Asian Economic Integration Report 2018: Toward Optimal Provision of Regional Public Goods in Asia and the Pacific
()
About this ebook
Read more from Asian Development Bank
Handbook on Battery Energy Storage System Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage Game Changers in Asia: 2020 Compendium of Technologies and Enablers Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Waste to Energy in the Age of the Circular Economy: Compendium of Case Studies and Emerging Technologies Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Integrated Solid Waste Management for Local Governments: A Practical Guide Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMicrosoft Excel-Based Tool Kit for Planning Hybrid Energy Systems: A User Guide Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPoverty in the Philippines: Causes, Constraints, and Opportunities Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Teacher Professional Development Case Studies: K-12, TVET, and Tertiary Education Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Hybrid and Battery Energy Storage Systems: Review and Recommendations for Pacific Island Projects Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEnergy Storage in Grids with High Penetration of Variable Generation Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsUrban Metabolism of Six Asian Cities Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPhilippines: Public-Private Partnerships by Local Government Units Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSmart Ports in the Pacific Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsClimate Change Adjustments for Detailed Engineering Design of Roads: Experience from Viet Nam Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFutures Thinking in Asia and the Pacific: Why Foresight Matters for Policy Makers Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCarbon Pricing for Green Recovery and Growth Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Practical Guide to Concrete Pavement Technology for Developing Countries Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDeployment of Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems in Minigrids Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMethodology for Estimating Carbon Footprint of Road Projects: Case Study: India Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWaste to Energy in the Age of the Circular Economy: Best Practice Handbook Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEnabling Inclusive Cities: Tool Kit for Inclusive Urban Development Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCAREC Road Safety Engineering Manual 1: Road Safety Audit Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCAREC Road Safety Engineering Manual 4: Pedestrian Safety Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCAREC Road Safety Engineering Manual 2: Safer Road Works Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCarbon Pricing for Energy Transition and Decarbonization Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHandbook on Microgrids for Power Quality and Connectivity Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsImproving Interchanges: Toward Better Multimodal Railway Hubs in the People's Republic of China Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCAREC Tourism Strategy 2030 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCarbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage Game Changers in Asia and the Pacific: 2022 Compendium of Technologies and Enablers Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTrainers’ Manual on Facilitating Local Government-Led Community-Driven Development Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to Asian Economic Integration Report 2018
Related ebooks
Economic Indicators for East Asia: Input–Output Tables Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAsian Economic Integration Report 2019/2020: Demographic Change, Productivity, and the Role of Technology Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAid for Trade in Asia and the Pacific: Promoting Connectivity for Inclusive Development Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAsian Economic Integration Report 2016 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSupporting Quality Infrastructure in Developing Asia Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsInclusive Business in the Asia–Pacific Economic Cooperation Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Role of Central Bank Digital Currencies in Financial Inclusion: Asia–Pacific Financial Inclusion Forum 2022 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAid for Trade in Asia and the Pacific: Promoting Economic Diversification and Empowerment Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Greater Mekong Subregion 2030 and Beyond: Integration, Upgrading, Cities, and Connectivity Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAsian Economic Integration Report 2021: Making Digital Platforms Work for Asia and the Pacific Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTrade Facilitation and Better Connectivity for an Inclusive Asia and Pacific Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFinancial Integration and Macrofinancial Linkages in Asia: Crises, Responses, and Policy Considerations Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsToward Inclusive Access to Trade Finance: Lessons from the Trade Finance Gaps, Growth, and Jobs Survey Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRethinking Infrastructure Financing for Southeast Asia in the Post-Pandemic Era Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEconomic Indicators for South and Central Asia: Input–Output Tables Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsADB International Investment Agreement Tool Kit: A Comparative Analysis Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsKazakhstan: Accelerating Economic Diversification Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRoad Map