Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

From $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

Disaster Falls: A Family Story
Disaster Falls: A Family Story
Disaster Falls: A Family Story
Ebook299 pages4 hours

Disaster Falls: A Family Story

Rating: 4 out of 5 stars

4/5

()

Read preview

About this ebook

A haunting chronicle of what endures when the world we know is swept away
 
On a day like any other, on a rafting trip down Utah’s Green River, Stéphane Gerson’s eight-year-old son, Owen, drowned in a spot known as Disaster Falls. That night, as darkness fell, Stéphane huddled in a tent with his wife, Alison, and their older son, Julian, trying to understand what seemed inconceivable. “It’s just the three of us now,” Alison said over the sounds of a light rain and, nearby, the rushing river. “We cannot do it alone. We have to stick together.”

Disaster Falls chronicles the aftermath of that day and their shared determination to stay true to Alison’s resolution. At the heart of the book is an unflinching portrait of a marriage tested. Husband and wife grieve in radically different ways that threaten to isolate each of them in their post-Owen worlds. (“He feels so far,” Stéphane says when Alison shows him a selfie Owen had taken. “He feels so close,” she says.) With beautiful specificity, Stéphane shows how they resist that isolation and reconfigure their marriage from within.

As Stéphane navigates his grief, the memoir expands to explore how society reacts to the death of a child. He depicts the “good death” of his father, which reveals an altogther different perspective on mortality. He excavates the history of the Green River—rife with hazards not mentioned in the rafting company’s brochures. He explores how stories can both memorialize and obscure a person’s life—and how they can rescue us.

Disaster Falls is a powerful account of a life cleaved in two—raw, truthful, and unexpectedly consoling.
LanguageEnglish
PublisherCrown
Release dateJan 24, 2017
ISBN9781101906705
Author

Stéphane Gerson

STÉPHANE GERSON is a cultural historian of modern France and the editor of a new edition of Nostradamus's Prophecies for Penguin Classics. He has won several awards, including the Jacques Barzun Prize in Cultural History and the Laurence Wylie Prize in French Cultural Studies. He has also contributed to Publishers Weekly and the Jewish Daily Forward. Gerson teaches French history at New York University and lives in Manhattan and Woodstock, NY, with his family.

Related to Disaster Falls

Related ebooks

Personal Memoirs For You

View More

Related articles

Reviews for Disaster Falls

Rating: 3.893081742138365 out of 5 stars
4/5

159 ratings65 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    This is such a tragedy. To lose your 8-year-old son on vacation while rafting and later finding out it could have been prevented if the rafting company cared more about safety than profit is heartbreaking. This family learned how to go forward and live without their son in the physical world when tragedy can pull a family apart.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    There is no owner’s manual for grief.

    Stéphane Gerson calmly shares the story of his family during the five years following the accidental death of an eight year old child. Parts of this book are tough to read. Sometimes I had to put it down. But after starting the book, I needed to know how this family had moved forward, coping with the unimaginable.

    The description of the accident itself unfolds as does memory, in flashbacks and remembered premonitions, second thoughts and comforts, clinical facts and suppositions. It nestles amidst the story of a family of four, suddenly a family of three, struggling to make sense of how to go on with their lives individually and, by conscious agreement, together.

    Some of what happened after Owen’s death was predictable, some unexpected and seemingly odd - until the reader remembers that each parent, sibling, classmate, and friend experienced this loss in a unique way.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    As I lost a child, the book was very sad for me. It was very hard and personal to me of the reality of death that we are unprepared for in our life.
    It was a very honest look at the family and their mourning the loss of the son. This real story of their next few years was very honest look at the family. This was an actual story.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Is there anything more devastating than the death of a child? It is an inversion of the universe, a shattering of the heart, an unrepairable rip in the fabric of life. For Stephane Gerson and his family, it became a terrible reality when 8 year old Owen drowned on a family rafting vacation. And this memoir is one of the ways in which Gerson not only acknowledged their huge loss but a way that allowed him to finally look more closely at what happened that day, to understand and to accept.

    When you plan a vacation with your two young children, you would never imagine that your family of four would be a family of three before it is over. The Gersons, father Stephane, mother Alison, oldest son Julian, and youngest son Owen couldn't have either. Their vacation was supposed to be safe for families with children, a rafting trip on the Green River in Utah. But they left New York as four and returned home as three, Owen having drowned at the spot known as Disaster Falls. Gerson chronicles his overwhelming grief at losing Owen as well as the different journeys that Alison and Julian also took through the days, weeks, months, and years after Owen's death. He speaks of the isolation of sorrow, the pain and anguish, his guilt over what happened that day, and the shocked huddle of a family violently rent apart in this emotionally devastating memoir.

