Physics of the New Millennium, Birth of the New Paradigm

Prologue

These knowledge may have been known somewhere in some other universe since hundreds of millions of years ago. These are not new inventions. Moreover, some advanced civilizations in the universe may have mastered this technology to be able to visit the earth throughout the history.

These are merely the collection of the knowledge that were known and have existed somewhere in the universe for eons.

It just happened that they turned out to be the collection of the revelations of the multiple fallacies in science that humanity has handed down for generations and mistakenly believed to be the truth.

None of these can be new in the cosmic library of the books on the secret of the universe. I may happen to remember these ideas from the long forgotten memory of our collectively forgotten civilization.

Why did I feel odd when I first learned the calculation of the capacitor energy in the science class at school? Why did I feel odd when I heard that plasma and magnetic field solved the problem of the jets from the black hole accretion discs?

At the time I did not understand exactly why. They indeed were registered odd as I remember now. The truth or fallacy of the scientific paradigm can not be hidden. They are destined to be revealed in one way or another.

Here is the collection of the truth of the universe as far as I could expound them.

Chapter One: Chronological Order

In the late 1970s, the prospect of the plasma fusion as a physically viable alternative energy for safe and abundant future energy source was widely publicized and conveyed as very promising. As an undergraduate student in physics, I imagined the world where abundant clean energy is available as a result of the successful solution provided by physicists’ active research. It will certainly be a rewarding career helping humanity to have abundant energy and clean environment.

At the third round of exam for the national scholarship competition for the study abroad program, one of the examiners asked me what would I major for my graduate study. I replied I will study plasma fusion to solve the energy problem for humanity, not knowing exactly what is involved in pursuing such a career path and also what will be my evolving interest among the wide branches of the graduate study of physics. These events point to the plausible certainty that I’ll be keeping the quest for energy in close touch even though I may drift away from the subject for a while.

I was eventually selected as one of two recipients of the national scholarship in the year 1980 in the physics division for the study abroad program offered by the education ministry in South Korea. It was a great honor. My whole extended family including great aunts (my grand father’s sisters) came to the airport to see my departure to America. The whole family believed that somebody who will brighten the Jeong family as prophesied throughout the Korean prophecy books may have come out and he is going for his life long journey to the west.

I decide to attend the University of Michigan Ann Arbor for the graduate study program after receiving several admission offers from other universities. Despite my answer to the examiner's question that I would study plasma fusion in my scholarship examinations, I was more inclined to study elementary particle physics as I believe it would widen my perspective of the foremost advanced field in physics. Most of the study in physics was basically mathematics. Once a well defined mathematical rule is discovered in the specific field of physics, physicists are ready to apply it to understand the wide spectrum of phenomena happening in that specific field until they find a specific domain that the rule will no longer be valid. We see this pattern of events happening in the field of gravitation at the moment. Dark matter problem, black hole accretion discs and the jet phenomenon have been out of touch of true understanding for a long time. It has been long over due that something fundamental has to be discovered.

This is the point where that specific branch of physics needs a new clue, a new adventure. The numbers calculated by the well defined mathematical procedure predicts the quantity that will be compared with the measured number by experiment and the accuracy of the theory is determined by how closely the theory predicted the measured number. When the predicted number consistently matches with the experimental results, we believe we have a correct theory that can be used to predict even further unknown physical phenomenon. For example, Maxwell’s theory of electricity and magnetism is one of the most well tested theories that have weathered numerous hard test and verification. Most of the electromagnetic phenomenon can be explained by using Maxwell’s theory of electricity and magnetism and physicists are well aware this fact. This also means that any new mathematical findings in the solutions of the theory of electricity and magnetism will have powerful implications on uncovering and understanding of the new physical phenomenon.

