Claiming Homes: Confronting Domicide in Rural China
()
About this ebook
Chinese citizens make themselves at home despite economic transformation, political rupture, and domestic dislocation in the contemporary countryside. By mobilizing labor and kinship to make claims over homes, people, and things, rural residents withstand devaluation and confront dispossession. As a particular configuration of red capitalism and socialist sovereignty takes root, this process challenges the relationship between the politics of place and the location of class in China and beyond.
Charlotte Bruckermann
Charlotte Bruckermann currently works in the Department of Social Anthropology at the University of Bergen. Her publications include a book co-written with Stephan Feuchtwang The Anthropology of China: China as Ethnographic and Theoretical Critique (2016, Imperial College Press), and various articles and chapters on environment, kinship, housing, care, morality, and ritual.
Related to Claiming Homes
Titles in the series (31)
Slipping Away: Banana Politics and Fair Trade in the Eastern Caribbean Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWhen Women Held the Dragon's Tongue: and Other Essays in Historical Anthropology Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBiopolitics, Militarism, and Development: Eritrea in the Twenty-First Century Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWhere Have All the Homeless Gone?: The Making and Unmaking of a Crisis Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Class, Contention, and a World in Motion Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIndigenist Mobilization: Confronting Electoral Communism and Precarious Livelihoods in Post-Reform Kerala Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBlood and Fire: Toward a Global Anthropology of Labor Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCommunities of Complicity: Everyday Ethics in Rural China Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Neoliberal Landscape and the Rise of Islamist Capital in Turkey Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIntellectuals and (Counter-) Politics: Essays in Historical Realism Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEnduring Uncertainty: Deportation, Punishment and Everyday Life Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCrude Domination: An Anthropology of Oil Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBreaking Rocks: Music, Ideology and Economic Collapse, from Paris to Kinshasa Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsElusive Promises: Planning in the Contemporary World Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFrontiers of Civil Society: Government and Hegemony in Serbia Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWorldwide Mobilizations: Class Struggles and Urban Commoning Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Anthropology of Corporate Social Responsibility Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Partial Revolution: Labour, Social Movements and the Invisible Hand of Mao in Western Nepal Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFacing the Crisis: Ethnographies of Work in Italian Industrial Capitalism Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFifty Years of Peasant Wars in Latin America Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Revolt of the Provinces: Anti-Gypsyism and Right-Wing Politics in Hungary Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDemocracy Struggles: NGOs and the Politics of Aid in Serbia Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsClaiming Homes: Confronting Domicide in Rural China Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBig Capital in an Unequal World: The Micropolitics of Wealth in Pakistan Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Insidious Capital: Frontlines of Value at the End of a Global Cycle Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGlimpses of Hope: The Rise of Industrial Labor at the Urban Margins of Nepal Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Global Life of Mines: Mining and Post-Mining in Comparative Perspective Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBrazilian Steel Town: Machines, Land, Money and Commoning in the Making of the Working Class Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBulldozer Capitalism: Accumulation, Ruination, and Dispossession in Northeastern Turkey Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related ebooks
Communities of Complicity: Everyday Ethics in Rural China Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Compromise of Return: Viennese Jews after the Holocaust Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCaring Cash: Free Money and the Ethics of Solidarity in Kenya Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsResettlers and Survivors: Bukovina and the Politics of Belonging in West Germany and Israel, 1945–1989 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Life and Death of States: Central Europe and the Transformation of Modern Sovereignty Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHospitality of the Matrix: Philosophy, Biomedicine, and Culture Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOrthodox by Design: Judaism, Print Politics, and the ArtScroll Revolution Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Absent Jews: Kurt Forstreuter and the Historiography of Medieval Prussia Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPlay time: Gender, anti-Semitism and temporality in medieval biblical drama Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIntegrating Strangers: Sherbro Identity and The Politics of Reciprocity along the Sierra Leonean Coast Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCarnivalizing Reconciliation: Contemporary Australian and Canadian Literature and Film beyond the Victim Paradigm Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCitizen-Saints: Shakespeare and Political Theology Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAfter Difference: Queer Activism in Italy and Anthropological Theory Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsManaging Ambiguity: How Clientelism, Citizenship, and Power Shape Personhood in Bosnia and Herzegovina Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDespite Cultures: Early Soviet Rule in