Everand Logo

Welcome to Everand!

  • Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

    From $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

    The State of the World's Biodiversity for Food and Agriculture
    The State of the World's Biodiversity for Food and Agriculture
    The State of the World's Biodiversity for Food and Agriculture
    Ebook1,266 pages13 hours

    The State of the World's Biodiversity for Food and Agriculture

    By Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

    ()

    Read preview

    About this ebook

    Biodiversity for food and agriculture is the diversity of plants, animals and micro-organisms at genetic, species and ecosystem levels, present in and around crop, livestock, forest and aquatic production systems. It is essential to the structure, functions and processes of these systems, to livelihoods and food security, and to the supply of a wide range of ecosystem services. It has been managed or influenced by farmers, livestock keepers, forest dwellers, fish farmers and fisherfolk for hundreds of generations.

    Prepared through a participatory, country-driven process, the report draws on information from 91 country reports to provide a description of the roles and importance of biodiversity for food and agriculture, the drivers of change affecting it and its current status and trends. It describes the state of efforts to promote the sustainable use and conservation of biodiversity for food and agriculture, including through the development of supporting policies, legal frameworks, institutions and capacities. It concludes with a discussion of needs and challenges in the future management of biodiversity for food and agriculture.

    The report complements other global assessments prepared under the auspices of the Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, which have focused on the state of genetic resources within particular sectors of food and agriculture.

    LanguageEnglish
    PublisherFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
    Release dateFeb 21, 2020
    ISBN9789251321812
    The State of the World's Biodiversity for Food and Agriculture
    Author

    Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

    An intergovernmental organization, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) has 194 Member Nations, two associate members and one member organization, the European Union. Its employees come from various cultural backgrounds and are experts in the multiple fields of activity FAO engages in. FAO’s staff capacity allows it to support improved governance inter alia, generate, develop and adapt existing tools and guidelines and provide targeted governance support as a resource to country and regional level FAO offices. Headquartered in Rome, Italy, FAO is present in over 130 countries.Founded in 1945, the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) leads international efforts to defeat hunger. Serving both developed and developing countries, FAO provides a neutral forum where all nations meet as equals to negotiate agreements and debate policy. The Organization publishes authoritative publications on agriculture, fisheries, forestry and nutrition.

    Read more from Food And Agriculture Organization Of The United Nations

    Related to The State of the World's Biodiversity for Food and Agriculture

    Related ebooks

    Social Science For You

    View More
    View More

    Related podcast episodes

    Related articles

    • UNLIMITED

      Certified Sustainable

      Jul 13, 2018

      Certified Sustainable
      7 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      The Alternative To Food System Chaos

      Jun 1, 2022

      The Alternative To Food System Chaos
      13 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      The Expense Of Eating Healthy Food

      Sep 15, 2023

      The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) recently released its annual ‘The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World’ report. On pages 6 and 7 of this issue, we look at the section of the report that deals with urbani

      2 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      Regenerative Soil Solutions

      Apr 26, 2020

      Regenerative Soil Solutions
      1 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      Black Magic

      Nov 1, 2022

      Black Magic
      3 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      Essential Wetlands

      Sep 17, 2021

      Essential Wetlands
      6 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      Agroecology Our Organic Future

      Oct 26, 2023

      Agroecology is a bit of a challenge to explain as, like a jewel, it has many facets. The word itself is a contraction of agriculture and ecology. Fundamentally, it is an interdisciplinary science that studies the interactions of organisms with each o

      4 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      GENE EDITING: are We Ready?

      Mar 26, 2020

      GENE EDITING: are We Ready?
      2 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      A Look At Alternative Food Sources

      May 6, 2022

      “The global population is expected to reach 9,7 billion in 2050. To meet the increasing demand for food, overall food production will need to be raised by about 70% above 2009 levels. New food sources imply those that have not been widely consumed, e

      4 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      Benefits Of Irrigating With Wastewater

      Jun 11, 2021

      What prompted the research? Dr James Meyer (JM): It was conducted to evaluate whether the positive effects of microbe addition described in international literature could be replicated locally, and thereby challenge the limits imposed in South Africa

      4 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      THE Grapevine

      Oct 10, 2018

      Jo is an environmental scientist, photographer and writer. She has worked in the environment movement for decades and is co-ordinator of the National Toxics Network, an organisation dedicated to creating a toxicfree future. She has written many artic

      3 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      We Contribute To The People In The World With Our Agritechnology And Sincerity

      Jul 23, 2021

      Buoyed by their technological and manufacturing prowess, Japanese companies have positioned themselves at the forefront of the biggest global challenges of the 21st century. Two of the most unprecedented challenges of our time, climate change and foo

      2 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      Scientific Advancements In Seed Breeding And Agrochemicals Are Key For SA's Agricultural Progress

      Feb 23, 2024

      As an export-oriented agricultural sector, South Africa must always pay attention to global developments and risks that could undercut its competitiveness in the world market. Several environmental, social and political risks remain top of mind for f

      3 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      At Last, Farmers Are Acknowledged As Part Of The Solution

      Dec 16, 2022

      Ever since the ill-advised and scientifically flawed 'Livestock's Long Shadow' was published by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations in 2006, agriculture, and livestock farming in particular, has become a handy scapegoat for cl

      2 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      Lab-grown Meat And Insect Protein

      Jul 14, 2023

      I recently received a media release in which it was claimed that the World Farmers' Organisation (WFO), which represents more than 1,2 billion farmers across the globe, has taken a “resolute stand against adopting lab-grown food as an alternative to

      2 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      A Manual For Red Meat Producers

      Jul 27, 2020

      Stock farmers face a long list of challenges and risks. One of the greatest of these is the conservation of natural resources, as today’s producers are entirely responsible for their own fodder flow programmes and can no longer look to the state for

      2 min read

    Related categories

    Reviews for The State of the World's Biodiversity for Food and Agriculture

    0 ratings

    0 ratings0 reviews

    What did you think?

    Tap to rate

    Review must be at least 10 words

      Book preview

      The State of the World's Biodiversity for Food and Agriculture - Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

      Required citation:

      FAO. 2019. The State of the World’s Biodiversity for Food and Agriculture, J. Bélanger & D. Pilling (eds.). FAO Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture Assessments. Rome. 572 pp. (http://www.fao.org/3/CA3129EN/CA3129EN.pdf)

      Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.

      The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned.

      The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO.

      ISBN 978-92-5-131270-4

      E-ISBN 978-92-5-132181-2 (EPUB)

      © FAO, 2019

      Some rights reserved. This work is made available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO licence (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/igo/legalcode/legalcode).

      Under the terms of this licence, this work may be copied, redistributed and adapted for non-commercial purposes, provided that the work is appropriately cited. In any use of this work, there should be no suggestion that FAO endorses any specific organization, products or services. The use of the FAO logo is not permitted. If the work is adapted, then it must be licensed under the same or equivalent Creative Commons licence. If a translation of this work is created, it must include the following disclaimer along with the required citation: This translation was not created by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). FAO is not responsible for the content or accuracy of this translation. The original [Language] edition shall be the authoritative edition.

      Disputes arising under the licence that cannot be settled amicably will be resolved by mediation and arbitration as described in Article 8 of the licence except as otherwise provided herein. The applicable mediation rules will be the mediation rules of the World Intellectual Property Organization http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/mediation/rules and any arbitration will be conducted in accordance with the Arbitration Rules of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL).

      Third-party materials. Users wishing to reuse material from this work that is attributed to a third party, such as tables, figures or images, are responsible for determining whether permission is needed for that reuse and for obtaining permission from the copyright holder. The risk of claims resulting from infringement of any third-party-owned component in the work rests solely with the user.

      Sales, rights and licensing. FAO information products are available on the FAO website (www.fao.org/publications) and can be purchased through [email protected]. Requests for commercial use should be submitted via: www.fao.org/contact-us/licence-request. Queries regarding rights and licensing should be submitted to: [email protected].

