Mastering the Art of Psychotherapy: The Principles Of Effective Psychological Change, Challenging The Boundaries Of Self-Expression

Section One:

THE FUNDAMENTALS

The View

Structure of the Psyche

Prsonality Structure

Trauma Dynamics

Psychodynamics

The Architecture of Attitude

The Rules

CHAPTER ONE

THE VIEW

What If?

Our Natural Ally

The Fear and the Two Obstacles

The Five Challenges of Waking the Mind

The Symptom Profile

Emotions: A General Overview

Threshold of Perception

Threshold of Expression

The Fundamental Problem in Therapy

The World as a Symphony of Emotion and Information

Conclusion: The View

WHAT IF?

What if every aspect of who you are and who you are designed to be is actually built into your psychological structure at birth and waiting for activation? What if self-image and self-worth are directly linked to self-expression? What if the most joyous moment of your life is actually your normal state of mind?

Jungian psychology proposes that everyone has access to a deeper level of psychological completion within the unconscious, called the Self, which acts as an organizational structure for the collective unconscious. Jung proposes two levels of the unconscious: the personal unconscious, which compensates for the excesses of personality, and the collective unconscious, which contains the psychological potential of humanity. The Self is the structural organization of the collective unconscious. Personality is essentially a distorted mirror of the Self.

• The Self organizes the full psychological potential of a human being.

• The Self responds to reality accurately and directly without distortion or delay.

• The Self is the energetic resource for the human psyche.

• The Self brings the excesses of personality into balance.

• The Self is the author of our psychological growth.

• The Self is the interconnection between all forms of awareness.

The stages of development that every child experiences either activate or repress the influence of the Self. The parts of our psyche that work well (creativity, expression, insight) need only natural growth and expansion to reach their design potential. These parts of the psyche have been encouraged and nurtured as a child matures, and as such, serve as bridges to the Self: brilliance without editing. The parts of the psyche that are dysfunctional and symptomatic (anxiety, tension, stress, guilt, shame, fear, resentment) result from inconsistent parenting and cultural rigidity at best and gross physical discipline and psychological and emotional abuse at worst. As the child experiments with the world, gathering data, interpreting experience, and practicing emotional responses (building an inventory of experiences), the personality structure is born out of the conditioning by the environment. It is our personalities that regulate access to and expression of this deeper psychological capacity. Personality is the guardian at the gates of perception and self-expression.

When personality is too rigid, it is a brutal dictator that distorts our perception of reality, inhibits self-expression, and produces massive symptomatic shifts of self-image, self-worth, and energy levels.

Many in the medical community today, as well as the founding psychoanalysts, believe that the human being is purely a biological system. They contend that awareness itself is created as the byproduct of a complex biological system. In this theory, the personality structure either helps or hinders the optimal functioning that the body requires and all psychological symptoms are the expressions of distress when the body’s functions are limited or blocked from timely expression: the stronger the block, the more significant the symptoms.

In the early 1900s, Carl Jung, the noted Swiss psychiatrist and colleague of Sigmund Freud, proposed that there are two systems at play in human beings: the biological system and the psychological system, each with its own expressive goal. Jung accepted Freud’s description of the biological system but not his perception of the origination of awareness. For Jung, the psychological system is as complicated as the biological system and has expressive and evolutionary goals of its own. Jung outlined the psychodynamic structure of the personality as having three contributing components: the influencing neural-emotional complexes, compensatory function of the unconscious, and deeper wells of the collective wisdom available through the Self. The Jungian perspective posits two separate and interdependent systems influencing the experience of life and living; the same rules and consequences of expression and repression that apply to the body apply to the psyche as well.

The psyche, like the body, is not a passive system that tolerates restriction without consequences. In the biological system, holding your breath causes painful symptoms to arise fairly quickly. In the psychological system, holding back anger or sadness or sexual expression can immediately create a variety of symptoms that cause suffering and inappropriate or even self-destructive behavior.

The personality is the psychological mechanism that determines one’s level of expression and the amount of sublimation, repression, or dissociation. As such, the personality is not only a guardian designed to protect the individual against punishment, but it is also a censor that restricts self-expression in order to meet the moral and ethical rules of social conformity. That restriction substitutes suffering for emotional expression.

The fundamental idea shared by many cultures throughout the world is that human beings are flawed, with corrupt desires, feelings, and thoughts that must be continually guarded against lest they lead to immoral or unethical behavior. Thus we begin the first part of our psychological journey in the quest for perfection, usually based on the approval and training of others. But what if human beings are not inherently corrupt, and it is actually this attempt to correct the flaws of humanity by family, society, and religious institutions that does the damage to our self-image and self-expression? What if the problem is that we perceive flaws where there is perfection?

So here we have the child, freshly entered into the world and spontaneously interacting with all the characters of his universe. The immediate lesson the child learns is that certain emotional expressions produce pleasurable experiences, and other emotional expressions produce painful experiences. His personality and nervous system are quick to adopt the expressions that produce pleasure and begin the systematic repression/restriction/avoidance of expressions that trigger pain. He learns the rules of inhibiting emotional expression from the significant people and circumstances in his life with the mother or primary caretaker having the most significance in the development of personality structure.

