Do We Live in Two Worlds?: Reconciling Science and Soul Second Edition

Table Of Contents

Thoughts

PART I INTRODUCTION

Introduction

Scope

Prelude

The Case For God’s Existence

A Scenario In Unity

Interdisciplinary Fertilization

Anatomy Differences In Origins Of Families

Is This Possible?

PART II CREATION

Creation

In The Beginning

Periodic Law

A Black Hole Theory

Physical And Parallel Forces In Antimatter

From Mineral To Life

Pangaea

Directed Evolution—Out Of Africa Or Not?

The Unique Brain Structure Of Humans

Multiple Locations For Human Origins

DNA And RNA

A Rosebud Theory Of Divergent And Consolidated Evolution

PART III The Cosmos

Thoughts And Questions Of An; Amateur Cosmologist

Today’s View Of The Cosmos

PART IV THE SOUL

Soul—An Overview

One Plus One

In God’s Own Image

Out Of Creation Came Souls

Evolution And Intelligence

Speech Ability

Comments Regarding The Soul

Three Scenarios In Heaven

Qualities Of The Soul

Functions In Life

Brain Think Vs. Emotion

Earth’s Garden In Development

Angels

Guardian Angels

Soul And Spirit Defined

God Is Like An Athletic Coach

This Comprehensive Concept Of Spiritualism, In A Nutshell

Souls And Miracles

Souls And Buddhism

Buddhism

Spiritual Energy

How Extensive Are Your Dimensions?

God And Souls In Image

ELEMENTARY PARTICLES In Particle Physics

A Realistic View Of God And Soul

A Clone Is Not Complete

Conceptual Relationship Of Soul And Man

Soul Interaction With The Mind

Evolution Of The Soul

A Continuum Of Historic Thought In Developing Dualism

The Quest For Truth

Beginnings Of Religion

PART V TO THE FUTURE

The Scheme Of History Is Already Written

Near Death And After Death Experiences

Time Comes In Little Glass Boxes

Hyper Speed Is Possible

Is There Anything To This Astrology Thing?

A Challenge To Fundamentalists

A Research Project In Fiction

In Summary

Update:

Gene Manipulation And Life Science Institutes

Woman And Man Were Separate Species

PART VI PERSPECTIVE AND LOOK-BACK

Perspective And Look-Back

God’s Empire

Essence Of We Live In Two Worlds

PART VII EPILOGUE

Epilogue Explaining Two Worlds

PART VIII EPILOGUE II

Making The Sperm Of Others

Time May Be Illusory

Two Worlds And Heaven’s Gate

Some Sources Of Cosmic Or Earth Catastrophe

Time Line—The Physical Earth

GLOSSARY

THE AUTHOR

Books And Articles By The Author

Dedication . . . . and Thanks

. . . . to my wife

. . . . to my family

. . . . to my acquaintances

. . . . and to the other authors whose input formulated understanding of a more complete existence.

—Robert Greenough

And . . . . Thanks to Hazel, Don, and Kathy, with their editorial staff at Proctor Publications, LLC. They performed what I must consider a production miracle in transforming word processed pages, with numerous errors, to become this finished book. I know they must have been exasperated by the many hold the presses additions written to clarify different topics.

THOUGHTS

I am convinced that theoretical physics is actually philosophy.

Max Born

As often in science, the incredible theory of one age becomes the everyday image for its successors.

J. Bronowski, The Ascent of Man

Every sentence that I utter should be regarded by you not as an assertion but as a question.

Neils Bohr, in addressing his students

I reserve the right to be inconsistent as long as I become more enlightened.

President Jimmy Carter

An essence of science is that if you ask an impertinent question, you are on the way to the pertinent answer.

J. Bronowski, The Ascent Of Man

I think that in discussion of physical problems we ought to begin not from the authority of scriptural passages, but from sense-experiences and necessary demonstrations . . . . Nor is God any less excellently revealed in nature’s actions than in the sacred statements of the Bible.

Galileo Galilei, 16th Century

Your Galileo has ventured to meddle with things that he ought not to and with the most important and dangerous subjects which can be stirred up in these days.

and

His Holiness charges the Inquisitor at Florence to inform Galileo, in the name of the Holy Office, that he is to appear as soon as possible in the course of the month of October at Rome before the Commissary-General of the Holy Office.

Pope Urban VIII, Year 1632 (from The Ascent Of Man)

The imagination is a telescope in time. What we call cultural evolution is essentially a constant growing and widening of the human imagination. In every age there is a turning point, a new way of seeing and asserting the coherence of the world.