Formulating Theories of Elementary Particle Physics

During the time studying at the University of Michigan, I was particularly interested in the way the mass of the elementary particle is generated in the high energy particle physics. The chiral symmetry of the field theory has to be broken for the particular fields to acquire mass. Where the mass of the elementary particles come from? Why the actual calculation of the mass always turns out to be infinite? How these infinities are subtracted for the purpose of calculation and still can make the theory meaningful? Why the quarks inside the proton seem to be confined so strongly and never been observed outside of it? The mathematically infinite self energy was subtracted from the calculation of the quantum field theory and they still could make sense out of it as long as the subtraction of the infinities can be performed consistent manner so that the strict rule is observed. This mathematical process has been known as renormalization. And then all the measurable quantities in the particle interactions can be predicted with amazing accuracy. Physicists tend to try anything that is possible to extract the secret information from the universe using the available mathematical tools.

So it takes a certain amount of physical intuition in addition to the mathematical fluency to study and succeed in physics. The most important trait to be a physicist is to be able to relate the physical reality with the corresponding mathematical description of the phenomenon. It’s not the details of the calculation that matters. It’s the ball park figure of the numbers that can be significantly important in the interpretation of the physical reality that matters, also in understanding on what kind of physical effect can be predicted from the given form of the potential energy profiles in gravity, electromagnetism and elementary particle interactions, and most importantly the ability to catch the minor yet significant anomaly that was not expected from the known physics.

In the course of learning the elementary particle physics, while still having no advisers for the thesis project. I stumbled upon the idea that there is a specific ratio between the mass of the particle in QCD (quantum chromodynamics) and QED (quantum electrodynamics) when the calculation is performed by using the dimensional regularization method invented by t'Hooft and Veltman. The formal infinities have the same mathematical structures so that they can be canceled out when the ratio was taken. And when the known coupling constants were plugged in, the ratio between the mass of QCD and QED turned out to be the ratio of the electron and proton.

This was an interesting yet unexpected result. However, this was a bit baffling because QCD is actually representing the field associated with the quarks. So the ratio of the mass of the quark and the electron has turned out to be the mass ratio between the electron and the proton which is awkward because the proton is supposed to consist of three quarks. What could this possibly mean?

It could mean that the ratio only represents the stable configuration of the mass of the quark and the electron, which is the mass ratio between proton and the electron. It still requires a lot of investigation to be done in this field. I continued investigation on the issue of the coupling constant and the mass. And then eventually came up with a successful and original form of QCD and QED potentials. In physics, any type of interaction potential can become the basis of the understanding of the mechanics of the corresponding entire array of physical phenomenon. That’s the reason finding the first principle potential function of any interaction in physics is so important. These papers have not been published but the mathematical results still have relevancy to the modern day theory of elementary particle physics.

There were so many unanswered questions in the field of elementary particle physics that were not supposed to be asked or taken for granted to accept it as the way it is without question. If everybody accepts that as fact and continue the same path, we may not be able to find any truthful answer to all the questions. Someone has to ask questions as plainly as possible why the things are the way it is when it doesn’t seem to make sense from a purely mathematical point of view.

I just tried that and that was also about the time when the scale dependent coupling constant from the renormalization group equation was calculated and published for strong interactions and the Nobel Prize in Physics 2004 was awarded jointly to David J. Gross, H. David Politzer and Frank Wilczek for the discovery of asymptotic freedom in the theory of the strong interaction.

When I tried to convert the scale parameter into the length element using the simple conversion function,

, where μ is the scale parameter and r is the length element, when this transformation function was substituted into the scale dependent couple constant at the Yukawa form of nuclear potential when κ was set to 2, it became,

This is the strong interaction potential that was derived from the first principle of the elementary particle physics. It does have the capacity to explain many unexplained strong interaction phenomenon in the elementary particle physics. This line of research has resulted in several of very interesting papers which are still relevant and valid in the field of elementary particle physics today including the manuscript on Quark Confinement.

Relativistic Center of Mass Shift

In 1982, while studying at the graduate school at the University of Michigan Ann Arbor, I stumbled onto the fact that there is a second order mathematical term in the linearized theory of general relativity that has been discarded as physically meaningless which was a mystery considering that this term could be the most important term in general relativity as its physical strength is right next to Newtonian gravity. The problem with this mathematical term was that once this term is pronounced to have physical meaning, Newtonian mechanical principles have to break down.

