The Hunt for Moore's Gold: Investigating the Loss of the British Army's Military Chest During the Retreat to Corunna
By John Grehan and Angel Rodil Perez
()
About this ebook
History abounds with unresolved puzzles and unanswered questions, none more so than that of the loss of the British Army’s military chest during the retreat to Corunna in 1809. Now, with a group of fellow historians, the author set off to search the archives and the mountains of Galicia in a bid to find Moore’s gold.
Sir John Moore’s small force had dared to attack Marshal Soult’s II Corps isolated in the north of Spain. But before Moore could pounce on the unsuspecting French corps, he learned that the Emperor Napoleon, at the head of an overwhelming body of troops, was bearing down on the British force, hoping to cut it off from the sea and its only avenue of escape.
A desperate race for the coast then began, with the French hard on Moore’s heels. In subzero temperatures, the troops were driven on through the snow-clad Galician mountains at a punishing pace. As the men trudged on in deteriorating conditions, the bullocks pulling the army’s military chest could no longer keep up. So, in order to prevent the money from falling into enemy hands, the entire military chest was thrown down a deep ravine.
What then happened to all those dollars and doubloons? Some were snatched up by the pursuing French cavalry. Some, also, were retrieved by British soldiers who intentionally lagged behind, though their greed cost them their lives on the end of a French bayonet. But what of the rest of the money?
John Grehan
JOHN GREHAN has written, edited or contributed to more than 300 books and magazine articles covering a wide span of military history from the Iron Age to the recent conflict in Afghanistan. John has also appeared on local and national radio and television to advise on military history topics. He was employed as the Assistant Editor of Britain at War Magazine from its inception until 2014. John now devotes his time to writing and editing books.
Read more from John Grehan
The Battle of Hastings 1066: The Uncomfortable Truth: Revealing the True Location of England's Most Famous Battle Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Hitler Assassination Attempts: The Plots, Places and People that Almost Changed History Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Lines of Torres Vedras: The Cornerstone of Wellington's Strategy in the Peninsular War 1809-12 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Hitler's Wolfsschanze: The Wolf's Lair Headquarters on the Eastern Front – An Illustrated Guide Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGreat Naval Battles of the Pacific War: The Official Admiralty Accounts: Midway, Coral Sea, Java Sea, Guadalcanal & Leyte Gulf Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDunkirk: Nine Days That Saved An Army: A Day-by-Day Account of the Greatest Evacuation Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5First Burma Campaign: The Japanese Conquest of 1942 By Those Who Were There Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Boer War, 1899–1902: Ladysmith, Megersfontein, Spion Kop, Kimberley and Mafeking Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Doolittle Raid: The First Air Attack Against Japan, April 1942 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Berlin Airlift: The World's Largest Ever Air Supply Operation Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRAF and the SOE: Special Duty Operations in Europe During WW2 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOkinawa: The Last Naval Battle of WW2: The Official Admiralty Account of Operation Iceberg Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSlaughter on the Somme 1 July 1916: The Complete War Diaries of the British Army's Worst Day Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Royal Navy and the War at Sea, 1914–1919 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsChurchill's Secret Invasion: Britains First Large Scale Combined Offensive 1942 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Battle of Barrosa: Forgotten Battle of the Peninsular War Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBattleground Sussex: A Military History of Sussex From the Iron Age to the Present Day Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Medical Officers on the Infamous Burma Railway: Accounts of Life, Death & War Crimes by Those Who Were There With F-Force Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFighting with the Fourteenth Army in Burma: Original War Summaries of the Battle Against Japan 1943–1945 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHitler's V-Weapons: The Battle Against the V-1 and V-2 Written at the Time, An Official History Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Battle of Tinian: The Capture of the Atomic Bomb Island, July-August 1944 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsStorming Hitler's British Fortress: The Commando Raids on the Channel Islands in World War II Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBomber Harris: Sir Arthur Harris' Despatches on War Operations 1942–1945 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Waterloo Campaign in 100 Locations Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWestern Front, 1914–1916 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to The Hunt for Moore's Gold
Related ebooks