J. Bronowski, The Ascent Of Man, 1973

He drew a circle that shut me out,

Heretic, rebel, a thing to flout,

But love and I had the wit to win,

We drew a circle that took him in.

Edwin Markham

Fort Worth, Texas—Bill Moyers to Southern Baptists, Lighten up! The broadcaster says conservatives are clinging to an alien ideology by leaning towards a literal interpretation of the Bible and a close-minded philosophy. Speaking at the Baptist General Convention of Texas, Moyers—a Baptist minister—blasted the conservative faction for pushing a belief system that is less a set of ideas than it is a pathological distemper, a militant anger over the fact that the universe is not closed and life is not static. He told 1,700 people at Tuesday’s meeting that Baptists must accept other religions and reject conservative legislation that is not inclusive.

From the Associated Press, in The Ann Arbor News. November 14,1996

It’s easy to be visionary, or to be creditable. It’s hard to be both.

Geoffrey Landis,

Researcher in Space-Time at NASA

I’m not sure I totally buy this idea—it’s outrageous, but it’s the only idea that explains the action that is observed.

Anonymous

The most beautiful and most profound emotion we can experience is the sensation of the mystical. It is the sower of all true science. He to whom this emotion is a stranger, who can no longer wonder and stand rapt in awe, is as good as dead. To know that what is impenetrable to us really exists, manifesting itself as the highest wisdom and the most radiant beauty which our dull faculties can comprehend only in their most primitive forms—this knowledge, this feeling is at the center of true religiousness.

My religion consists of a humble admiration of the illimitable superior spirit who reveals himself in the slight details we are able to perceive with our frail and feeble minds. That deeply emotional conviction of the presence of a superior reasoning power, which is revealed in the incomprehensible universe, forms my idea of God.

—Albeit Einstein

From The Universe and Dr. Einstein

by Lincoln Barnett, William Morrow & Co., 1949

THE UNEXAMINED LIFE IS NOT WORTH LIVING.

Socrates, fifth century B.C.

PART I

INTRODUCTION

• Introduction

• Scope

• Prelude

• The Case For God’s Existence

• A Scenario In Unity

• Interdisciplinary Fertilization

• Anatomy Differences In Origins Of Families

• Is This Possible?

INTRODUCTION

Whom do people say that I am? Jesus once asked his disciples according to the Gospel of Matthew. The disciple’s answered, Some say John the Baptist, others say Elijah… or one of the prophets. This reveals how, even then, there was little consensus over the identity of the enigmatic preacher from Galilee. And the controversy endures today. Some modern scholars say that historical evidence reveals a much different portrait of Jesus than the one in the Christian creeds.

The historical quest has been denounced by some as a frontal assault on Christian faith and an attempt to undermine the Bible’s authority. Yet proponents find in it hope for a more rational basis for belief and a clearer essence of Jesus’s teachings. Many scholars think the gospels are unreliable records since they were written as proclamations, not objective history, decades after Jesus’s death. (Excerpted from In Search of Jesus, U.S. News and World Report, April 8,1996.)

Reporting of religious events in Paleo-time could only be told by the word of God, as related in the Book of Genesis. But Biblical and historic man has misinterpreted the time frame into something within their conceivable history. We may have a variance between the actualities of an event and the Biblical interpretation.

In comparison with the technological knowledge available as we enter the 21st Century, two and three thousand years ago there was incredible ignorance and lack of knowledge regarding nearly all phases of science, physical, social, and theological in comparison with the state of knowledge as we know it today.

In light of these developments, some theologians are actually a part of the problem in their rigid, dogmatic mind sets. It was only in year 1996 that Pope John Paul II acknowledged that evolution may be a possibility. The Roman Catholic Church now recognizes, as St. Augustine did in about year 600 and St. Thomas Aquinas did in about year 1250, that soul and body exists within the same human. This concept has been termed for hundreds of years as dualism. It has been said, There are laws in the background and contingency in the details.

The reader will see conflict between the rationalist and the mystic—between the person who believes in the conventional thought, and the mystic who is searching for something beyond conventional thought in an attempt to explain and to understand.

In writing these pages, I do not portray myself in any way as a scientist, and I think this is the strength of this book.

A scientist would feel compelled to protect his professional reputation, to give lengthy support for the hypothesis presented, and to provide unquestioned documentation for any statements made.