Tajikistan Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPunching Back: Gender, Religion and Belonging in Women-Only Kickboxing Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCushions, Kitchens and Christ: Mapping the Domestic in Late Medieval Religious Writing Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTruth in Motion: The Recursive Anthropology of Cuban Divination Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHidden Heretics: Jewish Doubt in the Digital Age Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Gleaning for Communism: The Soviet Socialist Household in Theory and Practice Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDarwin's Unfinished Symphony: How Culture Made the Human Mind Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Along the Archival Grain: Epistemic Anxieties and Colonial Common Sense Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Stepping Stones to a Higher Vision Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCartoon Vision: UPA Animation and Postwar Aesthetics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGerman Jews in Love: A History Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsYiddish Writers in Weimar Berlin: A Fugitive Modernism Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Devil's Art: Divination and Discipline in Early Modern Germany Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Accommodated Jew: English Antisemitism from Bede to Milton Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Future of Immortality: Remaking Life and Death in Contemporary Russia Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGender, rhetoric and regulation: Women's work in the Civil Service and the London County Council, 1900–55 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Social Science For You
A People's History of the United States Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Come As You Are: Revised and Updated: The Surprising New Science That Will Transform Your Sex Life Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5All About Love: New Visions Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Verbal Judo, Second Edition: The Gentle Art of Persuasion Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5On Tyranny: Twenty Lessons from the Twentieth Century Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Barracoon: The Story of the Last "Black Cargo" Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5My Secret Garden: Women's Sexual Fantasies Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Dumbing Us Down - 25th Anniversary Edition: The Hidden Curriculum of Compulsory Schooling Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of Witty Banter: Be Clever, Quick, & Magnetic Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Fourth Turning Is Here: What the Seasons of History Tell Us about How and When This Crisis Will End Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Little Book of Hygge: Danish Secrets to Happy Living Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5You're Not Listening: What You're Missing and Why It Matters Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Men Explain Things to Me Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Close Encounters with Addiction Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Living Resistance: An Indigenous Vision for Seeking Wholeness Every Day Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Freedom Is a Constant Struggle: Ferguson, Palestine, and the Foundations of a Movement Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Unhumans: The Secret History of Communist Revolutions (and How to Crush Them) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Three Women Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Like Switch: An Ex-FBI Agent's Guide to Influencing, Attracting, and Winning People Over Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for Claiming Homes
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Claiming Homes - Charlotte Bruckermann
CLAIMING HOMES
DISLOCATIONS
General Editors: August Carbonella, Memorial University of Newfoundland, Don Kalb, University of Bergen and Utrecht University, Linda Green, University of Arizona
The immense dislocations and suffering caused by neoliberal globalization, the retreat of the welfare state in the last decades of the twentieth century, and the heightened military imperialism at the turn of the twenty-first century have raised urgent questions about the temporal and spatial dimensions of power. Through stimulating critical perspectives and new and cross-disciplinary frameworks that reflect recent innovations in the social and human sciences, this series provides a forum for politically engaged, ethnographically informed, and theoretically incisive responses.
Recent volumes:
Volume 26
Claiming Homes: Confronting Domicide in Rural China
Charlotte Bruckermann
Volume 25
Democracy Struggles: NGOs and the Politics of Aid in Serbia
Theodora Vetta
Volume 24
Worldwide Mobilizations: Class Struggles and Urban Commoning
Edited by Don Kalb and Massimiliano Mollona
Volume 23
The Revolt of the Provinces: Anti-Gypsyism and Right-Wing Politics in Hungary
Kristóf Szombati
Volume 22
Frontiers of Civil Society: Government and Hegemony in Serbia
Marek Mikuš
Volume 21
The Partial Revolution: Labour, Social Movements and the Invisible Hand of Mao in Western Nepal
Michael Hoffmann
Volume 20
Indigenist Mobilization: Confronting Electoral Communism and Precarious Livelihoods in Post-Reform Kerala
Luisa Steur
Volume 19
Breaking Rocks: Music, Ideology and Economic Collapse, from Paris to Kinshasa
Joe Trapido
Volume 18
The Anthropology of Corporate Social Responsibility
Edited by Catherine Dolan and Dinah Rajak
Volume 17
Enduring Uncertainty: Deportation, Punishment and Everyday Life
Ines Hasselberg
For a full volume listing, please see the series page on our website: https://www.berghahnbooks.com/series/dislocations
CLAIMING HOMES
Confronting Domicide in Rural China
Charlotte Bruckermann
Berghahn BooksFirst published in 2020 by
Berghahn Books
www.berghahnbooks.com
© 2020 Charlotte Bruckermann
All rights reserved. Except for the quotation of short passages for the purposes of criticism and review, no part of this book may be reproduced in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system now known or to be invented, without written permission of the publisher.