Secret Forces of World War II Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIn the Heart of the Rockies: A Story of Adventure in Colorado Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLife and Adventures of "Billy" Dixon: A Narrative in which is Described many things Relating to the Early Southwest Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLoyal Service: Perspectives on French-Canadian Military Leaders Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMist on the Rice-Fields: A Soldier's Story of the Burma Campaign 1943–1045 and Korean War 1950–51 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsField Gun Jack Versus the Boers: The Royal Navy in South Africa, 1899–1900 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAlaska's Greatest Outdoor Legends: Colorful Characters Who Built the Fishing and Hunting Industries Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Contractors: A Justice Incorporated Short Story: Justice Incorporated Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Iron Brigade in Civil War and Memory: The Black Hats from Bull Run to Appomattox and Thereafter Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Cape May Navy: Delaware Bay Privateers in the American Revolution Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Misfire: The Tragic Failure of the M16 in Vietnam Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Pig War: The Most Perfect War in History Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWith Moore at Corunna Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDespatch Rider on the Western Front, 1915–18: The Diary of Sergeant Albert Simpkin MM Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCoral Comes High (Illustrated): U.S. Marines and the Battle for The Point on Peleliu Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGrey Wolves: The U-Boat War 1939?1945 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Hourglass: A History of the 7th Infantry Division in World War II Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Succession Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTowns of Lincoln County Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Stalky & Co: “All the people like us are we, and everyone else is they” Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDesert Warfare: From Its Roman Origins to the Gulf Conflict Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBush Yarns Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRyan Pitts: Afghanistan: A Firefight in the Mountains of Wanat Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Surprise And Deception In The Early War Years, 1940-1942 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsChancellorsville 1863: Jackson's Lightning Strike Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Last in Their Class: Custer, Pickett and the Goats of West Point Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBig Mobs: The Story of Australian Cattlemen Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Custer 1861-1865: The Custer America Forgot Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsKnife Edge Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Farpool: Marauders of Seome Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Wars & Military For You
The Happiest Man on Earth: The Beautiful Life of an Auschwitz Survivor Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Last Kingdom Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Sun Tzu's The Art of War: Bilingual Edition Complete Chinese and English Text Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How to Hide an Empire: A History of the Greater United States Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Art of War: The Definitive Interpretation of Sun Tzu's Classic Book of Strategy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Wager Disaster: Mayem, Mutiny and Murder in the South Seas Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Resistance: The Warsaw Ghetto Uprising Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of War Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Masters of the Air: America's Bomber Boys Who Fought the Air War Against Nazi Germany Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Shogun: The Life of Tokugawa Ieyasu Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBlitzed: Drugs in the Third Reich Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The God Delusion Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Ordinary Men: Reserve Police Battalion 101 and the Final Solution in Poland Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5On Killing: The Psychological Cost of Learning to Kill in War and Society Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of War & Other Classics of Eastern Philosophy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Twilight of the Shadow Government: How Transparency Will Kill the Deep State Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe History of the Peloponnesian War: With linked Table of Contents Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Daily Creativity Journal Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Unabomber Manifesto: Industrial Society and Its Future Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Killing the SS: The Hunt for the Worst War Criminals in History Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Unit 731: Testimony Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Making of the Atomic Bomb Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Mysterious Case of Rudolf Diesel: Genius, Power, and Deception on the Eve of World War I Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Band of Brothers: E Company, 506th Regiment, 101st Airborne from Normandy to Hitler's Eagle's Nest Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5God Is Not One: The Eight Rival Religions That Run the World--and Why Their Differences Matter Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Dr. Seuss Goes to War: The World War II Editorial Cartoons of Theodor Seuss Geisel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Related categories
Reviews for The Hunt for Moore's Gold
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
The Hunt for Moore's Gold - John Grehan
Introduction
The Quest for the Chest
‘O h, beg pardon, sir
, said the blue-coated officer; I am paymaster general … The treasure of the army, sir, is close in the rear, and the bullocks being jaded are unable to proceed.
’ The officer that the paymaster general had addressed was General Paget in charge of the retreating army’s rear-guard. Paget had no time, or men, to spare to deal with the paymaster general’s problems, for he had an enemy to fight.
That enemy was creeping round the rear-guard’s right flank and the military treasure chest, heavy and immobile on the carts of the exhausted cattle, was certain to be overtaken by the pursuers. Paget had no choice. The money had to abandoned.
