Why They Stay: Sex Scandals, Deals, and Hidden Agendas of Nine Political Wives (First Edition)

Table of Contents

Praise for Why They Stay

Copyright

Dedication

Prologue

The White Queen Relationship

Trait One: Submitting to Tradition

Trait Two: Longing for Security

Trait Three: A Personal Sense of Patriotism

Trait Four: Responsibility for the Family’s Emotional Health

Trait Five: Ambition to Build and Bequeath a Legacy

1. Eleanor and FDR

Living Separate Lives Together

Eleanor’s White Queen Quotient: 8

Seeking Security in a World of Privilege and Dissolution

Schooled in a Proud Patriarchal Legacy

To Washington, and Temptation

Eleanor’s Commitment to Duty Tested

Fashioning a New Kind of First Lady

Infidelity’s Legacy For the Five Roosevelt Children

2. Jackie and JFK

A Legacy of Adultery

Jackie’s White Queen Quotient: 7

The Kennedys and Fitzgeralds: Stepping Up from ‘Second Class’

The Bouviers: A Façade of Financial Security

Jackie’s Mother: Schooling her Daughters to Marry Mr. Right

Male Privilege: Philandering in Both Houses

Coping in Bed and All the Way to the Bank

Turning Outward toward Caretaking

A Heritage of Resiliency

3. Valerie Hobson and Jack Profumo

Bringing Down the Party

Valerie’s White Queen Quotient: 8

From Poverty to Hollywood: The Woman at the Center of the Scandal

A Noble Family and Every Other Advantage

Marriage Agrees with Jack’s Political Career

Hiding the Scandal from the Children

Deciding Whether to Stay

4. Marion Stein and Jeremy Thorpe

Party Leader Blackmailed

Marion’s White Queen Quotient: 9

A Life Blossoming Through Music

Fairy Tale Marriage to a Royal Grandson

The Charismatic Jack Kennedy of Britain

Gay Men in Public Life

A Deadly Plot

Scandal’s Legacy for Four Sons

5. Hillary and Bill Clinton:

Inventing the Power Couple

Hillary’s White Queen Quotient: 10

Mixed Messages from a Righteous Mother and Overbearing Father

An Evidently Formidable Team

Clearly Not a One-Woman Man

Uneasiness in the Land of Patriarchal Politics

Protecting Her Family’s Legacy—and That of Her Country

Making a Normal Family Life for Chelsea

Arguing for a ‘Zone of Privacy’ for Political Families

6. Gila and Moshe Katsav

Loyalty After Rape Charges

Gila’s White Queen Quotient: 8

A Life Built on Building a Community

A Tremor of Scandal, and then an Avalanche

What Gila and their Children Knew

7. Wendy and David Vitter

Anti-Sex Crusader

Wendy’s White Queen Quotient: 9

Early Training in ‘No Nonsense’

The Lone Wolf of Louisiana Politics

D.C. Madam Publishes Clients’ Phone Numbers and Fetishes

Protecting Himself from His Own Urges

8. Silda Wall and Eliot Spitzer

Clinging to Power

Silda’s White Queen Quotient: 6

A Southern Belle Drawn to Harvard

Pressure to Perform in a Dynasty on the Rise

Silda Wonders, ‘Who is This Guy?’

‘The Wife is Responsible for the Sex’

Trying to Mend the Family

9. Huma Abedin and Anthony Weiner

A Woman of Confidence

Learning to Defend Herself and Her Culture

A Middle-Class Son from Brooklyn and Queens

The ‘Most Competent, Graceful Person’ in Politics

A sex scandal fueled by 21st century media

Huma’s White Queen Quotient: 10

Social Media Obsession Helps to Sink Hillary Clinton Campaign

Conclusion

Acknowledgments

Praise for Why They Stay

Marriage is a mysterious thing and political unions are even more so. In the engrossing and important Why They Stay Anne Michaud peers into the heart of some of the most famously troubled political marriages of the past 100 years in an attempt to understand why accomplished women ranging from Hillary Clinton to Silda Spitzer put up with men many others would have quickly kicked to the curb. Her answers will no doubt influence how we think about these scandals going forward – not to mention the ones still to come.

