Ideas of Good and Evil
By W.B. Yeats
()
About this ebook
W.B. Yeats
William Butler Yeats (1865–1939) was an Irish poet, playwright, and author who won the Nobel Prize in Literature in 1923. Yeats published his first works in the mid-1880s while still a student; however, his most famous works, such as The Tower and Words for Music Perhaps and Other Poems, were not published until after he received the Nobel. He teamed up with Lady Gregory to develop plays in Ireland and soon founded the Irish National Theatre Society. He has since inspired poets and playwrights around the world.
Read more from W.B. Yeats
Irish Fairy Tales and Folklore Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Tower Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsW. B. Yeats – The Complete Collection Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Collected Poetry of William Butler Yeats Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5At the Hawk's Well Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Celtic Twilight: Faerie and Folklore Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Irish Fairy and Folk Tales (Barnes & Noble Library of Essential Reading) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEssays On Art: "All empty souls tend toward extreme opinions." Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIrish Fairy and Folk Tales Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Wild Swans At Coole & Other Poems: “What can be explained is not poetry.” Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The King's Threshold: “Life is a long preparation for something that never happens.” Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Secret Rose: “There is another world, but it is in this one.” Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsChangelings: Or, Beware Baby Snatchers of the Fairy Kingdom: Magical Creatures, A Weiser Books Collection Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Celtic Twilight Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Wild Swans at Coole Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPer Amica Silentia Lunae Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCeltic Twilight Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDeirdre Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5Stories of Red Hanrahan Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Best-Loved Yeats Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Fairy and Folk Tales of the Irish Peasantry Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMichael Robartes and The Dancer Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Short Stories Of W.B. Yeats: “Think like a wise man but communicate in the language of the people.” Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOn Baile's Strand Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Unicorn from the Stars and Other Plays Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Countess Cathleen: “The world is full of magic things, patiently waiting for our senses to grow sharper.” Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe W.B. Yeats Collection Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Celtic Twilight Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to Ideas of Good and Evil
Related ebooks
Ideas of Good and Evil Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHow to Listen to Music, 7th ed: Hints and Suggestions to Untaught Lovers of the Art Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAn Absolute Gift: A New Diary Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Vocal Wisdom Maxims of Giovanni Battista Lamperti [1931 edition] Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5England's Antiphon Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHourglass and Other Poems Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Language of Music Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Hundredfold: Songs for the Lord Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Purcell Ode, and Other Poems Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Tradition of Western Music Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Magic of Poetry and the Poet's Art Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Listener Aspires to the Condition of Music Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWhen Your Way Gets Dark: A Rhetoric of the Blues Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsStyle and Idea Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Confessions of an Opera Singer Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLove Death and Whiskey: 40 Songs Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Greater Music Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Irradiations; Sand and Spray Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNegro Folk Rhymes Wise and Otherwise: With a Study Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLives of the Poets (with Guitars): Thirteen Outsiders Who Changed Modern Music Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5A Journey Towards Poetry Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOn English Poetry: Being an Irregular Approach to the Psychology of This Art, from Evidence Mainly Subjective Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsVocal Mastery Talks with Master Singers and Teachers, Comprising Interviews with Caruso, Farrar, Maurel, Lehmann, and Others Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Secret Life of Love Songs Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMusically Speaking: A Life Through Song Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Wild Reciter: Poetry and Popular Culture in Australia 1890-2020 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAn Autobiography Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Music: An Art and a Language Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRodney Trudgeon's Concert Notes: A Selection of Favourite Orchestral Masterpieces Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIrradiations. Sand and Spray: 'Towards the sunset beyond the broken doors of to-day'' Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Classics For You