    The non-linear time line jumps from the rawness of immediately after the accident to what led up to it and back again as the family learns to negotiate life after Owen. The whole of how Owen died isn't fully presented until well into the book, Gerson coming close to it before shutting down the remembrance many times, only telling the whole of it when he feels he's capable and strong enough to look at it. The story is heart rending and the reader can feel the ache and the searching in the haunting writing even years after Owen's death. The book is clearly a way for Gerson to honor his son and his memory of his son, to mourn the loss not only of the boy that he was, but also the whole of the imagined life he never had a chance to live. There are repetitions here but they so closely echo the stunned and frozen rehashing of what happened, the what ifs, and the if onlys that they seem entirely fitting. Not easy to read, this is a thoughtful, introspective, quite beautiful look at a family and a father going on forever changed by their shared loss for those readers who don't mind being emotionally wrung out at the end of a book.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    This is not a book I would have normally picked to read. However, I received it through the Early Reviewers program. I read it in two days. The pain this father went through in losing a child was very compelling. I appreciated how he discussed the different ways he grieved as compared to his wife. Not a cheerful topic, but a book that kept my interest.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    The double entendre title gives notice of Gerson’s abilities describing what a family goes through dealing with gut wrenching, heart pounding, fear-inducing loss. Quickly, not only do we begin to understand the loss itself, but we see the suffering of the extended family, friends, co-workers, people who in their kindest of intentions, can still get it all wrong, and occasionally get it right. When dealing with such a bereavement, you feel it as only it affects you. You see others struggling but that amounts to nothing compared to the pain, guilt and regret in your mind. Gerson relates a terribly sad story and manages to tell the world, that life goes on. Life is different. Life will never be the same and that ultimately, life is change. A beautifully told “family story.”

    This book was provided gratis in return for an honest review.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    This memoir details the loss of son and the aftermath associated with the loss. The work is very readable but is emotionally challenging, as it no doubt should be. Though I ended up having to read it in smaller doses, I highly recommend this book.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Come along with the author as he takes you on a journey of grief, tragedy, and mourning. On a family rafting vacation in Utah, the youngest member of the Gerson family, Owen, was swept away by the river and drowned. This book is the father's attempt to understand and cope with the accident, his culpability, and his struggle to go on living. Together with his wife and remaining son, Stephane seeks to remember Owen while letting him go.

    A very intimate and moving story about death and it's place in life.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Sad from beginning to end, but a great read. Goes through the processing of the sudden death of a child.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    In this heart-wrenching memoir, Gerson works through the grief caused by the death of his son. His memoir resembles the journal he kept after his son’s death. He shifts topics, skirting the actual day of the accident until later in the book, replicating his aversion to thinking about the accident until he’s ready to revisit it. He also discusses his own coping mechanisms and those of his wife and surviving son. On the night of the accident, when the family was forced to camp overnight next to the river that had taken their son’s life, his wife makes a vow to move forward and not live in the past. While this wasn’t always possible for them, Gerson and his wife do move forward together, never letting their own anger and grief destroy them. They each find a way to cope with their son’s death and not lose each other in the process. When, a few years later, Gerson’s father dies after a battle with cancer, he’s better able to reconcile his relationship with his father and the one he was never able to have with his son.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    A haunting account of a man trying to make sense of the death of his eight-year-old son who was drowned in a boating accident.

    A couple and their two sons took a float trip on Utah’s Green River. They knew little about running rivers or the American west, but the trip was said to be safe for children. The unthinkable happened. Their younger son drowned in the rapids. Over the next three years, the boy’s father struggled to make sense of what had taken place as the family tried to move on. This book is his narrative of that struggle.

    Stephane Gerson is a cultural historian who teaches at New York University. Cultural historians are an emerging subset of historians who focus on understanding cultural adaptations and how they change. In his prize-winning scholarly work, Gerson has focused on topics like memories and geographical place. For example, he has looked at the impact of tumultuous events like the French Revolution on individuals and culture rather than its concrete political affect. Unlike traditional intellectual historians who have studied “great men and great ideas,” cultural historians look at the attitudes that pervade groups of people. They are sensitive to the stories that people construct to explain their lives. They are aware that such stories may differ widely and be contradictory. Instead of absolute factual accuracy, they are interested in the shape and textures of the stories. Gerson’s account of accepting his son’s death grows out of the assumptions of his field, although he shuns the jargon that too often makes cultural history difficult to read.

    What happened to eight-year-old Owen was incomprehensible to his father, and Gerson needed to find a means of coping with it. Although he had no hope that would find a definite answer to his literal or metaphysical questions, his response was to write, to craft words that could allow him to negotiate the path ahead. At first he wrote in his journal and later he composed this book.

    Gerson writes with skill and insight. He brings readers into his numbness and sense of isolation without becoming voyeuristic or smothering them in his emotions. He is fully aware of what words can and cannot do. Deliberately refusing to get caught up in anger and blame, he experiences deep guilt as a parent who failed at any parent’s chief task, keeping his child safe. Because he wants to honor and remember his son, he continues to look for the words to express the unthinkable.