As the author, I do not feel constricted to these limits. I am a layman—a businessman by training, who has wide interests in many fields. This diversity in background has fomented and developed a universal, or wide-scope view in approaching possible solutions to the questions presented in this book.

My thought mechanisms seem to want a desire to link advancements in science to a cause that is spiritual and which has a spiritual motivation. In many ways this study is a reconciliation of science and theology. The two are not as widely opposed as some people in the past have thought.

It seems that all fields of knowledge present a system of how each concept in their respective discipline develops. The fields of knowledge are like brothers and sisters in a family, all of the same parents, with differences in their nature, yet held together by their like genes. So, many knowledge, cultural, and religious systems are different, yet alike.

These concepts many times seem to be related to one another. Social science rules have their parallel in proven rules of physical science: rules of accounting state that for every debit there is a credit, and these have parallels in nuclear theory that for every electron there is a proton, the business transaction that triggers accounting entries is parallel to the neutron from which electrons and protons emanate.

I see at least three ways to study science: 1) The academic, laboratory, experimental way, to prove or disprove some question or hypothesis—necessary, but mundane. 2) The theoretical method, employed by physicist and mathematicians—the real fun of the chase. 3) The way of reason, multi-disciplinary association, and gut feeling, a way used in brainstorming, where conventional limitations are dismissed from mind in order to create new solutions, or at least new questions to be studied later.

In industry, these three styles might be illustrated by: 1) the worker, who is operational and actually makes the product, 2) the manager or foreman who coordinates the efforts in a sensible way, and 3) the executive or planner, who is paid to be creative and come up with better ways to run the enterprise, considering the multiple challenges that exist in the universe of marketing, finance, future, and practicalities of actual existence. An executive will sometimes, faced with many subjects vying for his time, employ separate specialized entities, perhaps a researcher or planner, to concentrate on a particular aspect of his responsibilities.

So, in science, experts will explore in depth certain specialized topics. I see future research, experimentation, and exploration as confirmation (and some rejection) of theories and analysis presented here.

I visualize intuitive insight into how something might be, to infer, theorize, or simply speculate on its exact nature. I have tried to be a futurist, using cognitive subjects for wellspring ideas.

I hope to present a meeting ground for fundamentalist advocates who hold that words stated in the Bible stand without question, and the evidence before us that disputes some aspects given in the Bible, if taken literally.

I hope to present an integrated and plausible theory of how and when souls were created by God, how they functioned over the many eons to be God’s messengers, acting to shape evolution.

Jesus, an intellectual and moral spiritual leader of His time, was tried and crucified because He was facing an establishment in which religion was simply an arm of government. One can compare the joint functioning of laws in present-day Moslem countries and present-day Christian oriented governments that separate church and state in this regard.

One can also contrast a world in which science and government are separate, versus that existing in a country where science and government are interrelated, heavily subsidized, and acting almost as one. In the latter, will science evolve to be a tool of government, controlled by government, and without freedom and independence of thought?

It has been said that a mind once stretched by a new idea, never regains its original dimensions. It also can be taken that in the wondrous creation of earth and life over the many eons, all things which can occur, have, and do occur.

I suspect that even God has experienced some failures in his development of life and biological trials. We can cite evolutionary regression, or loss of developed mutations in the evolved biological anthropology of man as an example. The record lies in the genes of mankind.

From failures improvements evolved. I don’t think God is through with mankind yet. There is bound to be further refinements, and perhaps some failures, as there has been for over 4 1/2 billion years, when, I believe God first manifested Himself with life forms in this cosmos.

I imagine that most men and women feel that they would like to retain and remember all of the knowledge to which they have been exposed—the information or experiences which they have read, or heard, or seen, or analyzed, or have been the subject of their associated thoughts. This, however, is impossible. If I read the whole 20 volumes of the Encyclopedia Britannica on the shelf of my living room, I could retain and absorb only a fraction of the information contained therein.

But the association of bits of information and essence of knowledge regarding various fields that relate to one another is, I believe, the essence of learning. The bits of information then cease to be only bits, but become an integral part of the more complete understanding of the various subjects associated.

It is like the supply of individual bricks, sitting at a construction site (the bits of information), finally serving a more complete service when the mason has assembled them to become a whole building (the essence of knowledge and understanding of a field). Each bit of information supports and relates to each other bit of information in the whole to become a significant, recognizable, rational and logical structure. In this way, a city is built, although it will probably never be completed. From such structuring and analysis, wisdom is built.