      Contents

      Foreword

      Acknowledgements

      Abbreviations and acronyms

      About this publication

      Executive summary

      Part A Overview

      CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION

      1.1 Biodiversity and the challenges facing global food and agriculture

      1.2 What is biodiversity for food and agriculture?

      1.3 Biodiversity for food and agriculture and global policy agendas

      1.4 Assessments of biodiversity for food and agriculture

      1.5 Key concepts addressed in this report

      CHAPTER 2 ROLES AND IMPORTANCE OF BIODIVERSITY FOR FOOD AND AGRICULTURE

      Key messages

      2.1 Introduction

      2.2 Ecosystem services

      2.2.1 Provisioning services

      2.2.2 Regulating and supporting services

      2.2.3 Cultural services

      2.3 Resilience

      2.3.1 Overview of the contributions of biodiversity for food and agriculture

      2.3.2 Resilience to specific threats

      2.3.3 Needs and priorities

      2.4 Sustainable intensification

      2.4.1 Overview of the contributions of biodiversity for food and agriculture

      2.4.2 Needs and priorities

      2.5 Livelihoods

      2.5.1 Overview of the contributions of biodiversity for food and agriculture

      2.5.2 Needs and priorities

      2.6 Food security and nutrition

      2.6.1 Availability

      2.6.2 Access

      2.6.3 Utilization

      2.6.4 Stability

      2.6.5 Nutrition and food systems

      2.6.6 Contribution of wild foods

      2.6.7 Needs and priorities

      Part B Drivers, status and trends

      CHAPTER 3 DRIVERS OF CHANGE OF BIODIVERSITY FOR FOOD AND AGRICULTURE

      Key messages

      3.1 Introduction

      3.2 Overview

      3.3 Economic and social drivers

      3.3.1 Population growth and urbanization

      3.3.2 Markets, trade and value chains

      3.3.3 Changing economic, sociopolitical and cultural factors

      3.4 Environmental drivers

      3.4.1 Climate change

      3.4.2 Natural disasters

      3.4.3 Pests, diseases and invasive alien species

      3.5 Advances and innovations in science and technology

      3.6 Drivers at production-system level

      3.6.1 Changes in land and water use and management

      3.6.2 Pollution and external inputs

      3.6.3 Overexploitation and overharvesting

      3.7 Policies

      3.8 Drivers of women’s involvement in the management of biodiversity for food and agriculture

      3.9 Drivers of traditional knowledge of biodiversity for food and agriculture

      CHAPTER 4 THE STATUS AND TRENDS OF BIODIVERSITY FOR FOOD AND AGRICULTURE

      Key messages

      4.1 Introduction

      4.2 Plant, animal, forest and aquatic genetic resources for food and agriculture

      4.2.1 Plant genetic resources for food and agriculture

      4.2.2 Animal genetic resources for food and agriculture

      4.2.3 Forest genetic resources

      4.2.4 Aquatic genetic resources for food and agriculture

      4.3 Associated biodiversity

      4.3.1 Associated-biodiversity species managed for ecosystem services

      4.3.2 Information and monitoring systems on associated biodiversity

      4.3.3 Overview of status and trends

      4.3.4 Associated biodiversity for pollination

      4.3.5 Associated biodiversity for pest and disease regulation

      4.3.6 Associated biodiversity for soil-related ecosystem services

      4.3.7 Associated biodiversity for water-related ecosystem services

      4.3.8 Associated biodiversity for natural-hazard regulation

      4.3.9 Associated biodiversity for habitat provisioning

      4.3.10 Associated biodiversity for air-quality and climate regulation

      4.4 Wild foods

      4.4.1 State of knowledge

      4.4.2 Status and trends

      4.5 Ecosystems of importance to food and agriculture

      4.5.1 Wetlands

      4.5.2 Mangroves

      4.5.3 Seagrasses

      4.5.4 Coral reefs

      4.5.5 Forests

      4.5.6 Rangelands

      4.6 Needs and priorities

      Part C State of management

      CHAPTER 5 THE STATE OF USE OF BIODIVERSITY FOR FOOD AND AGRICULTURE

      Key messages

      5.1 Introduction

      5.2 Overview of management practices and approaches

      5.3 Ecosystem, landscape and seascape approaches

      5.3.1 Overview

      5.3.2 Sustainable forest management

      5.3.3 Ecosystem approach to fisheries and aquaculture

      5.3.4 Agroecology

      5.3.5 Landscape and seascape approaches and management

      5.3.6 Integrated land- and water-use planning

      5.3.7 Needs and priorities

      5.4 Restoration practices

      5.4.1 Overview

      5.4.2 Status and trends

      5.4.3 Needs and priorities

      5.5 Diversification in production systems

      5.5.1 Integrated crop–livestock systems

      5.5.2 Home gardens

      5.5.3 Agroforestry

      5.5.4 Diversification practices in aquaculture

      5.5.5 Needs and priorities

      5.6 Management practices and production approaches

      5.6.1 Organic agriculture

      5.6.2 Low external input agriculture

      5.6.3 Management practices to preserve and enhance soil biodiversity

      5.6.4 Conservation agriculture

      5.6.5 Integrated plant nutrient management

      5.6.6 Integrated pest management

      5.6.7 Pollination management

      5.6.8 Forest-management practices

      5.6.9 Needs and priorities

      5.7 The use of micro-organisms in food processing and agro-industrial processes

      5.7.1 Micro-organisms in food processing

      5.7.2 Micro-organisms in agro-industrial processes

      5.8 Rumen microbial diversity

      5.8.1 Roles and drivers

      5.8.2 Methane emissions

      5.8.3 State of knowledge

      5.8.4 Needs and priorities

      5.9 Genetic improvement

      5.9.1 Domestication and base broadening

      5.9.2 Plant, animal, forest and aquatic genetic resources for food and agriculture

      5.9.3 Associated biodiversity – overview

      5.9.4 Pollinators

      5.9.5 Assisted evolution for reef-building corals

      5.9.6 Needs and priorities

      CHAPTER 6 THE STATE OF CHARACTERIZATION OF BIODIVERSITY FOR FOOD AND AGRICULTURE

      Key messages

      6.1 Introduction

      6.2 Plant, animal, forest and aquatic genetic resources for food and agriculture

      6.2.1 Plant genetic resources for food and agriculture

      6.2.2 Animal genetic resources for food and agriculture

      6.2.3 Forest genetic resources

      6.2.4 Aquatic genetic resources for food and agriculture

      6.3 Associated biodiversity

      6.3.1 Overview

      6.3.2 Country-report analysis

      6.4 Wild foods

      6.4.1 Overview

      6.4.2 Country-report analysis

      6.5 Needs and priorities

      CHAPTER 7 THE STATE OF CONSERVATION OF BIODIVERSITY FOR FOOD AND AGRICULTURE

      Key messages

      7.1 Introduction

      7.2 Plant, animal, forest and aquatic genetic resources for food and agriculture

      7.2.1 Plant genetic resources for food and agriculture

      7.2.2 Animal genetic resources for food and agriculture

      7.2.3 Forest genetic resources

      7.2.4 Aquatic genetic resources for food and agriculture

      7.3 Associated biodiversity

      7.3.1 In situ conservation

      7.3.2 Ex situ conservation

      7.4 Wild foods

      7.4.1 In situ conservation

      7.4.2 Ex situ conservation

      7.5 Roles of protected areas

      7.5.1 Status and trends

      7.5.2 Contribution to conservation of wild species used for food

      7.5.3 Management of biodiversity or food and agriculture in protected areas

      7.5.4 Country-report analysis

      7.6 Maintenance of traditional knowledge associated with food and agriculture

      7.7 Needs and priorities

      Part D Enabling frameworks

      CHAPTER 8 THE STATE OF POLICIES, INSTITUTIONS AND CAPACITIES

      Key messages

      8.1 Introduction

      8.2 Stakeholders

      8.2.1 Producers and their organizations

      8.2.2 Suppliers, processors, traders and retailers

      8.2.3 The public sector

      8.2.4 The non-governmental sector

      8.2.5 The general public

      8.2.6 Regional and international organizations

      8.3 Cooperation

      8.3.1 Cooperation at national level

      8.3.2 Cooperation at international level

      8.3.3 Needs and priorities

      8.4 Education, training and awareness raising

      8.4.1 Plant, animal, forest and aquatic genetic resources for food and agriculture

      8.4.2 Associated biodiversity

      8.4.3 Needs and priorities

      8.5 Research

      8.5.1 Institutions involved in research on associated biodiversity

      8.5.2 Needs and priorities

      8.6 Valuation

      8.6.1 Overview of valuation approaches

      8.6.2 State of implementation

      8.6.3 Needs and priorities

      8.7 Incentives

      8.7.1 Overview

      8.7.2 State of adoption

      8.7.3 Needs and priorities

      8.8 Policy and legal frameworks

      8.8.1 Frameworks at international level

      8.8.2 Frameworks at national level

      8.8.3 Climate change policy and programmes

      8.8.4 Frameworks supporting the maintenance of traditional knowledge

      8.8.5 Access and benefit-sharing

      Part E Conclusions

      CHAPTER 9 NEEDS AND CHALLENGES

      9.1 Introduction

      9.2 Drivers of change

      9.3 Status and trends

      9.4 Management

      9.4.1 State of use

      9.4.2 State of conservation

      9.5 Policies, capacities and institutions

      9.6 Towards a more diverse and sustainable future

      References

      BOXES

      1The Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture

      PART A

      1.1 Biodiversity for food and agriculture, FAO and the Sustainable Development Goals

      1.2 Assessing the state of the world’s genetic resources for food and agriculture

      2.1 Projects and programmes supporting livelihoods by promoting biodiversity for food and agriculture – examples from around the world