The emotional expression or repression that we learn ultimately has energetic consequences. Limiting ourselves to behaviors that seek the approval of the people around us produces a highly symptomatic personality structure. Seeking approval is simply using one’s ability to meet the needs of others in order to play it safe, but this occurs at the expense of living a full life. Approval-seeking behavior, in most cases, requires strategic repression of specific emotions, and repressing emotions creates psychological and psychosomatic symptoms. Ego/ personality is simply the mechanism that redirects self-expression into the other behaviors or symptoms that the people around us find more acceptable to their own self-concerned agendas.

Throughout childhood we learn to tolerate the stress this compromise produces. We come to believe that stress is normal, and although unfortunate, stress is better than the punitive consequences a more genuine response would trigger. In simpler terms, who wants to get punished for saying what he or she really feels or thinks? So we keep our responses to ourselves and tolerate the tension and stress resulting from that repression.

OUR NATURAL ALLY

But what if nature herself wants us to be conscious and provides opportunities to correct this blunted expression? Could it be that our designer (however one wishes to interpret that concept) intended for us to be conscious in order to fulfill our design destiny or purpose? And might each moment simply be an opportunity for genuine, authentic, and honest self-expression?

Instead of settling for a personality structure that mitigates and redirects emotional expression into symptoms, we can begin to build bridges to the Self, accessing the deeper psychological gifts of spontaneity, wisdom, energetic motivation, creativity, insight, and service.

Throughout our lives, we build an inventory of experiences that remain in our memories as significant. Falling in love, spiritual transformations, stunning encounters with nature, amazing conversations, powerful dreams, sacred places, significant coincidences, drug experiences, insights, and meetings with remarkable people all contain a shared aspect: these events feel energetic. They have an energetic impact and leave their fingerprints on our nervous system in the form of strong emotion, a sense of place and purpose, a timeless quality, and interconnectedness. Our descriptions of these charged experiences may vary; terms like amazing, stunning, beautiful, spiritual, connected, loving, timeless, acceptance, forgiveness, presence of God, purpose, mercy, startling, thrilling, peaceful, clear, and insight are widely shared. The single most common element of each of these encounters is their energetic sensation.

What if these high-energy experiences are not those rare moments—few and far between in our lives where we feel most alive—but rather, our normal state of mind? Practical experience, however, points out that these are not everyday experiences, and that they are, unfortunately, rare for many people. But what if the problem is that we have come to expect less of our lives, that we actually defend our suffering as normal and accept disappointment and frustration? What if we have been taught to expect less, tolerate more, not complain, and not express our discontent? In truth, we have been taught and believe in a world-view that insists we are inherently flawed and need to continually correct those damaged aspects of ourselves, that emotional freedom of expression will hurt or wound those around us. What if living a highly energized, joyous, and satisfying life is possible and we have settled for less?

There are few quotes that better symbolize our challenge of living fully than author Marianne Williamson’s challenge to courage.

Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It is our light, not our darkness that most frightens us. We ask ourselves, who am I to be brilliant, gorgeous, talented, fabulous? Actually, who are you not to be? You are a child of God. Your playing small does not serve the world. There is nothing enlightened about shrinking so that other people won’t feel insecure around you. We are all meant to shine, as children do. We were born to make manifest the glory of God that is within us. It’s not just in some of us; it’s in everyone. And as we let our own light shine, we unconsciously give other people permission to do the same. As we are liberated from our own fear, our presence automatically liberates others.

—Marianne Williamson, A Return to Love: Reflections on the Principles of A Course in Miracles

So, why are some experiences so energetic while others feel so toxic and depressing? The answer: it is our response to those situations that makes them energetic or not; the situation itself only provides the opportunity for us to let go and feel our energetic response to the world. And those other situations and people that trigger feelings of anxiety, depression, or dread are actually the result of our not fully expressing ourselves in the moment, of holding back. Even though we want to give credit to people, circumstances, or environmental factors for producing a positive or negative experience, it is in fact our response to these factors that determines the overall quality and energy of our experience. My conclusions are as follows:

1. Psychological energy is in proportion to self-expression.

2. Self-worth is in proportion to our psychological energy levels.

3. Self-worth is in proportion to self-expression.

You know the formula: if A equals B, and B equals C, then A equals C.

THE FEAR AND THE TWO OBSTACLES

Most people reasonably fear the consequences of open and unrestricted self-expression. The first obstacle to embracing genuine, honest and immediate self-expression is overcoming our fear of the consequences of being openly expressive. What would actually happen if we went around saying whatever we feel and think and doing whatever we are motivated to do in the moment? Experience tells us that there are certain feelings best left unexpressed, even if they bother us. We rationalize our fear of the punitive consequences of free expression and learn to live a moderately depressed life, safe, but suffering.

The second obstacle is more philosophical or theological: Are we inherently moral and good beings, or are we, deep down, self-indulgent animals controlled by a thin layer of social appropriateness? Obviously, if you believe that we are inherently corrupt, the philosophy of self-expression would seem morally inappropriate.