A basic tenet of science is that there is a reason for everything. With this tenet, we need only to find what that reason is. Without action or change, we have inertia only to remain at rest.

I suggest that if the reader disagrees with some aspect presented here, that he (or she) separately pick out exactly what is disagreed with, and not throw out the entire concept. Perhaps an improvement in the reasoning process will result. The modern-day automobile was inconceivable in the initial years of its conception. Continual honing of the ideas were required to attain our present state of usefulness. To cite a cliche, Rome wasn’t built in a day.

We will all die. It is just a matter of when, where, and the circumstances. Death levels all things.

SCOPE

In the story of We live In Two Worlds, the author reflects and recognizes the teachings of past philosophers that soul exists within, but separate and distinct from the body, and that soul continues on in existence after the body has died.

These ideas are not new. It may be that it is only one’s personal realization that is new, of the idea that we are living in two worlds. The concept of a soul existing within man goes back at least to Plato and Aristotle, to Pope Gregory, St. Augustine, Thomas Aquinas, to the Stoics of Ancient Greece, and to leading church men in history, as well as to many religious followers. Some persons, even today, have not come to the realization that man is more than an animal body, that he, or she, has a soul, a spirit of God, that exists within his material body.

The idea of the origin of the soul may be new and unique with this writing. Less unique may be the idea of the existence and appearance of the soul during our own lifetime, as well as at times in the past, and the eventual victory of the soul, which may in fact replace Cro-Magnon man on earth, as Homo sapiens had replaced Neanderthal man in the past.

The author proposes how the soul came into existence during the particle physics evolution prior to, during, and after the Big Bang. He proposes the preexistence of God as an intelligence in a prior cosmos, and that souls are a microcosm, or micro-division of God.

Souls, therefore, have existed as long as has the earth’s creation. This book suggests that all living organisms since creation have the potential of having soul, and that souls perhaps have undergone an evolutionary process, much as the primate body has evolved to Homo sapiens.

I first composed my theory espoused here in about 1990 after spending a lone weekend at my family cabin and then driving the four hour trip back to my home. Readings in scientific journals since that time have elaborated and supported various aspects of my theory and given encouragement that other aspects may not be as ridiculous as I first believed. My thoughts were not publicly expressed for fear of ridicule.

Readings on evolution of Black Holes parallel my theory.

The Big Bang development, cosmic and earth formation, physical and chemical creation of life, evolution of species, events in parapsychology, and historic and Biblical readings, all played a part in trying to resolve questions through reason and analysis.

The studies in depth to prepare for this book were much more grand than my simplified, conceptual overview and scheme. The scope of the book is somewhat all-encompassing and I found it necessary in many cases to summarize the findings, rather than add to the complexity of this panorama of thought.

Now I find even today yet another study (Scientific American, November, 1994, The Self-Reproducing Inflationary Universe) that parallels and supports an element in my theory that perhaps many Big Bangs did exist and created various portions of the cosmos.

There are distinct and separate qualities of souls that are characterized in the qualities of the mind, as opposed to those of the brain alone. The brain functioning permits life for animals to live, eat, digest, be mobile, and otherwise serve as living creatures on earth, somewhat as a biological-electrical machine with computer-like programming.

However, the soul exists and is manifested in the mind of Homo sapiens, demonstrating qualities of affection, planning, emotion, insight, intuition, and like qualities beyond what a mere machine or computer could perform in the parallel functioning.

The existence of mind and souls within man is presented. Souls, sometimes called spirits or even ghosts, have been reported, documented as best possible, for hundreds and thousands of years.

Souls play a part in guiding and directing the minds and bodily functioning of each of us, as they have directed the functioning of living bodies since the first algae and amoeba life on earth.

The tool for biological change has been manipulation of RNA and DNA. It is the author’s belief that God, operating through souls that manipulated the RNA and DNA of all living organisms, did, in this way, create and evolve the life forms on the earth, including man.

The author proposes that a change in religious dogma should take place that accommodates the practical existence of soul, and proposes interpretation of the reporting in the Bible that would be consistent with these presentations. After all, much of our religious dogma was developed after the time of Christ.

The continuum of humanoid evolution is projected forward many millenniums to a state when, as the Bible states, The meek shall inherit the earth. Just as pre-humans evolved in many phases to Neanderthal, then replaced by Homo sapiens and Cro-Magnon man, our present form of humanoid existence may, in another 50,000 years or so, evolve into an existence only of souls, human bodies having then become extinct.