A Confederacy of Dunces Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Silmarillion Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Dune Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Farewell to Arms Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Odyssey: (The Stephen Mitchell Translation) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Fellowship Of The Ring: Being the First Part of The Lord of the Rings Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Color Purple Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Flowers for Algernon Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Wuthering Heights (with an Introduction by Mary Augusta Ward) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Things They Carried Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Poisonwood Bible: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Mythos Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Rebecca Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Count of Monte Cristo Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5We Have Always Lived in the Castle Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Old Man and the Sea: The Hemingway Library Edition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Sense and Sensibility (Centaur Classics) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Ulysses: With linked Table of Contents Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Princess Bride: S. Morgenstern's Classic Tale of True Love and High Adventure Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Master & Margarita Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Count of Monte-Cristo English and French Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/520000 Leagues Under the Sea Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Republic by Plato Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Count of Monte Cristo (abridged) (Barnes & Noble Classics Series) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Canterbury Tales Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Little Women (Seasons Edition -- Winter) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Jungle: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5For Whom the Bell Tolls: The Hemingway Library Edition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Persuasion Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Related categories
Reviews for Ideas of Good and Evil
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Ideas of Good and Evil - W.B. Yeats
W. B. Yeats
Ideas of Good and Evil
EAN 8596547166429
DigiCat, 2022
Contact: [email protected]
Table of Contents
SPEAKING TO THE PSALTERY
I
II
III
MAGIC
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
THE HAPPIEST OF THE POETS
I
II
III
IV
V
THE PHILOSOPHY OF SHELLEY’S POETRY
I. HIS RULING IDEAS
II. HIS RULING SYMBOLS
AT STRATFORD-ON-AVON
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
WILLIAM BLAKE AND THE IMAGINATION
WILLIAM BLAKE AND HIS ILLUSTRATIONS TO THE DIVINE COMEDY
I. HIS OPINIONS UPON ART
II. HIS OPINIONS ON DANTE
III. THE ILLUSTRATIONS OF DANTE
SYMBOLISM IN PAINTING
THE SYMBOLISM OF POETRY
I
II
III
IV
V
THE THEATRE
I
II
THE CELTIC ELEMENT IN LITERATURE
I
II
III
IV
THE AUTUMN OF THE BODY
THE MOODS
THE BODY OF THE FATHER CHRISTIAN ROSENCRUX
THE RETURN OF ULYSSES
I
II
IRELAND AND THE ARTS
THE GALWAY PLAINS
EMOTION OF MULTITUDE
SPEAKING TO THE PSALTERY
Table of Contents
I
Table of Contents
I have always known that there was something I disliked about singing, and I naturally dislike print and paper, but now at last I understand why, for I have found something better. I have just heard a poem spoken with so delicate a sense of its rhythm, with so perfect a respect for its meaning, that if I were a wise man and could persuade a few people to learn the art I would never open a book of verses again. A friend, who was here a few minutes ago, has sat with a beautiful stringed instrument upon her knee, her fingers passing over the strings, and has spoken to me some verses from Shelley’s Skylark and Sir Ector’s lamentation over the dead Launcelot out of the Morte d’Arthur and some of my own poems. Wherever the rhythm was most delicate, wherever the emotion was most ecstatic, her art was the most beautiful, and yet, although she sometimes spoke to a little tune, it was never singing, as we sing to-day, never anything but speech. A singing note, a word chanted as they chant in churches, would have spoiled everything; nor was it reciting, for she spoke to a notation as definite as that of song, using the instrument, which murmured sweetly and faintly, under the spoken sounds, to give her the changing notes. Another speaker could have repeated all her effects, except those which came from her own beautiful voice that would have given her fame if the only art that gives the speaking voice its perfect opportunity were as well known among us as it was known in the ancient world.
