Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

From $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

The Way Of All Flesh: "Sensible people get the greater part of their own dying done during their own lifetime."
The Way Of All Flesh: "Sensible people get the greater part of their own dying done during their own lifetime."
The Way Of All Flesh: "Sensible people get the greater part of their own dying done during their own lifetime."
Ebook178 pages2 hours

The Way Of All Flesh: "Sensible people get the greater part of their own dying done during their own lifetime."

Rating: 3.5 out of 5 stars

3.5/5

()

Read preview

About this ebook

Samuel Butler (4th December 1835 – 18th June 1902) had both a father and grandfather in the church and was being groomed by his father to be a priest. However, after a first at Cambridge, he decided he wanted to be an artist. His father could not and would not consider such a thing and by mutual consent Samuel went to New Zealand to be a sheep farmer. Here he started writing which he continued on his return to London as well as taking up painting. Whilst he did have several paintings exhibited at the Royal Academy, his talent undoubtably was in his writing but the extent of which was only really apparent after his death. This was due entirely to his great work, “The Way of All Flesh” published the year after he died to tumultuous acclaim which is well illustrated by George Bernard Shaw describing it as "one of the summits of human achievement." “The Way of All Flesh” is a thinly disguised autobiographical account of his own harsh Christian upbringing as it traces the life and loves of Ernest Pontifex and his family. Along the way, it satires Victorian values and beliefs and with brilliant wit and irony offers a powerful indictment of most 19th-century institutions in England. Each generation has found that despite the book savaging Victorian hypocrisy, it still speaks to every era as ultimately the theme of young people growing up wanting a greater degree of personal freedom than their parents is very much alive and kicking in most families around the world.

LanguageEnglish
Release dateAug 20, 2013
ISBN9781780009001
The Way Of All Flesh: "Sensible people get the greater part of their own dying done during their own lifetime."
Author

Samuel Butler

Samuel Butler (1835–1902) was the son of a clergyman. Following a disagreement with his father, he left England to beome a sheep farmer in New Zealand, returning to England in 1864. He published Erewhon anonymously in 1872, and went on to publish several works attacking contemporary scientific ideas, in particular Darwin's theory of natural selection.

Read more from Samuel Butler

Related to The Way Of All Flesh

Related ebooks

Biographical/AutoFiction For You

View More

Related articles

Related categories

Reviews for The Way Of All Flesh

Rating: 3.554411727058824 out of 5 stars
3.5/5

340 ratings12 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    This is becoming a lost classic. It is very specific, very English novel that surprisingly captures enduring human feeling, from politicians that are too good to how it feels when you can no longer return to a place where you lived.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    I read this back in the early 80s. If I happen to find a review I wrote at that time I will add it. I remember liking the book very much
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    The Way of All Flesh tells the story of the Pontifax family over four generations, focusing on the last two generations, the loathsome Theobald and his son George. I loved the book. It is a sarcastic, scathing indictment of nearly every aspect of society. It is one of the funniest books I have ever read.
  • Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
    1/5
    My second pass of this much-acclaimed early 20th century novel, and now I remember why I didn't remember -- verbose, pompous writing, author-intrusive and a window into Butler's navel.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    I've always been fond of erudite books where the author isn't afraid to digress in order to tell you something insightful or just simply interesing, and Butler's most famous novel is a great example. His story follows the life of a young man, an everyman who carries in him Butler's beliefs, and reflects the society he lived in.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    The first and last few chapters are great...unfortunately, the middle of the book happens.Still, it has one of my favorite quotes from any book (its in one of the first few chapters): "We must judge men not so much by what they do, as by what they make us feel that they have it in them to do."
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    this book is a magnificent satire right up there with jonathan swift. it is a 19th century mommy dearest.
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2/5
    I did not appreciate the author's sneering attitude to things, as I recall
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    At first I was really enjoying this book, for I like the prolixity of Victorian novels and their comments on society. However, as the story of Ernest Pontifex wore on, and on and on, I found too much philosophizing with only occasional bits of dialogue, action and humor to break it up. The book was not published until 1903, years after the author's death, and is a good argument for the editor's blue pencil, which might have improved it. It was a book that was supposed to blow the lid off the Victorian family, not to mention the Church and society in general. Anyone who's read Anne Perry's Victorian historical mysteries will have come across far worse things happening to children in perfectly respectable families than anything that happens to Ernest. The narrator's voice grates more and more as he allows himself to give way to his desire to philosophize. I'd much rather be reading Trollope.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    I don't know what I thought this book would be about from the title; I thought it could have been about the will being weaker than the flesh. It's not about that --it's about a boy whose father was a clergyman in England, and who of course shoved all his hypocritical beliefs down his throat, along with his mother. The boy, because of a family friend and his aunt Alethea, ends up having his eyes opened to reality as to his father and mother, and to the teachings of his religion. I loved that Butler shows the Bible's story of Jesus' resurrection to be malarkey. if you are like me and was brainwashed by the (Catholic) Church, you know what a battle it is to unbrainwashed yourself and open your eyes. I could have used well this book years ago, but maybe it will do it's good work to other minds that need enlightening.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    I find it quite hard to read and understand, with its theological and philosophical themes. The characters are quite tedious too like Ernest and his parents. And the most likable character, Ernest's aunt, had to die young. However, I did learn one thing from the book - compound interest works. Ernest's godfather had invested the money from his aunt for him and the money grew over the years, thus leaving more money for Ernest to inherit.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    The 19th century novel tells a story of six generations of the Pontifexes through a disinterested narrator, Mr. Overton. The narration is both brilliant and flawed as Overton has access to even the inner thoughts of the characters. Brilliant because it is as if Mr. Overton is Ernest Pontifex, the protagonist, like how when you ask for advice, you would say, "My friend has this problem," and that "friend" is you. But if this is a veiled autobiography, then we must know that Overton is prejudiced and inaccurate about his evaluation of the characters.