      2.2 The Second International Conference on Nutrition Framework for Action

      2.3 Voluntary Guidelines for Mainstreaming Biodiversity into Policies, Programmes and National and Regional Plans of Action on Nutrition

      2.4 The Biodiversity for Food and Nutrition Project

      2.5 Food-based dietary guidelines as a tool to promote biodiversity

      PART B

      3.1 Human-made grasslands as a cultural and ecological asset

      3.2 Links between biodiversity, biodiversity loss and disease risk

      3.3 Unsustainably managed production systems are a key threat to bird species

      4.1 The International Union for Conservation of Nature Red List of Threatened Species ™

      4.2 Birds as indicator species

      4.3 Monitoring total flying insect biomass over 27 years in protected areas in Germany

      4.4 The main functional groups of biological control agents

      4.5 The roles of birds in the supply of supporting and regulating ecosystem services

      4.6 The Netherlands’ soil biological monitoring programme

      4.7 Páramos – a vital provider of water-regulating services under threat

      4.8 Trends in the state of habitats in the European Union

      4.9 Soil carbon assessment initiatives – examples from the United States of America

      4.10 FAO global definition of forest

      PART C

      5.1 The Convention on Biological Diversity’s principles and operational guidelines for the ecosystem approach

      5.2 The concept of sustainable forest management

      5.3 Application of the ecosystem approach in capture fisheries – an example from Panama

      5.4 Ecosystem approach to fisheries management in Saint Lucia

      5.5 The ten elements of agroecology

      5.6 The Pacific Ridge to Reef approach – an example of integrated land and water-use planning

      5.7 Needs and challenges in coral-reef restoration

      5.8 The floating gardens of Bangladesh

      5.9 Promotion of home gardens for healthy diets in Solomon Islands

      5.10 Projects and initiatives targeting home gardens – examples from around the world

      5.11 Policy and legislative frameworks promoting agroforestry – examples from around the world

      5.12 France’s Agroforestry Development Plan 2015–2020

      5.13 Fish polyculture for improved nutrition – an example from Bangladesh

      5.14 The Voluntary Guidelines for Sustainable Soil Management

      5.15 Burkina Faso’s Operation Manure Pits

      5.16 Conservation agriculture for climate-smart agriculture

      5.17 The Save and Grow approach

      5.18 The push–pull approach

      5.19 Integrated pest management in horticultural production in Almería, Spain

      5.20 Management of stingless bees in Malaysia

      5.21 Enhancing pollinator presence in cassava fields in Ghana

      5.22 Measures or steps typically included in reduced-impact logging

      5.23 Global research efforts in rumen microbiology

      5.24 SmartBees: a European project for the conservation of endangered honey-bee subspecies

      6.1 The role of molecular techniques in the characterization of food-processing micro-organisms

      6.2 Characterization studies on micro-organisms – examples from Peru

      6.3 Why undertake genetic data analysis of crop wild relatives and wild food plants?

      6.4 Study and development of foods and natural products with potential health benefits in Paraguay

      7.1 The World Information and Early Warning System on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture

      7.2 The Domestic Animal Diversity Information System

      7.3 Marine sanctuaries and monitoring systems – examples from Jamaica

      7.4 Marine protected areas in Palau

      7.5 The traditional Hima rangeland management system in Jordan

      7.6 Agri-environmental schemes supporting cropland and grassland biodiversity – examples from Belgium

      7.7 Initiatives supporting the in situ conservation of pollinators in the United States of America

      7.8 Selected species-conservation measures in Ireland

      7.9 Plan of Action for the Conservation of the Nordic Brown Bee

      7.10 Conservation methods for micro-organisms stored ex situ

      7.11 Cooperation in the ex situ conservation of micro-organisms

      7.12 The culture collection of Mexico’s National Genetic Resources Centre

      7.13 The Microbial Biodiversity Directorate of the Ethiopian Biodiversity Institute

      7.14 Micro-organism conservation for improved agricultural production in India

      7.15 The role of Japan’s National Agriculture and Food Research Organization Genebank in recovering genetic resources after the earthquake of 2011

      7.16 Voluntary Guidelines for the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Crop Wild Relatives and Wild Food Plants

      7.17 The IUCN Green List of Protected and Conserved Areas

      7.18 FAO’s Globally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems

      7.19 The role of geographical indications in the maintenance of biodiversity for food and agriculture

      7.20 Maintenance and use of indigenous knowledge – examples from Kenya

      7.21 Maintenance and use of traditional practices in the Pacific

      7.22 Women’s traditional knowledge for improved food and seed security under climate change

      7.23 Community forest management and development in Ban Banh, Viet Nam

      PART D

      8.1 Governance outcomes promoted by small-scale food providers’ organizations

      8.2 Community control of a coastal ecosystem – an example from Senegal

      8.3 Agroforestry under local control – an example from Costa Rica

      8.4 The role of a women’s group in promoting sustainable fishing – an example from Ecuador

      8.5 Contributions of non-governmental organizations to the sustainable management of biodiversity for food and agriculture – examples from the Near East

      8.6 Zambia’s Biodiversity Community Network

      8.7 The Norwegian Genetic Resource Centre and its genetic resources committees

      8.8 France’s Agricultural Biodiversity Observatory

      8.9 The Regional Project for Sustainable Management of Globally Significant Endemic Ruminant Livestock (PROGEBE)

      8.10 Appointment of national focal points and participation in the preparation of The State of the World’s Biodiversity for Food and Agriculture

      8.11 Transfrontier conservation areas in Southern Africa

      8.12 Resolution 4/2017. The Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture and its contribution to the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals

      8.13 Farmer field schools on integrated pest management – experiences from Nepal

      8.14 The farmer field school approach

      8.15 Participatory workshops with local communities in the development of a Globally Important Agricultural Heritage System in Chile

      8.16 Incentive schemes promoting sustainable shrimp aquaculture in Viet Nam

      8.17 Integrated incentive packages for microwatershed development in Brazil

      8.18 Integrated incentive packages in Mexico

      8.19 Binding and soft-law instruments related to port state measures in the capture-fisheries sector

      8.20 Biodiversity and international law

      8.21 Brazil’s experience in mainstreaming biodiversity into its Food and Nutrition Security Policy

      8.22 Voluntary Guidelines to Support the Integration of Genetic Diversity into National Climate Change Adaptation Planning

      8.23 The UNFCCC adaptation and mitigation instruments

      TABLES

      1Overview of country reports and their regional distribution

      PART A

      1.1 Production-system classification used in this report

      2.1 Biological control of invasive alien species through predation, parasitism and herbivory – examples from the country reports

      2.2 Biological control of invasive alien species through resource competition and other antagonistic relationships − examples from the country reports

      2.3 Species or varieties that are tolerant or resistant to the effects of invasive alien species – examples from the country reports

      2.4 Potential interventions to support positive interactions in food production systems 38

      PART B

      3.1 Drivers of change explored in the country-reporting guidelines

      3.2 Reported effects of drivers of change on regulating and supporting ecosystem services, all production systems aggregated