    As Gerson makes clear, he has not written an advice book but an account of his own introspective journey. His wife and his surviving son took different paths, but the family deliberately decided not to allow the tragedy to destroy their family bonds. Theirs was a Jewish family, but not a particularly observant one. At times traditional Jewish words and practices resonated, but family did not find a solution to their grief in religion. Gerson’s parents had escaped Nazi Germany and continued to live in Belgium. After Owen’s death, Gerson pondered his own identity as both a father and a son. His father’s death, three years after Owen’s, brought him a sense of his ongoing relationship to both.

    Disaster Falls is the name of the book and the place where Owen died. It also identifies the devastating loss of meaning that can occur in our lives. As such I recommend this book to all who are dealing such losses themselves. Reading Gerson can provide a sense that those who grieve are not as alone as they often feel. Another person has been through the darkness been able to find words for it, inadequate as they may be. The book also can provide insight and permission to follow one’s path because there is no one required way to grieve.

    In addition, Gerson offers an example what it means to “construct our own stories.” Such an idea is commonplace among some academics, but some within and without academia, find it disturbing and overly relativistic. Gerson displays how stories are not simply things we “make up” but can be grounded in the objective physical realities of life. The fact Owen died is about as real as anything can be. So are the swirling contradictions that Gerson experiences. The story is literally a way to bring order to what is unthinkable. The story does not claim to be perfectly objectively true, although it must include that sort of truth. It is not the only valid story; other valid stories can be told from other perspectives. The story’s power is that an acceptable narrative can allow us to survive extreme loss. As my nation moves into an unthinkable future, I long for words to make bearable. Perhaps we all need to find new stories to deal with our new realities.

    I sincerely recommend this book to a variety of readers who are curious about creating stories that face reality and steady us as we live through turbulent times.
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2/5
    I cannot imagine every losing a child and having the strength to write a memoir about the death of a child. However, I wasn't as impressed with this memoir. I understand that we all grieve in different manner and fashions, but does that mean this family should get a metal for staying together,.or eventually have a another child to help heal. I feel as if that's what most ponder in a situation like this. The story jumped from time back and forth,and I could keep up, but was exhausted trying to do so in understanding the grief and guilt while trying to hear of how the death occurred. I'm glad they were able to find some semblance of peace and carry on, the story just felt a little flat.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    A heart-wrenching memoir of loss, grief, guilt, and pain as a father re-counts the tragedy of losing his eight year old son. What was supposed to be a fun family trip soon turned into a nightmare when their youngest son drowned while kayaking on the Green River. Almost numb with pain, the author recounts with clarifying and insightful detail the emotions (or sometimes lack thereof) experienced by him, his wife, and their only remaining child. Spanning over the course of a few years, this memoir is a glimpse into the tragedy that many families experience everyday. A wonderful, but heart breaking memoir that beneficial for everyone to read. Not everyone experiences grief the same way and reading this will help readers with that cold hard fact.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    This is an important book. The author has carefully and thoughtfully examined the ramifications of his family's terrible, tragic loss, and has written a book which reveals much about human nature. This is a serious work, not a fun book. My advice to you: read it!
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    This one ties into my reading about end of life since the author talks about the death of his father later in the book. A 10 month decline from cancer and having assisted suicide be legal in Belgium led his father to a much different death than experienced by the author's son, Owen. Owen fell out of a raft on a river trip and drowned at 8 years old. This book records the way Gerson comes to terms with his son's death, talking about the first and second years in detail, but circling around the circumstances of the death a lot. I can see how it was super hard to face, but as a reader I'd have preferred to have at least the medium level details of how the accident happened, beyond what I summarised above. It's a compelling read though, raw and honest, written in consultation with his wife who grieved in a totally different way. I half suspected at points that Lin Manuel Miranda had read a copy of this before writing certain songs in Hamilton, but maybe it's just that the experience of losing a son is somewhat universal for fathers. One quote that stood out to me:

    [...] were subjected to forms of risk they did not comprehend because these risks were not made comprehensible.

    The rafting company was letting the paying guests make their own calls on if and how they would run the rapids, yet didn't make sure that the guests had the necessary information to make a solid estimate of the risks involved.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    I don't know why I thought this was a novel up until I started reading it, but that's neither here nor there, I suppose. This is a bit of a rough read, but it does read like grief feels - disjointed, bouncing from place to place and thought to thought with no linear or logical explanation. To my surprise, in a book about the death of a young son, the part that got to me more was the death of Gerson's father. Perhaps it was the ability to finally say things that had troubled him, or the fact that he was actually able to say goodbye, or the dignity with which Berl was able to choose his end. Perhaps it was that this section contained the most selfishly affecting passage to me - the discussion of Julian now having to make end-of-life decisions for Gerson and his wife alone. As a person who has lost a sibling, I will always connect more with explorations and depictions of that loss and those few sentences that touched on something I've had to recognize myself were quietly moving.

