The Glorious First of June

This edition is published by FRIEDLAND BOOKS – www.pp-publishing.com

To join our mailing list for new titles or for issues with our books – [email protected]

Or on Facebook

Text originally published in 1961 under the same title.

© Friedland Books 2017, all rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted by any means, electrical, mechanical or otherwise without the written permission of the copyright holder.

Publisher’s Note

Although in most cases we have retained the Author’s original spelling and grammar to authentically reproduce the work of the Author and the original intent of such material, some additional notes and clarifications have been added for the modern reader’s benefit.

We have also made every effort to include all maps and illustrations of the original edition the limitations of formatting do not allow of including larger maps, we will upload as many of these maps as possible.

THE GLORIOUS FIRST OF JUNE

OLIVER WARNER

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS 3

DEDICATION 5

PREFACE 6

ACKNOWLEDGMENT 7

LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS 8

1 — Lord Howe 10

II 12

III 17

IV 19

2 — The Queen Charlotte 27

II 30

III 33

IV 37

3 — The Enemy 41

II 42

II 47

III 49

IV 51

4 — Midshipman in the Defence 54

II 55

III 60

IV 62

V 65

5 — The Case of Captain Collingwood 68

II 69

III 75

6 — Ships in Battle 77

II 78

III 80

IV 82

V 86

VI 87

VII 90

VIII 95

IX 97

X 103

XI 106

7 — Lady Mary Rejoices 107

II 111

III 114

Epilogue — HONOURS AND AWARDS IN THE NAVY 116

II 117

III 121

APPENDIX I — Lord Howe’s Letters to the Admiralty 123

APPENDIX II — Lord Howe’s Fleet 128

APPENDIX III — The French Line of Battle on 1st June 135

APPENDIX IV — Sources and Acknowledgments 137

REQUEST FROM THE PUBLISHER 139

DEDICATION

To

R. A. L. Hartman

PREFACE

This study of Howe’s battle of 1794, and of his methods on that occasion, is based on material, some of it hitherto unpublished, listed in a note following the narrative, where will be found acknowledgment of the discoveries of others working in the same field. Special thanks are due to Lord Bridport, and to the authorities of the National Maritime and the British Museums, for allowing facilities for the examination and use of manuscript material. The author is also grateful for the friendly help of Professor Michael Lewis, of Professor Christopher Lloyd of the Royal Naval College, Greenwich, and of Commander W. B. Rowbotham R.N. Mr. William Myson, Borough Librarian of Wimbledon, supplied an interesting reference, and his secretary, Mrs. Peters, cleverly read obscure handwriting and turned it into impeccable typescript.

Battle plans, based on those by Lieutenant Ballard serving in the Queen, reflect observations made from that ship, in each case simplified. The plans were published in Logs of the Great Sea Fights, edited in 1899 for the Navy Records Society, a learned body which has earned the blessing of all students of maritime history.

O. W.

Spring, 1961

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

The Author and publishers wish to thank the following for permission to reproduce the illustrations which appear in this book:

Lord Bridport and the Trustees of the British Museum for fig. 29

Musée de la Marine for figs. 3, 12, 14, 18 and 25

The Director and Trustees of the National Maritime Museum for figs. 1, 6, 7, 17, 19, 21, 24, 26-28 and 34-36, and for figs. 16, 20, 31 and 33 from the Greenwich Hospital Collection

The National Portrait Gallery for figs. 15 and 22

The Parker Gallery for figs. 2, 23, 30 and 32

The Radio Times Hulton Picture Library for fig. 13

LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS

Figure

1—Lord Howe—From the portrait by John Singleton Copley

2—Commemoration Plate of the Victory of 1st June—By Bartolozzi, Landseer, Ryder and Stow, after R. Smirke, 1802

3—The inner basin of the port of Brest—From the painting by J. H. Hue, 1794

4—Approximate tracks of the Fleets, 19th May-1st June 1794

5—Diagram showing the first encounter with the French fleet, 28th May 1794

6—James Bowen, Master of the Queen Charlotte—From a portrait by an unknown artist