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Names: Bruckermann, Charlotte, 1984- author.
Title: Claiming homes : confronting domicide in rural China / Charlotte
Bruckermann.
Description: First edition. | New York : Berghahn Books, 2020. | Series:
Dislocations; volume 26 | Includes bibliographical references and
index.
Identifiers: LCCN 2019029047 (print) | LCCN 2019029048 (ebook) | ISBN
9781789203578 (hardback) | ISBN 9781789203585 (ebook)
Subjects: LCSH: Sociology, Rural--China. | Rural population--China. |
Home--China. | Kinship--China. | Group identity--China. | Social
classes--China. | Rural-urban relations--China.
Classification: LCC HT443.C6 B78 2020 (print) | LCC HT443.C6 (ebook) |
DDC 307.720951--dc23
LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2019029047
LC ebook record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2019029048
British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data
A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library
ISBN 978-1-78920-357-8 hardback
ISBN 978-1-78920-358-5 ebook
CONTENTS
List of Figures
Acknowledgments
Notes on Transliteration
Introduction. The Countryside as Home
Part I. History, Politics, Place
Chapter 1. The Big Village
Chapter 2. Genealogies Revealed and Concealed
Part II. Gender, Generation, Kinship
Chapter 3. Reproducing Kin across Generational Divides
Chapter 4. Gendered Aspirations in Marriage
Part III. Labor, Location, Precarity
Chapter 5. Fields, Food, and the Market
Chapter 6. Dangerous Domesticities
Conclusion. Claims, Belonging, and the Home
Postscript. Home as Workplace
References
Index
FIGURES
Figure 0.1. Aerial view of Sweeping Cliff.
Figure 0.2. Sweeping Cliff rooftops.
Figure 1.1. Funeral procession on Sweeping Cliff main street.
Figure 2.1. Ancestral tablets with Chairman Mao and the God of Wealth.
Figure 2.2. Ancestral tablet cabinet and family photographs.
Figure 2.3. The autumn harvest in a courtyard home.
Figure 3.1. Frosting play at a birthday.
Figure 3.2. A celebrated singleton baby with his father and his maternal grandfather.
Figure 3.3. Mother and newborn sitting the month
(zuo yuezi) on the kang with the infant’s maternal grandmother providing care.
Figure 3.4. A maternal grandmother surrounds her grandson with the kuolian wreath bread.
Figure 3.5. Sheep breads, pork dishes, and a birthday cake.
Figure 3.6. Grandmothers encircling their grandson with the kuolian wreath bread.
Figure 4.1. Ritual reliance on brothers and shovels for the bridal sending-off ceremony.
Figure 4.2. Bride checking her bridewealth before her sending-off ceremony.
Figure 4.3. Bridewealth suitcase including jewelry, cash, and bank card.
Figure 4.4. Bride and groom making joint wishes for their marital future.
Figure 5.1. Harvesting millet together.
Figure 8.1. The new village.
Figure 8.2. The dragon dance, a new tradition for Sweeping Cliff.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
From first venturing on fieldwork to publication, I have been almost a decade in the writing of this book. Through all the twists and turns over these years, I had the very good fortune to encounter a great number of wonderful people who helped me along the way—only some of whom can be mentioned within these few pages, and none of whom can I do justice to with just a few words of thanks.