    I received this book as part of LibraryThing's Early Reviewers program.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    How does a family go on after the loss of a child? This book tells of the aftermath of such a tragic event. Author Stephane Gerson tells this story in heart-breaking beautiful language. Writing skill and compassion resonate on every page. This is an artful and touching work by an exceptional writer.

    The subject matter is obviously extremely sad, but it is not a story to miss. Ir will be well worth your tears.
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2/5
    Disaster Falls is the memoir of a father who loses his son in a tragic rafting accident. It is terribly sad, absolutely heartbreaking, and emotionally difficult to read about his grief. I'm not sure who the target audience would be for this book, but I can't recommend it. I just didn't like it. The author writes well enough, but the story was sometimes scattered and disjointed. I found it difficult to follow at times. It's such a sad subject matter, I did not want to finish the book.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    A detailed account of an affluent family's devastating loss of their youngest (of two) sons, the result of white-water rafting. It is a well written, intelligent book about a family drafted by fate into a heartbreaking reality. We all hope to stay clear of living longer than our children, but it's such a random thing, and who you are or aren't seems to have no bearing,, much like the accident itself.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    On a trip from their home in upstate New York to the Green River in Utah, a family of four decides to rough it on an adventure outing. The parents and two boys, ages 8 and 10, enjoy camping, rafting and being outdoors. Until one afternoon the rapids become more urgent than the family expected, and tragedy strikes. Eight-year-old Owen is ejected from the "duckie" that he and his father are manning into the river. Due to the action and danger of the river, Owen's father does not immediately realize Owen has been thrown overboard. By the time he realizes it and is able to alert the guides, Owen has been missing for a while. This story does not end well.

    After Owen's death, the family returns to New York and tries to move on with their lives. Each family member deals in their own way. They try to deal with the tragedy together, although not always successfully. They do, however, keep their pact to stay together rather than let this awful tragedy tear them apart.

    Owen's father, a writer and historian begins writing a book about the event of Owen's death and the aftermath on him, personally, and on Owen's mother and Julian, Owen's brother. He frequently refers to famous authors who wrote about losing their children, and things they published about their loss.

    He also ties Owen's death to the loss of his own father a few years later, relating how opposite yet similar they were.

    He talks about the platitudes they hear from friends, family, strangers, how everyone says they cannot even begin to imagine the family's pain, and how true he finds some things, how annoying he finds other things.

    I really hope the author found writing this book to be therapeutic. I can't imagine why anyone would choose to share something so personal and awful otherwise. I won this book via Library Thing.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    For full disclosure, I received a copy of Stephane Gerson's "Disaster Falls" from LT's Early Reviewers program. The memoir is the story of the loss of Gerson's son Owen, who died tragically at the age of 8 in a rafting accident on Utah's Green River. Reading the book was painful, as Gerson's grief is so palpable it overwhelms him. He relieves every decision his family and others made on the day Owen died, knowing that different choices would likely have meant their son would still be alive today.

    Gerson does a good job detailing his family's struggle to deal with the loss of Owen. I never really got a very good sense of the kid Owen was -- Gerson describes him in a mass of contradictions -- perhaps because that's what 8-year-old boys are or perhaps because it was too painful to fill in that blank. I also didn't particularly enjoy the portions of the book that tried to draw parallels between Gerson's father's death and Owen's.

    I did think the book was well-written and I hope the Gerson family finds a measure of peace.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    I received this as a an ARC and did not realize until I was a third of the way through that it was not a work of fiction. It is tough reading, but worth it. My son is exactly the age of the authors when tragedy strikes, so I felt connected with the author. It was nice to read of a family that stays together after the death of a child (sorry if that's a spoiler to anyone). Though the author doesn't want to find meaning in the terrible thing that happens to their family, I think that he eventually does - especially when it comes to dealing with his father and his father's family. Anyway, I enjoyed the book, as much as one can for this subject matter.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    I received this book as an Early Reviewer. I have to say I didn't initially realize it wasn't fiction, and that made the subject matter a little more difficult. Gerson has a heartbreaking tale of life before and after losing a young child in a rafting accident. It brought tears to my eyes many times, and I'm not even a parent yet. I can see how this would be too difficult or not a go-to choice for a lot of readers, but if you're interested in stories about the range of human experiences and emotions, even sad and terrible ones, then it's a good read.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    I have read a lot of memoirs over the years about a parent writing of the loss of a child. The child here is the author's eight year old son who dies in a river rafting accident. The book is so depressing as the author micro analyzes every single aspect from the incident itself to the several years afterwards as he, his wife and other son struggle to cope. If this story isn't enough the author takes a trip to Europe where he relives his families holocaust experience and then for good measure juxtaposes his son's quick death with several chapters regarding his dad's lengthy struggle and death from cancer. This was probably good therapy for the author but the only audience I see getting something out of the book are parents who just lost a child.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Losing my grandson at 8 years old, I found this difficult at first to read. But I did, and am glad I did because I got to see how a father would grieve such a tremendous loss. While on a family rafting trip, Owen was on his own raft and upset, drowning. With an older son, Julian, Alison, the mom, Stephane and Julian made a pledge to stick together and survive their grief. Each seemed isolated in their own different ways of grieving, but ultimately they were able to carry on. Re configuring their marriage, Stephane provides an expansive, unflinching meditation on loss, on responsibilities toward our children and the stories we tell ourselves inh the wake of traumatic events. This is an excellent book (memoir) to read and to consoling yourself to any traumatic event in your life.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    When I requested this book, I am sure that I knew it was a memoir. But, by the time I received it, I had forgotten that part. I began thinking it was a sad story about the loss of a child but quickly realized it was not a story but truth. Gerson reveals the circumstances of the child's death slowly throughout the book and mixes that with details of what it is like to deal with such a tragedy. Although quite sad, the book was well written. It is interesting to see how husband, wife, and brother all deal with the tragedy in their separate and different ways.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    I did not like this book. Not because it was not well written, it was. The reason why I did not like it is because it was so raw and emotional. Gerson writes an inteospective look at the death of his eight year old son. It is heart wrenching but the writing itself is incredible, putting the reader at the rapids with them.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    A memoir of the author's 8-year-old son, Owen, who drowned during a family vacation, a white-water rafting trip. The father, who was rafting with Owen at the time of the accident, recounts his family's grief and recovery process, the accident itself, the subsequent death of the author's estranged father from cancer, the lawsuit against the rafting company, and, in the epilogue, the family's mixed (but generally joyous) reaction to the news that Owen's mother, Alison, is pregnant in her late 40's.