—Helaine Olen, author of Pound Foolish

It’s a story we’ve heard often: Prominent politicians suddenly find themselves ensnared in humiliatingly public sex scandals, but their wives decide to stay with them. With a prodigious amount of research and deft storytelling skill, Anne Michaud goes beyond the headlines and explores the stories of both spouses, on both sides of the Atlantic, revealing the pain, the loyalty, and the calculations behind the wives’ decisions. Every political couple should read it.

—Bob Keeler, author and Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist

Anne Michaud breathes life into headlines that I thought I knew so well with fresh details about well-known political spouses like Hillary Clinton, Silda Wall Spitzer and Huma Abedin. Her thorough reporting helped cast them into an entirely new light and see how their personal struggles reflect the internal struggles women have faced for centuries.

—Christine Haughney, former New York Times staff reporter

|

"I found it really interesting, meticulously researched, and well-documented. Why They Stay doesn’t revert to sensationalism but really goes to the question of why they stay in the marriage."

— Stephen F. Medici, author of The Girls in Pleated Skirts

Why They Stay

Sex Scandals, Deals, and

Hidden Agendas

of Nine Political Wives

A n ne Mic h a u d

Ogunquit-NY Press

‡

Copyright

Copyright ©2017 by Anne Michaud. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.

Library of Congress Control Number 2016914885

Why They Stay: Sex Scandals, Deals, and Hidden Agendas of Nine Political Wives /Anne Michaud

ISBN 13: 978-0-9976633-0-3

ISBN-10: 0-9976633-0-8

Printed in the United States of America

First Edition, January 2017

Editor: Bonnie Britt

Cover designer: Janet Michaud

Cover photographer: C.J. Burton

Designer/Typographer: Bonnie Britt

Publisher: Ogunquit-NY Press

P.O. Box 1520, Huntington NY 11743-2714 web: www.annemichaud.com

For inquiries, contact: [email protected]

Dedication

For Daniel, Isabelle, and Charlotte for believing.

Prologue

The White Queen Relationship

For a year after a sexting scandal forced him to resign from Congress in June 2011, Anthony Weiner lived quietly outside the public spotlight. It was an intensely solitary period for the Brooklyn son who had had the chutzpah to become the youngest New York City council member in history. Just seven years later, at age 34, he had risen to win a seat in Congress. Impudent and confrontational, Weiner was something of a loud political lone wolf before pulling off the collaboration of a lifetime: marrying into American Democratic royalty. Against all odds, this Jewish outer-borough shnuk had courted a glamorous and sophisticated Muslim woman–and surrogate second daughter to Bill and Hillary Clinton–for several years before she consented to marry him. Bill Clinton officiated at the July 2010 wedding of Huma Abedin and Anthony Weiner.

But that was then. Private life post-Congress was proving stultifying for the exhibitionist ex-Congress member who had sent a photo of his penis in gray cotton briefs to 45,000 Twitter followers. So he and Huma were plotting his return to power.

In June 2012, the couple posed for People magazine with their 6-month-old son, Jordan. Huma told the People interviewer that Anthony was doing the laundry and other house-husbandly tasks. He claimed to have become a very different person since the birth of their child, and said he was trying to be the best dad and husband [he] can be.

The interview was published the following month. At the same time, Huma was cajoling Anthony to sit for another interview–this one bigger and more serious, which was to be the final word on the sexting mess that had ended his congressional career. She wanted to clear the air, put that behind them, and get back on track toward their dreamed-of life in politics. Mayor of New York City had always seemed to be a good fit for her brash and brilliant husband.

That next spring, on April 14, 2013, Huma finagled a rambling, confessional profile on the cover of The New York Times Magazine. A more public, more earnest venue the couple could not have aspired to. Weiner and Abedin have realized, it seems, that the only way out is through, wrote Jonathan Van Meter. Anthony summed up the troubles that had ended his seven terms in Congress as one fateful Tweet.