According to Newtonian mechanics, an object without being subjected to an external force in the direction of the movement cannot and will not change its position of the center of mass. An object will stay at the same position as long as there is no external force imposed on it. However this turns out to be not the case when a spinning hemispherical object is considered in light of special relativity. The calculation of the center of mass of the spinning hemisphere turns out to have its center of mass shifted depending on the angular frequency of the rotor when the special relativistic mass increase effect is applied to the individual mass components.

It is interesting to notice that the equation does not ask if the system is in rotation. The only parameter that the equation is asking is if there is a finite length element of the shift of the center of mass. For some miraculous reasons, this could be achieved by the rotating hemisphere, cone or funnel shaped rotor when the special relativistic mass increase effect is incorporated. The equation certainly does not demand that it has to be a rotational motion that creates such a shift of the center of mass. We tend to restrict the meaning of an equation with our preconceived concept that we expect to happen from the known expectations. The reason for making this point is to leave the door open for the possibility that there may be cases that this type of the shift of the center of mass can occur without the actual physical rotation of the object.

The inevitable relation between the spinning motion of the rotating hemispherical object and the finite shift of the relativistic center of mass was the key to the discovery of the gravitational dipole moment. This means that we found a way to parameterize the rotational frequency of the source into a measurable length element in the second order term of the linearized theory of general relativity. This opened the floodgate of the possibilities of the new mechanics that can explain the variety of hitherto unexplained mysteries in cosmology. These include, origin of the Saturn ring, black hole jets, dark matter problem, Lense-Thirring force, GPB experimental anomaly etc.

On the other hand, the thoroughly and extensively studied general relativity has concluded long time ago that there is no dipole gravitational field from the rotating spherical mass while the earlier investigation of the rotating mass shell by Lense and Thirring in the weak field limit of general relativity has shown that there are indeed nonzero components of the second order gravitational field near the center of the rotating spherical mass shell. The radial horizontal component of this force was identified by Einstein as the manifestation of the centrifugal force according to Mach’s principle.

The problem was that there was an additional component of the force in the longitudinal direction in the Lense-Thirring force as if there is a force pulling in from both of the poles toward the center, for which there was no physical explanation at all. So, the result of Lense-Thirring’s calculation has remained in the arena of general relativity as a mystery. The book Gravitation doesn’t deal with the calculation of Lense-Thirring force in any of their chapters. It has literally remained an enigma in the field of general relativity.

Another astounding consequence of this rotating longitudinally asymmetrical object like hemisphere and cone etc is that this object can be used to extract energy from space by constructing an elaborate mechanical device with it. I subsequently published the article concerning the possibility of extracting gravitational energy from the space purely by mechanical means.

The motivation to publish this paper is to wake the mass of the people who have been indoctrinated to believe that the energy cannot be created in space, up to the fact that this doctrine is not absolute at all. In terms of actually creating the gravitational free energy device, the rotor used inside would have to rotate with tremendously fast speed and the bulk size of the device would not be very practical compared to the amount of energy that will be generated. It was a proof of concept device that will certainly work and another purpose of it was to show how general relativity was not very well understood. It was a fundamental challenge to the well known Newtonian mechanics. But it was also a challenge to the existing interpretation of general relativity in which gravitational dipole moment was completely abandoned as a mathematical artifact devoid of having any physical meaning.

It was a result of the simple gedanken experiment what happens to the center of mass of a hemispherical rotor if the mass increase effect of special relativity is introduced to the each mass element comprising the hemispherical rotor. It could have been an utterly boring question that no physicists would be interested in asking.

Because it looked like there was no interesting physical features in it. They will probably say what about it? with absolute disinterest, do not waste your time on day dreaming, something of that nature. I was asking this particular question to myself after I was back to the United States after working for five years in South Korea for the Pohang Accelerator project.

It was probably not the object in motion itself that interested me, but when the mathematical calculation inside the picture of my mind was showing its astonishing conceptual result. The mass increase effect of special relativity inside the rotating hemisphere creates a non uniform mass density increase. So when the center of mass of the rotating hemisphere was calculated in the mental picture the result was surprising. The new center of mass of the rotating hemisphere is not at the same location!!!!! The exact amount of the displacement was not an important issue, the issue was in the fact that there is a nonzero displacement of the center of mass in this particular system of the rotating object.

