Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

From $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

Socialism: Positive and Negative
Socialism: Positive and Negative
Socialism: Positive and Negative
Ebook117 pages1 hour

Socialism: Positive and Negative

Rating: 0 out of 5 stars

()

Read preview

About this ebook

DigiCat Publishing presents to you this special edition of "Socialism: Positive and Negative" by Robert Rives La Monte. DigiCat Publishing considers every written word to be a legacy of humankind. Every DigiCat book has been carefully reproduced for republishing in a new modern format. The books are available in print, as well as ebooks. DigiCat hopes you will treat this work with the acknowledgment and passion it deserves as a classic of world literature.
LanguageEnglish
PublisherDigiCat
Release dateSep 16, 2022
ISBN8596547340003
Socialism: Positive and Negative

Read more from Robert Rives La Monte

Related to Socialism

Related ebooks

Classics For You

View More

Related articles

Related categories

Reviews for Socialism

Rating: 0 out of 5 stars
0 ratings

0 ratings0 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

    Book preview

    Socialism - Robert Rives La Monte

    Robert Rives La Monte

    Socialism: Positive and Negative

    EAN 8596547340003

    DigiCat, 2022

    Contact: [email protected]

    Table of Contents

    PREFACE

    SCIENCE AND SOCIALISM

    I

    The Materialistic Conception of History

    II

    The Law of Surplus-value

    III

    The Class Struggle

    MARXISM AND ETHICS

    MARXISM AND ETHICS

    THE NIHILISM OF SOCIALISM

    THE NIHILISM OF SOCIALISM.

    THE BIOGENETIC LAW

    THE BIOGENETIC LAW

    KISMET.

    KISMET.

    ADVERTISEMENTS

    STANDARD SOCIALIST SERIES.

    LIBRARY OF SCIENCE FOR THE WORKERS.

    THE INTERNATIONAL LIBRARY OF SOCIAL SCIENCE.

    CHARLES H. KERR & CO.

    264 East Kinzie Street CHICAGO

    PREFACE

    Table of Contents

    Of the papers in this little volume two have appeared in print before: Science and Socialism in the International Socialist Review for September, 1900, and Marxism and Ethics in Wilshire's Magazine for November, 1905. My thanks are due to the publishers of those periodicals for their kind permission to re-print those articles here. The other papers appear here for the first time.

    There is an obvious inconsistency between the treatment of Materialism in Science and Socialism and its treatment in The Nihilism of Socialism. I would point out that seven years elapsed between the composition of the former and that of the latter essay. Whether the inconsistency be a sign of mental growth or deterioration my readers must judge for themselves. I will merely say here that the man or woman, whose views remain absolutely fixed and stereotyped for seven years, is cheating the undertaker. What I conceive the true significance of this particular change in opinions to be is set forth in the essay on The Biogenetic Law.

    Some Socialists will deprecate what may seem to them the unwise frankness of the paper on The Nihilism of Socialism. To them I can only say that to me Socialism has always been essentially a revolutionary movement. Revolutionists, who attempt to maintain a distinction between their exoteric and their esoteric teachings, only succeed in making themselves ridiculous. But, even were the maintenance of such a distinction practicable, it would, in my judgment, be highly inexpedient. As a mere matter of policy, ever since I first entered the Socialist Movement, I have been a firm believer in the tactics admirably summed up in Danton's "De l'audace! Puis de l'audace! Et toujours de l'audace!"

    Should any reader find himself repelled by The Nihilism of Socialism, let me beg that he will not put the book aside until he has read the essay on The Biogenetic Law.

    I do not send forth this little book with any ambitious hope that it will be widely read, or even that it will convert any one to Socialism. My hope is far more modest. It is that this book may be of some real service, as a labor-saving device, to the thinking men and women who have felt the lure of Socialism, and are trying to discover just what is meant by the oft-used words 'Marxian Socialism,' Should it prove of material aid to even one such man or woman, I would feel that I had been repaid a hundred-fold for my labor in writing it.

    Robert Rives La Monte.

    Feb. 7, 1907.