The Light Company of the 28th Regiment was ordered to the rear in double-quick-time to hold back the French cavalry as the remainder of the regiment drew up in close order around the two the paymaster general’s carts. The military chests were then opened and the treasure of the army, silver and possibly gold specie, was thrown over the snow-covered cliff into the ravine below. ‘As they rolled down the precipice, their silvery notes were accompanied by a noble bass,’ wrote a youngofficer of the 28th, Robert Blakeney ‘for two guns were thundering forth their applause into Soult’s dark brown column as they gallantly pressed forward.’
Anyone who has read the history of Sir John Moore’s retreat to Corunna will know of the story of the army’s military chest being thrown into a deep ravine rather than allowing it to fall into the hands of the enemy. But just how true is this tale and exactly how much treasure was lost? How much of it was seized by the passing troops and was any recovered by the local Spanish peasants when the snow thawed and coins were exposed? Perhaps more importantly, is there any of that treasure still sitting at the bottom of the ravine?
For years, I have pondered these questions, indeed my personal journey began when I purchased a copy of Blakeney’s memoirs at a table-top sale at a gymkhana in the New Forest whilst on a farm holiday with my family. Remarkably, the book was signed and dated July 1900 (just after the book had first been published), and was given as a present to Fanny Blakeney. It cost me just 10p!
After decades of wondering what had happened to the military chest I had to accept that there was only one way to find out – by looking for myself. Thus began this quest to discover, once and for all, what happened to Moore’s gold.
The approach I am taking in this book, is to retell the story of the retreat to Corunna in as great a detail as I possibly can. This, I hope, will enable me to understand the circumstances around the loss of the military chest, and its exact location. The retreat to the coast of northern Spain and the battle outside the port of Corunna to hold back the French before the battered and bloody British army was able to safely embark on the ships that would carry them to England, is also one of the most dramatic tales in British military history and well worth the retelling, drawing on the standard accounts of the retreat, as well as some that have not been presented to the public for more than 200 years, and a number that have only recently become readily available.
The second part of the book will focus on the events of that cold winter evening of 5 January 1809 and culminate in an expedition to Galicia to investigate in person the possible site where the sacks holding the military chest were discarded. As I write this introduction I do not know where this journey will take me, or where it will finish. It might be that I can positively identify the location of the lost treasure but that the slope is too steep to be climbed, I simply do not know.
My search for Moore’slost bullion may end on the top of a precipice staring down a ravine I will never enter, or in an Assay Office as the coins bearing the image of King George (or more likely Carlos IV) are weighed. Please join me on this journey, it should be quite a trip.
The Peninsula Campaing 1808–1814
Chapter 1
Cintra Shame
The raft swayed gently on the slow-running waters of the Niemen. Napoleon’s boat was the first to arrive, the Marines of the Guard proving swifter oarsmen than their Russian counterparts. Upon the raft had been built a magnificent apartment, the imperial eagles of both countries proudly adorning the doors and the roof. A few moments later, Alexander I, Czar of All the Russias, stepped onto the elaborately decorated craft. Napoleon courteously opened the door flap for the young Russian autocrat and, for the first time, the two most powerful men in the world stood face to face.
They were there, anchored in the middle of a neutral river, to formulate a treaty of peace after years of antagonism. But one obstacle still stood in their way – Britain, Russia’s ally and financial backer, France’s implacable enemy.
Acutely conscious of Napoleon’s growing strength and Britain’s increasingly isolated position, the Czar made the first move: ‘I hate the English as much as you do yourself,’ he declared. ‘If that is the case,’ replied Napoleon, ‘then peace is already made.’¹
For more than an hour the two emperors bargained over the fate of Europe as a host of dignitaries and the massed ranks of the French and Russian armies lined the banks of the river. Twenty-three days earlier, on 14 June 1807, Napoleon’s seemingly invincible horde had crushed the Russian Army at the Battle of Friedland and the despondent Czar had begged for an armistice. After ten months of almost continuous warfare the last two major continental powers in arms against France, Prussia and Russia, had been beaten and humiliated. Only that small nation of shopkeepers, sitting remote and secure behind the ‘wooden walls’ of the Royal Navy, refused to pay homage to the new Charlemagne.