for the National Single Window in Maldives Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTajikistan: Promoting Export Diversification and Growth Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBangladesh: Consolidating Export-led Growth Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAsia-Pacific Financial Inclusion Forum 2021: Emerging Priorities in the COVID-19 Era Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCOVID-19 and the Finance Sector in Asia and the Pacific: Guidance Notes Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsKey Indicators for Asia and the Pacific 2016 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings2017 Development Effectiveness Review Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNarrowing the Development Gap: Follow-Up Monitor of the ASEAN Framework for Equitable Economic Development Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsASEAN+3 Bond Market Guide 2018 Myanmar Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNational Strategies for Carbon Markets under the Paris Agreement: Current State, Vulnerabilities, and Building Resilience Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFinancial Soundness Indicators for Financial Sector Stability: A Tale of Three Asian Countries Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Business Development For You
Never Split the Difference: Negotiating As If Your Life Depended On It Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Die With Zero: Getting All You Can from Your Money and Your Life Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Financial Feminist: Overcome the Patriarchy's Bullsh*t to Master Your Money and Build a Life You Love Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Boundaries for Leaders: Results, Relationships, and Being Ridiculously in Charge Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Good to Great: Why Some Companies Make the Leap...And Others Don't Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Confidence Code: The Science and Art of Self-Assurance---What Women Should Know Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Ultralearning: Master Hard Skills, Outsmart the Competition, and Accelerate Your Career Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of Thinking Clearly Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How to Think Like a Lawyer--and Why: A Common-Sense Guide to Everyday Dilemmas Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Capital in the Twenty-First Century Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Summary of Graham Cochrane's How to Get Paid for What You Know Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsVisual Intelligence: Sharpen Your Perception, Change Your Life Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Vivid Vision: A Remarkable Tool for Aligning Your Business Around a Shared Vision of The Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Hard Truth About Soft Skills: Soft Skills for Succeeding in a Hard Wor Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Multipliers, Revised and Updated: How the Best Leaders Make Everyone Smarter Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Built to Last: Successful Habits of Visionary Companies Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Bezos Letters: 14 Principles to Grow Your Business Like Amazon Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The New One Minute Manager Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Leadership and the One Minute Manager Updated Ed: Increasing Effectiveness Through Situational Leadership II Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Getting to Yes with Yourself: (and Other Worthy Opponents) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How to Start a Business for Beginners: A Complete Guide to Building a Successful & Profitable Business Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Good To Great And The Social Sectors: A Monograph to Accompany Good to Great Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Do the F*cking Work: Lowbrow Advice for High-Level Creativity Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The E-Myth Contractor: Why Most Contractors' Businesses Don't Work and What to Do About It Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for Asian Economic Integration Report 2018
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Asian Economic Integration Report 2018 - Asian Development Bank
1
Regional Economic Outlook and Development Challenges
Economic Outlook and Risks
ADB forecasts for developing Asia’s economic outlook have improved since the Asian Economic Integration Report 2017—economic output is set to grow 6.0% in 2018 from 6.1% in 2017.
Developing Asia’s economic growth in 2018 is 0.2 percentage points above the estimate used as a backdrop for last year’s Asian Economic Integration Report.¹ Some 26 of the region’s 45 developing economies (57.8%) recorded a better-than-expected economic expansion according to the latest forecasts of the Asian Development Bank (ADB) available in the Asian Development Outlook 2018 Update. The People’s Republic of China (PRC) is expected to grow 6.6% in 2018, bolstered by strong economic performance in the first half of the year (Table 1.1).
Over the past year, external conditions improved—growth in the euro area has been revised upwards (by 0.2 percentage points) along with the United States (US) (0.4 percentage points). Even as the first quarter 2018 growth in the euro area slowed to 1.6%, it stabilized at 1.5% in the second quarter as labor markets improved, the accommodative monetary policy continued, and fiscal support remained intact. In Japan, growth recovered strongly in the second quarter of 2018, reversing the contraction in the previous quarter. In the US, growth accelerated to 4.2% in the second quarter of 2018 from 2.2% growth in the previous quarter (first half growth reached 3.2%). If this trend continues, the US Federal Reserve may be forced to raise interest rates faster than expected.