What I have found is that people who are actually destructive or anti-social don’t ever hold back, and it is only the compassionate people, concerned with the wellbeing of others, who are self-restricted. It’s not that holding back makes us good and uninhibited expression makes us corrupt; it’s that good people don’t trust their inherent goodness, and by holding back they limit their ability to shape the world for the better. By inhibiting self-expression, our energy and positive influence on the community are compromised. Meanwhile, the truly mean-spirited, self-indulgent anti-socials operate with complete lack of restriction and with complete access to their energetic reserves, to the detriment of society. The challenge of self-expression is really a challenge for the people with true morality and ethics to find their voices and confront and corral the insidious behavior of those who serve the forces of destruction.

So, how do we wake up and claim the deeper energetic reserves of our true Self? There are three essential qualities that we need for personal transformation: curiosity, courage, and commitment.

Curiosity is needed to discover who we really are and to tap the resources of the unconscious. Without curiosity, we simply lack the motivation to awaken our true nature. The part of our psyche controlled by the ego/personality is in reality a fearful, jealous, resentful, and anxious representation of a truly glorious, creative, spontaneous, and insightful deeper Self. Curiosity is required to proceed on the journey of self-discovery.

Courage is needed to develop the strength and voice that no longer bows to external approval but celebrates the energetic and wise nature of the Self. Without courage, we will shrink from the formidable task of confronting those threats we have suffered throughout our lives. Without courage, we only experience resistance, suffering, and the relentless pressure of the symptoms of our emotional blockages. Courage is the willingness to stand for a deeper moral conviction. Courage is the inner sense of purpose and strength that allows us, in spite of the odds against our voices being heard, to try to represent that growing inner voice authentically. Courage is an aspect of wisdom that helps us differentiate between the pressure of conformity and our duty to the community. Courage is always in service to the greater good.

Commitment is the development of healthy discipline. Without commitment, there is no follow-through, regardless of whether we are prepared or motivated. Commitment is the dedication to the process of awakening. It is the consistent action of expression and experimentation necessary to stabilize emotional chaos, challenge the limits of self-expression, and begin to tackle the formidable task of transforming our world.

THE FIVE CHALLENGES OF WAKING THE MIND

The individual who seriously wants to grow psychologically faces five challenges in order to make progress.

The first challenge of waking the mind is to embrace hope: that personal suffering can be resolved and not just accepted. There is a difference between actual hardship (the challenges of life, love, and relationship) and the psychological suffering that occurs because we:

• agree to a distorted view of the world;

• make repeated errors in judgment;

• encourage predators to feast at our table;

• make excuses for those who persecute and abuse us in the name of love, loyalty, family, and financial security.

These represent the suffering of ego and the false self and the worshiping of the gods of approval.

The second challenge of the waking mind, and certainly the most daunting, is suffering: the realization of how much suffering is in the world. Because our fundamental narcissism leads us to take things personally, the awakening sense of suffering in the world is brutal and often temporarily creates a sense of despair. We ask ourselves, How can I (little me) possibly deal with all this pain? This despair arises from the limited perception that we are in this life by ourselves. We lack conviction that we are an integral and intimate part of a larger energetic and moral structure and thus still identify with the small ego’s perspective of individuality and isolation. This is the view of the child: I have no help; I am tiny and lack power. The truth is that there is an ever-expanding network of people working to transform the world to a higher state of consciousness, and that in spite of the chaos and random violence that certainly exists, there is practical and effective work to be done that will actively move the world community forward. We are not alone. This second challenge is particularly difficult because it raises the issue of interdependence, which leads to the third challenge.

The third challenge of waking mind is intimacy: learning that the world acts as a feedback loop that helps guide us in a direction of fulfillment and purpose. Initially, the world appears to be adversarial and threatening; however, as we begin to express ourselves in a more dynamic and direct manner, threatening elements begin to lose their influence over us and we start experiencing a sense of spaciousness and satisfaction in self-determination. Once we begin to recognize that there is a not-so-subtle energetic reward for harmonizing with both our deeper Self and the world, we begin to cooperate with those energetic sources (the rhythms of the world, feng shui, I Ching) and abandon the small rewards of safety and approval that are mediated through the ego. We develop a deep appreciation and even love for the world; we realize that the world is actually interacting and providing us with the resources to fulfill our path. The energetic attractors of the world seem to be specific to each person’s psychological and biological design; thus, the more bravely we attend to the energetic rewards of our personal path, the more the challenges of the path make sense and support our continued pursuit of meaning and purpose in our life. We slowly abandon our attachment to the philosophy of free will and start to actively and aggressively harmonize with those energetic influencing elements in our life. This sense of intimacy immediately leads to a deeper experience of psychological design and purpose.