My deepest gratitude extends to the people of Sweeping Cliff, who generously opened their homes and shared their lives with me. In particular my host family formed a source of comfort, patience, and sustenance throughout my stay and upon my return visits. For their friendship, hospitality, and warmth, I am particularly grateful to Nainai, Sanhua, Erhua, Huanzi, Guowei, Kunjuan, Hanshuai, Yangqiang, and Zhijing. Lu Douheng smoothed the path for this academic exploration and kept the gates of Sweeping Cliff open. Li Hong’s optimism, kindness, and enthusiasm fortified me through rocky beginnings. Sun Liping made vital recommendations and introductions to locate my fieldsite. Teacher Zheng shared his time, knowledge, and wisdom with me time and again. In Beijing, Gao Bingzhong, Weng Naiqun, Lai Delin, and Karin Janz provided me with invaluable academic and personal support to get this research off the ground. To keep the sparkle going, I could not have had better confidants than Judy Bretschneider, Sha Hua, Lan Tu, Lamine Lahouasnia, Lidia Sakarapani, Max Duncan, Mike Nalwalker, and Duncan Innes-Ker.
At the University of Oxford, I owe a great deal to the inspiration of Elisabeth Hsu and to creative discussions and exchanges over the years while she was my doctoral supervisor and beyond. Leading by example, she showed me how to take courage while crossing bridges, both in terms of the practical steps during fieldwork and in taking theoretical leaps in writing between diverse fields of anthropology, from medical to ritual and beyond. Bob Parkin supported me throughout my time in Oxford in everything from navigating bureaucratic hurdles to introducing me to the exciting field of kinship. As a thesis examiner Adam Chau graciously took the time and energy to provide attentive reading, sharp comments, and evocative questions for my viva. By reading, commenting, and encouraging me on my work, Anna Lora-Wainwright, Inge Daniels, Eileen Walsh, and Maria Jaschok shaped this project at various stages. I would never have reached the finish line without the long walks and even longer talks with Insa Koch, Urvashi Aneja, Ros Holmes, Emilie Lefebvre, and Kate Leadbetter. A great number of friends helped with the final countdown, including Lee Crawfurd, Ike Belcher, Hugh Lazenby, Juri Viehoff, Iza Kavedžija, and (quite literally) Oliver Owen.
Funding for the DPhil research was generously provided by the Economic and Social Research Council, the Institute of Social and Cultural Anthropology, and St Antony’s College. These ideas took further shape during various postdoctoral fellowships in the anthropology department at the London School of Economics (LSE; 2012–2014), the re:work Center for Work and the Lifecycle in Global History at the Humboldt University (2014–2015), the Europainstitut at the University of Basel (2015), the Department for Resilience and Transformation in Eurasia at the Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology (2016–2018), and the Department of Social Anthropology at the University of Bergen.
At the LSE I was immersed in an exciting, encouraging, and collegial atmosphere, and I am grateful to everybody there for helping me work through arguments, ideas, and comments. I would like to express particular thanks to my fellow fellows: Tom Boylston, George St Claire, Jason Hickel, James Johnston, Insa Koch, and Zuzanna Olszewska. I appreciated, and very much enjoyed, teaching together with Stephan Feuchtwang, as well as writing a textbook and discussing different ideas in the following years, as his insightful clarity sharpened my own thinking. I also want to thank colleagues, friends, and altogether great people in the wider London anthropology circles, in particular Catherine Allerton, Rita Astuti, Laura Bear, Lewis Beardmore, Max Bolt, Ana Gutierrez, Tom Grisaffi, Tom Hinrichsen, Yanina Hinrichsen, Deborah James, Jess Jacobson, Anni Kajanus, Hannah Klepeis, Jonah Lipton, Nick Long, Mathijs Pelkmans, Alpa Shah, Charles Stafford, Hans Steinmüller, Alice Tilche, Tan Tongxue, Harry Walker, and Gisa Weszkalnys.
In Berlin I benefited from exchanges with past and present fellows at re:work, delving into historical and sociological comparisons that broadened and enhanced my anthropological approach. I am particularly grateful to Farah Barakat, Heike Drotbohm, Andreas Eckert, Michelle Engeler, Felicitas Hentschke, Jürgen Kocka, Alf Lüdtke, Helga Lüdtke, Julia Pauli, Julia Tischler, and James Williams. Beyond the institute, Julia Zantl, André Thiemann, Michael Hoffmann, Mathijs Pelkmans, and Judith Bovensiepen helped turn this time of work into a pleasure.