Table 1.1: Regional Gross Domestic Product Growtha (%, year-on-year)
– = data not available.
a Aggregates weighted by gross national income levels (Atlas method, current $) from World Bank, World Development Indicators.
b Forecasts based on Asian Development Outlook Update 2018.
c Refers to the 45 developing members of the ADB.
d Data for Bangladesh, India, and Pakistan are according to their fiscal year. For India, the fiscal year is from April of the specified year through March of the following year. For Bangladesh and Pakistan, the fiscal year is from July of the previous year through June of the specified year.
e Excludes Nauru as weights are unavailable.
f Quarterly growth rates are based on quarter-on-quarter seasonally adjusted annualized rate.
Sources: ADB (2018); CEIC (accessed September 2018); and World Bank. World Development Indicators. https://data.worldbank.org/products/wdi (accessed September 2018).
Risks to the Outlook
Risks remain tilted to the downside, primarily due to the escalating trade frictions between the US and the PRC; in addition, elevated debt levels could cause greater financial market volatility as US monetary policy normalizes and interest payments rise.
The threat against open, free trade has begun—posing a clear downside risk to developing Asia’s growth forecasts. In August, the US launched tariffs on $50 billion of PRC imports, and the PRC countered in kind. The US also canceled country exemptions from steel and aluminum tariffs, prompting countermeasures from Canada, the European Union, Mexico, and the Russian Federation.
Based on recent ADB estimates, the direct impact from the first set of tariffs had very little net effect on growth, investment, and the external current account balance (ADB 2018). But there is no assurance that a further escalation in protectionist measures will not disrupt global supply chains or curb future business expansion plans. Asia is one of the most open regions worldwide—and closely integrated into the global value chain—so a slowdown in global trade or any global shock to trade and investment could easily harm its economic prospects (Box 1.1).
Box 1.1: Trade Volume Outlook for Developing Asia
World trade growth is expected to slow moderately from 4.7% in 2017 to 4.5% in 2018 as growth eases in some advanced economies—likely to affect exports of emerging and developing economies as well.
Developing Asia’s trade is also expected to grow but at a slower pace. Trade volume growth is projected to decline from the 7.6% estimate in 2017 to 5.5% in 2018. In the first 5 months of the year, the region’s major economies saw trade volume growth moderating. A key risk to the trade volume projection is the escalating trade friction between the United States and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) (ADB 2018).
As in previous years, the PRC will remain the key driver of developing Asia’s trade growth, while the four middle-income economies of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, and Thailand) and the newly industrialized economies (Hong Kong, China; the Republic of Korea; Singapore; and Taipei,China) will also provide a boost. Imports to these economies will be buoyed by robust domestic demand, while exports will benefit from growing intraregional demand.
Trade Volume Growth (%, year-on-year)
ASEAN = Association of Southeast Asian Nations, E = estimate, GDP = gross domestic product, NIE = newly industrialized economies, P = projected, PRC = People's Republic of China.
Note: ASEAN4 includes Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, and Thailand. NIE4 includes Hong Kong, China; the Republic of Korea; Singapore; and Taipei,China. Trade volume growth projections are calculated using trade volume growth rates of all economies, which were generated using each economy’s elasticities-to-real GDP (for imports) and elasticities-to-real GDP of top trading partners (for exports).
Sources: ADB calculations using data from International Monetary Fund.
World Economic Outlook April 2018 database. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2018/01/weodata/index.aspx (accessed May 2018); International Monetary Fund. Direction of Trade Database. https://www.imf.org/en/Data (accessed August 2018); and World Trade Organization Statistics database. http://stat.wto.org/Home/WSDBHome.aspx (accessed May 2018).
High debt levels can be a destabilizing factor for the financial sector.
Since the 2008/09 global financial crisis, many large developing economies in the region have rapidly accumulated private external debt as a share of gross domestic product (GDP). For example, the PRC’s corporate debt rose from 120% of GDP in 2009 to 160% in 2017. The ratio has increased significantly in Thailand; the Republic of Korea; Hong Kong, China; and Singapore. The concern is that these ratios could prove unsustainable should global interest rates rise sharply.
