I Know The Answers

Introduction

From our early childhood we were inspired by myths and stories about ancient adventurers and hidden treasures, extinct mammoths and dinosaurs, pyramids and ancient cities, distant stars and mysterious galaxies. During the first half of our lives, we believed that our parents were hiding many answers from us and that one day when we grew up all our questions would be answered. Time passed by, and we grew up and became more experienced and more knowledgeable in many aspects of our lives. When we hit our (so unwelcomed) 40s, we realized that we are on the top of our life pyramid and soon, slowly but steadily, we were going to go down. Gradually the roles are changing and the next generations are asking the questions we were asking our parents. By trying to answer the question: Who are we and for what purpose are we here? we realize that we have no clue about our source of origin, except the one described in the Old Testament. After communicating with older and presumably wiser generations we realize that all their wisdom does not go beyond human relationship, politics and philosophy, while the main question of our appearance on this planet remains unanswered.

In search for answers, we realize that except for the common desire of happiness for ourselves, the meaning of our lives gradually transforms into the process of providing better life conditions for our direct descendants (our children and grandchildren), and the fate of generations after them strangely becomes less of our concern. Happiness is a process of growth, whether it is physical, mental, financial or any other type of growth. After reaching its apogee, any decline of the former growth leads to an eventual loss of interest in life. Eventual admission of our helplessness before Her Majesty — the Time — and awareness of our eventual approach to the final destination gradually leads to our self-reassuring and revengeful defiance to the heavens: I will pass away, but my descendants will live on. With this self-calming slogan millions and millions of people are passing away to nothingness.

If we look at all living things on Earth from a computerized point of view, we can describe ourselves as carriers of different programs. A newborn child is nothing more than a brand new memory chip that observes and collects information he receives from the first days of his life. The recording of this information occurs involuntarily, and we have no control over our craving for information. That is the reason why every parent desires to fill his offspring’s mind with a mentality similar to his own; otherwise it will be filled with who knows what. Independent of race and nationality, a child born in a different society absorbs the language, traditions and understanding of that particular environment.

During our lives, by downloading this or that program we are forming our personalities and therefore our physical and intellectual characteristics can be described as:

We are what we eat (food wise), and we are what we absorb (information wise).

Being capable of weighing all the facts we collected through the existence of our civilization, we can explain the appearance of our universe and therefore reconsider our own appearance on this planet. All we have to do is to accept the arguments of our ancestors and try to look at the subjects they have described through their own points of view.

This book is based on the precious works of Hugh Auchincloss Brown, Immanuel Velikovsky, Zecharia Sitchin and Karl Brugger. I also include major events from the Old Testament.

I provide in my book scientific arguments that go against widely accepted theories of the origin of continents, oceans, mountains, lakes and volcanoes. The reader of this book will find a revolutionary approach to the problems of appearance of our universe, origins of every celestial body and their eventual fate.

With detailed descriptions of the purpose of all the megalithic structures on Earth, the book makes undoubted breakthrough in the revelation of all the major enigmas of antiquity.

I invite you to join me on this journey to making your own judgment.

Academic Science

Nowadays we hear more and more criticism about academic science and its bureaucratic apparatus. Whatever does not fit into its proven dogmas is being automatically dismissed. The way we live today is also thanks to the same academic science and technology. Of course it is far from perfect, and maybe there are many other and more advanced and cheaper technologies to be realized in our lives, but to demolish existing science without introducing something new means going back to the Stone Age period again.

Archaeologists constantly find artifacts, which cannot be explained and therefore cannot be linked to any existing scientific theory. If there is no explanation of their origin, they are stored in archives. But science was created by us humans. If we see an object we have never seen before, our brain begins to look for similar silhouettes in our memory to compare it with the image we see. If the search does not yield any results after a while, we try to convince ourselves that it was not real, and if we never see the object again we even begin to question its existence. The rest is a matter of time. Time cures.

Similarly with our mind, science also has its trump card — Her Majesty the Time. For example, according to science the Earth and moon were created four and a half billion years ago. For those of us whose average lifespan is around 70 years, millions and billions of years means something unreachable and hardly imaginable. Problem solved. Nobody else wants to ask any questions.

Paleontologists constantly discover dinosaur fossils in different strata of the earth. Sedimentary rocks formed by the deposition of material on the earth’s surface take hundreds of years to harden. Considering each stratum as a period of time, scientists came to the conclusion that dinosaurs lived on Earth from 231.4 to 66 million years ago. But that principle has the right to exist only in one case: millions of years of absolute stable environmental conditions on Earth.

Comparing our lifespan to the age of our planet, we consider the earth as some kind of constant. But should we? Has the earth always rotated in the same direction? Were there any shifts of poles on Earth? Was the sea level always the same? Was the moon always there? And so on and so forth. We can ask hundreds of questions and not get any reasonable answers.

According to the Old Testament and many ancient manuscripts, there were many events and mythical characters that modern science can neither prove nor disprove. That is the major non-compliance between science and the religion we created. There is a huge gap between them, and it is understandable why that is so because to get a scientific explanation of an event is much harder than just to witness it. That is why science is way behind religion, and our only hope for the future is to shorten the gap between them. Every generation has a hard time perceiving such double, sometimes completely opposing foundations: religious and scientific. And in this book I will try to bridge that gap as much as I can.