At the Max Planck Institute in Halle I benefited from being part of a large and diverse anthropological community, and I particularly enjoyed the cooperation and camaraderie within our financialization group
composed of Tristam Barrett, Natalia Buier, Dimitra Kofti, Marek Mikuš, and Hadas Weiss, as well as friendships with Hannah Klepeis, Minh Nguyen, Mareike Pampus, Luca Szücs, Ivan Rajković, and Roberta Zavoretti. For filling my life in Halle with art, music, and delicious food, I am thankful to all my housemates at the Reil 100, and especially Stine Albrecht, Aart van Bezooyen, Marlen Tennigkeit, and Sara Schmitz. It was during these three years in Halle that this manuscript took its final shape and reached a publishable state, and for the time and opportunity to finish writing this book I am grateful to Chris Hann. At the institute Jutta Turner created the crisp map for this book and James Carrier read and improved the book proposal and manuscript plans. For reading, commenting, and suggesting improvements to the entire manuscript, I am very thankful to the two reviewers at Berghahn, one of whom subsequently revealed himself as Andrew Kipnis. Don Kalb as an editor of the Dislocations series and Stephen Campbell on the Frontlines project at the University of Bergen also took the time to read the manuscript in the final stages, offering a number of insightful interventions.
Over the years, from before our first Chinese adventures to today, the friendship of Luke Phillips, Alan Lau, Louisa Gladwin, Alex Guiney, Franziska Ochs, Michał Murawksi and Aaron Klemm provided solid grounding for bold antics. Living, working, and celebrating together at various times in the last decade, Insa Koch, Urvashi Aneja, and Ros Holmes have offered strength, support, and joy. Last, I want to thank my family, in particular my mother, father, brother, sister, and grandmother, for supporting me throughout all my adventures and always welcoming me back home.
Chapter 1 includes excerpts from the 2016 article Trading on Tradition: Tourism, Ritual, and Capitalism in a Chinese Village,
published in Modern China 42(2):188–224, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0097700415578808 and reproduced courtesy of Sage Publications. Sections of Chapter 2 appeared in the 2017 article The Materiality of the Uncanny: Preserving the Ruins of Revolution in Rural Chinese Homes
in Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East 37(3):446–55, doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/1089201x-4279152 and is reproduced courtesy of Duke University Press. Chapter 3 includes sections from the 2017 article Caring Claims and the Relational Self across Time: Grandmothers Overcoming Reproductive Crises in Rural China
in JRAI (Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute) 23(2):356–75, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.12611, reproduced courtesy of Wiley; 2019 Why Do Grandparents Grumble? Chinese Children’s Birthdays between Kinship, Market, and State,
in Ethnos, doi: 10.1080/00141844.2018.1561486, reproduced courtesy of Taylor and Francis; and 2017 Longevity, Labor, and Care between Kin and State in China,
in Global Europe—Basel Papers on Europe in a Global Perspective 114:2–23, https://europa.unibas.ch/fileadmin/user_upload/europa/PDFs_Basel_Papers/BS114.pdf, reproduced here courtesy of the Institute for European Global Studies, University of Basel.
An earlier version of Chapter 6 appeared as an article in 2018 as Rumours as Moral Action: Contesting the Local State through Housing in China,
in Critique of Anthropology 38(2):188–203, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275X18758875, reproduced courtesy of Sage Publications.
NOTES ON TRANSLITERATION
Although a predominantly Han ethnic province, the linguistic diversity of Shanxi is palpable, and its dialects are not only numerous but also frequently mutually unintelligible. Shanxi dialects, or Jin yu, are enriched by a diverse and ancient vocabulary, a shifting Sandhi tonal system, and glottal stops that punctuate guttural flows of melodic rises and falls of the human voice.
Sinitic languages are usually divided into six or seven groups of Mandarin, Wu, Xiang, Yue, Min, and Gan, with Kejia being either separate or part of the Gan group. The renowned linguist and dialectologist Li Rong (1987) revised this classification with three additional groupings, including a separate classification of the Jin dialect found in Shanxi and Inner Mongolia due to its retention of the entering tone
(rusheng). The rusheng does not refer to a tone
per se, but to a syllable that ends abruptly in a sharp consonant or a voiceless glottal stop made by suddenly cutting off the air in the vocal tract.