Given this concern and market expectations of further rate rises in the US, many developing Asian currencies weakened relative to the US dollar from early-April 2018 to the end of September. Leading the group is the Indian rupee, which depreciated 11.2% over the period. The PRC yuan fell 9.4%, the Indonesian rupiah 8.4%, Japanese yen 7.4%, and the Malaysian ringgit 7.2%. The Korean won, Taipei,China NT dollar, Singapore dollar, Philippine peso, and Thai baht weakened between 3.8% and 5.0%.
Capital outflows from the region—mostly portfolio investment—have occurred recently.
The regional currency weakness—combined with higher 10-year US Treasury yields—triggered some bouts of capital outflows from emerging markets and the region (Figure 1.1). However, these mostly nonresident portfolio outflows could also be explained by the strong inflows of portfolio investment in 2017—which reached nearly $760 billion (see Financial Integration
, pp. 60–80).
Figure 1.1: Nonresident Portfolio Capital Inflows—Developing Asia ($ billion)
BOP = balance of payments, IIF = Institute of International Finance.
Notes: Portfolio flows are the sum of equity and debt flows. BOP data cover developing Asian economies: Brunei Darussalam; Cambodia; Hong Kong, China; India; Indonesia; the Lao People Democratic Republic; Malaysia; Myanmar; the People’s Republic of China; the Philippines; the Republic of Korea; Singapore; Taipei,China; Thailand; and Viet Nam. The IIF data are based on the IIF monthly portfolio flow tracker, which covers India; Indonesia; Malaysia; the People’s Republic of China; the Philippines; the Republic of Korea; Taipei,China; Thailand; and Viet Nam.
Sources: ADB calculations using data from CEIC; IIF. Monthly Portfolio Tracker. https://www.iif.com; and International Monetary Fund. International Financial Statistics. https://www.imf.org/en/Data (all accessed August 2018).
Nonetheless, the decline in portfolio investment flows was far more muted compared with nonresident outflows during the 2013 taper tantrum
episode. More importantly, nonresident capital outflows were more than offset by stronger inward flows of foreign direct investment and other investments—including bank lending. These inflows contributed to stronger accumulation of international reserves across much of the region, although some economies had foreign exchange reserves decline due to exchange rate volatility.
Still, there has been some market turbulence. For instance, elevated external debt in Argentina and Turkey recently contributed to some financial market turmoil and spillover effects—with the Turkish lira losing more than 40% of its value this year as markets reacted to Turkey’s high external debt-to-GDP ratio (over 50%), high and rising inflation (15% in July), and the delayed response from the central bank after it failed to raise interest rates to defend the lira. This turbulence could generate spillover shocks to other emerging markets if confidence suffers, and risk perceptions lead investors to extract their investments.
Capital flow volatility has subsided in developing Asia during the US monetary policy normalization—except for portfolio debt flows most affected by rising interest rates in the US.
For most subregions, the volatility of net debt investment flows into developing Asia has increased as US monetary policy normalization tightens global financial conditions since 2016. In contrast, during the same period, the volatility of net capital flows—in equity, foreign direct investment, and financial derivatives—has declined (Table 1.2).
Table 1.2: Capital Flow Volatility—Developing Asia (standard deviation of capital net flow levels as % of GDP)
** = refers to the direction of capital flow volatility between post-global financial crisis and post-normalization, = decrease, = increase, FDI = foreign direct investment, GDP = gross domestic product, GFC = global financial crisis, MP = monetary policy, SDR = special drawing rights.
a The category Other Investments
includes (i) other equity; (ii) currency and deposits; (iii) loans (including use of International Monetary Fund credit and loans); (iv) nonlife insurance technical reserves, life insurance and annuities entitlements, pension entitlements, and provisions for calls under standardized guarantees; (v) trade credit and advances; (vi) other accounts receivable/payable; and (vii) SDR allocations (SDR holdings are included in reserve assets).
Notes: Central Asia includes Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic, and Tajikistan. East Asia (excluding Japan) includes Hong Kong, China; Mongolia; the People's Republic of China; and the Republic of Korea. South Asia includes India and Sri Lanka. Southeast Asia includes Brunei Darussalam, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, and Viet Nam. Data for Brunei Darussalam are only until Q4 2016.