On the other hand, the rotating sphere would have the same center of mass due to the geometrical symmetry of the sphere, effectively canceling out the displacement from the two opposite half spheres.

In fact, the discrepancy itself of the behavior of the center of mass between a rotating sphere and a rotating hemisphere was a huge anomaly. According to Newton’s first law of motion, an object should stay at the same location unless there is an external force applied to it. The center of mass of an object defines the exact point of the location of the bulk object for the purpose of calculating the trajectory of its motion in Newtonian mechanics.

So if the effective center of mass moves just by simply spin rotating it, which should not according to Newton’s first law of motion, we have a serious anomaly and a legitimate exception to the laws of Newtonian mechanical principle. The existence of this particular mechanical object proved that Newton’s law of motion was not absolute!!!!

One can certainly take an opposite theoretical stance that if that is the case, special relativity must be wrong except that the matter is not that simple. Special relativity has been proven to be correct repeatedly and the concept of the Lorentz invariance which is based on special relativity has been the core principle in the modern elementary particle physics. There is no turning back as long as the concept of special relativity is concerned. It’s a proven scientific fact. If that is the case, then Newton’s first law of motion is not correct and an object can move effectively without having to be forced to move in the direction of the movement by an external force. It was a lightening like shock that has prompted a lot of mathematical calculations and the proof of concept verification happening at the same time inside the analytic part of my brain.

People normally do not forget some strange experiences or puzzling sense of reality. That's when I read the news article in 1982 when I was a graduate student at the University of Michigan Ann Arbor regarding the story that physicists finally solved the mystery of the jet phenomenon in the black hole accretion discs by the mechanism of magnetic field and plasma.

Somehow it didn’t convince me and I thought if that is the case the length of the jets from one of poles should be much shorter than the other because there is a huge difference between the mass of the electrons and the ions. Because the plasma is a material state where the electrons and ions are mixed like soup and the magnetic field will separate them and shoot them out in opposite direction if my understanding of the theory of electricity and magnetism was correct.

But in general the published report of the length of the jets seems about the same according to the pictures that have been taken from the astronomical telescopes.

If there can be a mechanism that can explain the jets from the black hole accretion discs, it has to be from some unknown gravitational phenomenon, I thought, and went further to spend sometime to look up the book Gravitation by Kip Thorne et al. at the department library. I was searching for the mathematical term next to Newtonian gravity in the low energy limit of general relativity. The second term was there in the linearized theory but it was deemed a removable mathematical artifact and it was dismissed and literally thrown away. You may say it was discarded, trashed or ignored.

The reason was because the center of mass of an object can always be aligned with the center of the coordinate system and because there is no such thing as energy dependent shift of the center of mass in Newtonian mechanics. If the center of mass changes by any means, it will be due to the continuous translational motion of the object due to the momentum conservation principle, which is nothing new.

It didn’t take long to remember this little excursion from the memory and I started making connections to this mysterious shift of the center of mass of the rotating hemispherical or conic object that has longitudinal asymmetry yet has circular symmetric form in the x-y plain. It was amazing to see that all these puzzles were starting to unravel in a moment of a fraction of a second.

The gigantic theoretical puzzle and the reality of the universe were converging together at the speed of light. Newtonian gravity was not the full story of gravity after all. In the absence of such proof that Newtonian mechanics can be violated, the interpretation of general relativity could not be made correctly and the jets from the black hole accretion discs, Saturn’s ring, GPB experimental anomaly could not be explained at the same time within the concept of general relativity.

The magnitude of this discovery in science would be too big to comprehend. I remember the strong shock of electricity flowing through my spine the moment I realized the meaning of this observation. I started to calculate the gravitational dipole field in the superposed configuration of rotating sphere and published the result in the journal Physica Scripta. They were critical yet very supportive of the manuscript enough to accept the paper for publication where I derived the Lense-Thirring force from the principle of dipole gravity including the mysterious longitudinal component. The conventional calculation of this effect from the rotating sphere in the weak field limit has turned out to be zero as it cancels out all the details inside and out of the rotating sphere.

