Four Branches of Government in Our Founding Fathers’ Words: A Document Disguised as a Book That Will Return the Power of Government to “We the People” and to Petition the Government for a Redress of Grievances

FOUR BRANCHES

OF

GOVERNMENT

IN OUR FOUNDING FATHERS’ WORDS

A Document Disguised as a Book

That Will Return the Power of Government

to We the People and to Petition the Government for a Redress of Grievances

Steven King

AuthorHouse™

1663 Liberty Drive

Bloomington, IN 47403

www.authorhouse.com

Phone: 1 (800) 839-8640

©

2015 Steven King. All rights reserved.

No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted by any means without the written permission of the author.

Published by AuthorHouse 10/13/2015

ISBN: 978-1-5049-1927-2 (sc)

ISBN: 978-1-5049-1926-5 (hc)

ISBN: 978-1-5049-1928-9 (e)

Library of Congress Control Number: 2015910145

Any people depicted in stock imagery provided by Thinkstock are models,

and such images are being used for illustrative purposes only.

Certain stock imagery © Thinkstock.

Because of the dynamic nature of the Internet, any web addresses or links contained in this book may have changed since publication and may no longer be valid. The views expressed in this work are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher, and the publisher hereby disclaims any responsibility for them.

Contents

1.   Interpretation of Preamble

2.   The U.S. Government Is a Four Branch System

3.   Power schematics of a Three and Four Branch Systems

4.   Four Branches of Government Equation

5.   The House of Representatives Is Truly a Reflection of the People

6.   The Senate

7.   Supreme Court’s Accumulation of Power For the Federal Government

8.   The President

9.   Congress

10.   The Origin of Political Parties

11.   The Power of Government

12.   In Our Founding Fathers’ Words; Love, Humor, Culture and Deceit

13.   Checks and Balances of the Constitution

14.   Branches Beyond the Four

15.   The Evolution of America

16.   Unions

17.   Politics, Pollution, Climate Change, EPA and Economy

18.   Over Population

19.   Immigration

20.   Assimilating into America

21.   America’s Exceptionalism

22.   Education

23.   Religion and Science

24.   Political Views on Government

25.   Political Correctness

26.   Freedom of Speech

27.   Government has Become a High-End Welfare System

28.   The National Debt is a Borderline Ponzi Scheme

29.   The Liberal’s Disabled America

30.   Liberal Ideology vs. Conservative Ideology

31.   Left, Right; Extremes and the Economy

32.   Liberal Creativity

33.   Today’s Liberalism is a Developmental Issue

34.   Socialism, Communism vs. The Freedom of Americanism

35.   The Results of Liberal Democrat Policies

36.   Liberal Politics in Conflict with Liberal Policies

37.   The Topic of Race

38.   Local Police and the Judicial System

39.   A Liberal King, A UN-Constitutional President

40.   The Wars on Will Never End

41.   The Ying & Yang of Republican Decisions

42.   Responsibilities of Choice

43.   The Flaws of the Constitution

44.   Some Corrections of the Constitution

45.   The Liberal Ending of America

46.   Conclusion to Four Branches of Government and Equation

47.   Ending Note from Me to You

This book has many intentions but the truth is in the forefront of each. To correct history as it has been perceived or rewritten through our history. From the structure of our government to the procedures of the Constitution, at times seen through the eyes of our Founding Fathers. From tracing certain political ideologies thru history, to applying these same ideologies and their results on portions of our society. It shows how religion and science do not oppose each other but walk hand in hand through history with each leading the way at times, exposing the world’s history. It uses these topics and others to trace the history of our American society and how political agendas have and are affecting that same society. Society cannot save society from society without society’s help!

INTERPRETATION OF PREAMBLE

In the Preamble of the Constitution what are listed are just 6 excerpts out of many purposes, goals or a future product of the Constitution, not functions of government. Most all of the purposes are listed in the Constitution’s Article I, Section 8 and are what the Founding Fathers deemed necessary at that time period for the people. The document also allowed for change through legislation for future generations. Those items listed are what the Founding Fathers wanted government to legislate through legislation once the government was formed by elections. The Founding Fathers did not feel they should legislate on any of the needs of government presented in Article I, Section 8 because their duty was to form the framework of government. It would then be the duty of the newly elected government by We the People who then would represent We the People to legislate laws to meet the needs the Founding Fathers included in the Constitution.

