An Operational Level Analysis Of Soviet Armored Formations In The Deliberate Defense In The Battle Of Kursk, 1943
()
About this ebook
The battle analysis methodology as promulgated by the Combat Studies Institute at the United States Army Command and General Staff College, Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, established the guidelines for the study. Both Western and Soviet sources were utilized. Objectivity and compatibility of all available source material were of paramount importance in establishing the validity and accuracy of various accounts.
The study concludes the Soviets prepared superbly for the operational battle; however, execution fell short of expectations. Because this was the first time the Soviets used tank armies in battle, an analysis of Kursk serves as an excellent catalyst for subsequent examination of present Soviet defensive doctrine and the use of tank armies in defense.
Major Charles L. Crow
See Book Description
Related to An Operational Level Analysis Of Soviet Armored Formations In The Deliberate Defense In The Battle Of Kursk, 1943
Related ebooks
Standing Fast: German Defensive Doctrine on the Russian Front During World War II — Prewar to March 1943: [Illustrated Edition] Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Battle for Kharkov, 1941–1943 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSoviet Defensive Tactics At Kursk, July 1943 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Analysis Of Deep Attack Operations: Operation Bagration, Belorussia, 22 June - 29 August 1944 [Illustrated Edition] Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Eastern Front Campaign: An Operational Level Analysis Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAugust Storm: Soviet Tactical And Operational Combat In Manchuria, 1945 [Illustrated Edition] Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Swinging The Sledgehammer: The Combat Effectiveness Of German Heavy Tank Battalions In World War II Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Impact Of Political-Military Relations On The Use Of German Military Power During Operation Barbarossa Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsViking Panzers: The German 5th SS Tank Regiment in the East in World War II Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Battle of the Dnepr: The Red Army’s Forcing of the East Wall, September-December 1943 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Small Unit Actions During The German Campaign In Russia [Illustrated Edition] Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Typhoon over Moscow Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsStalingrad And The Turning Point On The Soviet-German Front, 1941-1943 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTank Warfare on the Eastern Front, 1943–1945: Red Steamroller Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Kursk: A Study In Operational Art Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Manstein’s Campaigns - More Than Tactics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOperation Bagration: The Soviet Destruction of German Army Group Center, 1944 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Panzer Tactics: Tank Operations in the East, 1941–42 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Battle of Kursk: The Red Army’s Defensive Operations and Counter-Offensive, July-August 1943 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Defense of Moscow 1941: The Northern Flank Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBattle of Kursk, 1943 Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Roots Of Soviet Victory: The Application Of Operational Art On The Eastern Front, 1942-1943 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Anvil of War: German Generalship in Defence on the Eastern Front Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Battle of Kursk: Unleashing Steel, The Clash That Shaped WWII's Eastern Front Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe German Army on the Eastern Front: An Inner View of the Ostheer's Experiences of War Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Great Patriotic War And The Maturation Of Soviet Operational Art 1941-1945 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Panzer Divisions: The Eastern Front 1941–43 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Wars & Military For You
Sun Tzu's The Art of War: Bilingual Edition Complete Chinese and English Text Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Happiest Man on Earth: The Beautiful Life of an Auschwitz Survivor Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Masters of the Air: America's Bomber Boys Who Fought the Air War Against Nazi Germany Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The History of the Peloponnesian War: With linked Table of Contents Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Wager Disaster: Mayem, Mutiny and Murder in the South Seas Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Resistance: The Warsaw Ghetto Uprising Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Art of War: The Definitive Interpretation of Sun Tzu's Classic Book of Strategy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5On Killing: The Psychological Cost of Learning to Kill in War and Society Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How to Hide an Empire: A History of the Greater United States Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Blitzed: Drugs in the Third Reich Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of War & Other Classics of Eastern Philosophy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of War Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Killing the SS: The Hunt for the Worst War Criminals in History Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Last Kingdom Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Daily Creativity Journal Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Twilight of the Shadow Government: How Transparency Will Kill the Deep State Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNuclear War: A Scenario Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The God Delusion Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Forgotten Highlander: An Incredible WWII Story of Survival in the Pacific Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Mysterious Case of Rudolf Diesel: Genius, Power, and Deception on the Eve of World War I Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Ordinary Men: Reserve Police Battalion 101 and the Final Solution in Poland Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Unit 731: Testimony Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Faithful Spy: Dietrich Bonhoeffer and the Plot to Kill Hitler Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Shogun: The Life of Tokugawa Ieyasu Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThey Thought They Were Free: The Germans, 1933–45 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Making of the Atomic Bomb Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5
Related categories
Reviews for An Operational Level Analysis Of Soviet Armored Formations In The Deliberate Defense In The Battle Of Kursk, 1943
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
An Operational Level Analysis Of Soviet Armored Formations In The Deliberate Defense In The Battle Of Kursk, 1943 - Major Charles L. Crow
This edition is published by PICKLE PARTNERS PUBLISHING—www.picklepartnerspublishing.com
To join our mailing list for new titles or for issues with our books – [email protected]
Or on Facebook
Text originally published in 1985 under the same title.