In the early days of general relativity, Lense and Thirring calculated the general relativistic effect near the center of the rotating spherical shell and published the result. Einstein was pleased by their result because the result showed the component of the radial force resembling the centrifugal force. They named it consequently the induced centrifugal force. However, there was an additional axial force along the direction of the Z axis that came out of the calculation of Lense-Thirring force, the origin of which remained a mystery. No one could figure out what this mysterious longitudinal component of Lense-Thirring's force was about.

After finished working at the Pohang Light Source Project for 4 years to finish the requirement of having to serve at the academic or research institute in return for receiving the scholarship, I was free to choose what may be my next move in my career. I moved back to the States in 1994 and settled in California with my two boys and wife near San Francisco, Castro Valley to decide what I will be doing next for my career. It may be about a couple of months since I started living there that the idea of the relativistic shift of the center of mass from hemispherical rotor came out while reading a book at the local library for leisure. There was no focused intention to find out or learn anything particular.

While I was there, I might have been looking to read a fun and informative story of an extra terrestrial experience allegedly happened to a farmer living in Mexico. It was a story about the alleged abduction of a farmer named Billy Boas in Mexico where he reported that he observed the rotating cupola in the space ship where he was about to be boarded. Somehow, I was fixated on the paragraph in the book mentioning about the rotating cupola that the farmer saw being attached to the craft that he was abducted. It was a good entertainment story for a physicist who has no particular duty or schedule to follow on a lazy Saturday lunch time in Castro valley California at the outskirt of San Francisco to kill a little bit of time in 1995.

Of course cupola is a hemispherical object and my curiosity started sparking on this particular physical object. It was quite natural for me to ask casually what this rotating cupola could possibly be related to the propulsion mechanism of the craft.

What is so special about the rotating hemisphere? I asked as if there could really be something special about it. It was a meaningless question because a rotating cupola may or may not have anything to do with any physics or the actual propulsion mechanism of the craft in the first place. Then I remembered reading somewhere that the center of mass has something to do with the exotic propulsion mechanism. That’s when I asked what happens to the center of mass of the rotating hemisphere if the principle of special relativity is incorporated?

I immediately started calculating the center of mass of the rotating hemisphere in my mind using the relativistic mass increase effect. And I noticed, to my complete surprise and astonishment, that the center of mass of the hemisphere in rest state is not the same as the center of mass of the spinning hemisphere. It moves slightly depending on the frequency of the rotation toward the flat side of the hemisphere.

That was the moment of the strong electric shock that I felt flowing through my spinal cord, when I realized that the center of mass of the rotating hemisphere moved without an external force in the direction of the movement in direct violation of Newtonian mechanical principle. I also remembered immediately the time when I paid special attention to the second order term in the linearized theory of general relativity when I was a graduate student at the University of Michigan Ann Arbor 13 years ago. Many mysteries in physics started unraveling in my mind on the deepest secret of the nature.

It was hidden in plain site waiting patiently to be discovered and it was the Gravitational Dipole Moment!!!!!

The time to process all this information was very fast. It was like a lightening speed. I stumbled upon the phenomenon of the relativistic shift of the center of mass from the rotating rigid hemispherical mass shell in 1995 which was the key to the physical realization of dipole gravity that was dismissed from the early days of general relativity. The mathematical term was there in the linearized theory of general relativity from the beginning but the fundamental mechanism to attach the real physical meaning to it was not known. While this phenomenon is physically as real as the bright day light, the so far known physics has not recognized its presence and the early handlers of general relativity haven't found its presence either.

Sometimes, incidences that have nothing to do with the question we have in our mind can provide us with the vital answer to the problem that we have been seeking. And it happens more often than not. Every body sees and knows apples fall to the ground. But it suddenly struck someone’s core of scientific perception when he was deeply involved with the question of the planetary motion of the solar system.

There was even a colorful and exotic moment described by the farmer which added to the effect of reducing the daytime boredom substantially. On the other hand, I may have had some vague background intentions to learn something about the propulsion mechanism of those crafts however nonsensical it may sound. To get a hint of the technology that is so far advanced from our civilization, we can’t miss any slightest chance of obtaining some kind of a hint. After all, one may learn something new from there unexpectedly but only when and if he has certain relevant questions in the back of his mind.