With rational, philosophical thought, society has moved away from the supernatural and the unexplainable. Faith is needed only for the unexplainable. We have come to realize that there is more than one way to look at things. We realize that exploration into new thoughts requires an open mind, a willingness to investigate unconventional ideas, theories, and new areas in which to gain knowledge.

This book is presented as an effort to reconcile principles of theology with facts known to science. It has been said that God is the greatest scientist. The magnitude of this concept is being revealed even further in the current era by revelations in particle physics, a field of science not even suspected at the early part of our current century. (See Part II—Creation).

Other facts presently known have been revealed over the past 2,000 years since the days of Christ on this earth. It is safe to state that further revelations in science, and I believe applicable to theology, will come to be known in the future.

Presented here is a complex theory: A theory of what differentiates modern man from animals. A theory of how and why man, with conscience and ethics, evolved to be different from other animals, including Simians, a theory springing from accepted biologic, geographic, and otherwise scientific development of the tangible earth and its contents of metallic, as well as organic life, that we call matter.

A theory is presented of when and how our very souls were created into an exotic world of antimatter, coexistent with the world of matter. A theory is presented of how the souls, under the direction of a preexisting God, directed the evolution of plant and animal life from protozoa and algae, through formation of worm-like organisms, then to functional combinations, developing into complex organs of animal and plant life, all acting by manipulation of RNA and DNA, by these messengers from God. In this sense God was the Creator. (See Part IV—The Soul).

There is presented an outline of those qualities possessed by all animals having ability to motor (move by themselves), whether worms, reptiles, fish or animal. Presented also is an additional outline of qualities possessed by Cro-Magnon man. These latter qualities are not exhibited by animals other than man, and these qualities are those that make man unique in this world. (See Part IV—The Soul).

Evidence of coexistence of man and souls are suggested by recognized events in parapsychology. Some in the field of what we call religion.

Projection into eons of the future, too, are suggested, that a new world, without animate forms of man, may transpire, as radical, or more so, than the pre-history replacement on earth of Neanderthal man by Homo sapiens. (See Part V—To The Future).

This theory ties together and could explain the wonderment of man’s existence that science, theology, and philosophy have debated for thousands of years. A reasonable continuum would explain where and why life exists, and perhaps the future of mankind on this earth.

Beliefs, practices in theology, formulated by minds with the limits of knowledge existing 2,000 to 2,600 years ago (when the individual books of the Old Testament were written) are challenged in light of information obtained since those times.

Many holdings in religious dogma should be updated to reflect not mystical events, but rational events. This reinterpretation would serve, not to destroy faith and confidence in religious beliefs, but in fact, bring this to a state of realism and understandable comprehension with today’s state of information.

The concept of God changed during the reign of Solomon, from the militant, fearsome, omnipotent Yahweh of old, to the omnipotent Father who loved His children. So too, our concept was made more clear of how the organization of Heaven’s ways could now be better understood.

This book is intended to present a message as an overview. The author feels that the scope of the story, ranging in time before time, to a period of evolution when humans have become extinct, and an attempt to relate tangibility to the intangible as it relates to antimatter, is deep enough as it is. I prefer not to make this book more complex.

Considerable research and reporting has been performed and is available in all of the component aspects of this story. One can read extensively in fields of the Bible, particle physics, geology, anthropology, archeology, philosophy, psychology, medicine, anatomy, brain and mind, natural science, zoology, social relationships, cosmology, astronomy, theology, Newtonian, Einsteinian and general science, mathematics, history of art, and really all other fields of knowledge. Individuals have made careers in each of these academic fields, and elaboration here in depth would require volumes, with thousands of pages to adequately explain each field.

In 1989 COBE (Cosmic Background Explorer Satellite) was launched into space. COBE looked for, and found, the faint afterglow of cosmic radiation left by the Big Bang, proving once and for all that a massive explosion and expansion brought the universe into being.

I recall a dream when I was about age 8 that either influenced or predicted my future interest. In this dream I experienced a loss, and later control, of gravity. Loss of gravity meant eternal falling through space. However, in my dream, I was able to control gravity by turning two valves, much like temperature of water can be controlled at a sink by adjusting the hot and the cold valves. I have experienced an interest in science ever since, with a special respect for gravity.

I also experienced the childish question of whether the world goes away when I shut my eyes? Recent thoughts in philosophy and multiple universes