The fourth challenge of the waking mind is purpose: embracing one’s psychological design in life. Although almost everyone has the capacity to perform a variety of tasks in this life, embracing and honoring one’s design and following the life-path that provides the highest level of energetic satisfaction are among the great challenges of being human. The fourth challenge speaks to a confidence and recognition that each person has purpose and that we are fortunate indeed to discover our deeper design and to fulfill our design destiny. Service to the greater community of life, humanity, and nature is essential to the fulfillment of one’s deeper purpose. The Buddhists approach this step as a commitment to compassion and the cessation of the suffering of all sentient beings. But even beyond the moral aspect of this commitment is the more practical and dynamic purpose of accessing the energy of the world community, which leads to the fifth challenge.

The fifth challenge of the waking mind is energy: accessing our greater energetic resources and the recognition that service to the world gives consciousness access to a much larger energetic resource. This is a much more subtle challenge in that, without a commitment to an energetic experience, it is difficult to effectively differentiate the energetic potentials of our life choices. If all paths look equal, how can we choose the right path for ourselves? As psychological energy rises, our potentialities begin to differentiate between the higher and lower avenues of self-expression. Part of the challenge of accessing our energetic potential is in recognizing and engaging with larger energetic resources.

In the same way that healthy food, air, water, and environmental safety simply sustain a more energetic body and provide awareness with the energetic potential of one’s physical dynamism, the greater energetic resources of the unconscious are directly linked to our relationship with the life force of the human, plant, and animal kingdoms. Without appropriate respect for this essential life force in its myriad forms, our personal energy resources are limited to those social communities with which we identify and from which we actively seek approval. At one fundamental level, it is a question of whom or what we serve. To those who serve the greater good—the healing archetype—the energy we access is in proportion to the service we render.

THE SYMPTOM PROFILE

Throughout this book, I will use the term symptom profile as a reference to the set of emotional symptoms that we each manifest as a result of our personality function, which converts emotions into symptoms through three mechanisms: sublimation, repression, and dissociation. For the purposes of this book, I identify eleven major blocked emotional symptoms: anxiety, tension, stress, guilt, shame, fear, resentment, depression, worry, grief, and somatization. These are symptoms, not emotions. Each person has a somewhat unique set of predictable and repeated symptoms that reflect the over-regulation of emotional expression based on the family and social systems by which we were behaviorally shaped in childhood. Most personality-created symptoms are the acceptable substitute for emotional honesty, and every family encourages the child to exact this substitution as a convenience to the family pathology. The symptom is not the problem, but it certainly is illustrative of the underlying expressive problem that is contributing to the emotional suffering the client is bringing to therapy. The presence of any of the eleven major psychological symptoms—anxiety, tension, stress, guilt, shame, fear, resentment, depression, worry, grief, and somatization—indicate the presence of an overly restrictive personality structure.

A psychological symptom is the simple substitution for a blocked emotion. The particular symptom profile that we each manifest is predicated on our family and society’s support of those symptoms at the expense of the insight and creativity that attend authentic and accurate emotional expression.

Psychological growth requires an important insight into differentiating between feelings, symptoms, and emotions. Although everything we feel could be considered an emotion, emotions actually serve very specific functions; they provide information about the world and express our response to that information. In this book’s psychodynamic system there are four basic emotions: thought, sadness, anger, and sexuality, and there are five stages of perception through which awareness evolves from unconscious to consciousness: symptom, dream, fantasy, emotion, and insight. (See chapter 2: Structure of the Psyche, Reality and The Five Stages of Perception.)

Personality is different from awareness in that awareness uses personality to engage the world strategically. Personality is how you present yourself in a unique way, whereas awareness is the actual core and truth of who you are and your connection with all that is alive. You don’t have awareness; you are awareness. However, you have a personality, one that has been shaped by the influences of your family, environment, culture, and gender.

The personality structure is fundamentally an energy, emotion, and information regulating system and has been trained to recognize, interpret, and respond to the phenomena of the world.

Based on the thresholds of perception and expression, personality distinguishes between what is known, what is felt as an emotion, and what is felt as a symptom. When you are hungry, your personality determines whether you feel hunger or whether you feel a pain in your stomach; personality then translates that feeling into knowing what and where you want to eat, or more dramatically, what type of eating disorder you are developing.

Understanding the link between fear, repression, symptomology, energy, and physical health is core to the success of therapy and necessary for any significant psychological growth.

Although the goal of many therapies is to change the symptom profile, no long-term effective personality change occurs without confronting the fears and consequences of emotional expression.

Each emotion has its own particular signature: sadness, anger, pleasure, and thought. However, emotion is but one step in a series that should lead to accuracy of perception (insight) and immediacy of expression (creativity). Psychodynamically, emotion is a transitional stage between experience and knowledge and is, specifically, partially repressed information. Information only registers as feeling when the personality resists the information or is unfamiliar with the experience.

Throughout this book, I will explore the idea that restricted emotional expression is at the core of all psychological suffering. Our personality symptom profile is simply a combination of any of the eleven major symptoms, which are the outward signs of repressed emotions. Too often, these symptoms are treated as emotions and are addressed in therapy as such.