Without asking questions, our mind does not provide answers. Mind works in a very strange way and we cannot predict what it will come up with in the very next few seconds. The best way to utilize the best of our mind is to let it go and let it follow its own curiosity. Read and experience everything you possibly can and have a certain objective in your mind to find the answer or solve the questions that you have deep interest in it. Out of the wilderness and desert and seeming total chaos there appears the order, the order so beautiful and glorious that it will literally shock your spinal cord from the neck all the way to the tail bone.

Even though the rotating hemisphere may look like staying at the same location, due to the inhomogeneous mass increase effect stemming from the longitudinal asymmetry, the rest of the universe views the object has moved toward the flat side by a definite distance. This object will be the key to many mysteries of the universe. The reason is because it is a rare yet real physical anomaly that has not been expected to happen in the theory of Newtonian mechanics. Shifting the center of mass of a matter object without giving it an external momentum will never happen in classical Newtonian mechanics and/or in the hitherto known theory of general relativity. Yet this phenomenon is as real as any physical manifestation.

It may take years of exploration, derivation and diligent comparison with experimental data to completely understand the entire physical nature of it. However, there was no doubt that a Pandora's Box has just been opened by the discovery of this phenomenon. What will it bring to the understanding of the universe will be truly mind boggling. There could be many more mysteries involved in this particular mechanical system than we can possibly imagine.

On the Physical Nature of the Neutrinos and the Capacitor Anomaly

In 1996, after I came back to Austin Texas, I was pondering deeply about the physical nature of the elementary particle neutrinos and came to the conclusion that neutrinos must be tachyons. There were no ifs or buts on this conclusion. If a particle that has imaginary mass doesn't violate Lorentz invariance, then it can be a good candidate for a physically real particle. There was no other possible alternative to this conclusion. I published the paper Neutrinos must be Tachyons based on these observations at the LLNL archive in 1997. At the time, I was also preparing for the publication of the paper Non Newtonian Force Experienced by Gravitational Dipole Moment at the Center of the Two Mass Pole Model Universe at the journal Nature. The paper was not accepted for publication at the journal Nature, but later it was accepted for publication at the Swedish Journal Physica Scripta in 1999. The first paper on dipole gravity was titled Center of Mass Shift: Gravitational Dipole Moment which was published earlier at the LLNL archive and then later at the Hadronic Journal.

From the year 1995 to 2000 was the period that most of the discoveries on dipole gravity, neutrinos and capacitor anomaly were made. The discovery of the phenomenon of capacitor anomaly in 1998 which showed that the energy stored in the capacitor is always larger than the energy needed to charge the capacitor was so fascinating that until the year 2006 I did not make any serious attempt to apply the theory of dipole gravity to the actual cosmological mysteries, hoping that someone else may pick up the idea and develop it further to explore the secret of the nature.

In the mean time, I was developing and experimentally testing the theory Physics of Free Energy Device based on the fact that the energy stored in the capacitor is much larger than the energy needed to charge it. I uploaded the main point of this exploration in the public forum YouTube in Aug 4th 2009. This scientific fact did not need the scrutiny of the major referees of the scientific journal to realize that what I was presenting was mathematically correct. I believed it will save time to propagate and awaken the public on the obvious fallacy of the modern physics.

Moreover I didn't feel like I need a focal attention for such a discovery to publish it in the prestigious journal as the nature of the discovery was obvious to anyone who had training in physics after a few minutes of examination. After all, energy was never conserved in the process of charging the capacitors. Instead, energy was gained in the form of the repulsive electrostatic potential energy in large quantities in the charged capacitors.

The mathematical proof of this physical anomaly was shown by using the concentric spherical capacitor as an example.

Sign Error in the Lense-Thirring Force

In 2007, while applying the theory of dipole gravity to the phenomenon of the jets and the dark matter problem, I noticed there may be a serious error in the signs of the Lense-Thirring force. After the signs were reversed, the entire cosmology of the jets and the dark matter problem started to make perfect sense including the reasons why rings are formed around the Saturn. I published these findings on my blog Dipole Gravity in 2007. At this point, the issue of recognition for these discoveries has become a non-issue. The magnitude of the past mistake was too outrageous to bring it to the review of the refereed journal. I was busy publishing them in the blog as soon as I realize that they are very important so that people in the field can get informed of those findings as quickly as possible. I may have been tired of dealing with the pretentious referees in the field when I was merely trying to publish the paper that was describing pretty much the obvious physical facts and exposing the old fallacies that can be noticed after a little bit of investigation.