      3.3 Number of countries reporting negative, neutral and positive effects of drivers of change on the diversity, availability and knowledge of wild foods

      3.4 Reported effects of population growth and urbanization on the provision of regulating and supporting ecosystem services, by production system

      3.5 Reported effects of markets, trade and the private sector on the provision of regulating and supporting ecosystem services, by production system

      3.6 Reported effects of changing economic, sociopolitical and cultural factors on the provision of regulating and supporting ecosystem services, by production system

      3.7 Reported effects of climate change on the provision of regulating and supporting ecosystem services, by production system

      3.8 Natural disasters reported to have had a significant effect on biodiversity for food and agriculture and/or on ecosystem services in the past ten years

      3.9 Reported effects of natural disasters on the provision of regulating and supporting ecosystem services, by production system

      3.10 Reported effects of pests, diseases and invasive alien species on the provision of regulating and supporting ecosystem services, by production system

      3.11 Invasive alien species reported by five or more countries as present in one or more production systems

      3.12 Reported effects of advances and innovations in science and technology on the provision of regulating and supporting ecosystem services, by production system

      3.13 Reported effects of changes in land and water use and management on the provision of regulating and supporting ecosystem services, by production system

      3.14 Reported effects of pollution and external input use on the provision of regulating and supporting ecosystem services, by production system

      3.15 Reported effects of overexploitation and overharvesting on the provision of regulating and supporting ecosystem services, by production system

      3.16 Reported effects of policies on the provision of regulating and supporting ecosystem services, by production system

      4.1 Examples of species and genera reported by countries to be managed for regulating or supporting ecosystem services in production systems

      4.2 Species and genera most frequently reported to be managed for multiple supporting and regulating ecosystem services

      4.3 Risk status of associated biodiversity for which a significant threat of extinction or loss is reported

      4.4 Reported trends in the state of provision of regulating and supporting ecosystem services in production systems

      4.5 Examples of associated-biodiversity species or species groups that contribute to pest and disease regulation reported to be under threat

      4.6 The functions of soil organisms

      4.7 Typical numbers of soil organisms in healthy ecosystems

      4.8 Summary of regional extent, trends and uncertainties of soil-biodiversity loss presented in the Status of the World’s Soil Resources

      4.9 Selected examples of wild food species and genera reported by countries

      4.10 Global forest area change (1990–2015)

      PART C

      5.1 Reported levels of adoption of selected management practices and approaches, all production systems aggregated

      5.2 Reported trends in the adoption of selected management practices and approaches, by production system

      5.3 Reported ecosystem, landscape and seascape approaches

      5.4 Restoration measures for wetlands and other aquatic ecosystems

      5.5 Land area under agroforestry (2008–2010) and trends (2000–2010), by region

      5.6 Major benefits and challenges of aquaponic food production

      5.7 Indicators of the status of organic agriculture worldwide

      5.8 Environmental and other benefits of implementing the three principles of conservation agriculture

      5.9 Examples of integrated pest management measures

      5.10 Examples of the roles of associated biodiversity in integrated pest management

      6.1 Traits and methods used for characterizing germplasm: percentage of accessions characterized and/or evaluated, by region

      6.2 Degree of characterization for the five largest crop collections conserved by 27 reporting countries

      6.3 Characters most frequently assessed in 692 evaluations of forest-tree genetic variability reported by countries

      6.4 Known and estimated number of species of soil organisms and vascular plants

      7.1 Associated biodiversity species and genera reported to be conserved in situ , by taxonomic group

      7.2 Associated biodiversity species reported to be conserved ex situ , by taxonomic group

      7.3 Wild food species and genera reported to be conserved in situ , by taxonomic group

      7.4 Wild food species and genera reported to be conserved ex situ , by taxonomic group

      7.5 IUCN Protected Area Management Categories

      7.6 Number of species in the comprehensively assessed groups of The IUCN Red List with mapped ranges and classified as used for human food

      7.7 Types of designated area reported to be of particular significance for biodiversity for food and agriculture

      PART D

      8.1 Selected regional intergovernmental bodies and multilateral partnerships reported by countries to contribute to initiatives in the management of associated biodiversity

      8.2 Examples of associated-biodiversity management activities reported by international organizations

      8.3 Examples of practices reported to be promoted through the provision of incentives

      FIGURES

      1Assignment of countries to regions in this report

      PART A

      1.1 Key developments in the international recognition of the importance of biodiversity for food and agriculture

      2.1 Damage and loss to agriculture sectors caused by specific types of abiotic hazard (2006–2016)

      2.2 The sustainable livelihoods analytical framework

      2.3 Types of wild-food use reported by countries 59

      PART B

      3.1 Reported climate change-related threats to associated biodiversity, (A) by region and (B) by production system

      3.2 Global trends in the occurrence of natural disasters − 1980 to 2017

      3.3 Invasive alien species reported by countries to be impacting biodiversity for food and agriculture, A) by type of organism and (B) by region

      4.1 Regulating and supporting ecosystem services for which associated biodiversity is reported to be managed, by sector of production

      4.2 Reported threats to associated biodiversity, by region

      4.3 Reported trends in associated biodiversity, by production system

      4.4 The soil food web

      4.5 Map of the Soil Biodiversity Index

      4.6 Map of potential threats to soil biodiversity

      4.7 Global risk status of invertebrates in the classes Bivalvia, Holothuroidea, Maxillopoda and Polychaeta

      4.8 Global risk status of species included in The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, by habitat

      4.9 Number of wild food species reported, by type and region

      4.10 Examples of wild plants reported to be used for food

      4.11 Production systems and environments in which wild food species are present and harvested, by type

      4.12 Reported trends in the status of wild food species, by region

      4.13 Reported trends in the status of wild food species, by type

      4.14 Risk categories of wild foods for which a significant threat of extinction or loss is reported, by region

      4.15 Reported threats to wild foods species

      4.16 Number of species classified as used for human food on The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, by type and risk category

      4.17 Global distribution of mangroves

      4.18 Interconnectivity between coastal ecosystems

      4.19 Global distribution of seagrasses

      4.20 Global status of reef-building corals

      4.21 Annual change in forest area (1990–2015)

      4.22 Global distribution of ruminant livestock production systems

      4.23 Global grasslands suitable and unsuitable for crop production and share of land use

      PART C

      5.1 Perceived impacts on biodiversity for food and agriculture of various management practices and approaches

      5.2 The ten principles that characterize the landscape approach

      5.3 Legal and policy frameworks on agroecology

      5.4 Commitments to the Bonn Challenge

      5.5 Livestock and crop integration: from a linear to a circular bioeconomy

      5.6 An example of an aquaponic system

      5.7 Rumen microbial fermentation

      5.8 Motivation for and steps involved in the assisted-evolution approaches in corals

      6.1 Reported progress in the implementation of (A) phenotypic and (B) molecular characterization in livestock species of economic importance

      6.2 Status of characterization or evaluation of associated biodiversity species reported to be conserved ex situ , by region

      6.3 Wild foods in the FAO/INFOODS Food Composition Database for Biodiversity

      6.4 Status of identification and characterization of differences within wild food species reported by countries, by type

      7.1 Reported objectives for the in situ conservation of associated biodiversity

      7.2 Reported actions for the in situ conservation of associated biodiversity

      7.3 Reported objectives for the ex situ conservation of associated biodiversity

      7.4 Reported objectives for the in situ conservation of wild foods

      7.5 Progress of global coverage of protected areas

      7.6 Geographic distribution of the terrestrial, marine and coastal protected areas of the world

      7.7 Protected area coverage of species in the comprehensively assessed taxonomic groups of The IUCN Red List with mapped ranges and classified as used for human food

      7.8 Protected area coverage of species in the comprehensively assessed taxonomic groups of The IUCN Red List with mapped ranges and classified as threatened and as used for human food

      PART D

      8.1 Elements of the TEEBAgriFood Evaluation Framework

      8.2 Examples of sources of incentives to support sustainable use and conservation of biodiversity

      Foreword

      Our food and agricultural systems depend in countless ways on the plants, animals and micro-organisms that comprise and surround them. Biodiversity, at every level from genetic, through species to ecosystem, underpins the capacity of farmers, livestock keepers, forest dwellers, fishers and fish farmers to produce food and a range of other goods and services in a vast variety of different biophysical and socio-economic environments. It increases resilience to shocks and stresses, provides opportunities to adapt production systems to emerging challenges and is a key resource in efforts to increase output in a sustainable way. It is vital to efforts to meet the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) of the 2030 Agenda.