Now, with almost all of Western Europe under his control, Napoleon could turn the full weight of his empire’s vast resources upon those ‘Perfidious Islanders’. A direct assault upon Britain, however, was beyond even Napoleon’s means, for although France dominated the land, Britannia still ruled the waves, and the frigates of the Royal Navy cruised the Channel with an unrelenting vigilance. Unable, therefore, to come to grips with his enemy, Napoleon had resolved upon warfare of a different kind. On 21 November 1806, five weeks after defeating the once-mighty army of Prussia, Napoleon issued a decree from the captured Prussian capital, Berlin, in which he outlawed all trade and correspondence between Britain and the French-controlled areas of Europe.
Britain then, as now, relied upon international commerce to maintain the expansion of its manufacturing industries. The restriction upon its trade caused by Napoleon’s ‘Continental System’ caused some discomfort throughout the United Kingdom and export figures fell. Many countries in Europe, including alleged allies of France, nevertheless, disregarded the decrees and openly, or secretly, continued to trade with the ‘Workshop of the World’. Napoleon was determined to stamp out this illicit trade and close off every Continental port to English shipping. So, when the two emperors met in the middle of the River Niemen at Tilsit, Napoleon was prepared to use every possible expedient to persuade Russia to participate in his embargo of British goods. Alexander, though, did not need much persuading. Anxious to achieve an honourable settlement, he readily agreed to ban English goods from his domains. Napoleon had no wish to humiliate Russia. His real enemy was to be found in London not in St Petersburg, and he needed the support of this huge northern state to bring the few wayward countries into line. Denmark, Sweden and Portugal still trafficked in British merchandise, the first as a neutral, the latter two as allies of King George.
Publicly, the Treaty of Tilsit proclaimed the advantages of harmonious relations between the two countries, the new opportunities for enterprise that this would bring, and the now mutual affection of the two emperors. The treaty, however, contained a number of secret clauses. Europe was to be split into two spheres of influence. Russia was to add Finland to its growing list of conquests and exert pressure upon King Gustavus of Sweden to sever his links with Britain. France agreed to abandon its traditionally friendly relations with Constantinople and allow Alexander to seize parts of the European provinces of the Ottoman Empire. In return, Russia would stand aside while France took possession of the Ionian Islands, the Dalmatian coast of what is now Croatia, and ‘The Bourbon dynasty in Spain and the House of Braganza in Portugal shall cease to reign; a prince of the Bonaparte family to succeed to each throne.’²
News of the Russian defeat at Friedland and the diplomatic manoeuvring at Tilsit reached Westminster by mid-July. Although the content of the secret clauses was unknown to the British Government, dark intrigues were immediately suspected. Considerable suspicion also surrounded the motives of ‘neutral’ Denmark and its ability (and determination) to withstand the mounting pressure from France to close its ports to British vessels. Fearing that the Danes might soon be overwhelmed and their valuable navy fall into the hands of Napoleon, the British cabinet decided upon an audacious scheme to capture the entire Danish battle-fleet.
With uncharacteristic speed the government assembled a force of 30,000 men and seventeen battleships, under Lord Cathcart, and despatched them to Copenhagen. This armada was preceded by an English diplomat, Mr Francis Jackson, who demanded the surrender of the Danish fleet in return for an annual payment of £100,000, with the ships to be returned to their owners upon the cessation of hostilities.
The crown prince naturally rejected Jackson’s offer, and on 16 August 1807, British troops landed at Vedboek and marched upon Copenhagen. Powerful batteries were erected and, after four nights of devastating bombardment, the city was surrendered and with it forty-five warships.
However piratical this act may have appeared, it was in fact a brilliant piece of anticipation. The combined naval strength of France, and her Dutch, Spanish, and now Russian allies, stood at 129 ships-of-the-line. The Royal Navy had, at the most, 113. Despite this slight numerical advantage, the French and Spanish fleets had spent much of the war blockaded within their own harbours. Man-for-man the inexperienced French sailor was no match for Jack Tar, as Nelson had so emphatically proved at Trafalgar two years earlier. If Napoleon still nurtured any hope of driving his old enemy from the seas he would have to considerably increase the size of his navy. It would take years to build such a fleet, but what Napoleon could not manage by construction he might yet achieve by force. Only days before Cathcart’s men began their advance upon Copenhagen, Napoleon had told the Danish Emissary that his country must ally itself with France or face war, and that a large force under Marshal Bernadotte was concentrating in Holland for the invasion of Denmark.