Everyone is brought to a psychological crossroads by the symptoms of suffering that can no longer be ignored. The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-V) is the codebook of the mental health industry and is filled with symptoms and patterns of symptoms, both psychological and biochemical. But remember: symptoms are not emotions and emotions are not symptoms. Unfortunately, many types of psychological treatments are based on symptom relief. This does make sense, but is really a rather shallow and inaccurate way of determining success of treatment. Symptoms are merely the indirect expression of emotions. And the intensity of the symptoms is directly in proportion to the strength of the blocked emotion. In an odd sort of twist, the symptom is actually not the problem. This brings us to a significant psychological rule: The symptom is not the problem; the symptom is the solution to the problem. Why? Because the symptom releases the pent-up pressure of emotional restriction. The unconscious is continually pressuring personality to release both the contents of restricted emotional expression as well as its creative potential. Not expressing one’s emotional tension produces symptoms of suffering. The unconscious continually pressures the personality to develop a less restrictive perceptive/expressive structure. All of the emotional responses that personality restricts and relegates to the unconscious remain charged, awaiting opportunity for release, and until that moment, these charged emotions are transformed into symptoms. Ultimately, these symptoms and the repressed feelings that they represent need to be reframed as information about the world and expressed in the fullness of their response. After all, we are just trying to understand the nature of the world and our place in it.

EMOTIONS: A GENERAL OVERVIEW

Much has been written about feelings, emotions, and their qualities, intensities, originations, purpose, and pathology. It is important to make this differentiation: all feelings are not emotions, but all emotions start as feelings. One of the basic capacities of the body is feeling. Fundamentally, feelings are the physical, bio-chemical reactions to external stimuli. Feeling is information about physical function, biological information, external information, and the overall well-being of the body and its relationship to reality. Emotions are a complex and specific subset of feeling. In this book’s psychological system theory, emotions are the result of complex neural networks associated with specific areas of the body. Emotion is the specific set of feelings associated with each of these specific neural-emotional systems of the body: head, respiratory, digestive, and reproductive.

We all know how emotions feel, but when we begin to examine the mechanism and purpose of emotions, things become a bit more complex. We all know what sadness or anger looks and feels like. And we also recognize that we do not all have identical emotional responses to every situation. What triggers aggression in some triggers fear or laughter or crying in others. What is sexually appealing to some is offensive to others. What is a simple worry to some is an obsession to others. What is sadness to some is depression to others. We certainly experience emotions the same way, but the intensity, meaning, and expression vary significantly from person to person. Culture, gender, family, and social values affect the manner in which we experience and express our emotions. Laughter, crying, and anger all have unique and often humorous expressive variations. Anger can be experienced in intensity varying from mild frustration to homicidal rage. There is clearly a spectrum of intensity in emotional potential. Emotional attraction to others can vary between boredom and a mild interest to strong infatuation, adoration, and even obsession. The mutual attraction between two people seems to be predicated on some specific emotional attractor that is not shared by everyone. This is why we are not equally attracted to the same people.

Emotions that are praised in certain situations are condemned in others. Aggression in sports is generally encouraged up to the point where the rules define controlled behavior. For some athletes, this can present a problem. In 2011, the NFL introduced new limitations on the types of hits that players can deliver to their opponents. The evidence of long-term damage due to concussions led the league to restrict the type and intensity of certain tackles. Some players objected to this limitation, and the league began to fine and suspend offending players. The consequences eventually began to prove effective in limiting dangerous play.

Families operate in a similar manner. Every family has spoken and unspoken rules about which emotional expressions are permissible and which emotions are not. The rules are enforced with consequences, both verbal and physical. Most families use some variation of physical punishment to limit a child’s behavior. The severity, frequency, and style of punishment usually depend on how the parents were raised as well as the cultural and religious beliefs concerning disciplining children.

The issue of how to best discipline children is one the most signifi-cant discussions taking place in therapy and research. The evidence of the negative effect that physical discipline has on the child challenges the parental rights to raise a child in this manner. Physical discipline simply has no positive effect on the child, and the use of physical discipline is one of the major factors in turning emotions into symptoms. Instead of the child expressing himself in an emotionally direct manner through verbal communication, opinion, sadness, anger, or sexuality, we now see a variety of symptoms such as anxiety, tension, stress, or guilt.

How we express ourselves emotionally as adults is directly linked to the issue of family discipline. Estimates of the use of physical discipline in American families vary, but figures range as high as 90 percent of American parents who use physical discipline at some point in raising children. At the time of this writing, I am unaware of any research that suggests that physical discipline improves psychological growth in a child. But how harmful could physical discipline be if we have all survived it—and we turned out okay, right? This argument is based on how we like to think of ourselves. Even though we all show signs of developmental trauma, our defensive self-perception is usually, I am okay, aren’t I? Maybe the next question needs to be: How do I know that I am okay? Then the bigger question becomes: What exactly defines psychological wounding and psychological health? Since we have been taught to tolerate psychological symptoms since our childhood, we all defend our okay-ness while simultaneously experiencing obvious psychological and emotional stress. And in some ways we are okay; that is, until our symptoms start to paralyze our lives through sleep interruption, health issues, relationship issues, or simply too much stress. Until we reach a crisis point, as far as we are concerned our symptoms are simply part of our emotional make-up. We don’t even realize that the anxiety, tension, and stress we feel are not really emotions but are symptoms resulting from blocked emotions, and those blocked emotions are directly related to how we were raised.