      Over the last two decades, FAO has prepared country-driven global assessments of the genetic resources of crop plants, livestock and forest trees. An assessment covering aquatic genetic resources will shortly be published. What has been missing to date has been an assessment of how biodiversity as a whole contributes to food and agriculture, including associated biodiversity, the myriad components of biodiversity that support food and agricultural production by providing services such as pollination, pest control, soil formation and maintenance, carbon sequestration, purification and regulation of water supplies, reduction of disasters threats, and the provision of habitat for other beneficial species. The urgency of closing knowledge gaps in this field is underlined by the mounting evidence that the world’s biodiversity is under severe threat and by the ever-growing challenges facing food and agriculture, including particularly those related to the impacts of climate change. The publication of The State of the World’s Biodiversity for Food and Agriculture is therefore a significant and timely milestone.

      Like all the global assessments prepared under the auspices of FAO’s Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, a key characteristic of this report is its country-driven nature. Ninety-one countries prepared and submitted reports on the state of their biodiversity for food and agriculture and its management, focusing particularly on associated biodiversity and its role in the supply of supporting and regulating ecosystem services and on wild species that are sources of food. The reporting process provided an opportunity for countries to identify needs and priorities in terms of promoting the sustainable use and conservation of these resources, both at national level and internationally.

      Parts of the global report make sombre reading. It is deeply concerning that in so many production systems in so many countries biodiversity for food and agriculture and the ecosystem services it provides are reported to be in decline. The foundations of our food systems are being undermined, often, at least in part, because of the impact of management practices and land-use changes associated with food and agriculture. It is also abundantly clear that the state of knowledge of many components of biodiversity, including in particular invertebrates and micro-organisms, is very inadequate and that this contributes to their neglect. The good news is that many management practices and approaches that rely on the maintenance of abundant and diverse biological communities, or that can otherwise be considered biodiversity friendly, are attracting growing interest and in many cases are becoming more widely adopted.

      The importance of biodiversity and its roles in the food and agriculture sector is increasingly being acknowledged in international policy agendas. This recognition needs to be translated into action. Key tasks include addressing the drivers of biodiversity loss within the food and agriculture sector and beyond, strengthening in situ and ex situ conservation measures, and increasing the uptake of management practices that promote the contributions of biodiversity to sustainable production. Coordinated and collaborative action on the part of the international community is essential. This report will make a valuable contribution to these efforts and to raising awareness of the vital importance of biodiversity to food and agriculture.

      Acknowledgements

      The preparation of The State of the World’s Biodiversity for Food and Agriculture required the dedication, time and expertise of many individuals, and the collaboration and support of many governments and institutions. The country reports submitted by 91 countries were the primary sources of information. FAO wishes to thank the respective governments and the hundreds of individuals involved, in particular the National Focal Points. Gratitude is also expressed to those who contributed to the preparation of the reports submitted by international organizations. The preparation of the report would not have been possible without the financial and in-kind support of Germany, Norway, Spain and Switzerland.

      The report was prepared by FAO. The reporting and preparation process was coordinated by Julie Bélanger, with the assistance of Dafydd Pilling and Kim-Anh Tempelman, in FAO’s Secretariat of the Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. The work was facilitated and supported by current and former Secretaries of the Commission, Irene Hoffmann and Linda Collette, and by current and former officers of the Secretariat, Anna Asfaw (seconded by the Government of Germany), Ladina Knapp (seconded by the Government of Switzerland), Dan Leskien, Damiano Luchetti and Miriam Widmer (seconded by the Government of Switzerland). Core contributors to the analysis of the country reports and the drafting, editing and/or finalization of report included Agnès Bernis-Fonteneau, Cordula Hinkes (seconded by the Government of Germany), Manuel Pomar Cloquell, Marcela Portocarrero-Aya, Suzanne Redfern, Vladimir Shlevkov-Pronskiy and Miriam Widmer. The work was further supported by a number of interns, Davide Albeggiani, Poljanka Johnson, Agathe Mansion-Vaquié, Michael Ruggeri, Angus Wilsdon, Lilly Zeitler and Sabrina Zhang. Administrative and secretarial support was provided by Nathalie Bramucci and Cintia Pohl.

      The database of country-report data was designed, created and loaded by Enrico Anello, under the supervision of Giorgio Lanzarone of FAO’s Information Technology Division. François Fauteux¹ processed and compiled all taxonomic information contained in the database.

      Over 175 individuals contributed to the preparation of the report as authors, contributors and reviewers. Details are provided in the table below, section by section. Significant contributions were provided by staff from many divisions within FAO. The manuscript was further reviewed by David Cooper² (Parts A, B and C), Nigel Dudley,³ Toby Hodgkin,⁴ Patrick Mulvany⁵ (Parts A and D) and Mary Taylor⁶ (Parts B and C). All members of the Commission Secretariat also contributed to the reviewing process.

      Text boxes were prepared by Peer Berg,⁷ Kaspar Bienefeld,⁸ Teresa Borelli,⁹ Martin Brink,¹⁰ Stuart Butchart,¹¹ Georgina Chandler,¹² Gonzalo Eiriz,¹³ François Fauteux,¹ Hasan Gezginç,¹⁴ Linn Fenna Groeneveld,⁷ Kim Holm Boesen,¹⁵ Danny Hunter,⁹ Mohd Fahimee Bin Jaapar,¹⁶ Rosliza Jajuli,¹⁶ Malene Karup Palne,¹⁵ Amir Kassam,¹⁷ Patricia Larbouret,¹⁸ Birgitte Lund,¹⁵ Tom Moore,¹⁹ Serge Morand,²⁰ Daniela Moura de Oliveira Beltrame,²¹ Christophe Pinard,¹⁸ Maryam Rahmanian, Ana Islas Ramos, Gamini Samarasinghe,²² Florence Tartanac, Emilie Vandecandelaere, Anja Laupstad Vatland,²³ Pierre Velge²⁴ and Victor W. Wasike.²⁵ Additional material for the preparation of text boxes was provided by Widegnoma Jean de Dieu Nitiema²⁶ and Thembinkosi Gumedze.²⁷

      The thematic study Biodiversity for food and agriculture and ecosystem services was prepared by Dafydd Pilling. The study Biodiversity for food and agriculture: the perspectives of small-scale food providers was prepared by Patrick Mulvany, Bob Brac de la Perrière, Maryam Rahmanian and Angela Cordeiro (International Planning Committee for Food Sovereignty, Agricultural Biodiversity Working Group). The study The contributions of biodiversity for food and agriculture to the resilience of production systems was prepared by Ashley Duval, Dunja Mijatovic and Toby Hodgkin (Platform for Agrobiodiversity Research). The study Contributions of biodiversity to the sustainable intensification of food production was prepared by Ian K. Dawson, Simon J. Attwood, Sarah E. Park, Ramni Jamnadass, Wayne Powell, Terry Sunderland, Roeland Kindt, Stepha McMullin, Peter N. Hoebe, John Baddeley, Charles Staver, Vincent Vadez, Sammy Carsan, James M. Roshetko, Ahmed Amri, Eldad Karamura, Deborah Karamura, Paulo van Breugel, Md. Emdad Hossain, Michael Phillips, Ashok Kumar, Jens-Peter B. Lillesø, John Benzie, Gerhard E. Sabastian, Beatrice Ekesa, Walter Ocimati and Lars Graudal (CGIAR). The document entitled Study on the linkages between protected areas and the conservation of biodiversity for food and agriculture was prepared by Natasha Ali, Bárbara Goettsch, James Hardcastle, Sara Oldfield and Yichuan Shi (International Union for Conservation of Nature). See respective studies for authors’ individual affiliations.

      The layout was designed and implemented by Chiara Caproni.

      The draft report was made available for review by members and observers of the Commission. Comments were received from Argentina, Bangladesh, Brazil, Canada, France, Georgia, Germany, Japan, Jordan, Mexico, the Russian Federation, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Thailand, Tunisia and the United States of America. The International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants and the Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity also provided comments.