When the French Emperor heard of the British coup his rage was uncontrollable. Yet there was once last chance. Lying idle in Lisbon harbour was the powerful Portuguese battle-fleet. At a diplomatic reception a few days later, Napoleon threatened the Portuguese Ambassador: ‘If Portugal does not do what I wish, the House of Braganza will not be reining in Europe in two months! I will no longer tolerate an English Ambassador in Europe. I will declare war on any power that receives one two months from this time! I have 300,000 Russians at my disposal, and with that powerful ally I can do everything.’
On the last day of November 1807, two months after Napoleon’s prophetic tirade, General Junot marched through the crowded, cobbled streets of Lisbon. Behind him trailed 1,500 ragged and exhausted men, the remnant of a magnificent force of 25,000 seasoned French troops who had crossed the Pyrenees only a few weeks before. They had encountered no organised resistance from the Portuguese but the invaders had suffered terribly from the ravages of the weather in the barren and inhospitable countryside. Many had died through exposure, others simply starved, the rest staggered on at whatever pace they could. Nevertheless, Junot had crossed the northern Iberian Peninsula at astonishing speed, covering the last 300 miles in fourteen days. His objective was to seize the Portuguese fleet before the British could once again intervene. Unfortunately for Junot, only forty-eight hours earlier a terrified and confused Prince John had submitted to the entreaties of the British Ambassador and, in the company of a Royal Navy squadron, he had sailed to set up court in the Portuguese colony of Brazil. With him went the Portuguese fleet and Napoleon’s last hope of naval supremacy.³
Over the course of the next few days the stragglers hobbled into the Portuguese capital and soon Junot had more than 24,000 men under arms. Dispatching strong columns to occupy the principle fortresses, Junot quickly and bloodlessly subdued the population. The subjugation of Portugal was, however, only part of a far grander design. Napoleon was under no illusions as to the efficacy of the Continental System, for while large parts of the old world were denied to the British traders, the UK’s unrivalled naval strength allowed those traders to open unlimited new markets in the developing countries of Asia and America. Napoleon, consequently, planned a series of massive assaults upon British-held posts throughout the globe.
The first of these attacks, aimed at India, was to consist of ‘50,000 men, Russians, French and perhaps Austrians,’ Napoleon announced, ‘marching into Asia by way of Constantinople [who] would no sooner reach the Euphrates than England would tremble and go down on her knees’. The second part of the scheme was designed to drive the Royal Navy from the Mediterranean, thus depriving the ships of their vital supply bases and compelling them to lift their blockade of the southern European ports. This would enable the combined fleets of France and Spain to execute the third phase of Napoleon’s master plan, and sail against the British colonies in South Africa and the West Indies.
By far the most important of these measures was the one directed at securing control of the Mediterranean. Gibraltar, Sicily and Malta, all garrisoned with British troops, provided the Royal Navy’s Mediterranean Fleet with food, shelter, and essential stores. So Napoleon’s brother Joseph, King of Naples, was to be ordered to seize Sicily, while a second army marched through Spain, besieged Gibraltar, and took possession of the free ports along the North African coast.
This last task could not be safely entrusted to the Spaniards. Although nominally an ally of France, and at war with Britain, Spain had shown herself to be a fair-weather friend. In October of the previous year, when the Grande Armée was about to face the feared Prussian Army, Godoy, the Spanish Prime Minister, believing that Napoleon had finally met his match, issued a proclamation evidently designed to raise an army against the French.
Godoy, as it transpired, had backed the wrong horse. When news of the sensational French victories at Jena and Auerstadt reached Madrid, he rushed off a letter to Napoleon in which he promised unending allegiance to ‘the most perfect model of a hero that History has to show.’ With such a fickle neighbour as this, Napoleon’s southern flank would always be in danger. The Spanish authorities had also proven to be unable, or unwilling, to stem the regular flow of British goods into the country and the once-proud and formidable Spanish fleet lay idle and rotting in its blockaded harbours. Much, then, could be gained by the military occupation of Spain, particularly if this could be achieved without great loss or expense. Already thousands of French troops were pouring into Spain under the pretext of reinforcing Junot in Portugal. By the Treaty of Fontainbleau, signed on 27 October 1807, Spain had agreed to the passage of Junot’s army across its northern provinces and to the occupation of some of the key towns along the route to secure the French line of communication. A further 40,000 men were to be held in readiness at Bayonne close to the Spanish border, to support Junot in the event of British military intervention. The Spaniards themselves were to provide a strong force to garrison many of the Portuguese towns and to assist Junot if the Portuguese offered any resistance.