The powers of the Constitution are handed down to government bodies and once assigned to a body of government that power then becomes a function of that government body and only that government body the power is assigned. The 6 functions of government are as follows: to execute government, interrupt laws via of the Constitution’s written words and an administration of justice, to legislate laws and to execute the powers not shared by the House of Representatives and Senate. Without following these 6 functions of government none of the items in Article I, Section 8 or anything else which legislatively followed the Constitution would have been passed into law. When using one or a combination of these 6 functions this creates a designed process for government to achieve the needed goals of government; to protect the people with a military, create a lawful society with a judicial system, establish a monetary system, etc. The Founding Fathers put forth this process as a recipe for good government of the people. To deviate from this process creates a chaotic process with the people not being represented through our government system.

The functions of the human body’s organs allow the processes of breathing, walking, thinking, etc. It is these processes that allow mankind to create products such as homes, planes, airports, the Constitution, etc. For man to change these body functions and how they work, to intermingle them, changes the processes and alters nature’s product (normally not for the better) being the human body. This description I offer is what has happen to the Constitution. A intermingling of the powers (functions) of government that has changed the process (procedures of government) which alters the quality of the product being the laws of government that rule We the People.

THE U.S. GOVERNMENT IS A FOUR BRANCH SYSTEM

I include very little opinion in my writings of the branches of government. I have backed every statement with an example of how our government works mathematically as a four branch system and can’t be duplicated using a three branch system. It includes a mathematical equation that supports my conclusion and the words of the Founding Fathers that name the four branches. The book includes a dead on description of how the government system has changed through history that even the Founding Fathers’ writings support with their fears of a centralized accumulation of power being the Federal Government. My writings support the same fear and how it is happening.

The Founding Fathers passed away centuries ago and left many questions unanswered. Some questions can be answered, some may never be answered. My intentions are to reveal and correct history to our nation of citizens. To stimulate the People’s minds in a effort to inform the informed with correct insights and engage the uninformed with material that might spark a renaissance in the learning’s of the Constitution and the Founding Fathers intent of the document known as the Constitution for the Betterment of our Nation.

During my research of the Constitution, I never came across any structural information in regards to the Constitution other than what is written in the Constitution. To my knowledge no Founding Father ever wrote anything, before, during or after the writing of the Constitution that mentioned three or four branches or the executive branch, legislative branch or branches and judicial Branch. I also could never pinpoint the time or source of who named the three branches as our government is perceived to be in its history. When and where was the first three branch schematic used to explain the government structure? To begin a defense of the three branch system it would need to start with the answers to these questions. No three branch or bicameral government has a veto overrule of the country’s leader. In a bicameral style of government, I believe all legislation is done with all parties in the room and is debated and agreed upon verbally before it is actually written and then voted on. This ensures that the bill will pass after it is written unless the wording or something has changed from the original verbal agreement. The veto overrule is a huge correction of power in our government structure and is what sets our government apart from all other governments of the world.

I first want to say the ability for someone to change their mind displays an intellect to adapt to a changing situation when based upon correct information and it is what you base your disagreement on that shows your intelligence or ignorance, are you an independent critical thinker or a herd follower. Secondly I think everybody needs to read the U.S. Constitution in an encyclopedia to help them understand the powers of each branch of government. Then they need to compare the actual U.S. Constitution as written using an encyclopedia as a reference so they can see the differences between the two, one being the actual document and the other being a teaching tool.

The words that describe and name our branches of government in the Constitution’s Articles I, II and III are the following in order of appearance: Congress, Senate, House of Representatives, Representative, Representatives, Senators, Senator, Vice President, the President of the United States, each House, either House, neither House, two Houses, that House, the other House, both Houses, a President of the United States of America, said House, the President, one supreme Court and those are all the words.

The names chosen by the Founding Fathers for our branches of government being the President, House of Representatives and supreme Court had never been used before in the history of world governments. Why did they feel the need to have names for government bodies that had never been used in a previous government system? Because the government they were creating also had never been done in history! Using three names that had never been used before in government, unique unto themselves, why would the Founding Fathers use a three branch system which had repeatedly failed throughout the history of the world? They didn’t! They created the first four branch government system in the world’s history. The Founding Fathers’ choice to reuse the word Senate was to honor the world’s first Republic government. The first Government to use the word in government was established within the Roman Empire and was a historical milestone as the first attempt at a self governing government by the people. Exactly what the Founding Fathers wanted as an end product of the Constitution, self governing by the people. To think the Founding Fathers after putting great thought into the names they chose would turn around and rename them with as mundane names as executive, legislative and judicial absolutely makes no sense (does an injustice to our Founding Fathers) and is not supported by the wording of the Constitution which is what they hoped to be a historical document. The only way for it to be a historical document is for it to continually function throughout the history of a lasting great nation.