Coral Castle Mystery and Electromagnetic Antigravity

While publishing these findings on dipole gravity and its cosmological implications, the idea of actual physical embodiment of the capacitor anomaly has mostly occupied my spare time. I needed to find out the key electronic peculiarities that can make these devices available commonly for our daily lives. This step would be more like an engineering challenge; however it still seemed to have quite a few of additional stumbling blocks that are needed to be addressed in detail in the level of the fundamental principles of physics.

The next step of scientific investigation that I was interested in was on the mystery of Edward Leedskalnin's secret on anti gravity device that he may have used to move gigantic stone sculptures in his Coral Castle. The details of these investigations are presented in this book.

Scientific Truth Prevails

Uncovering the secret of the universe itself is a tremendous joy and rewarding by itself. If I had the public recognition as the first priority in mind, I would have stopped right after writing the theory of the quark confinement in the elementary particle physics when I was 31, because I noticed that I was jilted and alienated by showing the manuscript of the theory that I have found to other professionals. It must have been a jealousy and embarrassment that they could not find such a simple yet beautiful theory before a student because I could defend myself in favor of my discovery against their critique in a private conference without any difficulty.

The beauty of the mathematics and its accurate description of the nature intrigued me beyond any other worldly pleasure of sports or entertainment. When someone's favorite leisurely activity is searching for the solution to the mystery of the universe in the entire spectrum of the branches of physics with incessant curiosity and passion, along with the hard earned mathematical training, no one will be able to beat the efficacy of it.

I believe it was destined for someone to find the solutions to these mysteries of the universe. There is no other way to describe it. If I do not let the public know of these findings, with my best good will intentions, it will be a tremendous disservice to the humanity.

I hope that the next generation of earthlings doesn’t have to suffer from the past fallacies of the physical scientific knowledge that have been handed down to us for many generations. I believe we are at the verge of the next scientific revolution. I hope that this book will spur the very movement forward in our current civilization.

Chapter Two: Dipole Gravity

On the Mystery of the Jets from the Black Hole accretion Discs

How did this question lead to find the secret of dipole gravity in general relativity? Someone sent me an email a while ago after taking a look at the mathematical form of dipole gravity, saying this is not general relativity!!! he proclaimed. He must have been a student or a professor of general relativity who has studied the discipline in depth for a while.

What is it then? It has been there in the second order of the linearized theory of general relativity from the beginning but everybody who studied it threw it away including the one who created it. It has remained an orphan for the last 80 years so I picked it up and took a good care of it. It was in 1995. I helped finding and tracing its legitimacy within the family of general relativity also.

Then what that makes me of? Foster parent of dipole gravity? I think by all common laws and regulations this child is my offspring. A person has no right to call the enigmatic entity her/his child after abandoning it for the last 80 years. It will be called Jeong’s gravity just like Newtonian gravity. I just proved that it belongs to general relativity by its DNA though. That doesn’t necessarily mean that it belongs to Einstein and/or his disciples.

They trashed and abandoned it long time ago. That’s why they do not want to recognize it even if I proved mathematically that it is a part of general relativity. Now they hate it and wish that it never existed. How sad is the situation? It was thrown away by the family and now it is being hated for even sharing DNA with that family. I mean DNA here as the unmistakable and undeniable mathematical linage. You can deny hearsay, rumor, unproven claims etc. But denying the mathematical proof which is basically the same as the DNA evidence in the forensic criminology? This is a travesty of cosmic order.