Napoleon had manipulated the situation extremely skilfully and Spain lay open at his feet. But Napoleon wanted to avoid another costly war and, if possible, add an air of respectability to his actions. The political situation in Spain at the time offered him every prospect of accomplishing both those aims, as the royal family was bitterly divided. The regal disputes were brought to a head when French troops marched into Madrid.
King Carlos sought Napoleon’s help to adjudicate in the family squabble, giving the Emperor the opportunity to intervene in Spanish affairs with all the appearance of legitimacy. He managed to persuade Carlos, his son and heir Ferdinand, Prince of Asturias, and most of the leading royals, to travel to Bayonne to settle the dispute. Once in France, the Spanish royal family was removed into the heart of France.
While the attention of the Spanish authorities was distracted by the regal wrangling, French armies had taken control of most of the northern provinces. The fortresses of Pamplona, San Sebastian, Barcelona and Figueros were treacherously seized, and before the Spanish Government could react, the troops of generals Moncey, Duhesme and Mouton were in possession of all the towns guarding the Pyrenean passes. Tens of thousands of reinforcements poured over the mountains and soon no less than 118,000 French soldiers were spreading all over northern Spain.
The Spanish army was in no condition to oppose the invaders. It was hopelessly disorganised, badly led and seriously ill-equipped. Of the infantry, not a single line regiment was up to strength, whilst of nearly 15,000 cavalry only 9,000 actually possessed horses. Spain’s finest body of men, over 15,000 strong, was at that time serving with the French occupation forces in northern Germany. These troops had been despatched to the Baltic on the insistence of Napoleon after Godoy’s act of infidelity the year before. This move not only ensured continued Spanish cooperation with France it also deprived Spain of its only effective armed force.
There was nothing it seemed to stand in Napoleon’s way and in a few short weeks the entire Iberian Peninsula had been conquered with barely a shot fired in anger. The thrones of both Portugal and Spain had been vacated and Napoleon was at liberty to choose their next occupants. In Madrid, however, events were no longer running quite so smoothly. The mob, already on the verge of insurrection due to the disappearance of the senior royals, particularly the popular young Ferdinand, rioted upon the news that the remainder of the royal family was to be rounded up and deported to France. The wild crowd rushed into the streets, slaughtering every Frenchman it could find.
Three hours later the blood-drenched streets were silent. Hundreds of French and Spaniards alike lay dead and mutilated in the alleyways and gutters. At every street corner a French cannon kept the peace. Martial law was imposed, and scores of supposed ringleaders were shot. But rather than quench the spreading fire of insurrection, these brutal reprisals merely fanned the flames. All over the country local councils, or ‘juntas’ were formed, and provincial armies were raised. The Peninsular War had begun.⁴
The suddenness of the French invasion had left the Spaniards totally unprepared. No amount of patriotic fervour could make up for the lack of weapons and ammunition. So it was, that in the first week of June, the patriots turned to their old enemy, Britain, for assistance. Lieutenant General Sir Hew Dalrymple, the Governor of Gibraltar, was approached by the Junta of Seville and, at the same time, a delegation from the Asturias sailed to London to beg for arms and money.
The long conflict between Britain and Spain was ended, and on 4 July 1808, peace was officially declared. Yet, despite the Spaniards’ desperate appeal for help, the British cabinet was soon to find increasing difficulty in assisting the rebels. Although Royal Navy cruisers, in anticipation of instructions from the Admiralty, were rousing the Spanish patriots along the coasts of Biscay and Valencia, the arrogant and self-interested regional juntas refused to permit British troops to land in their territories and they accepted the first shipments of gold bullion without allowing the British any real say in its distribution. There were, however, reports reaching London of outbreaks of violence in Portugal. The naturally indolent Portuguese had been stirred into revolt by Junot’s barbaric rule and indiscriminate plundering by his troops. Junot now only controlled the area around Lisbon and a number of vital fortresses. These disturbances in Portugal offered the British army the opportunity it needed to gain a foothold in the Peninsula. A landing in Portugal would divert French pressure without insulting Spanish pride.