I have transliterated from Chinese characters using the Pinyin system of Romanization for standard Mandarin (Putonghua). Where crucial terms or phrases were transcribed from local Jin, the spelling reflects the original sound as closely as possible following the Pinyin system. The difference is denoted through transcription of the local dialect term or phrase, followed by the Putonghua term.
Map of Shanxi. Map created by Jutta Turner.
INTRODUCTION
The Countryside as Home
Uneven Earthiness
Laolei and I were thrown together in a van bumping along a winding road westward through the Shanxi mountain range in the summer of 2009.¹ Passengers hopped on and off the van shouldering unwieldy sacks of red sorghum and balancing juicy green watermelons, as our vehicle crisscrossed the rural gorges of north China’s Loess Plateau baking under the sweltering sun. Laolei, now in his seventies, came of age under Maoism and proudly identified as a peasant
(nongmin) commanding authority over all aspects of rural life. Hearing I was headed for a historical trading village on the Yellow River (famed for its merchant cave dwellings), Laolei reacted with disbelief. The merchants and financiers who had dominated the Shanxi economy in the late Imperial Era were regarded as morally dubious for extorting profit from the rightful hands of citizens and the state, maligned by both Confucian and Maoist thought. The lines on Laolei’s tanned face deepened as he squinted at me with quizzical eyes, before exclaiming with exasperation, "Why do you want to go there? It’s so earthy [tu]!"
As he and I gazed out of the dusty windowpane at the agricultural terraces carved into the golden ravines, Laolei turned his narrative of the land into one of pride, as he explained that the passing fields were all manmade. He then launched into a reverie of Maoist nostalgia about how the chairman organized the farmers to build high-quality terraces throughout the area to increase agricultural output. Most famously, the town of Dazhai became a model for all the good communists of the land, inspiring campaign slogans that Laolei enthusiastically recited: For agriculture, learn from Dazhai! Move the mountains to make the fields! Change the sky to alter the land!
I asked him if he thought the craggy Shanxi mountainside was beautiful, to which he replied, Beautiful or not, it’s home.
Figure 0.1. Aerial view of Sweeping Cliff. Image data: Google Earth, DigitalGlobe 2019.
Laolei then reminisced about the peasantry working together to make the land efficient through pooling their collective labor in brigades, before lamenting that many families nowadays did not even farm the small plots of land that the village committees allocated to their households. As he saw it, today the land is going to waste, because young people don’t want to go to the fields; they want to go to the office and do business.
Laolei’s accusation was that contemporary rural youth resisted working the land, instead following aspirations to enter nonagricultural sectors of the economy. He prided himself on living a frugal life as a peasant (nongmin), unlike those merchants of old and the businesspeople of today, who turned away from labor in the fields in search of more lucrative trades and professions.
Fangdi, a Shanxi tour guide in the village of Sweeping Cliff (Figure 0.1), where I ended up doing fieldwork, was just this type of young peasant. He was employed with other young rural workers in a newly established tourism development company attempting to break into the emerging service economy in the area. On one occasion we were sitting in their office, where the tour guides waited for their turn in the roster to take affluent Chinese visitors through the village’s main attractions, particularly an underground tunnel complex. Squatting on low stools in the back courtyard tourism office located in an old temple complex, we sipped green tea from glass bottles and chatted about everything under the sun that hung low in the gray pollution of a stifling late summer afternoon.
A conversation unfolded about why Shanxi’s earth, composed of ochre loess soil, was called yellow earth
(huangtu). Struck by a train of thought, Fangdi boisterously exclaimed: The yellow earth creates the Yellow River, the Yellow River creates the yellow emperor.
To prove his point, Fangdi gestured toward his face: Look, even my skin is that color!
Everybody in the tour guide office erupted with laughter. Fangdi went on to explain that China’s history was tied to the peasantry’s dependence on the earth
(nongmin kaodi). He argued that this ancient situation is changing as peasants progress forward
(tuijin) with development
(fazhan).
Fangdi commuted from the city center to the countryside on a daily basis. Nonetheless, his affluent family background jarred with his local dialect and down-to-earth demeanor, leading the other tour guides to frequently tease Fangdi for being overtly earthy
(tu). Many of the tour guides came from more humble backgrounds than Fangdi but equaled him in educational attainment and even surpassed him in certain aspects of cosmopolitan sophistication. The tour guides often jostled as they compared and competed over who had higher levels of human quality
(suzhi). These young people felt like anything but the sellouts of the post-Maoist Era Laolei made them out to be, instead presenting themselves as the ultimate harbingers of a new vanguard of workers leaving the land but not the countryside
(litu bu lixiang).