Human Origin

Unlike animals, we can work, write and read, which allows us to pass information from generation to generation without ever seeing each other. That is why we constantly look for ancient sources in the hope of finding answers of our origin. However, because the information we get from ancient sources differs from our reality, we accept it as a myth or a tale and nothing else. There are two primary versions of human origin: evolutionary and biblical.

Evolutionary

Perhaps the fact that every generation, for some strange reason, considers itself much smarter and more advanced than older generations, inspired Charles Darwin to create his famous theory. But even the most atheistic person, at the back of his mind agrees with God’s creationism rather than evolving from monkey. With 96 percent of similar dna cells between us and apes, we have around 40 million differences which could not develop just by themselves with the passage of time. Even if we consider the so-called Homo habilis as our earliest known ancestor, who appeared 2.3 million years ago, then during all those years we were supposed to develop around seventeen differences a year. But it does not happen. That means there was either a sudden mutation or an artificial change in our genes 2.3 million years ago (if those numbers are correct).

With our pseudoscience we are going nowhere, but to dismiss Darwin’s theory completely would be wrong because indeed so many animal species on earth have numerous similarities and to call it just accidental coincidence would not be intelligent. And therefore Darwin’s evolution of species is absolutely right only in one case: major changes of our planet’s environment such as the changing of axis, direction of rotation, speed of rotation, distance to the sun and so on. Changes in climate or magnetic field could trigger drastic mutations of species because genes cannot just mutate without any cause. Any object resting in peace will never move unless some force is applied.

We can surely accept the theory of evolution, but what does not make sense in Darwin’s theory is the emergence of humans. We can definitely assume that there were sudden changes of climate, the magnetic field, et cetera, but none of the above mentioned factors could trigger the appearance of intellect. The disappearance of food on the trees could not lead monkeys to cultivate the land even in millions of years. There are so many animal species that have just vanished from the surface of the earth because of lack of food or water, and strangely none of them had ever tried to cultivate anything. Considering the above mentioned, we can make the assertion that mutation of any living thing on Earth is the result of major cataclysmic changes in the environment.

Biblical

God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them. (Gen. 1: 27)

Many scholars consider the biblical forbidden fruit as forbidden sex, because right after eating it Adam and Eve attained a sense of shame from being naked. Basically God created humans with reproduction abilities and got mad that people discovered it. What nonsense!

If God created us in his own image, it would be logical to assume that he created us with his own way of thinking also, isn’t it? And if today we were able to create living robots to help us in our everyday life, we would create just helpers rather than creatures smarter than us. Just as with the appearance of computers in our lives, we have anxiety about eventually being destroyed by them. It is just simple fear that one day they will stop obeying us. Gods could have exact same concerns about humans.

You may surely eat of every tree of the garden, but of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil you shall not eat, for in the day that you eat of it you shall surely die. (Gen. 2:16)

In 1976 Karl Brugger published his book The Chronicle of Akakor. The book describes the life and struggle of people of Ugha Mongulala, the natives of South America with a 12,500-year-old history. I came across very curious details in the book. When high priests were gathering to fast in order to predict the future, They ate only three kinds of fruit and small corn cakes (page-85). So why don’t we perceive the meaning of forbidden fruit literally? The absence of that particular forbidden tree at the present time makes us look for some hidden meanings. I am writing this book in the hope that my language will be attainable for anyone. Then why do we think that ancient authors wrote the Old Testament only for the chosen ones?

There is also reviewed biblical version where of course we have to mention the name of Zecharia Sitchin (1920 – 2010) Author of The 12th Planet, (1976). According to his works there was a race of extraterrestrials (Anunnaki) from planet Nibiru, who came to Earth in search of gold, which they needed desperately in order to save their own planet’s atmosphere. After years of hard labour in Earth’s gold mines, the Anunnaki decided to create primitive workers to help them in their multiple tasks on our planet.

Despite the outrage of many scholars, there is nothing irrational about this theory. Nowadays our civilization is pretty advanced in manipulating genes, and we actually do. But we do not create genetically incubated creatures just for fun or in order to play the role of gods to them. The apple does not fall far from the tree. We are supposed to have the same way of thinking as our creator, and therefore it makes sense to create something useful for us, isn’t it? We manufacture machines and computers to help us in the fulfillment of different tasks. The need of physical help could push God to conduct genetic experiments. According to Z. Sitchin, before the appearance of the first successful human (Adam), god(s) had worked and created numerous other forms of life who coexisted with first humans. The extinction of defective and odd looking forms of life led to the appearance of mythology.

Have you ever tried to imagine bizarre looking animals by combining different parts of two or more animals? It is too childish and complete nonsense, isn’t it? Then why would our ancestors keep themselves busy with such thoughts? Maybe they have really seen them? If we draw a parallel between us and God, their need in various biological robots is quite explicable. Centaurs, pegasus, mermaids, winged people, little people, giant people, etc. All of them could serve in different areas of God’s life. As creatures of the land that always had a desire to fly, swim and dive, we also create our computerized helpers and along with mini-excavators we created excavators of immense sizes. Curiously enough with each archaeological discovery of odd-looking human remains, we always convince ourselves that we are the originals and the rest of them are just abnormal.