II
Table of Contents
Since I was a boy I have always longed to hear poems spoken to a harp, as I imagined Homer to have spoken his, for it is not natural to enjoy an art only when one is by oneself. Whenever one finds a fine verse one wants to read it to somebody, and it would be much less trouble and much pleasanter if we could all listen, friend by friend, lover by beloved. Images used to rise up before me, as I am sure they have arisen before nearly everybody else who cares for poetry, of wild-eyed men speaking harmoniously to murmuring wires while audiences in many-coloured robes listened, hushed and excited. Whenever I spoke of my desire to anybody they said I should write for music, but when I heard anything sung I did not hear the words, or if I did their natural pronunciation was altered and their natural music was altered, or it was drowned in another music which I did not understand. What was the good of writing a love-song if the singer pronounced love, ‘lo-o-o-o-o-ve,’ or even if he said ‘love,’ but did not give it its exact place and weight in the rhythm? Like every other poet, I spoke verses in a kind of chant when I was making them, and sometimes, when I was alone on a country road, I would speak them in a loud chanting voice, and feel that if I dared I would speak them in that way to other people. One day I was walking through a Dublin street with the Visionary I have written about in The Celtic Twilight, and he began speaking his verses out aloud with the confidence of those who have the inner light. He did not mind that people stopped and looked after him even on the far side of the road, but went on through poem after poem. Like myself, he knew nothing of music, but was certain that he had written them to a manner of music, and he had once asked somebody who played on a wind instrument of some kind, and then a violinist, to write out the music and play it. The violinist had played it, or something like it, but had not written it down; but the man with the wind instrument said it could not be played because it contained quarter-tones and would be out of tune. We were not at all convinced by this, and one day, when we were staying with a Galway friend who is a learned musician, I asked him to listen to our verses, and to the way we spoke them. The Visionary found to his surprise that he did not make every poem to a different tune, and to the surprise of the musician that he did make them all to two quite definite tunes, which are, it seems, like very simple Arabic music. It was, perhaps, to some such music, I thought, that Blake sang his Songs of Innocence in Mrs. Williams’ drawing-room, and perhaps he, too, spoke rather than sang. I, on the other hand, did not often compose to a tune, though I sometimes did, yet always to notes that could be written down and played on my friend’s organ, or turned into something like a Gregorian hymn if one sang them in the ordinary way. I varied more than the Visionary, who never forgot his two tunes, one for long and one for short lines, and could not always speak a poem in the same way, but always felt that certain ways were right, and that I would know one of them if I remembered the way I first spoke the poem. When I got to London I gave the notation, as it had been played on the organ, to the friend who has just gone out, and she spoke it to me, giving my words a new quality by the beauty of her voice.
III
Table of Contents
Then we began to wander through the wood of error; we tried speaking through music in the ordinary way under I know not whose evil influence, until we got to hate the two competing tunes and rhythms that were so often at discord with one another, the tune and rhythm of the verse and the tune and rhythm of the music. Then we tried, persuaded by somebody who thought quarter-tones and less intervals the especial mark of speech as distinct from singing, to write out what we did in wavy lines. On finding something like these lines in Tibetan music, we became so confident that we covered a large piece of pasteboard, which now blows up my fire in the morning, with a notation in wavy lines as a demonstration for a lecture; but at last Mr. Dolmetsch put us back to our first thought. He made us a beautiful instrument half psaltery half lyre which contains, I understand, all the chromatic intervals within the range of the speaking voice; and he taught us to regulate our speech by the ordinary musical notes.
Some of the notations he taught us—those in which there is no lilt, no recurring pattern of sounds—are like this notation for a song out of the first Act of The Countess Cathleen.
It is written in the old C clef, which is, I am told, the most reasonable way to write it, for it would be below the stave on the treble clef or above it on the bass clef. The central line of the stave corresponds to the middle C of the piano; the first note of the poem is therefore D. The marks of long and short over the syllables are not marks of scansion, but show the syllables one makes the voice hurry or linger over.
One needs, of course, a far less complicated notation than a singer, and one is even permitted slight modifications of the fixed note when dramatic expression demands it and the instrument is not sounding. The notation which regulates the general form of the sound leaves it free to add a complexity of dramatic expression from its own incommunicable genius which compensates the lover of speech for the lack of complex musical expression. Ordinary speech is formless, and its variety is like the variety which separates bad prose from the regulated speech of Milton, or anything that is formless and void from anything that has form and beauty. The orator, the speaker who has some little of the great tradition of his craft, differs from the debater very largely because he understands how to assume that subtle monotony of voice which runs through the nerves like fire.