Physics has a way to legitimize nonsensical mathematical procedures to predict the physically measurable data like the well known renormalization procedure in the elementary particle physics. This is not to diminish the value of dipole gravity because in this case the mathematics is standard and very precise. The only problem was that the initial investigators could not find the particular length element that is physically legitimate as an energy dependent shift of the center of mass. By shifting the origin of the coordinate system to the center of mass of the object, the text book claimed that there is no gravitational dipole moment. On the other hand there was a mysterious force known as Lense-Thirring force that was calculated from the second order general relativity with the approximation limited to close to the center of the coordinate system from the rotating spherical shell model universe. So there was indeed the second order gravitational force from general relativity. The irony of this force was that immediately after the paper was published or perhaps even before the publication according to recorded communication between Lense-Thirring and Einstein on this issue, the radial component of the force was identified as the manifestation of the induced centrifugal force in general relativity.

However, Cohen and Sarill has reported later that the Lense-Thirring force represents the quadrupole field effect in their paper published in the journal Nature, 19 Cohen, J. M., Sarill, W. J. and Vishveshwara, C. V., Nature, 298, 829 (1982).

Their paper did not receive much attention and it was buried in the jungle of many other scientific reports. It didn’t change anything about the previous concept of the Lense-Thirring force that there is nothing new about this force and that it was just a manifestation of the old known centrifugal force. It was certain that a controversy could have been raised by their report but in the absence of complete explanation of the origin of the force and the detailed picture beyond the realm close to the center of the rotating sphere, their report didn't start any new development in this particular branch of general relativity. The most baffling problem was that there was a longitudinal force in the axial direction of the rotating sphere that could not be explained. Since the longitudinal force appears in package with the radial force, it cannot have any physical meaning attached to it when the radial force was already designated as the centrifugal force. And it was by Einstein’s approval who invented the theory of general relativity. Who are to challenge his interpretation? Unless some concrete mathematical proof is presented, this issue will not be resolved in a satisfactory scientific conclusion.

Beginning of the Quest for Dipole Gravity in General Relativity

I was not particularly interested in studying gravitational physics for my PhD thesis when I first entered the graduate school of physics at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. I was more interested in studying the theory of elementary particle physics and the quantum field theory. In the mean time, I was listening to the widely publicized story regarding the British physicists’ discovery of the mechanism for the jet phenomenon in the gravitational physics in 1982.

The jets from the black hole accretion disc was a completely new information that I encountered and it gave me wonders about the workings of the universe. I was craving for any new knowledge in physics at this time. The major story in the news was that the British scientists Blandford, R. D. & Znajek, R. were able to explain the black hole jet phenomenon using the principle of the plasma and the magnetic field. It was a widely publicized news broadcast through the media and it attracted my special attention. Upon considering how the magnetic field and the plasma would work together to produce such a magnificent jets from the black hole accretion discs; I started drawing mental pictures on how that might be possible.

Due to the directional polarity of the magnetic field, if the particles ejected from one direction through the north pole are electrons, for example, the particles ejected from the south pole will have be positive ions. The positive ions are much heavier than the electrons and therefore, the length of the jets of the positive ions will be much shorter than the length of the jets of the electrons. However the observed jets seem to have nearly identical lengths contrary to the expectation. This was an intriguing puzzle. It didn’t seem like the plasma and the magnetic field explanation of the jets can weather the simple gedanken experimental test.

For some reason, by intuition and intense curiosity and not because of having any test or homework assignment regarding general relativity at the time, I decided to take a look at what the book Gravitation says about the second order term in general relativity that should be found next to monopole Newtonian gravity and I asked why this term cannot explain the jet phenomenon as it should if general relativity is the correct theory of gravitation in the universe. It was purely a philosophical curiosity at the fundamental level knowing what mathematical theory is about and what it should be able to accomplish.

I was wondering mostly why they have to use the magnetic field and plasma model to explain the jets from the black hole accretion discs. Why general relativity was not used to explain it? I could have been laughed at by the professionals in the field by asking such a naive question. I was curious about what else beyond Newtonian gravity was uncovered from general relativity.

I looked up the book Gravitation written by Kip Thorne et al. to see what else is there that they have discovered regarding the next order gravity beyond the Newtonian. I was surprised to learn that there is virtually nothing extraordinary beyond Newtonian gravity except the quadrupole radiation in general relativity.

There was a full scale attempt to detect the gravitational quadrupole radiation coming from the space through LIGO project. Observations at LIGO began in 2002 and ended in 2010 and no gravitational waves have