Sources: ADB calculation using data from CEIC; and International Monetary Fund. Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Statistics. http://www.imf.org/external/np/sta/bop/bop.htm (both accessed July 2018).
The Financial Stress Index of developing Asia remains unusually low despite recurring economic and financial events, suggesting that investors have become more complacent toward risk.
Since December 2015, when the US Federal Reserve began normalizing its monetary policy—raising policy rates for the first time since June 2006—developing Asia’s Financial Stress Index (FSI)—a composite index that measures the degree of financial stress in four major financial sectors and markets including the banking sector, debt, equity, and foreign exchange markets—has remained very low (Figure 1.2) despite a series of economic, financial, and policy events that have significant implications for financial stability. Though the US Federal Reserve rate hikes in 2017 and 2018 may have contributed to some uptick in the FSI, levels were nowhere near those during the global financial crisis or the 1998/99 Asian financial crisis.
Figure 1.2: Financial Stress Index—Developing Asia
AFC = Asian financial crisis, FSI = Financial Stress Index, GFC = global financial crisis, PRC = People’s Republic of China, US = United States, US Fed = United States Federal Reserve System.
Notes:
(i) Pre-AFC = Jan 1995–Jun 1997, AFC = Jul 1997–Jun 1999, Pre-GFC = Jul 1999–Sep 2007, GFC = Oct 2007–Jun 2009, Post-GFC = Jul 2009–Sep 2015, Normalization = Oct 2015–Jun 2018.
(ii) Based on principal components analysis on data from four major financial sectors: the banking sector, debt, equity, and foreign exchange markets. Principal components are based from banking sector price index, sovereign yield spreads, stock market volatility, stock price index, and exchange market pressure index.
(iii) Developing Asia includes Hong Kong, China; India; Indonesia; Malaysia; the Philippines; the PRC; the Republic of Korea; Singapore; Thailand; and Viet Nam.
Sources: ADB calculations using data from Bloomberg; CEIC; Haver Analytics (all accessed August 2018); and methodology by Park and Mercado (2014).
A possible explanation is the wide array of reforms adopted in response to past crises—covering sound macroeconomic fundamentals (budget and foreign reserve management), more flexible exchange rates, stronger financial regulation and supervision, and a stronger regional cooperation framework—which likely contributed to bolstering the region’s financial stability and resilience.
Yet, the current low FSI levels may also indicate that investors have become more complacent toward risk—despite looming financial vulnerabilities. Subdued market volatility, coupled with a low risk premium, has often led to a buildup of systemic risks. Investor complacency may contribute to a major price correction in financial markets when investors’ risk sentiments suddenly shift due to a worsening growth outlook, or an unexpected change in monetary and credit conditions and policies.
Development Challenges: Vulnerabilities to Economic, Environmental, and Social Shocks
Global economic shocks
Greater economic interdependence and integration is contributing to faster transmission of global economic shocks.
Since the global financial crisis, episodes like the 2010 European debt crisis, the 2013 taper tantrum, this year’s sell-off of the Turkish lira, and the threat of escalating US–PRC trade tensions, remind everyone—from policy makers to investors—of the downside risks of a highly interconnected global economy. Until now, global financial and business cycles—and policy adjustments in the US—have largely driven capital flows, asset prices, and risk premia on a global scale, sometimes harming national economies.
This is evident from the strong correlation—since the Asian financial crisis—between the incidence of developing Asia’s recessions with those globally; possibly a consequence of the region’s deepening integration with the global economy (Figure 1.3). Generally, developing Asia’s recessions do not last very long—their median duration is about 3 quarters. However, the cost of recessions to developing Asia is proportionately larger than those in advanced economies. For instance, the cumulative output losses from recessions in developing Asia have a median of around 5.6% of peak GDP compared with 3.3% for advanced economies (Figure 1.4). This validates the findings of Aghiar and Gopinath (2007), which attributed the large and persistent volatility in emerging markets to their less diversified economic structures and limited ability to tap the international financial