The magazine profile ended with Anthony saying that Huma wanted him to run for New York City mayor, a position he had long coveted—and shortly afterward, he announced his candidacy. He immediately shot to the top of the field over four solid Democrats. He had the name recognition and the money—more than $4 million, much of it from Orthodox Jews in his Brooklyn-Queens district who backed his Zionist stance on Israel. As the basis of his platform, he developed a 64-point booklet of policy initiatives, Keys to the City. Paid pollsters had assured him that New Yorkers were willing to give him a second chance in public office. ¹ By June 2014, he was leading in the polls among voters. Anthony Weiner was back.

But so was a pseudonymous alter ego, Carlos Danger. Between sitting for the People photographer in June 2012 and the publication of the cozy family photos the following month, Anthony had reached out to a new sext partner. The relationship escalated quickly. Soon, the two were having phone sex as many as five times a day, and Anthony–Carlos– had proposed buying a condo in Chicago’s tony South Loop neighborhood where they could meet.

There is some evidence that Huma knew that her husband continued his sexting compulsion, even after quitting Congress in disgrace. According to friends and family who spoke to the New York Post, Anthony confessed to her in September 2012 that he was at it again. Huma blamed herself for bailing out of couples counseling, the story said, and focusing instead on their newborn baby.

That knowledge might have convinced another couple to hold back from the 2013 mayoral race, but Huma and Anthony pursued it with vigor. She was eager to get her life back in politics, to clean up the mess I had made, Anthony told the documentary filmmakers who followed his 2014 campaign in Weiner. Running for mayor was the straightest line to do it.

Within weeks of Anthony’s entry into the mayoral race, TheDirty.com published Carlos’s traitorous sexts for all to see. Now everyone knew: Even a resignation, even a new baby and a magnanimous wife, hadn’t quelled Weiner’s sexting compulsion.

To respond to the revelations, Anthony and Huma appeared at a press conference together. With the Carlos Danger revelations breaking into their carefully planned mayoral campaign, Huma’s presence seemed to be the only hope to rescue Weiner’s candidacy. Where are we on the statement? Huma asks him impatiently in the documentary, Weiner as she raps her fingernails repeatedly on a desk. He responds, My head is at, sell this as something people already know, and to try to turn the focus back to his posture as a middle class hero.

The couple appeared to be following a script written by Bill and Hillary Clinton more than two decades earlier, in 1992, after Gennifer Flowers claimed she’d had a 12-year affair with Bill while he was the governor of Arkansas. The political wife came forward and publicly vouched for her straying man. If she could continue to trust and believe in him, the public could too—or so the script went.

For his press conference, Weiner wore a fresh white dress shirt, with sleeves rolled up to mid-forearm. Abedin stood off to his left, and behind him. A woman of regal bearing, with strong Levantine features and renowned for elegance, Huma on this day wore her hair pulled into a bun. She appeared wounded and near tears. She didn’t meet Anthony’s gaze as he looked toward her and spoke about the challenges in their marriage, but Huma’s eyes shone when he talked about his vision for New York’s middle class. She still held hope—or at least she was playing at hope for the audience.

I do very strongly believe this is between us and our marriage, Huma told the bank of microphones, cameras, and reporters. I love him, I believe in him, and as we have said from the beginning, we are moving forward.

When I first heard about Anthony Weiner’s sexting scandal, I thought, That figures. It was only a matter of time before the man’s unstable ego undid his career in Congress. I had known Weiner when I was a political reporter in New York from 2003 to 2008 and had covered his 2005 bid for New York City mayor. I had heard the grumblings of his departing staff, who never seemed to last long, especially the women. My standard line about him was, He doesn’t have the temperament for public office.

During Weiner’s second run for mayor, when the Carlos Danger stuff came to light, I felt sick. At the press conference, Huma appeared pale and shrunken into herself. On any other day, she was one of the world’s most beautiful and accomplished women: At 32, she had accompanied candidate Hillary Clinton through her presidential campaign. Abedin was the well-traveled daughter of two university professors, a rising star of American politics ² and one of the most popular people in the Democratic Party, according to prominent Clinton strategist James Carville. ³ Yet here she was before the voracious New York City press corps having to defend a sleaze of a husband, reading her agreed-upon lines from a page she and Weiner had written together. I barely knew Weiner, yet had perceived he wasn’t someone I wanted to trust, let alone bet my future on. How had this worldly young woman missed that?

