Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

From $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

The Principles of Secularism
The Principles of Secularism
The Principles of Secularism
Ebook66 pages54 minutes

The Principles of Secularism

Rating: 0 out of 5 stars

()

Read preview

About this ebook

"The Principles of Secularism" by George Jacob Holyoake. Published by Good Press. Good Press publishes a wide range of titles that encompasses every genre. From well-known classics & literary fiction and non-fiction to forgotten−or yet undiscovered gems−of world literature, we issue the books that need to be read. Each Good Press edition has been meticulously edited and formatted to boost readability for all e-readers and devices. Our goal is to produce eBooks that are user-friendly and accessible to everyone in a high-quality digital format.
LanguageEnglish
PublisherGood Press
Release dateNov 22, 2019
ISBN4057664637154
The Principles of Secularism

Read more from George Jacob Holyoake

Related to The Principles of Secularism

Related ebooks

Reference For You

View More

Related articles

Related categories

Reviews for The Principles of Secularism

Rating: 0 out of 5 stars
0 ratings

0 ratings0 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

    Book preview

    The Principles of Secularism - George Jacob Holyoake

    George Jacob Holyoake

    The Principles of Secularism

    Published by Good Press, 2022

    [email protected]

    EAN 4057664637154

    Table of Contents

    CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTORY

    CHAPTER II. THE TERM SECULARISM.

    CHAPTER III. PRINCIPLES OF SECULARISM DEFINED

    CHAPTER IV. LAWS OF SECULAR CONTROVERSY

    CHAPTER V. MAXIMS OF ASSOCIATION

    CHAPTER VI. THE SECULAR GUILD

    CHAPTER VII. ORGANIZATION INDICATED.

    CHAPTER VIII. THE PLACE OF SECULARISM

    CHAPTER IX. CHARACTERISTICS OF SECULARISM.

    CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTORY

    Table of Contents

    "If you think it right to differ from the times, and to make

    a stand for any valuable point of morals, do it, however

    rustic, however antiquated, however pedantic it may appear;

    do it, not for insolence, but seriously—as a man who wore a

    soul of his own in his bosom, and did not wait till it was

    breathed into him by the breath of fashion."—The Rev. Sidney

    Smith, Canon of St Paul's.

    IN a passage of characteristic sagacity, Dr. J. H. Newman has depicted the partisan aimlessness more descriptive of the period when this little book first appeared, sixteen years ago, than it is now. But it will be long before its relevance and instruction have passed away. I therefore take the liberty of still quoting his words:—

    When persons for the first time look upon the world of politics or religion, all that they find there meets their mind's eye, as a landscape addresses itself for the first time to a person who has just gained his bodily sight. One thing is as far off as another; there is no perspective. The connection of fact with fact, truth with truth, the bearing of fact upon truth, and truth upon fact, what leads to what, what are points primary and what secondary, all this they have yet to learn. It is all a new science to them, and they do not even know their ignorance of it. Moreover, the world of to-day has no connection in their minds with the world of yesterday; time is not a stream, but stands before them round and full, like the moon. They do not know what happened ten years ago, much less the annals of a century: the past does not live to them in the present; they do not understand the worth of contested points; names have no associations for them, and persons kindle no recollections. They hear of men, and things, and projects, and struggles, and principles; but everything comes and goes like the wind; nothing makes an impression, nothing penetrates, nothing has its place in their minds. They locate nothing: they have no system. They hear and they forget; or they just recollect what they have once heard, they cannot tell where. Thus they have no consistency in their arguments; that is, they argue one way to-day, and not exactly the other way to-morrow, but indirectly the other way at random. Their lines of argument diverge; nothing comes to a point; there is no one centre in which their mind sits, on which their judgment of men and things proceeds. This is the state of many men all through life; and miserable politicians or Churchmen they make, unless by good luck they are in safe hands, and ruled by others, or are pledged to a course. Else they are at the mercy of the wind and waves; and without being Radical, Whig, Tory, or Conservative, High Church or Low Church, they do Whig acts, Tory acts, Catholic acts, and Heretical acts, as the fit takes them, or as events or parties drive them. And sometimes when their self importance is hurt, they take refuge in the idea that all this is a proof that they are unfettered, moderate, dispassionate, that they observe the mean, that they are no 'party men;' when they are, in fact, the most helpless of slaves; for our strength in this world is, to be the subjects of the reason and our liberty, to be captives of the truth.*

    How the organization of ideas has fared with higher class societies others can tell: the working class have been left so much in want of initiative direction that almost everything has to be done among them, and an imperfect and brief attempt to direct those interested in Freethought may meet with some acceptance. To clamour for objects without being able to connect them with principles; to smart under contumely without knowing how to protect themselves; to bear some lofty name without understanding the

    Enjoying the preview?
    Page 1 of 1