Despite being officially designated a peasant (nongmin) by the state’s household registration system, Fangdi had never worked the land. Instead, he completed a university education before entering the workforce as a rural tour guide, all while living in a luxurious family apartment in the city. His family came from a rural background but had struck wealth
(facai) through the expansion of coal mining operations into the area, a process in which his father was involved as a local cadre for a regulatory bureau. This position within the increasingly key sector of the local economy allowed his family to move to the city when Fangdi was in middle school and gain access to prime real estate in the urban valley. Thereby, Fangdi and his family established themselves as part of an emerging cadre capitalist elite of technocratic experts.
These red capitalists
emerged at the helm of the state’s agenda of fostering development in the post-Maoist Era of socialism with Chinese characteristics
(see Dickson 2003; So 2003; Kong 2010). They often boasted close ties to the communist party and oversaw strategic resources within particular localities, thereby optimally placing themselves to push the nation forward along a teleologically imagined sequence of progress, while simultaneously safeguarding political stability and economic growth. The official restoration of market mechanisms
after 1978 had transformed what once was a command-and-control economy, reorienting sectors ranging from agriculture, industry, and commerce to real estate, education, and healthcare. State institutions and corporate developers rallied around new priorities of competition and profit.
While China’s urban and coastal regions developed rapidly alongside these market transformations, interior provinces like Shanxi struggled to match their economic growth. Simultaneously, across China inequalities between urban cosmopolitan centers and the peripheral countryside became entrenched. Reflecting these disparities, rural residents of China’s interior appear as a monolithic surplus population, tucked away in the hinterlands to serve as a reservoir pool of labor fueling the growth of China’s export-oriented manufacturing zones. I argue that this is not the case: there are deep schisms between what it means to be a peasant within the partial, uneven, and unequal trajectories of development in Shanxi.
Peasants Out of Place
At first glance, the nostalgic Maoist farmer and the red capitalist tour guide appear to have little in common beyond identifying as peasants
at home in Shanxi.² However, they share an ambivalent relationship to the earth, both referring to locations and people as earthy
with derogatory connotations. This deserves a short explanation. The Chinese character for earth, or tu, at its most literal refers to the land and soil. In a more metaphorical way, tu can also refer to something being indigenous, local, and native, to being of the earth
so to speak. An extension of this tie between rootedness and the earth can plunge into a deprecating domain of tu as being too territorialized, too local, and too rural, to the point of being crude or rough. Within Fangdi and Laolei’s description of the countryside a tension runs between the earth as a substance from which life flows and the earth’s association with agricultural work that holds people to a localized, grounded, and at times harsh existence. But what of the people associated with the land?
China has, of course, come a long way from Fei Xiaotong’s (1992 [1948]: 27) famous dictum: Chinese society is fundamentally rural. I say it is fundamentally rural because its foundation is rural. … Country people cannot do without the soil because their very livelihood is based upon it.
Instead, the peasant as disappearing in the face of modernity or as the persistent obstacle to development has taken over from the peasant as the bedrock of Confucian order and the vanguard of Maoist progress. Are we simply moving from Laolei’s memories of the peasant as a revolutionary figure and hero of transformation toward Fangdi’s assessment of the peasant as a historical relic and source of embarrassment that can be, at best, a source of self-satirizing jokes?
In the cities, urbanites and rural migrants alike portray the countryside as inert, meaningless, and boring
(meijin, meiyisi; Yan H. 2003), populated with people left behind
(luohou) by development (Xiang 2007) and lacking the human quality
(suzhi cha) found in cosmopolitan centers (Anagnost 1997; Greenhalgh 2010). Parallel to these devaluations of the countryside, rural citizens increasingly sustain livelihoods by integrating into urban labor markets as they migrate, remit wages, or commute to find waged employment (Zavoretti 2017; Murphy 2002; Carrillo 2011). These developments raise critical questions about the commodification of rural labor in the interest of capital accumulation, especially through relations of dependence on and exploitation within cities. Yet, research into contemporary rural conditions shows that the countryside and its residents are far from a homogenous and passive population awaiting deliverance from cosmopolitan capitalist development.