Fundamentally, emotion is information, and each emotion represents a different type of information. Pleasure, compassion, thought, and aggression are simply specific types of information about the world. As we are growing up, parents, siblings, and authority figures teach us how to translate emotions into information, which in turn teaches us how to perceive the world and respond to it. Let’s say that the body is a receiver, just like a radio. The radio has different channels of information, whereas the body has different emotions of information.

Parents teach the child what each emotion means and how to respond to it. Unfortunately, intermixed with the family wisdom and skillful expression are distortions of reality and obstructions in emotional expression.

THE THRESHOLD OF PERCEPTION

This type of conditioning creates the personality structure, which has two major functions: the threshold of perception and the threshold of expression. The threshold of perception determines the reality that we perceive: what catches our attention and sets the level of stimulation required for us to be aware. This means that events in the world will only be perceived when an external person/place/object/ event reaches a certain level of intensity, which then catches our attention. Before it reaches this threshold of perception, unique to each of us, it remains a blind spot to awareness; it is simply not noticed. Our inability to read non-verbal communication until it becomes obvious is this type of blind spot. A common example of this blind spot occurs when you are not aware that the person you are speaking with is angry about something until his cues reach a certain intensity. This would be a block in your perception of aggression. Or you might not know that someone likes you until s/he emotionally breeches the perceptual threshold. This might be a block in feeling intimacy. The factors that determine what is obvious are the strength of the external signal and the threshold of perception. Subtle cues, perhaps non-verbal cues, may go unnoticed. You are suddenly surprised by what you now realize, and in looking backward, might even be able to identify the clues that you missed. Another common blind spot occurs in dating. There’s no one to date in this town (of 70,000 people). This simply means that the individual’s psychological filter is set so high that he is unable to perceive potential dating candidates. He is unable to see anyone to date.

The question for the therapist is: What purpose does this blindness serve in the person’s personality structure? Why would someone be unable to perceive datable people and what protective mechanism is involved? This might be an example of a sexual block, an inability to perceive those individuals who might be sexually available. If it is more important to respect your parents’ moral training than to honor your physical desires, then your moral perceptual threshold blocks your erotic perception of available partners. Thus, no one appears on the dating radar. You can see how a therapy designed to help a person learn how to date would be ineffective if the real problem is a moral standard that is too rigid. Working on dating or interpersonal techniques in therapy might improve the client’s interpersonal skill set, but ultimately will be rendered useless by the built-in moral authority obstructing the perception and ability to act on those sexual feelings. These types of blind spots are almost always initially associated with anxiety. Perceiving the cues associated with forbidden information produces anxiety, so instead of feeling love, anger, or sexual attraction, the person feels anxiety or another one of the eleven major symptoms associated with blocked emotional expression. These symptoms are a result of the second personality threshold: the threshold of expression.

THE THRESHOLD OF EXPRESSION

The unconscious emotionally responds immediately to all events in our life, and does so initially in proportion to the nature of the situation. In essence, one’s unconscious acts like a uniquely personal mirror, reflecting the emotional quality and intensity of the moment. The psychological problem occurs when an individual has been taught to respond to the world in a controlled or restricted manner. Thus, if a fully emotional response to an event represents one hundred percent of a person’s emotional potential, but he restricts his emotional response to only fifty percent of his emotional capacity to meet his family standards (don’t be angry, sad, sexy, or opinionated), the other 50 percent of the energy is converted into his symptom profile. This would be his or his family’s preferred symptoms: anxiety, tension, stress, guilt, shame, fear, resentment, grief, worry, depression, or somatization.

The threshold of expression is put into place by repeated lessons from the family and culture about what is acceptable behavior and what is not. Unacceptable behavior is met with a threat of consequences, which can be as fundamental as loss of approval from someone important or as dangerous as physical abuse. Usually, the intensity of the symptom is directly in proportion to the external emotional trigger and the threat of consequences. However, even small emotional blocks accumulated over time can become acute or chronic symptoms. The stronger the emotional trigger combined with the family rules and enforcement (the threat), the stronger the symptoms. I call this threat the Or-Else! It is the fundamental consequence we all fear, designed by our family or childhood developmental history. This Or-Else is the actual or remembered consequence that triggers the expressive inhibition. The individual’s personality, which inhibits perception and expression, is directly shaped by the threats of childhood, which are often accepted and adopted by society. Corporal punishment in school is a perfect example.

The Or-Else is practiced not only in our families but culturally as well and is directed toward the behaviors of certain targeted social groups from country of origin or race to gender and sexual orientation. An example of the cultural Or-Else is how women were threatened prior to the 1960s concerning their expression of the thinking function. You shouldn’t worry your pretty little head about that, was a phrase used both seriously as a cultural prejudice about a woman’s ability to think and later in comedic satires illustrating that prejudice. The same prejudice regarding thinking ability was used against black athletes vying for quarterback or coaching positions. This type of repression is often presented as a truth or even as a kindly attempt to protect the person from the emotional distress of overreaching his or her abilities. The underlying message was clear, however: thinking would lead to negative and even violent consequences.