      Listing every person by name is not easy and carries with it the risk that someone may be overlooked. Apologies are conveyed to anyone who provided assistance but whose name has been omitted.

      Abbreviations and acronyms

      ABO Agricultural Biodiversity Observatory (France)

      ABS access and benefit-sharing

      AGRA Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa

      AIDS acquired immune deficiency syndrome

      AMBER Adaptive Management of Barriers in European Rivers

      AnGR animal genetic resources for food and agriculture

      APCRM Association of Fishermen of the Rural Community Mangagoulack (Senegal)

      AQGR aquatic genetic resources for food and agriculture

      ASEAN Association of Southeast Asian Nations

      ASFIS Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Information System

      AU African Union

      BCA biological control agent

      BCCM Belgian Co-ordinated Collections of Micro-organisms

      BFA biodiversity for food and agriculture

      BFN Biodiversity for Food and Nutrition Project

      BGCI Botanic Gardens Conservation International

      BINGO Breeding Invertebrates for Next Generation Biocontrol

      BIO_SOS BIodiversity Multi-Source Monitoring System: from Space to Species

      BISQ Biological Indicator of Soil Quality (Netherlands)

      BLUP best linear unbiased prediction

      BRC biological resource centre

      CABI Centre for Agriculture and Biosciences International

      CABRI Common Access to Biological Resources and Information

      CAMPFIRE Communal Areas Management Programme for Indigenous Resources (Zimbabwe)

      CBD Convention on Biological Diversity

      CEPF Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund

      CIAT International Center for Tropical Agriculture

      CIFOR Center for International Forestry Research

      CIP International Potato Center

      CITES Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora

      CMS Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals

      COMET CarbOn Management Evaluation Tool

      COMIFAC Commission of Central African Forests

      CONABIO Biodiversity Commission (Mexico)

      COUSSA Conservation and Sustainable Use of Soil and Water (Mexico)

      CRP Conservation Reserve Program (United States of America)

      CSO civil society organization

      CSP Conservation Stewardship Program (United States of America)

      CTI-CFF Coral Triangle Initiative on Coral Reefs, Fisheries and Food Security

      DAD-IS Domestic Animal Diversity Information System

      DIAS Database on Introductions of Aquatic Species

      DNA deoxyribonucleic acid

      EBA Endemic Bird Area

      EBCC European Bird Census Council

      EBI Ethiopian Biodiversity Institute

      ECCO European Culture Collection Organization

      EMbaRC European Consortium of Microbial Resource Centres

      EODHaM Earth Observation Data for Habitat Monitoring

      EU European Union

      EUR euro

      FANTA Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance III Project

      FAO Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

      FAOSTAT FAO Statistical Database

      FBDG food-based dietary guidelines

      FGR forest genetic resources

      FMNR farmer-managed natural regeneration

      FRA Global Forest Resources Assessment

      FS farmer school

      FSC Forest Stewardship Council

      GBRCN Global Biological Resource Centre Network

      GDP gross domestic product

      GEF Global Environment Facility

      GEMStat Global Water Quality Database and Information System

      GEMS/Water Global Environment Monitoring System for Freshwater

      GIAHS Globally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems

      GIS geographic information system

      GRC Global Rumen Census

      HIV human immunodeficiency virus

      IBGE Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics

      ICCA Indigenous and Community Conserved Area

      ICIPE International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology

      IFF Intergovernmental Forum on Forests

      IFOAM International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements

      IMARPE Marine Institute of Peru

      IMTA integrated multitrophic aquaculture

      INDC intended national determined contribution

      INFOODS International Network of Food Data Systems

      INIA National Institute of Agricultural Innovation (Peru)

      INRA National Institute for Agricultural Research (France)

      INTECRAL Integrated Eco Technologies and Services for a Sustainable Rural Rio de Janeiro (Brazil)

      InVest Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs

      IPBES Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services

      IPF Intergovernmental Panel on Forests

      IPLC indigenous peoples and local communities

      IPM Integrated pest management

      IPM-FFS farmer field school on integrated pest management

      IPNM integrated plant nutrient management

      IPOA-IUU International Plan of Action to Prevent, Deter and Eliminate Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated Fishing

      IPPC International Plant Protection Convention

      IPPM integrated production and pest management

      IPR intellectual property rights

      IPSI International Partnership for the Satoyama Initiative

      ISCAAP International Standard Statistical Classification of Aquatic Animals and Plants

      IUCN International Union for Conservation of Nature

      IUU illegal, unreported and unregulated

      KBA Key Biodiversity Areas

      KEEP Kakamega Environmental and Education Programme (Kenya)

      KENRIK Kenya Resource Center for Indigenous Knowledge

      LEAF Linking Environment and Farming

      LEIA low external input agriculture

      LER land equivalent ratio

      LI-BIRD Local Initiatives for Biodiversity, Research and Development (Nepal)

      MARS Managing Aquatic ecosystems and water Resources under multiple Stress

      MasAgro Sustainable Modernization of Traditional Agriculture (Mexico)

      MAT mutually agreed terms

      MDS Ministry of Social Development and Hunger Alleviation (Brazil)

      MEA Millennium Ecosystem Assessment

      MERCES Marine Ecosystems Restoration in Changing European Seas

      MIRRI Microbial Resource Research Infrastructure

      MSDN Microbial Strain Data Network

      NAPA national adaptation programme of action

      NARO National Agriculture and Food Research Organization (Japan)

      NBA Niger Basin Authority

      NFP national forest programme

      NGO non-governmental organization

      NIBIO Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research

      NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (United States of America)

      NVS natural vegetative strips

      OECD Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development

      PAA Food Acquisition Programme (Brazil)

      PAAP Programme for the Acquisition of Productive Assets (Mexico)

      PDNA Post-Disaster Needs Assessment

      PEFC Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certification

      PELUM Participatory Ecological Land Use Management Association

      PERSAGA Regional Organization for the Conservation of the Environment of the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden

      PESA Strategic Project for Food Security (Mexico)

      PESAGRO-RIO Agricultural Research Enterprise of the State of Rio de Janeiro (Brazil)

      PGRFA plant genetic resources for food and agriculture

      PIC prior informed consent

      PLANAPO National Plan for Agroecology and Organic Production (Brazil)

      PNAD National Household Sample Survey (Brazil)

      PNAE National School Meals Programme (Brazil)

      PNAN National Food and Nutrition Policy (Brazil)

      PROGAN Sustainable Livestock Production and Management for Livestock and Beekeeping (Mexico)

      PROGEBE Regional Project for Sustainable Management of Globally Significant Endemic Ruminant Livestock

      PROMAF Project of Support for the Productive Chain of Corn and Bean Producers (Mexico)

      PRONAF National Programme for Strengthening Family Farming (Brazil)

      PRONAFOR National Forest Programme (Mexico)

      PSM port state measure

      PURSN Sustainable Use of Natural Resources Programme (Mexico)

      QTL quantitative trait locus

      REDD+ Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation

      REDESMI Spanish Micro-organisms Network

      REFORM REstoring rivers FOR effective catchment Management

      RIL reduced-impact logging

      RIVM National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (Netherlands)

      RNA ribonucleic acid

      RSPB Royal Society for the Protection of Birds

      SADC Southern African Development Community

      SAF Portuguese and Spanish abbreviation of agroforestry system

      SAGI Secretariat for Evaluation and Information Management (Brazil)

      SALT sloping agricultural land technology

      SBSTTA Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice

      SDG Sustainable Development Goal

      SEBRAE Brazilian Micro and Small Enterprises Support Service

      SEEA System of Environmental Economic Accounting

      SNP single nucleotide polymorphism

      SoW state of the world

      TEEB The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity

      TEEBAgFood TEEB for Food and Agriculture

      TEV total economic value

      TFCA transfrontier conservation area

      TRIPS Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights

      UBINIG Policy Research for Development Alternative (Bangladesh)

      UKNCC United Kingdom National Culture Collection

      UN United Nations

      UNALM National Agrarian University La Molina (Peru)

      UNCCD United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification

      UNCED United Nations Conference on Environment and Development

      UN Environment United Nations Environment Programme

      UNEP-WCMC UN Environment World Conservation Monitoring Centre

      UNESCO United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization

      UNFCCC United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change

      UNFF United Nations Forum on Forests

      UN-REDD United Nations Collaborative Programme on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation in Developing Countries

      UPOV International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants

      USAID United States Agency for International Development

      USD United States dollar

      USDA United States Department of Agriculture

      WAVES Wealth Accounting and the Valuation of Ecosystem Services

      WFCC World Federation for Culture Collections

      WHC World Heritage Convention

      WIEWS World Information and Early Warning System on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture

      WIPO World Intellectual Property Organization

      WISER Water bodies in Europe: Integrative Systems to assess Ecological status and Recovery

      WTA willingness to accept

      WTO World Trade Organization

      WTP willingness to pay

      About this publication

      Background

      This report presents the first global assessment of biodiversity for food and agriculture (BFA). It complements other global assessments prepared under the auspices of the Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (see Box 1), which have focused on the state of genetic resources within particular sectors of food and agriculture.