    This is a well-written and thoughtful book, perhaps at times overly cerebral, given the profound tragedy that gave rise to it. There is also an unrelieved bleakness, as one would expect, and it was difficult to get through. I don't think I walked away from the last chapter with any new insights into the human condition in times of grief and tragedy. It might be more relevant and useful to someone going through a similar grief, and that is the only audience I would really recommend for this book.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    In this memoir Stephane Gerson shares his familys experience at losing their 8 year old son Owen. On a vacation that was suppose to be fun they go on a rafting trip when it turns deadly and Owen drowns. Stephane describes the stages of grief they go through and of course the usual question of why couldn't I save him.

    To be honest this was a hard book for me to read because it is every parents nightmare. But I am so glad that I did read it as I marvel at the strength of this family to come to terms and move forward while never forgetting Owen.

    Thank you Mr. Gerson for sharing your journey.

    I received this from LibraryThing Early Reviewer for an honest review.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    Grief is hard to explain to another individual. As a listener, unless you have experienced the kind of trauma that changes your whole life it is hard to wrap your brain around it. How does one comprehend an emotion like grief? You may recognize pieces of trauma like how small recognitions in a foreign town you swear you have never visited before give you a sense of deja vu.
    Gerson's story might be redundant in its telling, but that is a part of the grieving process; to tell the story as many times as possible to anyone who will listen. You go over details, searching for truths; for explanations and when you have exhausted your examination you do it again and again, hoping for a different outcome. It's a never ending cycle of trying to find the Why in tragedy. Especially when the real tragedy of the situation is they (the Gerson family) had real misgivings about the falls before even running the rapids. They had doubt and doubt is the great provoker of the "what if?" game.

Book preview

Disaster Falls - Stéphane Gerson

ProloguePrologue

What we came to call the accident occurred on the Green River, near the border between Utah and Colorado. Life was good—filled with its daily conflicts and anxieties and unmet expectations, but good. Afterward, Owen was gone and we remained. Such things happen every day. Accidents, losses, and separations are the texture of human existence. If the circumstances are dramatic enough to appall or fascinate, the story makes the paper. A few years ago, the New York Times devoted four columns to a family caught in a flash flood in New Hampshire. The parents and the oldest child escaped from the car, but the seven-year-old daughter drowned. The father could not get her out in time.

Owen’s death did not make the Times. The following newspapers ran articles: the Greeley News, the Craig Daily News, the Denver Post, and the Salt Lake Tribune. Also, the Daily Freeman in upstate New York, where we spend a lot of time.

These articles, which I read days after the accident, contained the same material, taken from the same wire report: eight-year-old boy…family vacation…turbulent waters…aggressive search…truly tragic. There is nothing to be drawn from these pieces, neither new information nor the comfort, however contrived, of obituaries and immortalization. My son’s name is shorn of its meaning, its flesh-and-blood content, its humanity. It has been plugged into a template that journalists put together in ten minutes and readers digest in two.

In reality, it happens like this. You wake up one morning without knowing that a disaster will take place that day. You do everything right, you plan ahead, chart the course, ask the necessary questions, examine the situation from all sides. You do what parents are expected to do, and yet things still break down, they come undone, they slip away, an eight-year-old slips away and dies. There is no destiny at play. This death comes at the end of a string of decisions small and large, steps taken or not, resolutions made too long ago to leave visible traces, and behavioral patterns that, like canyons in forsaken lands, sediment so slowly that they seem eternal.