What this type of social bias does on a psychological level is distort a person’s ability to trust his own thinking processes or to trigger anxiety when he does activate his thinking. Suddenly, with a single thought, anxiety, guilt, and fear rush to the surface, undermining intellectual confidence and raising the specter of threat. The Or-Else is the consequence of breaking the social rules.

It is no surprise that at the end of the 19th century, psychology as a discipline began to emerge partly in response to the psychological symptoms arising from cultural prejudices against women. And then, in the early 1900s and later in the 1950s, the rising tide of the civil rights movement led to the unthinkable: larger and larger groups of people began to challenge the Or-Else. Instead of cooperating with the social prejudice in order to avoid persecution, women and blacks simply were no longer willing to compromise the quality and integrity of their lives and decided to confront the Or-Else. The response from society was ferocious. The women’s right to vote movement in the 1900s resulted in assaults, deaths, and imprisonment; the history of blacks in America is full of the most disgraceful and immoral acts ever perpetrated on a people. The civil rights movement rejected the consequences of suppression and demanded the equality and dignity guaranteed to all through God’s moral law. Again, assaults, death, and imprisonment were the social tools used in the unsuccessful attempt to suppress this movement.

One of my psychological truths is that we will not treat anyone else better than we treat ourselves. The deeper truth is that how we treat others is actually how we treat ourselves. The structure of social order reveals the psychopathology of any society. As we look in horror at how we treat people of different genders, races, or religions, it is the children of all these families of the oppressed, oppressors, and witnesses who bear the greatest burden of oppression. We taught these children how to perpetuate injustice, prejudice, and discrimination. Empathy was replaced with hatred or resentment. Love was replaced with prejudice. And fundamentally, truth and accuracy were replaced with distortion and symptomology. To accept and believe in a distortion means that emotional truth is blocked, and that block produces symptoms. These symptoms—anxiety, tension, stress, guilt, shame, fear, resentment, grief, worry, depression, and somatization—are the signs that emotional accuracy and truth have been compromised and that we have a distorted view of the world.

If there were no threats or consequences, most people would simply do and say whatever they felt. But this leads to a massive perceptual challenge. What would the world be like if everyone did and said exactly whatever they wanted? Obviously, the fantasy of this uninhibited reality would vary widely depending on one’s religious beliefs, cultural values, family fears, political orientation, and personality structure. Depending on how rigid one’s personality is, the vision of that unregulated world would look more and more threatening. Jung suggested that the actual problem with corrupt or dangerous behaviors occurs in those personalities that are the most severely restrictive. Strong inhibition actually produces highly symptomatic, destructive, and self-destructive behavior, and as soon as the individual begins to express himself effectively, his symptomology decreases. The very perfection that the ego seeks by instituting rigid rules of perception and emotional expression is ironically the source of the corruption. It is our perceptual distortion combined with our emotional repression that produce the very behaviors that the correction is designed to correct.

The unconscious is not a demoniacal monster, but a natural entity which, as far as moral sense, aesthetic taste, and intellectual judgment go, is completely neutral. It only becomes dangerous when our conscious attitude to it is hopelessly wrong. To the degree that we repress it, its danger increases. But the moment the patient begins to assimilate contents that were previously unconscious, its danger diminishes.

—C.G. Jung, Dreams

Each person has specific fears associated with his own inhibited behavior based on the consequences he experienced as a child. Although we tend to assume that all of us share the same fears, we do not. Most of our fears are specific to our families. It is true that geographically and culturally defined regions (such as the South) or shared religious values may teach children certain rules of behavior, but the fear that each of us experiences when confronted with an emotional dilemma is unique. Even among family members, what we are permitted/taught to perceive or express can vary significantly. This doesn’t mean that we limit all of our self-expression, but it often means that we over-control one or two of our fundamental emotions. Those emotions then produce symptoms instead of feelings, and we don’t get the energy or the information associated with those emotions. We literally repress the energy and information. We feel a bit more depressed or a lot more depressed depending on how much we are repressing our emotions. At the same time, our perception of the world is more distorted because the information associated with each emotion has been repressed.

In relationships, a partner’s irritating behavior that is obvious after months or years of relating to each other was initially completely missed or ignored. The problematic information was simply filtered out for the greater goal of getting a mate. Therapy rooms are filled with clients claiming that they keep dating the same type of man/woman over and over in a seemingly unending cycle. This is because the emotion (information) associated with the blind spot is systematically being inaccurately interpreted by personality. Thus the person is running the same dating experiment over and over. Because the individual is still inhibiting his emotional response to every new situation, it takes what seems like forever to realize that this relationship has the same problem as the last. If you can fully express your emotions, you will be able to access the information missing from the previous experiments. You will still respond to the same attractions, but you will no longer be fooled by them. You will know the specific qualities of the attraction, those aspects unique to your emotional training, and will learn to make a choice based on additional information and not just the attraction.