      Scope and contents of the report

      The State of the World’s Biodiversity for Food and Agriculture (SoW-BFA) addresses the sustainable use, development and conservation of BFA worldwide. BFA is taken to include the diversity of animals, plants and micro-organisms at the genetic, species and ecosystem levels that sustain structures, functions and processes in and around production systems and provide food and non-food agricultural products.

      The report consists of the following five parts.

      Part A – Overview: Chapter 1 describes the context for the assessment and presents key concepts and definitions used. Chapter 2 provides an overview of the contributions that BFA makes to the supply of multiple ecosystem services, to livelihoods, to the resilience of production systems, to the sustainable intensification of food and agricultural production, and to food security and nutrition.

      Part B – drivers, status and trends: Chapter 3 discusses the major drivers of change affecting BFA. Chapter 4 presents an analysis of the status and trends of BFA, including a discussion of the state of knowledge in this field.

      Part C – state of management: Chapter 5 considers the state of use of BFA, including discussions of landscape, seascape and ecosystem approaches, diversification in production systems, and management practices that utilize BFA or are considered to promote its conservation and sustainable use. This chapter also addresses the roles of micro-organisms in food processing, in agro-industrial practices and in the digestive processes of ruminant animals. Finally, it includes a discussion of breeding (genetic improvement) activities for various categories of BFA. Chapters 6 and 7, respectively, address the state of characterization and conservation efforts for BFA.

      Part D – enabling frameworks: Chapter 8 describes the state of policies, institutions and capacities that support the conservation and sustainable use of BFA.

      Part E – Conclusions: Chapter 9 presents a discussion of needs and challenges in the management of BFA.

      The reporting and preparatory process

      At its Eleventh Regular Session, in 2007, the Commission adopted a number of outputs and milestones to be addressed in its Multi-year Programme of Work,¹ including the presentation, at its Sixteenth Regular Session, of the SoW-BFA.² The Commission stressed that the preparation of the report should be based on information from country reports and should also draw on thematic studies, reports from international organizations and inputs from other relevant stakeholders, including centres of excellence in developing countries. It further stressed that the report should focus on interactions between sectors and on cross-sectoral matters, taking full advantage of existing information sources, including sectoral assessments. It also suggested that priority be given to information not available in existing sources. At its Sixteenth Regular Session, which was held in 2017, the Commission considered a draft of the SoW-BFA and requested FAO to finalize it, taking into account comments submitted by Members and Observers, by the end of 2018.

      Inputs to the report

      The main sources used to prepare the SoW-BFA were as follows:

      Country reports

      In June 2013, FAO invited countries to officially nominate national focal points to lead the preparation of country reports to be submitted to FAO to support the preparation of the SoW-BFA. FAO prepared guidelines to support the development of country reports. The guidelines outlined the suggested content of the report and provided questions to assist countries with their analysis and with the development of each section of the report. The guidelines were made available in all six official FAO languages (Arabic, Chinese, English, French, Russian and Spanish), both in read-only form and as a dynamic version into which countries could enter their responses in order to generate a preformatted country report.³

      Between March and May 2016, in response to a request by the Commission at its preceding session, FAO organized a series of informal regional consultations at which countries and other stakeholders could share knowledge and information on the state of BFA and discuss needs and priorities with respect to its conservation and sustainable use. The informal regional consultations also served to support national focal points in the finalization of their country reports. As background documentation for each informal regional consultation, FAO prepared a draft regional synthesis report based on the country reports that had thus far been submitted. The regional synthesis reports were subsequently finalized based on feedback received from the participants of the informal regional consultations and on additional country reports received.

      By 30 June 2017, the deadline set by the Commission, 91 country reports had been received (see Table 1).

      Reports from international organizations

      In April 2016, FAO invited 55 international organizations to report on their activities related to the management of BFA and provided them with a standardized questionnaire for the preparation of their reports. Responses were received from the following organizations: Africa Rice Center; African Union – Interafrican Bureau for Animal Resources; African Union Commission, Department of Rural Economy and Agriculture; Bioversity International; Caribbean Agricultural Research and Development Institute; Centre for Agriculture and Biosciences International; Global Crop Diversity Trust; IFOAM Organics International; Inter-American Institute for Cooperation on Agriculture; International Atomic Energy Agency; International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas; International Center for Tropical Agriculture; International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology; International Food Policy Research Institute; International Fund for Agricultural Development; International Institute of Tropical Agriculture; International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center; International Union for Conservation of Nature; International Rice Research Institute; Pacific Organic and Ethical Trade Community; Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity; Slow Food; Tropical Agricultural Research and Higher Education Center; United Nations Environment Programme – World Conservation Monitoring Centre; World Agroforestry Centre; World Bank. In addition, Oxfam voluntarily provided a report entitled Women’s roles in biodiversity management from lessons to practice and impact: scaling up pathways in people’s biodiversity management, containing case studies from Peru Viet Nam and Zimbabwe.

      Thematic studies

      The following four thematic studies providing in-depth analysis of specific topics relevant to BFA were prepared for the SoW-BFA:

      •Biodiversity for food and agriculture: the perspectives of small-scale food providers;

      •The contributions of biodiversity for food and agriculture to the resilience of production systems;

      •Contributions of biodiversity to the sustainable intensification of food production;

      •Biodiversity for food and agriculture and ecosystem services.

      Regional synthesis reports

      As described above, the series of informal regional consultations held in 2016 involved the preparation of a regional synthesis report for each region where consultations were held. The contents of these synthesis reports served as source material for the global analysis presented in the SoW-BFA.

      State of the world reports

      The subsections of the SoW-BFA that address plant (crop), animal (livestock), forest and aquatic genetic resources draw heavily on the respective global assessments (state of the world reports) published or in preparation under the auspices of the Commission.

      Other sources

      In addition to the sources mentioned above, the SoW-BFA draws on a range of literature and data sources. The latter include FAO’s statistical database FAOSTAT,⁴ the FAO/INFOODS Food Composition database for biodiversity,⁵ the Domestic Animal Diversity Information System,⁶ the World Information and Early Warning System on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture⁷ and The International Union for Conservation of Nature’s Red List of Threatened Species.⁸

      Regional classification of countries

      The assignment of countries to regions for the purposes of the SoW-BFA follows the regional groupings used in FAO statistics and for election purposes (Figure 1). Seven regions are distinguished: Africa; Asia; Europe and Central Asia; Latin America and the Caribbean; Near East and North Africa; North America; and Pacific.

      1CGRFA-11/07/Report, paragraph 90.

      2CGRFA-14/13/Report, paragraph 14.

      3The dynamic questionnaire was made available in Chinese, English, French, Russian and Spanish.

      4http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/

      5http://www.fao.org/infoods/infoods/tables-and-databases/faoinfoods-databases/en/

      6http://www.fao.org/dad-is/en/

      7http://www.fao.org/wiews/en/

      8https://www.iucnredlist.org/

      Executive summary

      What is biodiversity for food and agriculture?