Or had she? Perhaps this sort of marriage, at the top echelons of Washington and international society, was made from different rules than I had agreed to when I married. Fidelity, honesty—perhaps these were quaint ideas better suited to less ambitious people. When one had the heights of the free world practically in one’s grasp, maybe the bargain at the altar became more pragmatic. Certainly, if that were Abedin’s calculation—that with her brains and his brass, they could conquer American politics—she has many predecessors as role models. Jacqueline Kennedy, Joan Kennedy, Lee Ludwig Hart, Maria Shriver, Silda Wall Spitzer, Hillary Clinton. Did their decisions, to prop up their politically hungry husbands, send the message that sacrificing marital intimacy for worldly gain might be a worthwhile bargain?

Like Mellie Grant, the character of the president’s wife in the television series Scandal, every choice in the marriage—even to conceiving a child—might be grounded in cold political calculation.

The people at the center of these stories, real people involved in power couples, mostly choose to see their motives as selfless. In Elizabeth Edwards’ autobiography Resilience, she wrote of her marriage to John, U.S. senator from North Carolina, We were lovers, life companions, crusaders, side by side, for a vision of what the country could be. ⁴ When she found out he was cheating on her, the crusading together became the glue that kept them together. I grabbed hold of it. I needed to, Edwards wrote. Although I no longer knew what I could trust between the two of us, I knew I could trust in our work together. She wanted an intact family fighting for causes more important that any one of us. ⁵

Another difference affecting marriages of such public figures is that they’re subject to so much scrutiny, every wart is inevitably exposed and magnified. The couples learn to distrust what’s said about them in the media and to turn inward toward each other in times of crisis. Dina Matos McGreevey is the former wife of New Jersey Gov. Jim McGreevey who, in 2004, resigned his office, declaring himself a gay American. In her memoir Silent Partner, she wrote about ignoring press reports. Yes, I’d once or twice heard the rumor that Jim was gay, but I dismissed it just as I dismissed many other stories, most of which I knew not to be true. ⁶ Living in a bubble, powerful, public couples sift every report through what they know to be behind-the-scenes reality. This forces them into an extreme inward focus in which the spouse is often the only trusted confidante. The couple forms a hard shell against embarrassment and criticism and, when trouble comes, they are conditioned by years in the political trenches to fight back.

Hillary Clinton, for example, summoned aides to create a war room-like political team to defend her husband— legally and in the media—against scandal when news of his affair with a 22-year-old White House intern broke. Wendy Vitter, a steely former prosecutor, tried to shame a Louisiana crowd of reporters in July 2007. Her husband Sen. David Vitter had just been revealed as a client of D.C. Madam Deborah Jeane Palfrey. After a week’s hibernation, the Vitters called a press conference where Wendy Vitter said, You know, in most any other marriage, this would have been a private issue between a husband and a wife, very private. Obviously, it’s not here. ⁷

It wasn’t always that way for the wives of powerful men. Prior to the 1960s, the press generally kept mum about the sex lives of politicians. When Eleanor Roosevelt discovered her husband’s affair by reading a love letter, she kept it to herself—and used it to gain the upper hand in her marriage, which set her free to pursue writing and social activism. Today’s wives of philandering politicians do some of that, to be sure, but they also achieve the added bonus of being publicly martyred. Look at her, people may say. What a rock she is. He doesn’t deserve her. Although it’s a distasteful summary of an accomplished woman’s rise to power, some argue that the sympathy Hillary Clinton won by staying with Bill after the Monica Lewinsky affair propelled her to victory as a U.S. senator from New York, and later to the nomination for the U.S. presidency.