© Pickle Partners Publishing 2015, all rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted by any means, electrical, mechanical or otherwise without the written permission of the copyright holder.
Publisher’s Note
Although in most cases we have retained the Author’s original spelling and grammar to authentically reproduce the work of the Author and the original intent of such material, some additional notes and clarifications have been added for the modern reader’s benefit.
We have also made every effort to include all maps and illustrations of the original edition the limitations of formatting do not allow of including larger maps, we will upload as many of these maps as possible.
AN OPERATIONAL LEVEL ANALYSIS OF SOVIET ARMORED FORMATIONS IN THE DELIBERATE DEFENSE IN THE BATTLE OF KURSK, 1943
By
Major Charles L. Crow, USA
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS 4
ABSTRACT 5
LIST OF MAPS 6
CHAPTER 1—INTRODUCTION 7
CHAPTER II—THE STRATEGIC SETTING 13
CHAPTER III—THE BATTLE 26
CHAPTER IV—ANALYSIS OF THE BATTLE 48
CHAPTER V—IMPLICATIONS FOR TODAY 56
CHAPTER VI—CONCLUSIONS 62
APPENDIX A—NINTH ARMY ORGANIZATION 63
APPENDIX B—ARMY GROUP SOUTH ORGANIZATION 64
APPENDIX C—CENTRAL AND VORONEZH FRONTS ORGANIZATION 65
REQUEST FROM THE PUBLISHER 66
BIBLIOGRAPHY 67
DOCUMENTS 67
Theses and Dissertations 68
BOOKS 69
Articles and Chapters 71
JOURNALS 73
NEWSPAPERS 74
REFERENCES 74
MAP A—Soviet January 1943 Offensive 75
MAP B—Manstein’s Counteroffensive 76
MAP C—East Front Situation Prior to Kursk 77
MAP D—The Kursk Salient, July 1943 78
MAP E—Soviet Defensive Belts 79
MAP F—German Unit Missions 80
MAP G—The Central Front, 5-9 July 1943 81
MAP H—The Voronezh Front, 4-12 July 1943 82
MAP I—Soviet Operational Employment 83
ABSTRACT
This study is an historical analysis of the Soviet operational use of tank and mechanized corps, and tank armies, in the deliberate defense at the Battle of Kursk in 1943. It centers on the question of how effective was the Red Army in employing these units during this momentous battle. Events that shaped the battle and a brief comparison of forces set the stage. A discussion of the actual battle on the Central and Voronezh Fronts is followed by an analysis of the effectiveness of the employment of the operational armored units.
The battle analysis methodology as promulgated by the Combat Studies Institute at the United States Army Command and General Staff College, Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, established the guidelines for the study. Both Western and Soviet sources were utilized. Objectivity and compatibility of all available source material were of paramount importance in establishing the validity and accuracy of various accounts.
The study concludes the Soviets prepared superbly for the operational battle; however, execution fell short of expectations. Because this was the first time the Soviets used tank armies in battle, an analysis of Kursk serves as an excellent catalyst for subsequent examination of present Soviet defensive doctrine and the use of tank armies in defense.
LIST OF MAPS
MAP
A. Soviet January 1943 Offensive
B. Manstein’s Counteroffensive
C. East Front Situation Prior to Kursk
D. The Kursk Salient, July 1943
E. Soviet Defensive Belts
F. German Unit Missions
G. The Central Front, 5-9 July 1943
H. The Voronezh Front, 4-12 July 1943
I. Soviet Operational Employment
CHAPTER 1—INTRODUCTION
On 5 July 1943, Operation Citadel,
one of the greatest battles in history, was heralded by the opening salvo of thousands of guns on the Eastern Front in Russia. Hitler had staked the majority of his elite panzer forces on a bid to regain the strategic initiative over the Soviet Union. This battle was to be a beacon for the whole world
{1} of the might of the German Wehrmacht; at the same time, Hitler expected to reverse the string of recent German defeats in the east. For his part, Stalin sought to inflict yet another defeat upon the hated German invaders. Based on detailed information supplied from a well-placed source in the German High Command, the Soviets prepared the most elaborate defense in history in the Kursk salient. Following two weeks of battle, the pride of the Wehrmacht and the Third Reich lay decimated on the fields of Mother Russia. The once elite panzer forces, victors over Poland, France, the Balkans, and the initial strike into the Soviet Union, lay in ruin, defeated by the Bolshevik hordes.