The four government bodies have six powers or functions given to them by We the People in the powers of the Constitution; to execute government, interrupt laws via of the Constitution and administer justice, legislate laws and execute the powers not shared by the House of Representatives and Senate. Without using a combination of these six functions absolutely nothing happens in government. Anything that comes out of government is a purpose, a goal, a law, a product of a combination of these six functions. Now this doesn’t make our government a six branch system and it doesn’t make it a three branch system because someone picked out the three major functions of the six functions of government and used them to name the branches of government. The same three major functions just happen to be the second word in the first sentence of Articles I, II and III but is not the subject of any of the sentences. The Constitution has three main powers of government described in the document, they are distributed among four government bodies or branches of government. Our branches of government are not determined by the number of powers granted to government by the Constitution but the independent government bodies (branches) named in the Constitution by the Founding Fathers that possess an assigned power or may share a specific power of government independently of the other body or branches of government. The powers are what they are, powers, not the branches or bodies of our government. Why have all other forms of government been classified by our educational entities using their bodies of government and ours has been classified by the existing main powers of government? Keep in mind the descriptive boxes in the power schematic of our government usually have descriptions of what that branch does in government being the words executive, legislative & judicial which are adjectives and normally according to the rules of the English language describes what they do and is not the name for who they are. When these adjective words being executive, legislative and judicial are combined with the word branch, or in my argument being branches, were put there as a teaching tool by teachers and/or the news papers of some time period for novices (children’s education and/or an uneducated public of that time regarding the Constitution) that might not understand what the President, House of Representatives, Senate, and supreme Court do in the scheme of government in relation to the highest law of the land, the United States’ Constitution.

Now with a little history and math I will show how each are a branch of our government and the House of Representatives and the Senate are NOT combined under the Descriptive Phrase Legislative Branch. When using this Descriptive Phrase being executive branch, legislative branch & judicial branch it implies three branches of government.

When you are told over and over something you begin to believe it and at some point you accept it as the Truth. There is a difference between being told and being taught. "Being told is INDOCTRINATION into a certain way of thinking without any supporting facts. Being TAUGHT is backing the curriculum with FACTS that support the SUBJECT allowing the TRUTH to be seen"!

You may still say Congress consists of the Senate & the House of Representatives which is true BUT only when they convene (assemble) or in the Constitution when the Founding Fathers used the term describing their shared legislative powers. Legislating laws is the first function of their two constitutional powers. The second function is to execute the powers not shared by each house and they may or may not need (depending on what power is being executed) to convene (assemble) as Congress to execute their powers given to them in the Constitution. When the House of Representatives and the Senate convenes to form Congress that doesn’t mean the House of Representatives and Senate disappear from government when becoming Congress. The exact opposite is true! That Congress disappears from government when the House of Representatives and Senate are not convened. That is why the President can do recess appointments (judges, department heads) to the judicial system and government agencies or departments because congress no longer exists. To argue that our government is a three branch system means that the House of Representatives and Senate are always one under Congress. Therefore the House of Representatives and Senate would not need to convene (assemble) to legislate laws because they are one branch of government all the time which is not true. The reason they convene as Congress is because they are two separate branches of government.

After the New World (North America) was discovered the main people who immigrated (in the beginning) to this land were from England. What they were fleeing from was a government with absolute power dispensed by a King. They thought an ocean would separate them from that oppressive form of government but it didn’t. So they fought the War of Independence to gain their freedom from that King & Country.