The media’s role changed from Eleanor’s day to Hillary’s. The modern spotlight on private affairs inflates the women’s sense of themselves, making a public admission of defeat—ending the marriage—that much harder. Being a leading power couple means not only submitting to media scrutiny but also commanding coverage. To leave the marriage behind is to step out of the spotlight. It means fading into normalcy, returning to ordinary life, perhaps an impossible admission for women who have built their egos on being one member of a leading couple. To divorce is to admit defeat for women who see themselves as extraordinary and who are acknowledged as among the smartest people in the room, circulating with other famous and history making people. Indeed, Huma Abedin’s separation from Anthony Weiner came, in August 2016, as her mentor Hillary Clinton aspired to the highest office in America. One could argue that Huma exchanged her knight for a queen. That view has a negative connotation, yet I also believe that Huma’s purpose is not just to follow a mentor to power but also to help her to fulfill her sense of public mission.

I’ve researched nine of the most high-profile couples who stayed together after a sex scandal—Eleanor and Franklin Roosevelt, Jackie and Jack Kennedy, Valerie Hobson and Jack Profumo, Marion Stein and Jeremy Thorpe, Hillary Rodham Clinton and Bill Clinton, Silda Wall Spitzer and Eliot Spitzer, Huma Abedin and Anthony Weiner, Wendy and David Vitter, Gila and Moshe Katsav. I found that these women have in common characteristics of what I call the White Queen Syndrome. For the purposes of this book, I’ve defined staying in the marriage not only as ‘til death do us part, but also as a determined effort to resurrect the political fortunes of their husbands and restore their vision of their life together.

The original White Queen was Elizabeth Woodville, a woman of ordinary lineage who used her beauty and cunning to launch the powerful Tudor dynasty. Elizabeth Woodville apparently knew that her husband Edward IV had mistresses—and even one special mistress, Elizabeth Shore. But the rewards of being queen kept her bound to her royal husband. I was inspired to compare leading modern wives with those of Medieval England because the contrast seems improbable. Centuries ago, a woman’s only means of rising above the circumstances of her birth was via a man. Today, modern women have choices. They can earn a living, support a family, run for office—or choose to walk away and live a private life. Given women’s gains in legal and practical rights during the past 50 years—in dramatic contrast to the Middle Ages— I wondered why some political women choose to stay in unfaithful and often publicly humiliating marriages?

If their White Queen compromises seem a mystery to the average woman, who might never permit such humiliation in her life, we must allow for some unusual pressures of history and ambition on powerful, public couples. Not every one of the nine women profiled displays all five of the White Queen traits. However, as we’ll see, in general, the nine wives’ stories give us five common motives and calculations.

Trait One: Submitting to Tradition

Our modern White Queens were prepared from early life to accept the limits and burdens of marrying men with great political ambitions. Marriage as a goal in itself—and especially marriage to an important, wealthy man—is an ambition for which women have trained for centuries, and it’s what I refer to as a patriarchal mindset. In White Queen days, there was a literal patriarchy: Men ruled. Today, a remnant of this power hierarchy exists in our minds—and to some degree, in the political and corporate worlds—especially among people of privilege and social rank.

Politics reinforces this mindset because it’s a tradition-bound world. Political leaders exist in a bright spotlight where they are expected to respect time-tested rituals, hierarchies, decorum, and unwritten maxims. Politicians pay a good deal of money to advisers to counsel them and their wives about how to behave to appeal to the largest voting bloc. For example, when Bill Clinton was running for president for the first time in 1992, campaign advisers told him that voters were uneasy about the idea of him and Hillary serving as co-presidents. While voters genuinely admire Hillary Clinton’s intelligence and tenacity, they are uncomfortable with these traits in a woman, wrote advisers Celinda Lake and Stan Greenberg. She needs to project a softer side… the role of First Lady appears to be one of the last bastions of tradition. ⁸

Couples who enter the political world are at least comfortable with its underlying culture and assumptions, and that comfort deepens over the years they remain in politics. Men who aspire to high office choose partners who fit the patriarchal image of what a wife should be: supportive, home focused, feminine, gracious and self-sacrificing. Political wives who don’t fit this mold are forced to come to uneasy terms with it. Think of candidate’s wife Hillary Clinton competing in an election-year cookie bake-off against First Lady Barbara Bush, ⁹ or Silda Wall finally taking the last