Things could have turned out differently. But they do not. And when a child slips away people tell you that your loss resembles no other. They say that they cannot imagine what is happening to you, which also means that they cannot imagine it happening to them.

A doctor pulls in close and explains that the hurt will last a long time—perhaps forever. A rabbi confides that he has never seen anything like it, not once in twenty years on the pulpit. Friends write that losing a child is a hole without end, beyond the map of human experience. You are living every parent’s worst nightmare, they say.

This is what you become: a walking reminder of the nightmare that haunts all parents nowadays. In a world that promises children safety and happiness, such deaths become personal failures, crimes against civilization, an affront to our collective aspirations. What previous generations were simply unable to prevent now falls somewhere between aberration and delinquency. The loss of a child is intolerable and unthinkable.

I had become my own worst nightmare, intolerable and unthinkable. But I also sensed the banality and cosmic magnitude of Owen’s death, at once a ripple in the flow of everyday life and a disruption of the universe. Apart from that, everything eluded me. I could not understand the events that had taken place the day he died. I could not grasp how the ordinary turned extraordinary. And I could not imagine what would now arise within our family, what might transpire between Alison and me. We had to find a way forward, with Owen and with our older son, Julian, mourning his only sibling and the parents he used to know.

Two weeks after the accident, I began writing about Owen and our life without him. There was no plan. I simply picked up my laptop one morning and started chronicling my infinite shifts in mood, what Alison and Julian and the people around us said and did not say, what we and others did and were unable to do. I wrote at all hours, seized by a graphomaniac impulse that left me confounded until someone told me that, while those who have lost a parent are called orphans, there is no word for those who have lost a child. I wrote because there were no words. This is what I told myself at the time, I write because there are no words. But it was not only that.

I wrote to understand how, despite their best intentions, people end up in catastrophic situations.

I wrote to dispel the notion that no one, not even us, could imagine what we were going through.

I wrote because banal yet cosmic disasters require stories for the dead and the living. When Hester Thrale lost her nine-year-old son, in 1776, her friend Samuel Johnson wrote her, I know that such a loss is a laceration of the mind. I know that a whole system of hopes, and designs, and expectations is swept away at once, and nothing left but bottomless vacuity. When Alison and I lost our eight-year-old son, an acquaintance told us that there is nothing worse than the death of a child, and this is truly, as you know of course, a horror story for anyone who hears it.

It is also against such words that I wrote. When our hopes and designs and expectations are swept away, something has to endure besides horror stories and bottomless vacuity.

Part I The First YearPart I The First YearOneOne

Drew: Just a quick question: What is it like at home?

Owen’s former classmates—Drew and the others—sometimes asked us about the accident. They also recounted where they had been when they found out. This is how they told us his death had turned their lives upside down. Adults were not different, but most doubted that we wanted to know or else they feared saying the wrong thing so they tended to remain quiet. The few friends who took us back to that moment did so gingerly. They watched for our cues.

With Alison, they saw a distant gaze and hard features. She did not want to know what others were doing or what they had felt when we called with the news because such stories were not about Owen. They were solely about these people and the pain they had felt when the accident entered their lives. This was excruciating for Alison, who felt responsible for their suffering.

The signals I gave out were more conflicted. Throw it my way, they said. Give me another vantage point on this catastrophe so I can grasp its enormity. Owen’s death is too large to remain a private affair. I want this knowledge and I want this closeness. But do not tell me too much. Do not turn this death into a spectacle or a collective trial that taught us something and brought us closer together, even if that is true. Do not suggest that your grief resembles mine.

These were unreasonable expectations, I knew that.

One friend recalled that, during her first phone call, Alison had asked how she would go on living. Another told us she was in her car when her husband, who was standing outside, answered his cell phone. She watched him speak and then sob, though she did not know why. These are the kinds of recollections Alison sought to avoid. But I listened because our lives tipped over at that exact moment and I wanted to understand the world into which we had tumbled.

One day, a friend began describing the nervous anticipation that had filled our home in Woodstock, New York, as we made our way back from Utah, but she stopped midsentence because of Alison’s obvious lack of interest. I was disappointed. Though I never asked, I would have liked to hear what happened when friends and relatives converged upon our home the day after the accident. They had to respond to a situation they barely fathomed and at the same time handle practical matters. Someone had to drive to the Albany airport and find the courage to face us and say those initial words. Something else: what should the house look like when we arrived? I imagine that this entailed many decisions: where people would position themselves, whether food would be laid out, how bright to set the lights. There was a scene to compose.

I was only dimly attuned to all of this but did realize that people were stepping in and making decisions—they were making decisions for us. This was one of the mental notes I kept during the early days, tabulating as best I could the widening gulf between the old reality and the new.

