minded citizens seeking to understand the backbone of American justice.

    By addressing current controversies and encouraging critical examination of the modern judiciary, it empowers readers to become more informed and engaged participants in the democratic process.

    LanguageEnglish
    PublisherPublifye
    Release dateOct 5, 2024
    ISBN9788233932190
    The U.S Court 101

    Read more from Peregrine Peverell

    Related to The U.S Court 101

    Related ebooks

    Reference For You

    View More
    View More

    Related podcast episodes

    Related articles

    • UNLIMITED

      Supreme Court Is US ‘Decider.’ Here’s How Other Nations Check Judiciary.

      Aug 4, 2022

      In its infancy, the U.S. Supreme Court was the runt of the litter of America’s new institutions.  The court had little power compared to Congress or the presidency. Justices traveled the country hearing cases in grueling, unglamorous “circuits.” When

      6 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      Justice Denied

      Aug 19, 2024

      Justice Denied
      2 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      Contempt for Court

      Feb 12, 2018

      Contempt for Court
      5 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      Tobacco Judgment Troubling

      Dec 20, 2020

      THE recent tobacco judgment in the British American Tobacco case in the Western Cape High Court, penned by judges Ndita, Steyn and Slingers, makes for troubling jurisprudence. The optics look terrible. At its core, the court bends its jurisprudence f

      3 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      Tobacco Judgment Troubling

      Dec 20, 2020

      Tobacco Judgment Troubling
      3 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      Originalism Moves From Theory To High Court. What That Means For US.

      Dec 21, 2021

      In June 1986, at an otherwise nondescript Attorney General’s Conference on Economic Liberties, Antonin Scalia made an iconic sales pitch. Originalism – a judicial theory holding that the Constitution should be interpreted in line with the framers’ th

      7 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      Choosing Pragmatism Over Textualism

      May 3, 2024

      Choosing Pragmatism Over Textualism
      23 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      As High Court Term Begins, Trump Reshapes Federal Judiciary From Top to Bottom

      Oct 2, 2017

      The 'Trump effect' on law will begin to be felt in earnest during the high court’s term that begins Monday, with big cases on religious freedom, partisan gerrymandering, and unions. But the rapid pace of the president's judicial nominations could hav

      5 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      Beyond Originalism

      Mar 31, 2020

      Beyond Originalism
      9 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      Originalism, Divided

      May 25, 2021

      Originalism, Divided
      9 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      The Most Conservative Branch

      Aug 30, 2024

      The Most Conservative Branch
      13 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      Liberty No More

      May 7, 2022

      Liberty No More
      6 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      Supreme Betrayal

      Mar 14, 2024

      Supreme Betrayal
      10 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      Powers Of Our Constitution Tested

      Sep 4, 2024

      THE massive legal and political battles that are in progress in various courts in the country are a sombre reminder that forces are at work, testing the powers of our sacred Constitution. We are sadly witnessing compulsive serial litigation, stretchi

      1 min read

    Related categories

    Reviews for The U.S Court 101

    0 ratings

    0 ratings0 reviews

    What did you think?

    Tap to rate

    Review must be at least 10 words

      Book preview

      The U.S Court 101 - Peregrine Peverell

      From English Common Law to Judicial Review: The Evolution of U.S. Courts

      Picture yourself in a dimly lit courtroom in 18th-century England. The air is thick with tension as a judge, adorned in a flowing black robe and powdered wig, prepares to deliver a verdict. This scene, while seemingly distant from our modern American judicial system, is where our legal journey begins. The story of how the United States developed its unique legal framework is a tale of revolution, innovation, and the relentless pursuit of justice.

      The English Roots of American Law

      Long before the first European settlers set foot on American soil, the seeds of what would become the U.S. legal system were being sown in England. The concept of common law, a cornerstone of both English and American jurisprudence, emerged in medieval England following the Norman Conquest of 1066.

      Common law is a system where judges make decisions based on precedents set by earlier cases, rather than solely relying on written statutes. This approach allowed the law to evolve organically, adapting to changing societal needs while maintaining consistency and predictability.

      Did You Know? The term common law comes from the idea that it was the common custom of the realm, as opposed to local customs that might vary from place to place.

      As English colonists arrived in North America, they brought with them this common law tradition. However, the unique challenges of frontier life and the desire for self-governance would soon lead to significant departures from English legal practices.