The Founding Fathers had to form a government that would not transform into something that repeated the form of government they fled and fought against. The Founding Fathers needed to form an elected government with separated powers. What they were worried with most was giving one body of government too much power (three versus four branches, four branches divides power even more among the branches) especially the body of government (President) that might create another King or Supreme Ruler. The Founding Fathers were much smarter than many of today’s educated people that don’t give them the credit they deserve for writing a document that up until my writings they didn’t even understand. They had to disburse power and the functions of government evenly to government bodies or what many today refer to as branches of government. Now if you have three branches (Executive, Legislative, Judicial) each branch would have a percentage of power being 33 1/3% if disbursed evenly. That means the Senate and House of Representatives would each have 16.66…% of power. When convened as Congress would not have the power to overrule a President’s veto with a 2/3 super majority vote of the Senate (16.66…%) and House of Representatives (16.66…%) because their powers combined would only equal that of the President (33.33…%). In a 3 branch government how does the Senate not concur or disagree with a President’s appointment when the Senate’s power in government is only 16.66…% and the President’s power in government is 33.33…% being twice that of the Senate’s power in government? When you have four branches of equal power (25% each) each branch can only agree or disagree; concur or not concur. With Presidential appointments, the President picks his choice, the Senate either agrees or disagrees; concurs or does not concur. Neither branch has the power to force its choice on the other branch. This is also true for the House of Representatives (25% of power) and the Senate (25% of power) when Congress legislates laws each branch must agree or concur to pass the bill on to the President. Congress’ power must be greater than the President’s power to reflect Congress’s ability to overrule a President’s (25% of power) veto with a 2/3 vote thus Congress’ joined powers equaling 50% of government’s total power.

A four branch government can easily have the perception of a three branch government when the House of Representatives and Senate continually agree or can compromise on their differences. It is when the House of Representatives and Senate continually disagree and won’t compromise on their differences that it becomes evident causing perception to fade into reality and the four branches of government become evident in the reality of government. With four branches being the President, House of Representatives, Senate and supreme Court each branch now has 25% of the power if disbursed evenly. How each branch uses these powers given through the Constitution will demonstrate the four branches of government with evenly disbursed powers. The best and most direct way to do this is with the most fundamental aspect of government, the stop and start of government. This is referred to as government shutdown which can only happen each time a yearly budget bill (funding for government) or a national debt bill (borrowing to fund government) needs to be addressed by government.

How many branches of government can shutdown government? The answer is three branches.

The President (25% of power) by vetoing the yearly budget bill or national debt bill. This can be overruled by Congress with its 50% of power when and only when Congress agrees with a super majority 2/3 vote of Yea by both the Senate and the House of Representatives to pass the bill into law without the President’s signature.

The House of Representatives (25% of power) by not introducing or not responding to a yearly budget bill or a national debt bill or by passing a yearly budget or national debt bill to the senate that the Senate won’t vote on or will vote on but not pass. Neither the Senate nor the President separately or together can do anything to restart government.

The Senate (25% of power) by not introducing (see Article I, Section 7) or not responding to a yearly budget bill or a national debt bill or by passing a yearly budget or national debt bill to the House of Representatives that the House of Representatives won’t vote on or will vote on but not pass. Neither the House of Representatives nor the President separately or together can do anything to restart government.

This shutdown of government formula can NOT be duplicated under a three branch system because the mathematical powers of the House of Representatives and the Senate will be different not allowing it mathematically to happen.

The Founding Fathers’ actual process of legislation is that all three branches must concur (agree) to pass a bill into law. When this is accomplished each branch individually of the other two has exerted its 25% of power in government with a concurring vote or decision. If the first two legislative branches can’t agree on the bill then the bill will never reach the third branch being the President. When a written bill is passed by the legislative branches to the President he either concurs with his signature or not concurs with a veto of the bill. Once a vetoed bill is returned to the House from which it originated, a legislative decision is needed. It is now the two legislative branches that can combine their individual powers of Government (25% each = 50% combined overruling power) with a 2/3’s concurring vote of both branches to overrule the President’s (25% of power) veto thus allowing the bill to become law without the President’s concurring signature as designated by We the People’s Constitution.

The true power of Congress (50% of power) in government is to take the power of government out of the hands of one man and one branch of government, the President (Too see the true character of a man give him power), and place it in the hands of 535 people and two branches of government being the House of Representatives (435 people) and the Senate (100 people). It is a lot easier to corrupt the mind of one person than it is to corrupt the minds of 535 people.

Now you should be able to see the proper Descriptive Phrase to describe our branches of Government is executive branch, legislative branches (meaning two or more and both branches, House of Representatives and the Senate, convene to form Congress to legislate laws under the powers of the Constitution given to both branches) and judicial branch. These words are not the bodies or branches of our government but are the three major powers of the six powers given to our government by the Constitution. So the words executive, legislative & judicial are nothing more than a teaching tool for the powers of our branches of government inserted into the power schematic and then were intentionally or unintentionally picked as our three branches of government.