Two friends made the hour-long drive to Albany. It was dark, I think, when we left the airport. I sat in the backseat, feeling already like a passenger in my own life. I do not think that we discussed anything substantive during the ride, though I could be wrong. A haze surrounds these days, with random moments of clarity etched into my memory.

Among these moments: the sight of my mother, the first person whom I saw as we pulled into our garage. She shuffled across the dusty concrete floor with tiny penguin-like steps, ashen-faced, arms half-open. Though she moved slowly, I knew that she would reach me, grip me, collapse upon me. Behind her stood my father, smaller than in the past, my in-laws, my brother-in-law, friends from the area and others who had already flown in, all part of a funereal receiving line that meandered from the garage to the entryway, the kitchen, and finally the living room, a line of still and silent beings who resembled embalmed corpses.

What happened afterward? Did Alison and I sit with one person or one small group at a time? Did we talk about the Green River? Did we plead fatigue and retire to our room? And Julian—where did he go? All I know is that at some point that evening or the next day, lights went up, frozen bodies thawed, and waxlike faces regained elasticity. People began to move, first in slow motion and then faster until they were twirling from one room to another, up and down the stairs, onto the deck, into the garden. The house lit up with a circular energy that was manic and magical, an energy that surrounded us but could not touch me.

Alison and I began dating within months of moving to New York in the late 1980s, both of us fresh college graduates. We left for Chicago a few years later—I began doctoral studies in French history, Alison planned events for nonprofits—and returned in 2000, when New York University hired me. Having missed the early Giuliani era, we came back to a city that was cleaner and more affluent than the one we had known. We had two sons now, Julian and Owen, born three years apart in the late 1990s. Through their school and Little League games, we found ourselves in a universe of music producers, architects, account executives, film editors, academics, artists, venture capitalists, and foodies—all of us wearing black jeans and listening to the Red Hot Chili Peppers, or later Wilco. There was something intoxicating about downtown, a self-awareness of cool powered by a mix of prosperity and faux nonchalance.

New York also felt safer than the city we had known in the 1980s—except of course on 9/11. We were living in a Battery Park City rental, a few blocks south of the World Trade Center and within the evacuation zone. When we returned to our apartment to collect our belongings a week later, the fire still smoldered, its odor pungent. Trees sported white leaves—pages from memos, official letters, and instruction manuals shredded into macabre confetti. A dozen crushed ambulances and police cars were stacked outside our building like metal pancakes in primary colors. We left the neighborhood for the Upper West Side but feared that this would not be enough distance, not enough protection against the next attack.

This led us to purchase a home, for shelter and summers, in Woodstock, New York, two hours north of New York City. We met other urban refugees there, and also musicians and painters, onetime employees of a now-shuttered IBM plant, retired schoolteachers, svelte yogis, butchers who also coach Little League, bow-hunting carpenters, troubadour rabbis, and aging hippies who sometimes look the part and sometimes do not. Beyond the facile caricatures, it was an easy town to like. Our house was nestled in a dead end, surrounded by acres of forest. We had never lived among bears, snakes, and coyotes before, but this place felt oddly secure, as if, like giant cotton balls, the trees and bushes could muffle noise and vibrations.

This is where we spent the first weeks after the accident—hidden away. Everything was filtered, freed from the weight of obligations, pity, and accidental encounters with well-meaning acquaintances. Alison and I did not have to leave the house, not even to buy groceries, because friends and relatives took care of everything, preparing breakfast, answering the phone, welcoming well-wishers, signing for deliveries, and making runs to the hardware store. One of them called the local tennis club, where Owen had been slated to begin day camp, and explained that he had died. Others brought Julian to batting cages, anything to maintain the semblance of normalcy. (Such outings left Julian exposed in ways we had not anticipated. He later told us that, when a camper asked if he had siblings, he gave a frank answer. Oh shit, the kid said.)

Another one of our friends placed sleeping pills in our bathroom to help us get through the night. Alison took one every evening; I never did, but we both opened ourselves to this spellbinding human alignment, these tiny gestures inside our own home.

We became the silent center of a micro-society that filled the space Owen had left vacant.

The day after our return from Utah, I retreated to the small studio that serves as my office. Bookshelves cover all of the walls except for a section devoted to the kids’ drawings and a large bay window that opens onto the forest and a bluestone quarry. This is where I had written historical books and articles over the years, but that morning I sat at my desk to draft a preliminary version of our eulogy. Alison and I had taken notes on the flight home and agreed that I would show her something by midday.

Writing Owen’s eulogy was in some respects an impossible exercise, a confrontation with reality that proved so raw I had to turn my back to Owen’s art on the walls. But alone in this quiet space, surrounded by trees and traces of the path that quarrymen had followed decades earlier, I heard Owen for the first time since the accident. The eulogy flowed on the page, with ready-made sentences and echoes of his voice. All parents must carry within them biographies of their children, unwritten but available at a moment’s notice.