    SCIENCE AND SOCIALISM

    Table of Contents


    SCIENCE AND SOCIALISM[1]

    (International Socialist Review, September, 1900.)

    Until the middle of this (the nineteenth) century the favorite theory with those who attempted to explain the phenomena of History was the Great-Man-Theory. This theory was that once in a while through infinite mercy a great man was sent to the earth who yanked humanity up a notch or two higher, and then we went along in a humdrum way on that level, or even sank back till another great man was vouchsafed to us. Possibly the finest flower of this school of thought is Carlyle's Heroes and Hero Worship. Unscientific as this theory was, it had its beneficent effects, for those heroes or great men served as ideals, and the human mind requires an unattainable ideal. No man can be or do the best he is capable of unless he is ever reaching out toward an ideal that lies beyond his grasp. Tennyson put this truth in the mouth of the ancient sage who tells the youthful and ambitious Gareth who is eager to enter into the service of King Arthur of the Table Round:

    "——————the King

    Will bind thee by such vows as is a shame

    A man should not be bound by, yet the which

    No man can keep."

    This function of furnishing an ideal was performed in former times by these great men and more especially by those great men whom legend, myth and superstition converted into gods. But with the decay of the old faiths the only possible fruitful ideal left is the ideal upheld by Socialism, the ideal of the Co-operative Commonwealth in which the economic conditions will give birth to the highest, purest, most altruistic ethics the world has yet seen. It is true the co-operative commonwealth is far more than a Utopian ideal, it is a scientific prediction, but at this point I wish to emphasize its function as an ideal.

    But it is obvious that this Great Man theory gave no scientific clue to history. If the Great Man was a supernatural phenomenon, a gift from Olympus, then of course History had no scientific basis, but was dependent upon the arbitrary caprices of the Gods, and Homer's Iliad was a specimen of accurate descriptive sociology. If on the other hand the great man was a natural phenomenon, the theory stopped short half way toward its goal, for it gave us no explanation of the genesis of the Great Man nor of the reasons for the superhuman influence that it attributed to him.

    Mallock, one of the most servile literary apologists of capitalism, has recently in a book called Aristocracy and Evolution attempted to revive and revise this theory and give it a scientific form. He still attributes all progress to Great Men, but with the brutal frankness of modern bourgeois Capitalism, gives us a new definition of Great Men. According to Mallock, the great man is the man who makes money. This has long been the working theory of bourgeois society, but Mallock is the first of them who has had the cynicism or the stupidity to confess it. But mark you, by this confession he admits the truth of the fundamental premise of modern scientific socialism, our Socialism, viz., that the economic factor is the dominant or determining factor in the life of society. Thus you see the ablest champion of bourgeois capitalism, admits, albeit unconsciously, the truth of the Marxian materialistic conception of history. This book, however, is chiefly remarkable for its impudent and shameless misrepresentations of Marx and Marxism, but these very lies show that intelligent apologists of capitalism know that their only dangerous foe is Marxian socialism.

    But just as according to the vulgar superstition the tail of a snake that has been killed wiggles till sundown, so this book of Mallock's is merely a false show of life made by a theory that received its deathblow long since. It is the wiggling of the tail of the snake that Herbert Spencer killed thirty years ago with his little book The Study of Sociology. The environment philosophy in one form or another has come to occupy the entire field of human thought. We now look for the explanation of every phenomenon in the conditions that surrounded its birth and development. The best application of this environment philosophy to intellectual and literary phenomena that has ever been made is Taine's History of English Literature.

    But while Spencer's Study of Sociology is the most signal and brilliant refutation of the Great Man theory, no one man really killed that theory. The general spread and acceptance of Darwinism has produced an intellectual atmosphere in which such a theory can no more live than a fish can live out of water.

    By Darwinism we mean, as you know, the transmutation of species by variation and natural selection—selection accomplished mainly, if not solely, by the struggle for existence. Now this doctrine of organic development and change or metamorphic evolution, which was, with its originators, Wallace and Darwin, a purely biological doctrine,

    Enjoying the preview?
    Page 1 of 1