Lord Castlereagh, the Secretary of State for War, was hurriedly marshalling all the available British forces. Although the British Army in 1808 numbered around 200,000 men, most of these troops were dispersed around the world garrisoning the far-flung outposts of the empire. Of the remainder, a number were always retained at home for reasons of national security, leaving only a fraction of the total manpower disposable for field operations.
The largest force under arms was that of Lieutenant General Sir John Moore stationed off the coast of Sweden. Moore’s mission to Scandinavia was to assist the Swedes in repelling the anticipated invasion from Russia. The Swedish king, Gustav, however, wanted to throw Moore’s 10,000 men at the entire Russian army in a ridiculous offensive operation. Sir John refused to co-operate in such a suicidal venture and was placed under house-arrest by the mad king.
At Cork in southern Ireland, a further 9,500 troops under Sir Arthur Wellesley had assembled for an amphibious operation against Spanish possessions in South America. With the declaration of peace between Britain and Spain, Wellesley’s men were temporarily redundant. Another 5,000 men were in transports at Gibraltar, whilst Major General Beresford commanded 3,000 soldiers in Madeira. Lastly, Sir Brent Spencer was in Sicily with around 4,500 men. With favourable winds these units could be united off the coasts of Portugal in a matter of weeks.
While ministers debated which of these generals should lead the expedition to Portugal, Britain’s finest weapon, the Royal Navy, was being wielded with great dexterity. The Spanish army of the Marquis de la Romana that was still serving dutifully, though, reluctantly, under the French in the Baltic, was spirited away by a British fleet and repatriated on the northern coast of Spain on 27 August.
Meanwhile the first British troops had reached Portugal, being those under the command of Sir Arthur Wellesley and Brent Spencer, who began disembarking in Mondego Bay on 1 August 1808. Upon landing Wellesley made contact with the local Portuguese commander Lieutenant General Bernardim Freire, who immediately made Wellesley aware of the difficulties of campaigning in the Iberian Peninsula. Freire agreed to cooperate with the British but only if Wellesley undertook to feed his entire force of 6,000 men. As Wellesley was dependent upon the Royal Navy for his own supplies he could not accept such a proposition and when he began his march on the Portuguese capital he was accompanied by less than 2,000 Portuguese light troops.
As soon as he heard of the landing of the British troops Junot sent a corps of 4,000 men under General Henri Delaborde to delay Wellesley’s advance. Delaborde took up a defensive position upon a narrow hill to the south of the old walled town of Obidos adjacent to the main highway to Lisbon. Wellesley tried to encircle Delaborde’s corps but the French general withdrew in good order to a more extensive range of heights behind the village of Roliça. Wellesley repeated his earlier manoeuvre and again Delaborde held his ground until the last possible moment before disengaging.
Delaborde had done his job well. By nightfall, Wellesley had advanced just seven miles in twenty-four hours, allowing Junot to march up from Lisbon with the bulk of his army, intending to attack the British and drive them back to their ships before any more troops could be landed. He was too late. Two brigades of reinforcements had already arrived and were preparing to disembark at Maçeira Bay.
Wellesley moved along the coast to cover the disembarkation and he deployed his small force along the semi-circle of hills above the village of Vimeiro that encompasses the bay. Without hesitation Junot marched out to attack Wellesley but was repulsed at all points. As the French disengaged, Wellesley ordered an immediate advance but with the reinforcements came a more senior officer, Sir Harry Burrard, who ‘did not think it advisable to move off the ground in pursuit of the enemy.’ Junot therefore made good his escape.
The following day Burrard was himself superseded by Sir Hew Dalrymple from Gibraltar, who supported Burrard’s cautious decision. Wellesley was now relegated to the role of a divisional commander.
Junot, meanwhile, had come to a quick decision. With no possibility of help reaching him from Spain or France, the French commander requested an armistice in order to negotiate a deal that would allow his army to evacuate Portugal without further bloodshed. Dalrymple jumped at the chance of liberating Portugal without any more fighting and agreed, much to Wellesley’s dismay, on a cessation of hostilities. Under the terms of the subsequent Convention of Cintra, the French were allowed to retain their weapons and much of the plunder that they had looted from the Portuguese. To make matters worse, the French troops were to be repatriated in British ships and, upon their return, were free to take up arms once again. At this, Wellesley returned to England in disgust. What was particularly galling to Wellesley was that yet more reinforcements had arrived under Sir John Moore who had managed to escape from Sweden, giving the British a considerable numerical superiority over the French forces in Portugal. Junot should have been crushed or forced to surrender unconditionally, not permitted to sail freely away.