Not all peasants pack up and move to urban centers. Rural citizens remaining in the countryside establish new rural cooperatives (Hale 2013; Yan and Chen 2013; Lammer 2012), turn to organic farming (Klein 2009), improve local health services (Lai 2016), and challenge pollution levels (Lora-Wainwright 2013). They revive religious and ritual practices that strengthen the rural peasantry as an imagined community
(Kipnis 1997) and an agrarian public sphere
(Chau 2006b). They also move within rural areas, often for marriage and employment, sustaining lifelong relationships across different regions and localities outside urban centers (Gaetano 2015; Judd 2009). They overturn paradigms of the rural
as representing a more authentic, traditional, or moral Chineseness
by partaking in, and complaining of, rising individualism, competition, and even outright immorality in their midst (Liu 2002; Yan Y. 2003; Tan 2016). Some actively subvert stereotypical contrasts between modernity and ruralism by satirizing these representations (Steinmüller 2013), while others profit from the romantic appeal of the countryside by selling rural experiences to urban tourists hosted in family guesthouses (Park 2008) and ethnic minority villages (Chio 2011). In short, citizens, cadres, and corporations develop rural industries and offer services in the countryside to supplement agricultural livelihoods, thereby realizing state policies to construct a new socialist countryside
(jianshe shehuizhuyi xin nongcun) in complex, and sometimes contradictory, ways. In what sense, then, are these peasants out of place in the contemporary moment?
The persistence of peasant status no longer tethered to the land reveals the uneasy integration of agricultural labor into contemporary capitalism, where generating surplus from farming often necessitates significant state subsidies and governmental support. In situations where supplementary financial inputs bolstering capital accumulation for large-scale cultivators are not forthcoming, agriculture predominantly underscores rural livelihood strategies of subsistence supplemented with other sources of income. The growing importance of services and finance, but also subsistence activities, shifts the bases of reproduction beyond the framework of industrial capitalism and calls for consideration of where and how to locate theories of class in the contemporary moment (Friedman 2015). These transformations also raise questions about what we are witnessing: is this the end of the peasantry thrown under the wheels of developmentalist paradigms during the onward march of capitalism or is there rather a propitious reorientation of peasant identities afoot in China?
The Location of Class and the Politics of Place
In order to make sense of the peasantry’s positioning in terms of locality, two contending perspectives in anthropology, one of location and the other of dislocation, are worth articulating. Taking conceptions of locality as not simply given but created through the interaction between human activity and historical processes, James Weiner (2002: 21–22) posits a gulf between anthropological accounts of human relations to place. At one end is a focus on how people mediate attachment to particular places through dimensions of intimacy, knowledge, familiarity, history, and interpersonality
associated with long-standing co-constitution of persons and localities. At the other end of the spectrum, there is a second perspective that highlights the transience, the nomadism, the rootlessness, the migratory, the diasporic, the out-of-placedness
assumed to be characteristic of contemporary individuals and societies. Yet, the personal, spatial, economic, and political contradictions between location and dislocation cannot be easily resolved, as location frequently disappears from view under processes of dislocation, only to resurface through repressive and even violent exclusions.
Approaches to location and dislocation must not merely be mapped spatially, but temporally, as the constitution of location is assumed to be long term, while experiences of dislocation imply temporal discontinuity, even rupture. By focusing exclusively on the first dimension of location,
ethnographic accounts may refuse the contemporary coexistence of the peasantry in the present, in line with a pseudoevolutionary narrative that problematically implies a denial of coevalness
(Fabian 1983). By contrast, ethnographers who eclipse location
in favor of dislocation
may miss the long-term connections and forms of belonging that bind humans together as they pursue intertwined lives across massive spatial, personal, political, and temporal upheaval. Of course, these forms of belonging, especially when projected into the past, are always present articulations that entail evocations of memory, imagination, and even invention (Hobsbawm 1983). To bring location and dislocation together, I trace the labor of homemaking in forging belonging through kinship, community, and citizenship alongside the inequalities and exclusions associated with its broader political identifications.
Within economic relations, claims of belonging also