Even when one is speaking to a single note sounded faintly on the Psaltery, if one is sufficiently practised to speak on it without thinking about it one can get an endless variety of expression. All art is, indeed, a monotony in external things for the sake of an interior variety, a sacrifice of gross effects to subtle effects, an asceticism of the imagination. But this new art, new in modern life I mean, will have to train its hearers as well as its speakers, for it takes time to surrender gladly the gross efforts one is accustomed to, and one may well find mere monotony at first where one soon learns to find a variety as incalculable as in the outline of faces or in the expression of eyes. Modern acting and recitation have taught us to fix our attention on the gross effects till we have come to think gesture and the intonation that copies the accidental surface of life more important than the rhythm; and yet we understand theoretically that it is precisely this rhythm that separates good writing from bad, that is the glimmer, the fragrance, the spirit of all intense literature. I do not say that we should speak our plays to musical notes, for dramatic verse will need its own method, and I have hitherto experimented with short lyric poems alone; but I am certain that, if people would listen for a while to lyrical verse spoken to notes, they would soon find it impossible to listen without indignation to verse as it is spoken in our leading theatres. They would get a subtlety of hearing that would demand new effects from actors and even from public speakers, and they might, it may be, begin even to notice one another’s voices till poetry and rhythm had come nearer to common life.
I cannot tell what changes this new art is to go through, or to what greatness or littleness of fortune; but I can imagine little stories in prose with their dialogues in metre going pleasantly to the strings. I am not certain that I shall not see some Order naming itself from the Golden Violet of the Troubadours or the like, and having among its members none but well-taught and well-mannered speakers who will keep the new art from disrepute. They will know how to keep from singing notes and from prosaic lifeless intonations, and they will always understand, however far they push their experiments, that poetry and not music is their object; and they will have by heart, like the Irish File, so many poems and notations that they will never have to bend their heads over the book to the ruin of dramatic expression and of that wild air the bard had always about him in my boyish imagination. They will go here and there speaking their verses and their little stories wherever they can find a score or two of poetical-minded people in a big room, or a couple of poetical-minded friends sitting by the hearth, and poets will write them poems and little stories to the confounding of print and paper. I, at any rate, from this out mean to write all my longer poems for the stage, and all my shorter ones for the Psaltery, if only some strong angel keep me to my good resolutions.
1902.
MAGIC
Table of Contents
I
Table of Contents
I believe in the practice and philosophy of what we have agreed to call magic, in what I must call the evocation of spirits, though I do not know what they are, in the power of creating magical illusions, in the visions of truth in the depths of the mind when the eyes are closed; and I believe in three doctrines, which have, as I think, been handed down from early times, and been the foundations of nearly all magical practices. These doctrines are—
(1) That the borders of our minds are ever shifting, and that many minds can flow into one another, as it were, and create or reveal a single mind, a single energy.
(2) That the borders of our memories are as shifting, and that our memories are a part of one great memory, the memory of Nature herself.
(3) That this great mind and great memory can be evoked by symbols.
I often think I would put this belief in magic from me if I could, for I have come to see or to imagine, in men and women, in houses, in handicrafts, in nearly all sights and sounds, a certain evil, a certain ugliness, that comes from the slow perishing through the centuries of a quality of mind that made this belief and its evidences common over the world.
II
Table of Contents
Some ten or twelve years ago, a man with whom I have since quarrelled for sound reasons, a very singular man who had given his life to studies other men despised, asked me and an acquaintance, who is now dead, to witness a magical work. He lived a little way from London, and on the way my acquaintance told me that he did not believe in magic, but that a novel of Bulwer Lytton’s had taken such a hold upon his imagination that he was going to give much of his time and all his thought to magic. He longed to believe in it, and had studied, though not learnedly, geomancy, astrology, chiromancy, and much cabalistic symbolism, and yet doubted if the soul outlived the body. He awaited the magical work full of scepticism. He expected nothing more than an air of romance, an illusion as of the stage, that might capture the consenting imagination for an hour. The evoker of spirits and his beautiful wife received us in a little house, on the edge of some kind of garden or park belonging to an eccentric rich man, whose curiosities he arranged and dusted, and he made his evocation in a long room that had a raised place on the floor at one end, a kind of dais, but was furnished meagrely and cheaply. I sat with my acquaintance in the middle of the room, and the evoker of spirits on the dais, and his wife between us and him. He held a wooden mace in his hand, and turning to a tablet of many-coloured squares, with a number on each of the squares, that stood near him on a chair, he repeated a form of words. Almost at once my imagination began to move of itself and to bring before me vivid images that, though never too vivid to be imagination, as I had always understood it, had