You stop being the bird repeatedly bashing its head against the window, offended by or attracted to its own reflection.

You begin to shorten the length of time in your dating experiments while simultaneously increasing the information you have about more appropriate mates. Your learning curve is faster and you make better, more expedient decisions concerning your commitment to a relationship.

THE FUNDAMENTAL PROBLEM IN THERAPY

Poor self-image and feelings of guilt and shame are common in human beings. There are hundreds of theories and thousands of books on how to help people overcome their guilt or shame and how to build a positive self-image. Early analysts thought that interruptions in significant developmental stages in childhood led to permanent damage of the personality and that therapy was essentially the method of helping someone identify the damage and learn strategies for compensating for that damage. One hundred years later, we know that personality is much more flexible, and although the nervous system can develop certain stubborn habits reinforcing poor self-expression, the dedicated individual, by adopting a flexible regimen of exercise, diet, spiritual practice, social support, social service, insight, emotional release, and even medication, can effectively and significantly change self-perception and self-expression. Universal to all psychological systems is the need to address perceptual accuracy, emotional self-expression, and emotional regulation (mastery).

I tell my clients there is nothing wrong with them and then they explain in specific detail exactly what is wrong with them. I argue that they are good, fine, healthy, and wonderful, and they express in genuine emotions their anxieties, worries, bad habits, sins, dysfunctions, fears, and depressions. I point out what they do well, how they act compassionately, how they care deeply. My clients then argue that they are damaged and self-obsessed; some even argue that they deserved punishment as children. They argue that they are so sensitive that they don’t even want to socialize, as the suffering is too much. My clients explain how they set goals to perfect themselves—to change weight, attitude, relationships, finances, diet, education, and employment—which are all ways of perfecting their lives and their self-expression. And yet, each story is marked by a failure to meet expectations. They carefully detail this desire for perfection and the frustrating results of the quest.

With all the literature, workshops, and seminars concerning self-image and self-worth, one would think that the complements of a professional therapist who openly recognizes a person’s intelligence, or beauty, or sensitivity, or ability would have a more sustaining impact in the client’s view of himself. And yet, in spite of my efforts, my clients cling to a fundamentally distorted self-image. There is no question that people do feel better when their accomplishments and abilities are recognized. The real problem seems to be the inability to sustain those positive, uplifting feelings that emerge with recognition. It’s as though there is a gravitational pull toward a feeling of dissatisfaction and discomfort: something inside each of us has been activated briefly and then deactivates on its own.

We live in a culture that loves perfection and the quest for perfection. We are constantly confronted and seduced into accepting social goals that are inconsistent with self-expressive goals. Advertising, in general, is founded on the principle of There is something wrong with you and this will fix it. We are urged to seek material wealth, physical perfection, emotional balance, prescription medication, improved relationships, and on and on. The underlying message is that there is something fundamentally lacking in our lives. Advertising did not create social self-image, but it certainly takes advantage of and reinforces our flawed self-image. The problem is that we feel like there is something wrong with us. And this is our dilemma: What is this feeling that continually creates dis-ease in our psyche?

Our willingness to suffer our lower energy-states is a continual challenge when attempting to evolve our consciousness. However, the unconscious is continually attracting us into adventures that will energize us if we are courageous enough to meet the challenge along the way. Our world is filled with one white rabbit after another, leading us down the rabbit hole of psychological adventure.

THE WORLD AS A SYMPHONY OF EMOTION AND INFORMATION

The essence of all phenomena is its particular and specific vibrational characteristics. At the atomic level, all elements on the periodic table have their own vibrational frequencies, their vibrational signature; our bodies are specifically designed to be capable of receiving a significant spectrum of vibrational signals. Every object and event in the material world has a vibrational signature and is known by it. Thus, the world is a symphony of vibrations and our bodies are the receiver for those vibrations. We might then postulate that each neural-emotional complex (except throat/speech) is designed to receive and translate a particular vibration (vibrational information becomes emotion); therefore, the combination of all of the emotions of the four major emotional complexes represents our perception of the world and our response to it: the world symphony as heard and translated by our four neural-emotional complexes.

There is a wonderful encounter in the movie about Beethoven, Immortal Beloved, in which the composer is explaining the nature of music to his soon-to-be personal secretary. In simple terms, Beethoven says that a composer writes from emotional experiences, and if the musical composition is successful, and the symphony or performer expresses the music effectively, then the audience directly experiences the emotional states of the composer. There is a direct transmission of emotion from composer to audience through the medium of music (vibration). The audience can literally share the emotional experience of the composer. As members of the audience, we are moved, unbeknownst to us, by the emotional quality of the music. Emotion has a vibratory signature, and at some deep level, we recognize/translate those feelings through associations with our own emotional history. We are reminded of and moved by our own memories triggered by the musical vibration. I would further add that the body as a whole has translated the vibratory experience of the music through the four neural-emotional complexes: insight/head, empathy/heart, courage/ digestive, pleasure/reproductive. It is obvious that thought, sadness, anger, and pleasure are only the most