      Biodiversity is the variety of life at genetic, species and ecosystem levels. Biodiversity for food and agriculture (BFA) is, in turn, the subset of biodiversity that contributes in one way or another to agriculture and food production. It includes the domesticated plants and animals raised in crop, livestock, forest and aquaculture systems, harvested forest and aquatic species, the wild relatives of domesticated species, other wild species harvested for food and other products, and what is known as associated biodiversity, the vast range of organisms that live in and around food and agricultural production systems, sustaining them and contributing to their output. Agriculture is taken here to include crop and livestock production, forestry, fisheries and aquaculture.¹

      About this report

      The State of the World’s Biodiversity for Food and Agriculture provides an assessment of biodiversity for food and agriculture (BFA) and its management worldwide, drawing on information provided in 91 country reports (prepared by over 1 300 contributors), 27 reports from international organizations and inputs from over 175 authors and reviewers.

      It describes the many contributions that BFA makes to food security and nutrition, livelihoods, the resilience of production systems, the sustainable intensification of food production and the supply of multiple ecosystem services; the major drivers of change affecting BFA; the status and trends of various components of BFA; the state of management of BFA; the state of policies, institutions and capacities that support the sustainable use and conservation of BFA; and needs and challenges in the management of BFA.

      Key findings

      1. Biodiversity is essential to food and agriculture

      Biodiversity for food and agriculture is indispensable to food security, sustainable development and the supply of many vital ecosystem services. Biodiversity makes production systems and livelihoods more resilient to shocks and stresses, including to the effects of climate change. It is a key resource in efforts to increase food production while limiting negative impacts on the environment. It makes multiple contributions to the livelihoods of many people, often reducing the need for food and agricultural producers to rely on costly or environmentally harmful external inputs. The country reports highlight the importance of biodiversity, at genetic, species and ecosystem levels, to efforts to address the challenges posed by diverse and changing production systems. Many emphasize the role of diversification – using multiple species, integrating the use of crop, livestock, forest and aquatic resources, and conserving and managing habitat diversity at landscape or seascape scale – in promoting resilience, improving livelihoods and supporting food security and nutrition.

      2. Multiple interacting drivers of change are affecting biodiversity for food and agriculture

      While a range of drivers of change are having major negative impacts on biodiversity for food and agriculture and the ecosystem services it delivers, some provide opportunities to promote more sustainable management. Analysis of the country reports and the wider literature indicates that BFA is affected by a variety of drivers operating at a range of levels: major global trends such as changes in climate, international markets and demography give rise to more immediate drivers such as land-use change, pollution and overuse of external inputs, overharvesting and the proliferation of invasive species. Interactions between drivers often exacerbate their effects on BFA. Demographic changes, urbanization, markets, trade and consumer preferences are reported to have a strong influence on food systems, frequently with negative consequences for BFA and the ecosystem services it provides. However, such drivers are also reported to open opportunities to make food systems more sustainable, for example through the development of markets for biodiversity-friendly products. Many of the drivers that have negative impacts on BFA, including overexploitation, overharvesting, pollution, overuse of external inputs, and changes in land and water management, are at least partially caused by inappropriate agricultural practices.

      The driver mentioned by the highest number of countries as having negative effects on regulating and supporting ecosystem services is changes in land and water use and management. Loss and degradation of forest and aquatic ecosystems and, in many production systems, transition to intensive production of a reduced number of species, breeds and varieties, remain major drivers of loss of BFA and ecosystem services. Countries report that the maintenance of traditional knowledge related to BFA is negatively affected by the loss of traditional lifestyles as a result of population growth, urbanization and the industrialization of agriculture and food processing, and by overexploitation and overharvesting. Policy measures and advances in science and technology are largely seen by countries as positive drivers that offer ways of reducing the negative effects of other drivers on BFA. They provide critical entry points for interventions supporting sustainable use and conservation. However, policies intended to promote the sustainable management of BFA are often weakly implemented.

      3. Biodiversity for food and agriculture is declining

      Many key components of biodiversity for food and agriculture at genetic, species and ecosystem levels are in decline. Evidence suggests that the proportion of livestock breeds at risk of extinction is increasing, and that, for some crops and in some areas, plant diversity in farmers’ fields is decreasing and threats to diversity are increasing. Nearly a third of fish stocks are overfished and a third of freshwater fish species assessed are considered threatened. Countries report that many species that contribute to vital ecosystem services, including pollinators, natural enemies of pests, soil organisms and wild food species, are in decline as a consequence of the destruction and degradation of habitats, overexploitation, pollution and other threats. Key ecosystems that deliver numerous services essential to food and agriculture, including supply of freshwater, protection against hazards and provision of habitat for species such as fish and pollinators, are declining rapidly.

      Knowledge of associated biodiversity, in particular micro-organisms and invertebrates, and of its roles in the supply of ecosystem services needs to be improved. While a large amount of information has been accumulated on the characteristics of the domesticated species used in food and agriculture, many information gaps remain, particularly for species, varieties and breeds that are not widely used commercially. Information on wild food species is also often limited. Many associated-biodiversity species have never been identified and described, particularly in the case of invertebrates and micro-organisms. Even when they have, their functions within the ecosystem often remain poorly understood. Over 99 percent of bacteria and protist species remain unknown. For several types of associated biodiversity, including soil micro-organisms and those used for food processing, advances in molecular techniques and sequencing technologies are facilitating characterization. Several countries have active programmes for characterizing soil micro-organisms using molecular methods. In many countries, however, gaps in terms of skills, facilities and equipment constrain opportunities to benefit from these developments.

      Monitoring programmes for biodiversity for food and agriculture remain limited. Assessment and monitoring of the status and trends of BFA at national, regional and global levels are uneven and often limited. Even in developed regions, where the population trends of many species are well monitored and there are numerous ongoing research projects on the links between biodiversity and food and agriculture, available data often provide only a snapshot of the status of individual species (or groups of species) in particular production systems, habitats or geographical areas. While it is clear that many components of BFA are declining, lack of data often constrains the planning and prioritization of effective remedial measures.

      4. the use of many biodiversity-friendly practices is reported to be increasing

      The sustainable use and conservation of biodiversity for food and agriculture call for approaches in which genetic resources, species and ecosystems are managed in an integrated way in the context of production systems and their surroundings. In particular for many types of associated biodiversity and wild foods, sustainable use and conservation require in situ or on-farm management integrated into strategies at ecosystem or landscape levels. Ex situ conservation should serve as a complementary strategy.

      The use of a wide range of management practices and approaches regarded as favourable to the sustainable use and conservation of biodiversity for food and agriculture is reported to be increasing. Eighty percent of reporting countries indicate that one or more of the biodiversity-focused practices on which they were invited to report are being used in one or more types of production system. A much higher proportion of OECD countries than nonOECD countries report the use of these practices. However, it is difficult to fully evaluate the extent to which these approaches are being implemented, because of the variety of scales and contexts involved and the absence of data and appropriate assessment methods. Although countries generally indicate that the impacts of the biodiversity-focused practices on diversity are perceived to be positive, they emphasize the need for more research in this regard, even for practices where research on production issues is well established. Many biodiversity-focused practices are relatively complex and require good understanding of the local ecosystem. They can be knowledge intensive, context specific and provide benefits only in the relatively long term. Many countries note major challenges in up-scaling such practices, and the need to promote them through capacity-development and strengthening policy frameworks.

      Although efforts to conserve biodiversity for food and agriculture in situ and ex situ are increasing, levels of coverage and protection are often inadequate. Crop, livestock, forest and aquatic genetic resources are conserved in situ through a variety of approaches, including promotion of their sustainable use in production systems and the establishment of protected and other designated areas. However, many species and populations remain inadequately protected. Relatively few in situ conservation programmes are reported to explicitly target associated biodiversity and its roles in the supply of ecosystem services, although such programmes are increasing. Most associated-biodiversity species targeted are conserved through the promotion of biodiversity-friendly production practices, the establishment of protected areas, or policy and legal measures aimed at restricting activities that damage biodiversity. Ex situ conservation efforts for BFA are increasing, in particular for plant genetic resources, although many gaps in coverage remain. Much of the diversity present in minor crops, and in livestock, forest and aquatic species, is also not yet secured ex situ. Although limited, public- and private-sector ex situ conservation initiatives for targeted species of associated biodiversity have been established, with many countries, for instance, holding culture collections of micro-organisms used in agriculture or in agrifood industries. Eight percent of the wild species reported by countries to be used for food are reported to be subject to in situ conservation measures and 13 percent to be conserved ex situ.

      5. enabling frameworks for the sustainable use and conservation of biodiversity

      Enjoying the preview?
      Page 1 of 1