Ours began with the joy of having two boys and the pain of living without one of them. Alison and I told anecdotes about a child who had memorized our credit card number, and recounted some of his small victories that spring. We touched upon the accident and Owen’s absence. All that remained, we said, were recollections—and something else:

Owen looked into himself and into the outside world with penetration and feeling. He sought understanding while remaining aware of his own frailty and limitations. He embraced the beauty and efflorescence of life while grasping its darker, impenetrable side. If Owen has left us a legacy, then this is it.

These words continue to ring true even if I now realize that legacy talk is what the two of us needed at that moment. Owen’s life had to harbor some deeper meaning.

Alison and I also spoke against anger. We had both felt its pull within days of the accident, and so we pushed back. We would no doubt feel anger in the future, we said. But not today. An anger that was equal to the death of Owen would consume us; it would scorch the earth and the insides; it would preclude all other emotions, even sadness; it would make it impossible to truly see, to understand what had happened and who we were becoming. There was no religious belief or ethical framework behind our words, just the conviction that once we surrendered we would lose ourselves and lose Owen—we would lose him again. This, too, we needed to say and hear that day, as if to make a public commitment, to ourselves and to the rest of the world. A life without anger, a life with as little anger as possible: this became almost right away our mantra and our daily practice.

The morning after writing the eulogy, I woke up knowing we would bury Owen that day. Every morning, there are parents who wake up knowing this is what they will do before sunset.

I dragged my legs to the side of the bed and raised my body, hoping to accrue enough momentum to overcome the inertia that kept me pinned under the sheets. As I stood up, I wondered how the day would unfold. I might sit prostrate on a chair, or sob uncontrollably, or fall on my knees in the cemetery. Or perhaps Alison would behave in ways I did not recognize. The images of bereaved parents that I carried with me suggested that all of this was possible. After losing her seven-year-old daughter, the friend of a friend screamed in bed every morning. This was terrifying, but her behavior seemed appropriate.

Alison wore a navy sleeveless dress with pleats and a short gray sweater. The rabbi recommended that I pick an old tie since, following Jewish custom, we would cut it (and Alison’s sweater) before the services. I chose my favorite tie instead; Owen deserved it. Afterward, we met our relatives in the synagogue library. I felt numb and restless, remote yet hyper-present.

In the great room, quiet but full of static when we took our seats next to Owen’s coffin, people barely moved as the rabbi chanted and then summoned Alison and me to deliver the eulogy. We read paragraphs in turn while holding the sheets of paper between us, her hand and mine touching the words. Like a passing of the baton, this responsive recitation kept us in motion. It gave us balance. Julian watched from the front row though I do not know what he heard. I do not recall what he wore either (there are no photographs). Alison and I paid attention to Julian, but not as closely as before. He later told us that, for weeks, we did not concern ourselves with what he ate.

Alison stood tall, feet planted on the platform. At the cemetery afterward, she held my hand firmly. It was a bright day, with a big blue sky surrounding Overlook Mountain, a local peak we had recently hiked with Owen and Julian, climbing past the ruins of a Gilded Age resort that had burned down long ago. The rabbi asked the mourners to create space for the three of us to walk around the grave. Afterward, still within this human circle, we shoveled dirt onto the casket. Alison remarked that a gust of wind blew out of nowhere at that moment.

Before picking up the shovel, she stepped toward the black hole, as if to peer in. I placed my hand on her arm.

You really thought I would jump in, didn’t you? she asked during the car ride home. She smiled faintly, but I think that she felt slighted, as if I had doubted her strength. Perhaps I had: it was easier to focus on her potential breakdown than to face my own.

At the house, mourners overflowed into the garden. This was no longer an indeterminate mass, but familiar people who held our hands, squeezed our shoulders, looked us in the eye. One of them thanked me. Minutes later, someone else did the same. So it went as the afternoon blended into the evening and the sun lost its intensity somewhere beyond Overlook.

Thank you for your words, friends told me. We came to offer you strength, but you have helped us. Alison heard the same words and found them as jarring as I did. It took me months to understand the relief that people felt when we stood before them in the synagogue, spoke of a present without anger, and imagined our future alongside Owen’s. This is not what they had expected. We might have screamed uncontrollably or jumped into the grave.

Hardly anyone mentioned Owen in my presence that afternoon. I barely mentioned him myself; this made me feel ashamed, but it seemed easier that way. At one point, I ended up among fathers from the kids’ school who bantered about vacations and the like—anything to fill the silence. I listened, then wandered off. Circling the small groups in dark colors, my eyes fell upon the couch where Owen had sat reading, legs crossed, a few weeks earlier. The book he had picked up on our coffee table that day—New York Changing—coupled Berenice Abbott’s photographs of New York City in the mid-1930s with shots of the same locations sixty years later. While some spots had not changed, many are now unrecognizable. The Wanamaker’s department store on Broadway and Ninth Street—razed. The block-long

Enjoying the preview?
Page 1 of 1