Nevertheless, the Portuguese fortresses were handed over intact to the British. This included the key border fortresses of Elvas and Almeida which guarded the main routes into Spain. The principle objective of Britain’s intervention in the conflict in Iberia was to assist the Spaniards in repelling the French invaders, and with these fortresses in his hands Dalrymple could start to plan a move into Spain.
Time, though, was of the essence and the morning after the signing of the convention, Wellesley wrote that, ‘I do not know what Sir Hew proposes to do, but if I were in his situation I would have 20,000 men in Madrid in less than a month from this day.’⁵
Dalrymple, though, could not march off into Spain until the French had cleared Portugal, and this process was not completed until the end of September.
While he was waiting for the French to be evacuated Dalrymple devoted his time in Lisbon to establishing some form of interim government in the absence of the prince regent and his court. The only positive military moves he made was to send two brigades under Sir John Hope towards Elvas and a single regiment to garrison Almeida. He declared that he was waiting until Moore’s recently arrived corps was fully integrated into the new command structure that Dalrymple busied himself compiling.
Matters, however, were going to take a sudden and surprising turn. When the details of the Convention of Cintra were published in London there was widespread public outrage and ministerial embarrassment. Dalrymple was recalled, to be put before a Board of Inquiry to explain his conduct. But ministers were intent on continuing operations in Iberia in support of the Spaniards and while Dalrymple awaited the start of the inquiry, command of the force destined to advance into Spain was placed in the hands of Lieutenant General Moore.
Even more dramatic events were taking place beyond the Portuguese border. The uprising in Iberia had taken Napoleon by surprise, but he was determined to crush the insurrection before it escalated into a major war. Planning operations from Bayonne, he ordered his troops in Spain to march upon the major towns and the principle centres of insurrection. From his distant headquarters, though, Napoleon had no real understanding of the extent of the rebellion, and his generals found themselves opposed by such strong forces that they were unable to quell the insurgency.
Despite this, and the fact that almost every district was now in open revolt, Napoleon still believed that this unexpected show of Spanish nationalism would soon die on the bayonets of the French grenadiers. But he failed to appreciate the depth of the emotions that the invasion had aroused. His brother Joseph had been persuaded to relinquish his Neapolitan throne and accept the far more prestigious one of Spain. Yet, within days of arriving in his new capital, the ‘intrusive’ King of Spain was compelled to evacuate Madrid.
This was because General Pierre Dupont, conducting operations in the south of Spain, had been forced to withdraw from Cordoba in the face of mounting resistance. Unwilling to concede failure, Dupont lingered indecisively in the heart of Andalusia, while the Spanish forces and armed peasantry, emboldened by his inactivity, cut off his line of retreat to Madrid. At last realising his predicament, Dupont desperately tried to force his way through the passes of the surrounding mountains. The Spaniards, though, had been allowed too much time to consolidate their positions and despite five successive attacks the French were unable to dislodge them.
Dupont sought an armistice. Two days of tenacious negotiations resulted in the Convention of Bailén and the surrender of Dupont’s entire force. The French laid down their arms on the promise that they would be repatriated, yet few of the 18,000 men saw their homeland again. Shipped off to the Balearic Isles or left to rot in prison hulks, many died of disease, even more of starvation.
For the first time in nearly a decade a French army had been defeated, and Napoleon was furious. Never, he wrote, was there ‘ever anything since the world was created so senseless, so stupid’.⁶
The repercussions were felt throughout Europe, giving new hope and inspiration to the subjugated nations. King Joseph, already becoming disillusioned with the attitude of his new subjects, immediately abandoned Madrid and retired northwards with all speed. Though he was told by Napoleon to hold the line of the River Douro, Joseph did not stop until his last man had crossed the Ebro.
Napoleon was stunned with Joseph’s withdrawal. ‘To re-cross both rivers,’ he raged,