If the House of Representatives is not an equal branch of government how did a inferior co-branch of government shutdown government in 2013 trying to stop or delay the implementation of the Affordable Care Act, aka Obamacare? It wasn’t the Senate or Congress or the legislative branch (it actually was one of the legislative branches, which one? Having to ask and then answer this question to get the correct answer is an admission of four branches in itself!) or the President or the supreme Court or any terrorist organization as Barack Obama & Democrats described the Republican controlled House of Representatives. The House of Representatives is an equal branch of government and so is the Senate because the Senate mirrors the House of Representatives in shared powers and both have powers unique unto themselves. The Senate and House of Representatives are each fifty percent of the power of Congress which legislates one hundred percent of all bills and laws. It is alarming how through our country’s history, educational system and/or news papers this phrase used as a teaching tool sneaked right into our perception of how our government’s power schematic is laid out. The phrase Executive Branch, Legislative Branch or Branches & Judicial Branch should not be between the top tier Government and the bodies of government in the power schematic and when removed reveals the true names for our four branches. To avoid future confusion in our educational system they should be below the President, House of Representatives, Senate and supreme Court because these are the names of the branches of the United States of America’s Government.

Constitution (100% power) given to Government by We the People

to form Our Government (100% of power)

My argument is that a three branch system will not support the Legislative Branch being able to overrule the Executive Branch’s veto of a legislative bill. I contend that only in a four branch system would the legislative branches have enough power to overrule a President’s veto.

To demonstrate that I am correct on this issue I will create two complete mathematical equations. The first equation is a 3 branch and 4 branch government without the ability to overrule a President’s veto as if the 2/3 vote to overrule a veto does not exist in the Constitution.

Mathematical Equation Setup

 1 = 1   : the numbers are equal, one is not greater than the other, one cannot overrule the other.

1/3 = 1/3 : the numbers are equal, one is not greater than the other, one cannot overrule the other.

Under the above conditions the only options are to agree or disagree, concur or not concur.

 50 > 25 : 50 is greater than 25, one is greater than the other, the greater can overrule the lesser.

100% = 1/3% or 33.3…% + 1/3% or 33.3…% + 1/3% or 33.3…%

100% = 25% + 25% + 25% + 25%

3 Branch Government (100% power) = Executive 1/3% + Legislative 1/3% + Judicial 1/3%

4 Branch Government (100% power) = President 25% + House of Representatives 25% + Senate 25% + supreme Court 25%

So now I have set the parameters of the equation and have assigned a mathematical value to all of government and each branch of government. Now I will create two equations from the above information. I also will create two statements from the Constitution, one true & one false. I will apply a 3 branch government equation and a 4 branch government equation to each statement then apply that to the Constitution. Mathematics is the universal language of the universe, it has no opinion, there will only be one correct answer and the others will be incorrect.

Legislative Branch 1/3% = Executive Branch 1/3% = Statement = Controlled Statement

House of Representatives 25% + Senate 25% > President 25% = Statement = Controlled Statement

Controlled Statement = What the Constitution States

What the Constitution States

Remember, as if the 2/3 vote to overrule a veto does not exist in the Constitution

1). House of Representatives 25% + Senate 25% > President 25% = legislative branches can’t overrule executive branch

2). House of Representatives 25% + Senate 25% > President 25% = legislative branches can overrule executive branch

3). Legislative Branch 1/3% = Executive Branch 1/3% = Legislative Branch can overrule Executive Branch

4). Legislative Branch 1/3% = Executive Branch 1/3% = Legislative Branch can’t overrule Executive Branch

The 1st Equation: The math states the Legislative Branches can overrule the President but the statement states the Legislative Branches can’t overrule Executive Branch and the statement is correct by the Constitution. The math doesn’t support the statement. So the equation is incorrect.

The 2nd Equation: The math states the Legislative Branches can overrule the President. The statement states the Legislative Branches can overrule Executive Branch. The Constitution states it can’t. The Constitution doesn’t support the math or the statement. So the equation is incorrect.