7—The opening phase of the action on 29th May, 1794—From an eyewitness sketch by Nicholas Pocock

8—Diagram showing the beginning of the action on 29th May 1794

9—Diagram showing the development of the action on 29th May 1794

10—Diagram showing a late stage of the action on 29th May 1794

11—Diagram showing Lord Howe’s approach, 1st June 1794

12—Rear Admiral François-Joseph Bouvet—From a contemporary lithographic portrait

13—Admiral Villaret-Joyeuse—From an engraving by Forestier, after Ambroise Tardieu

14—Jean-Bon Saint-André—From the portrait by Jacques Louis David, 1795

15—Captain James Gambier, of the Defence—From the water-colour portrait by Josiah Slater

16—Captain John Duckworth, of the Orion—From the portrait by Sir William Beechey

17—Sir Alexander Hood, K.B.—From the portrait by C. F. Abbott

18—Captain Renaudin, of Le Vengeur—From a contemporary bas-relief

19—Captain Payne, of the Russell—From an enamel miniature by Henry Bone

20—Lord Hugh Seymour, of the Leviathan—From the portrait by John Hoppner

21—Captain Collingwood, of the Barfleur—Detail of the portrait by Henry Howard

22—Admiral Gardner—Detail of the portrait by Theophilus Clarke

23—The Evening of the Glorious First of June—Engraved by T. Medland from a painting by Robert Cleveley, 1795

24—Contemporary model of the Queen Charlotte’s stern

25—A French version of the defence of Le Vengeur—From the painting by Ozanne

26—The duel between the Brunswick and Le Vengeur—From a painting by Nicholas Pocock

27—Sepia sketch of the scene after the Battle—From the journal of Edward Baker

28—The Battle, showing Le Vengeur sinking—From the painting by Robert Dodd, 1795

29—Letter from Lord Howe to Sir Alexander Hood

30—The British Fleet bringing into Spithead the six French ships captured on 1st June 1794—From an engraving by Birnie and Pollard of a painting by T. Lury, 1794

31—Detail of the Battle: the Queen Charlotte in action—From the painting by P. J. du Loutherbourg

32—Le Juste and L’América, two of the captured ships in Portsmouth Harbour—From an aquatint by I. Wells, 1794

33—George III presents a diamond-hilted sword to Lord Howe on board the Queen Charlotte—From the painting by H. P. Briggs

34—The letter from King George III to Lady Howe after the victory

35—Admiral’s Gold Medal and Chain for services at the Glorious First of June—Designed by Thomas and Lewis Pingo

36—A ballad on the Battle by a seaman of the Orion

1 — Lord Howe

THE GLORIOUS FIRST OF JUNE, actually the climax of a series of encounters, was fought in 1794—on a Sunday—between the fleets of Lord Howe and Admiral Villaret-Joyeuse. It took place in the North Atlantic, four hundred and twenty-nine miles west of Ushant, farther out to sea than any other major action in home waters of the days of sail. It was the first tactical victory of the British in the war with Revolutionary and Napoleonic France which lasted for over twenty years (1793-1815). Strategically, it was not a success for Howe, since the French did what they most wanted to do, which was to ensure the safe passage of a convoy of grain from America to their needy country. That particular outcome was not realised in England, at any rate by the public at large, and the sight of six prizes at anchor at Spithead was a tonic to a nation which had begun the war uncertainly, and whose leaders saw no immediate prospect of any important success by land. Its moral effect on the British fleet was lastingly good.

In his day, Lord Howe was known as taciturn—as unshakeable as a rock, and as silent, Horace Walpole once said of him. As if to emphasise the characteristic, little has been written about him since his death, and some of that little is controversial. He left no readily accessible mass of papers and documents, and such letters as have been published are often as involved and stiff in expression as they are beautiful in their hand-writing. Moreover an important phrase which Nelson let fall about a Lord Howe victory—meaning one which was not exploited to the limit—has been remembered at Howe’s expense.