The other thing that confirms Mr. Sitchin’s hypothesis is the human reproductive ability. With an all-season mating ability, the human population is constantly growing. Many scholars claim it as the result of abundance of food, but reality shows the opposite. Economically advanced countries have lower birth rates than countries that are struggling. We have exactly the same protective functions as anything else on our planet. The tree growing on a cliff with a lack of nourishment has longer and stronger roots than the tree growing on the rich soil. So somebody programmed us to breed like rabbits and set our system of self-preservation at higher than average levels. Just imagine if the production of automobiles were seasonal, it would never fulfill our needs.

The Earth

Hugh Auchincloss Brown (1879 – 1975), is the author of Cataclysms of the Earth (1967). According to his theory, every 3,000-7,000 years the Earth experiences recurrent careening. The main cause of it is the constantly increasing weight of polar ice. After reaching its maturity, thanks to the centrifugal force, enormous masses of ice make the Earth careen on its side, shifting geographic poles to the equator in a matter of days or maybe even hours. The proof of his theory are the radial striations on Earth, which are basically huge dents made by the enormous weight of former polar ice caps. According to his theory, there are four most recent poles on Earth: Caspian Sea Depression, Sudan Basin, Hudson Bay Basin and the present North Pole. The fact that Earth experienced many polar shifts in the past is obvious. Layers of salt in our strata prove that land was periodically under seawater.

Nowadays, our civilization is developed enough to explore outer space. Meanwhile, how many of us know how mountains are formed? Of course what comes to mind is a volcano, which can create one or several mountain peaks, but what about mountain ranges?

The scientific explanation is: Colliding of tectonic plates pushes the land masses upward, creating mountain ranges; a process which takes millions of years. But why can no one explain the source of such force capable to push the land masses against each other? Acceptance of this theory automatically makes our planet 4.5 billion years old. But is that so?

Hugh Brown explains that differently:

"after 90 degree careening... kinetic energy which has developed in the continental land masses because of their weights and velocities, collides with the combined energy of the newly generated bulges of the earth and of the ice caps.

The result of these collisions of forces is that the energy of the moving continents is absorbed by the crushing, elevating, and wrinkling of large land areas..." (page 102)

It is so unfortunate we did not study Hugh Brown’s theory at school instead of some invisible battle of tectonic plates. People have the same instincts as animals, and one of the first lessons of childhood is to never run if you see a dog or any other predator. Motionless creatures do not interest anybody, and we live by the same rules. For us, for instance, watching running cheetahs is more attractive than watching the crawling turtle. Analogically, it seems that somebody created a theory of very-slow moving tectonic plates in order to put our conscious mind to sleep.

Half a century ago this unrecognized scientist proved the theory of shifting poles (Hugh Brown’s book was published in 1967). It is strange that after such a long period of time we still do not pay serious attention to his theory. Maybe in order to achieve scientific recognition, one is to follow the same path as academic science? (He was not a scientist at all). In other words, in order to become an army general, naturally one would have to start as a soldier. Nobody likes smart outsiders, and I am sure not everyone will like my book also.

In hundreds of years, snow has been constantly accumulating on geographic poles and after an x-amount of time, recurrent reversal shifts the location of the poles to warmer latitudes. During the polar shifts, inertia of heavy poles interferes with the complex movement of the reversing Earth, where, thanks to centrifugal force, the heaviest part of the globe slides towards the equator of the planet. Gradually, after the shifting of geographical poles, the former equatorial bulge begins to resolve back into the mass of the Earth while the newly developing bulge is trying to make its way through the massive and heavy body of polar ice located on the equator.

The massiveness of the ice cap located on the top of the newly developing equatorial bulge makes an enormous dent in it, until it loses its weight because of a rapid melt down. After complete disappearance, the former ice cap leaves its round pattern pressed into the piled up mountains of rock. And we call those battlefields between the crushing powers of ice and rock mountain ranges. Our present equatorial bulge is 42.72 km or 21.36 km on each side. Just imagine the equatorial bulge trying to grow from a couple of kilometres to 21 km high. The force is enormous.

(Pic. 1) Mountains of Zhangye Danxia. China

In that time, sediment deposits create horizontal layers. Mountains with tilted sedimentary lines indicate that formerly horizontal lines were pushed and piled up by an enormously po ul force. One of the best and most spectacular proofs of that is the multi-coloured mountains of Zhangye Danxia in China, located 1800 meters above present sea level (Pic.1). It seems that even nature gives us an important hint to unravel the origin of mountains. All the tilted lines indicate their pushed and piled up nature where immense power of centrifugal force pushed enormous masses of polar ice towards a newly developing equatorial bulge. The highest mountains on Earth are just the result of the collision of a newly developed equatorial bulge with the ice masses of the previous pole.

According to Hugh Brown’s theory, the weight of polar ice leads to recurrent reversals of the Earth. What I would add to his theory is that the fate of future reversal and the time between