Over two and a quarter million soldiers, six thousand tanks and assault guns, five thousand aircraft and thirty thousand pieces of artillery clashed in what many classify as the death knell of the German forces in the crusade against communism in the east. {2} The Battle of Moscow in December 1941 had demonstrated to the world that the German war machine was not invincible. The Battle of Stalingrad in early 1943 had truly stunned the Germans and had inflicted casualties of staggering proportions on the Wehrmacht. Kursk and the subsequent Soviet offensives insured Soviet victory in the East. The Red Army seized the strategic initiative in July 1943 and never relinquished it. From this time forward, it was the Germans who were forced to react to Soviet initiatives until final defeat in the ruins of Berlin in May 1945.
Although Kursk has been the subject of numerous studies, we have not exhausted all avenues of investigation of this colossal battle. The staggering magnitude of the Battle of Kursk almost defies the imagination both in numbers of personnel and equipment committed and in results attained when viewed in context. Despite this, there is an appalling lack of knowledge concerning this battle in the west, particularly in the United States Army. The Soviets feel that this battle was the turning point of the war and they harbor deep resentment at the seeming downgrading of this feat of Soviet arms. {3} Kursk offers a multitude of opportunities for study, but one of the most intriguing is the Soviet use of their armored troops. Without discrediting the Soviet infantryman, who covered himself with glory in the battle, it was the armored and mechanized units that struggled and triumphed over the German panzers in the July heat at Kursk in 1943. These were the formations forged in battle the preceding two years against the German Wehrmacht. Now, battle hardened and flushed with victory from Stalingrad, these tankers and mechanized infantry defied Hitler’s finest and overcame tremendous odds.
Soviet operational employment of armored and mechanized forces throughout the war was part of an evolutionary process. Prior to the German invasion, Soviet military thought had been the catalyst for the development of armored and mechanized corps. When large mechanized and armored units were employed in Spain during the Spanish Civil War, the wrong conclusions were drawn, and the corps organization was dropped in favor of separate armored brigades. German successes, combined with the experience of the Soviet-Finnish war, forced the Soviets to realize that armored and mechanized corps were not only viable, but necessary. Massed armor was to dominate the field of battle.
Unfortunately, the German invasion caught the Red Army in the midst of a reorganization process. Based on an analysis of German successes in France and as a result of comprehensive wargames finished in January 1941, twenty-nine mechanized corps were to be established. {4} However, lack of equipment, poor command and control capabilities, and inexperienced leadership, in conjunction with unproven doctrine, contributed to the initial failure of these formations. By mid-July 1941, the mechanized corps had been abolished and replaced, by and large, with separate armored brigades. By 1942, tank and mechanized corps were in use again. During this stage of the war, the Red Army had proven itself a deadly adversary. Its armored and mechanized units had begun to assume a definitive form; and, despite faulty employment, these units were becoming a major influence on the battlefield.
Toward the end of what the Soviets refer to as phase II
of the Great Patriotic War, November 1942 to December 1943, the Red Army began forming tank armies. The Soviets had an effective doctrine for employing corps level units, but the method of employment of the new tank armies was still in the infant stage. The Battle of Kursk was to give the Red Army ample experience in employing large armored forces in a deliberate defense against blitzkrieg style tactics. {5}
This thesis proposes to conduct an operational-level analysis of Soviet armored formations in the deliberate defense during the Battle of Kursk in 1943. Because the battle effectively took place on two distinct fronts, this study will evaluate the use of armored forces in two dissimilar situations. On the northern face of the salient, the German attack was conventional, with infantry preceding the panzers to make a penetration for exploitation by massed armor. In the south, The German commander, Erich von Manstein, employed different tactics. Because of a severe shortage of infantry, the German assault here opened with a massive use of panzers in the first wave in an effort to seek a quick penetration.
How effective was the Red Army in using its new strength in the deliberate defense? Obviously, the Soviets were the victors in the Battle of Kursk; but did their victory stem from an overwhelming superiority in