While it is true that Howe represented the old navy and Nelson the new, that Howe relied upon tried methods and Nelson explored fresh ones, any idea that Nelson had anything but reverence for Howe can be dismissed at once, with proof to the contrary. When he held office as First Lord of the Admiralty, Howe gave Nelson his one and only peace-time command, the frigate Boreas, and Nelson was grateful. Later, Nelson achieved his own earlier successes as a flag officer under Lord St. Vincent, than whom Howe had no warmer admirer. (Lord Howe wore blue breeches, St. Vincent was fond of saying, and I love to follow his example even in my dress.) Finally, when news of the victory of the Nile reached London, Howe, who had long been at the head of his profession, and who later became the only man to have received the Order of the Garter for services purely naval in character, wrote at once to Nelson to add his congratulations to the shower he was then receiving.

Lord Howe’s letter was addressed from Grafton Street on 3rd October 1798. It reached Nelson over three months later, when he was in Sicily, depressed that the Neapolitan land campaign he had advocated was in ruins, and overwhelmed with administrative work. Sweeping everything else on one side, he wrote:

It is only this moment that I had the invaluable approbation of the great, the immortal Earl Howe—an honour the most flattering a Sea-officer could receive, as it comes from the first and greatest Sea-officer the world has ever produced.…

This was not entirely the language of hyperbole, and Nelson followed up his salute by describing the action he had won at Aboukir Bay in a few sentences of such clarity that they will always remain the best summary of the events of that fiery August night. He did so, he said, because it was to Howe that the Navy owed the efficiency of the system of signals then in use. He added:

I have never before, my Lord, detailed the Action to any one; but I should have thought it wrong to have kept it from one who is our great Master in Naval tactics and bravery.…

The letter reached Howe during the last year of his life, and it must have gratified him as coming from one who, though so many years his junior—Howe was commanding a ship of the line when Nelson was a baby—was obviously to succeed to the highest honours in their joint profession.

There is further detail to note about this incident, so creditable to both men. Sir Edward Berry, who had been Nelson’s flag-captain at the Nile and was sent home with dispatches, met Lord Howe shortly after he had written his letter, and was able to tell Nelson that one of the things about the action which had most struck Howe was that "every Captain distinguished himself. This, said Howe, made the action singular. In his own wide experience, he had not met with such a band of brothers" as Nelson had managed to collect and train.

Time passed, and one day, nearly forty years after Howe’s June action, King William IV was dining at the Brighton Pavilion with a group of naval friends. Among them was Sir Edward Codrington. He was an admiral of striking presence who had been captain of the Orion at Trafalgar and had commanded in chief at the Battle of Navarino in 1827, in the war of Greek liberation, the last full-scale fleet action fought wholly under sail. The talk turned upon Lord Howe: everyone agreed what a sad thing it was that no one had written his life. Codrington was specially disappointed that this was so, for he had known Howe well as a young man, and had served in his flagship at the Glorious First of June.

The King promised to do something about it, and shortly afterwards he summoned Sir John Barrow, Second Secretary of the Admiralty, requesting him to undertake the task. Barrow obeyed, though the task was not finished before William’s reign was over. It remains to this day almost the only venture into Howe biography. Its imperfections are various, not all of them the fault of the author, and it was not, indeed, the shortcomings of Barrow which moved Sir Edward to put pen to paper so much as the impertinence of a reviewer. A gentleman writing in The Spectator in January 1838 actually attributed shyness and want of nerve to Lord Howe in his later years, when noticing Barrow’s book. This was too much. All who knew him, Horace Walpole—who did not like him—included, were never in doubt as to Howe’s constitutional intrepidity. Codrington, in angry justification of his revered master, made a series of notes about the man who had shown him the qualities of an admiral, and these he inter-leaved into his own copy of Barrow. Many years later Codrington’s daughter, Lady Bourchier, included these notes, and many others, in a massive two-volume memoir of her father. Thanks to her daughterly affection, posterity has been enabled to follow the events of the sea campaign of June 1794 through the eyes of the young officer who was at the finest vantage point—the deck of Howe’s Queen Charlotte—throughout the action.

William IV had suggested to Barrow that certain events in Howe’s life would "require caution