      Colonial Courts: Adapting English Law to the New World

      In the early days of colonial America, settlers faced a dilemma. They needed a legal system to maintain order and resolve disputes, but the intricacies of English common law were often ill-suited to their new environment. As a result, colonial courts began to adapt and simplify English legal principles to fit their circumstances.

      For instance, many colonies established their own court systems, often with justices of the peace handling minor cases and more formal courts dealing with serious matters. These courts blended English common law with local customs and practical necessities, laying the groundwork for a distinctly American legal tradition.

      The colonists brought with them the common and statute law of England so far as it was applicable to their condition. - Justice Joseph Story, 1829

      This period of legal innovation wasn't without its challenges. Different colonies developed varying legal practices, leading to a patchwork of laws across the American colonies. Moreover, the increasing tension between colonial desires for self-governance and British attempts to assert control would eventually contribute to the American Revolution.

      Revolution and the Birth of a New Legal Order

      The American Revolution wasn't just a political upheaval; it was also a legal one. As the colonies declared independence, they faced the monumental task of creating a new legal system that reflected their values and aspirations.

      The Articles of Confederation, ratified in 1781, represented the first attempt at establishing a unified legal framework for the newly independent states. However, this document proved inadequate, lacking provisions for a strong central government or a federal judiciary.

      Recognizing these shortcomings, the Founding Fathers convened the Constitutional Convention in 1787. Their goal was to create a more robust system of government, including a federal judiciary that could unify the diverse legal practices that had developed across the states.

      Did You Know? The word constitution comes from the Latin constitutio, meaning arrangement or structure. The U.S. Constitution quite literally arranged the structure of the new nation's government and legal system.

      The Constitution and the Federal Judiciary

      The Constitution, ratified in 1788, laid the foundation for the American legal system as we know it today. Article III established the Supreme Court and gave Congress the power to create lower federal courts. This seemingly simple provision would have far-reaching consequences for the development of American law.

      The Judiciary Act of 1789 fleshed out the details of the federal court system, creating district courts and circuit courts beneath the Supreme Court. This three-tiered structure remains the basis of the federal judiciary to this day.

      However, the Constitution and the Judiciary Act left many questions unanswered. What was the exact role of the federal courts? How would they interact with state courts? And perhaps most importantly, who would have the final say in interpreting the Constitution?

      Marbury v. Madison: The Birth of Judicial Review

      The answers to these questions would come from an unlikely source: a relatively minor case about political appointments that would reshape the American legal landscape forever.

      In 1803, the Supreme Court heard the case of Marbury v. Madison. The dispute arose from a series of last-minute judicial appointments made by outgoing President John Adams. When the new administration of Thomas Jefferson refused to deliver the commissions for these appointments, one of the appointees, William Marbury, sued.

      Chief Justice John Marshall, in a masterful display of legal reasoning, used this case to assert a power that would become central to the American legal system: judicial review.

      It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is. - Chief Justice John Marshall, Marbury v. Madison, 1803

      With these words, Marshall established that the Supreme Court had the power to review acts of Congress and the Executive Branch and strike down those that violated the Constitution. This principle of judicial review, while not explicitly stated in the Constitution, became a cornerstone of American jurisprudence.

      Did You Know? The concept of judicial review wasn't entirely new. Some state courts had already been practicing a form of it, and Alexander Hamilton had argued for it in the Federalist Papers. However, Marbury v. Madison firmly established it as a power of the federal judiciary.

      The Impact of Judicial Review

      The establishment of judicial review had profound implications for the American legal system and the balance of power in the government. It positioned the judiciary as a check on the legislative and executive branches, ensuring that their actions remained within constitutional bounds.

      This power has allowed the Supreme Court to play a crucial role in shaping American society, often weighing in on contentious issues long before they're resolved in the political arena. From civil rights to privacy laws, from campaign finance to same-sex marriage, the Court's ability to interpret the Constitution has put it at the center of many of the nation's most important debates.

      However, judicial review has not been without controversy. Critics have argued that it gives too much power to unelected judges, allowing them to effectively create law from the bench. Supporters counter that it's a necessary safeguard against the tyranny of the majority and ensures that the rights of minorities are

      Enjoying the preview?
      Page 1 of 1