The 3rd Equation: The math states the Branches are equal and one can’t overrule the other. The statement states Legislative Branch can overrule the Executive Branch. The Constitution says it can’t. The math and the Constitution doesn’t support the statement. So the equation is incorrect.

The 4th Equation: The math states the Branches are equal and one can’t overrule the other. The statement states the Legislative Branch can’t overrule Executive Branch and the Constitution supports the math and the statement. All three support each other. So the equation is CORRECT!

Again, mathematics is the universal language of the universe, it has no opinion, there will only be one correct answer and the others will be incorrect.

What the Constitution States

Now, lets do the equation as the 2/3 vote to overrule a veto does exist in our Constitution.

1). House of Representatives 25% + Senate 25% > President 25% = legislative branches can’t overrule executive branch

2). House of Representatives 25% + Senate 25% > President 25% = legislative branches can overrule executive branch

3). Legislative Branch 1/3% = Executive Branch 1/3% = Legislative Branch can overrule Executive Branch

4). Legislative Branch 1/3% = Executive Branch 1/3% = Legislative Branch can’t overrule Executive Branch

The 4th Equation: The math states the Branches are equal and one can’t overrule the other. The statement states Legislative Branch can’t overrule Executive Branch but the Constitution states it can. The Constitution does not support the math or the statement. So the equation is incorrect.

The 3rd Equation: The math states the Branches are equal and one can’t overrule the other. The statement states Legislative Branch can overrule Executive Branch. The Constitution states the Legislative Branch can overrule the Executive Branch. The math doesn’t support the statement or the Constitution. So the equation is incorrect.

The 1st Equation: The math states the Legislative Branches can overrule the President. The statement states Legislative Branches can’t overrule Executive Branch. The Constitution states the Legislative Branch can over Executive Branch. The math and the Constitution do not support the statement. So the equation is incorrect.

The 2nd Equation: The math states the Legislative Branches can overrule the President. The statement states Legislative Branches can overrule Executive Branch. The Constitution supports the math and the statement. All three support each other. So the equation is CORRECT!

Conclusion: Without the 2/3 vote to overrule a President’s veto the equation chose a three branch government. With the 2/3 vote to overrule a President’s veto the equation chose a four branch government. Again a three branch government will not support a 2/3 vote to overrule a President’s veto because the branches have equal power of 1/3% each. The United States of America’s form of government created by the Constitution has a 2/3 vote to overrule the President’s veto in the Constitution so the United States of America’s form of Government must be four branches with the branches being the President, House of Representatives, Senate and supreme Court.

With this mathematical equation you now have three options and three options only on which too make an intellectually educated decision on how many branches exist in our government.

1). The equation is wrong and that is how I managed to get the conclusion I desired. But to say this you must pinpoint the flaw in the equation, just saying so is not enough.

2). The equation is correct but the answer is wrong. Be very careful with this option because now you are stating that mathematics is flawed and this has never happened throughout the history of mathematics.

3). The equation is correct, the answer is correct meaning everything I have written in regards to the United States’ form of government being a four branch system is correct.

Unbelievable as it may seem there are people that will still insist on the three branches and yet they will not read any portion of what I have written. There are others who after reading portions of it still try to develop an argument which ends right back at what they were taught in school being first through twelfth grade or college and what they were taught can’t be wrong. They paid good money for that college education. I even had one person high up in our local school system educated at Ole Miss with a History Degree compare what I wrote to a actual tree and its branches, it was amazing to me the stupidity of his argument. Yet there are many including principals in our local school systems who were stunned after reading this because a light went off in their head allowing them to see the truth of what I had written. For the ones who disagreed, in their defense, none including the people who agreed with just what was written had seen the equation or the sentence breakdown of Articles I, II and III because I had not written them yet. This also shows that throwing money at an educational system doesn’t guarantee a good education if the curriculum being taught is flawed. This ought to open our government’s eyes to how essential a correct curriculum is because without it there is no reason to teach.

There is absolutely nothing wrong with questioning what you are being taught especially if there are no facts being introduced on the subject. If the teacher has no answers for the questions chances are the teacher was indoctrinated by that same thought process without answers or Facts meaning what was and is being taught is only a theory and shouldn’t be portrayed as the Truth. Even with facts, are the facts limited to a set of perceptions which predetermine the outcome of the answer? If so, then the answer is incorrect because the facts were intended to be limited by the source in regards to the subject to achieve a certain predetermined outcome. In other words, Indoctrination!

THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES IS TRULY A REFLECTION OF THE PEOPLE

Our two government branches that legislate bills and the one branch that decides if it wants to execute the bill which may become law are each elected in three separate ways under the original Constitution for a purpose. It was for a representational format. The time of term in office also has a purpose. The President is elected by an electoral system selected by the peoples’ vote of the states for a national position for a term of four years. The President, one person one home, if or when he/she goes home does so to one state, one county, one city or town. So their only true contact with the people may just be a selection from those options. True, he/she may own a vacation home or shake hands while on the campaign trail. But where he/she grew up in a town or county, they truly have the same values and beliefs because they all shared the same environment, so they truly have the President’s ear. Of course his/her donors also have an ear, but that ear is bought and paid for. So the President is either belief motivated and/or money motivated or a combination thereof.

The Senate, two Senators are elected by the people from each State to represent the whole state for a term of six years. Again, one state, two people two homes, two counties, two towns or cities and everything else from the above paragraph also applies to the Senators.

The House of Representatives is elected for a two year term by the people to represent a district which covers a predetermined area of a county or counties within a state. The number of Representatives is determined by the population of the state. The result is a House of Representatives’ member and his/her office is guaranteed to live and be within a short proximity of a voter and what is mentioned in the first paragraph also applies to the Representatives. The two year terms of the House of Representatives was created by the Founding Fathers because the direction of government can be altered by We the People every two years instead of waiting four years for a Presidential election or six years for a Senator’s election. For the House of Representatives alone to alter the direction of government it must be 50%, along with the Senate (50%), of the branches that form Congress (100%) that write and pass all bills to the President to become law or vetoed. A do nothing Congress, as described by today’s Democrats, does not exist and never will. What does exist are two branches of government with two different ideologies and each is not willing to compromise their ideas on or of government. So because they will not pass legislation promoting the others ideology they are a deadlocked Congress in regards to those issues. Sometimes doing nothing is doing something. The Founding Fathers’ belief was no law being passed is better than a bad law being passed. That is why the Founding Fathers designed checks and balances of legislation that are divided between two legislative branches which encourage a deadlock of government instead of promoting bad government that passes bad legislation. So a deadlocked government can be and is a normal aspect of government when needed and is not an act of terrorism as described by Barack Obama. When government is divided in such a way as Barack Obama has divided it there are only two positions, one is right and one is wrong with very little shared in between and the Founding Fathers knew of this concept when writing the Constitution.

It is the voter’s responsibility to break the deadlock with elected officials that support the People’s views. The 2010 election that changed the House of Representatives from Democrat to Republican control and the 2014 election that changed the Senate also from Democrat to Republican control by We the People was a change in direction of the views of We the People. Also a low turnout of voters of one party is essentially a vote for a lack of faith in that party or the party’s leaders without having to put forth the effort of voting. Elections do have consequences Mr. President whether you agree with it or not, Barack Obama. It seems Barack only agrees with something when it works in his favor, how convenient.

The intent by the Founding Fathers was for the Legislative Branches to travel home and collect information as too the needs of the people along with ideas for solutions from the people who know the problems they are encountering and then write legislation regarding those ideas, a bottom up solution of governing. Because of this the Founding Fathers wanted the House of Representatives’ voice in government to be at least as loud if not louder because of their numbers (435) than the Senate (100) and the President (1). The Founding Fathers would not and did not dilute the strongest voice of We the People by combining the House of Representatives with the second strongest (335 less people) voice of government, the Senate, under one branch. The Fathers’ favorite son is the House of Representatives and wanted to ensure this thought by making it and the Senate equal branches in government because these two branches are the closest to the People. Because of this 4.35 to 1.0 ratio of the House of Representatives to Senate members is the Founding Fathers reason for this following statement. Article I, Section 7 of the Constitution States:

All Bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with Amendments as on other Bills.

The Founding Fathers wanted the branch closest to the people to be the branch that controlled the wallet (spending) of We the People. This was changed in the early to mid 1900’s (I think) by congress but not by an Amendment to the Constitution but an agreement of Congress which obviously was and still is, by over stepping their powers, a violation of the Constitution. Again an example of the Federal Government by doing this has shifted the flow of thoughts and ideas from the bottom up, the people to government, to a top down, government to the people, form of government. The Founding Fathers also gave the last say