    The dark-humored, Daniel-Defoesque novel starts off very slowly but the third volume of the book picks up and is in fact quite exciting.

    There are two great flaws which prevent the novel from being canonical: it has too many references to politicans, theologians, scientists and poets in 19th century so contemporary readers will fail to understand the book; and as an invective against against society and religion, this book uses the rhetoric of religion (didactic cant), which fails.

Book preview

The Way Of All Flesh - Samuel Butler

Samuel Butler’s The Way Of All Flesh

PREFACE

Samuel Butler began to write The Way of All Flesh about the year

1872, and was engaged upon it intermittently until 1884.  It is

therefore, to a great extent, contemporaneous with Life and Habit, and

may be taken as a practical illustration of the theory of heredity

embodied in that book.  He did not work at it after 1884, but for various

reasons he postponed its publication.  He was occupied in other ways, and

he professed himself dissatisfied with it as a whole, and always intended

to rewrite or at any rate to revise it.  His death in 1902 prevented him

from doing this, and on his death-bed he gave me clearly to understand

that he wished it to be published in its present form.  I found that the

MS. of the fourth and fifth chapters had disappeared, but by consulting

and comparing various notes and sketches, which remained among his

papers, I have been able to supply the missing chapters in a form which I

believe does not differ materially from that which he finally adopted.

With regard to the chronology of the events recorded, the reader will do

well to bear in mind that the main body of the novel is supposed to have

been written in the year 1867, and the last chapter added as a postscript

in 1882.

R. A. STREATFEILD.

CHAPTER I

When I was a small boy at the beginning of the century I remember an old

man who wore knee-breeches and worsted stockings, and who used to hobble

about the street of our village with the help of a stick.  He must have

been getting on for eighty in the year 1807, earlier than which date I

suppose I can hardly remember him, for I was born in 1802.  A few white

locks hung about his ears, his shoulders were bent and his knees feeble,

but he was still hale, and was much respected in our little world of

Paleham.  His name was Pontifex.

His wife was said to be his master; I have been told she brought him a

little money, but it cannot have been much.  She was a tall, square-

shouldered person (I have heard my father call her a Gothic woman)

who had insisted on being married to Mr Pontifex when he was young and

too good-natured to say nay to any woman who wooed him.  The pair had

lived not unhappily together, for Mr Pontifex's temper was easy and he

soon learned to bow before his wife's more stormy moods.

Mr Pontifex was a carpenter by trade; he was also at one time parish

clerk; when I remember him, however, he had so far risen in life as to be

no longer compelled to work with his own hands.  In his earlier days he

had taught himself to draw.  I do not say he drew well, but it was

surprising he should draw as well as he did.  My father, who took the

living of Paleham about the year 1797, became possessed of a good many of

old Mr Pontifex's drawings, which were always of local subjects, and so

unaffectedly painstaking that they might have passed for the work of some

good early master.  I remember them as hanging up framed and glazed in

the study at the Rectory, and tinted, as all else in the room was tinted,

with the green reflected from the fringe of ivy leaves that grew around

the windows.  I wonder how they will actually cease and come to an end as

drawings, and into what new phases of being they will then enter.

Not content with being an artist, Mr Pontifex must needs also be a

musician.  He built the organ in the church with his own hands, and made

a smaller one which he kept in his own house.  He could play as much as

he could draw, not very well according to professional standards, but

much better than could have been expected.  I myself showed a taste for

music at an early age, and old Mr Pontifex on finding it out, as he soon

did, became partial to me in consequence.

It may be thought that with so many irons in the fire he could hardly be

a very thriving man, but this was not the case.  His father had been a

day labourer, and he had himself begun life with no other capital than

his good sense and good constitution; now, however, there was a goodly

show of timber about his yard, and a look of solid comfort over his whole

establishment.  Towards the close of the eighteenth century and not long

before my father came to Paleham, he had taken a farm of about ninety

acres, thus making a considerable rise in life.  Along with the farm

there went an old-fashioned but comfortable house with a charming garden

and an orchard.  The carpenter's business was now carried on in one of

the outhouses that had once been part of some conventual buildings, the

remains of which could be seen in what was called the Abbey Close.  The

house itself, embosomed in honeysuckles and creeping roses, was an

ornament to the whole village, nor were its internal arrangements less

exemplary than its outside was ornamental.  Report said that Mrs Pontifex

starched the sheets for her best bed, and I can well believe it.

How well do I remember her parlour half filled with the organ which her

husband had built, and scented with a withered apple or two from the

pyrus japonica that grew outside the house; the picture of the prize ox

over the chimney-piece, which Mr Pontifex himself had painted; the

transparency of the man coming to show light to a coach upon a snowy

night, also by Mr Pontifex; the little old man and little old woman who

told the weather; the china shepherd and shepherdess; the jars of

feathery flowering grasses with a peacock's feather or two among them to

set them off, and the china bowls full of dead rose leaves dried with bay

salt.  All has long since vanished and become a memory, faded but still

fragrant to myself.

Nay, but her kitchen and the glimpses into a cavernous cellar beyond it,

wherefrom came gleams from the pale surfaces of milk cans, or it may be

of the arms and face of a milkmaid skimming the cream; or again her

storeroom, where among other treasures she kept the famous lipsalve which

was one of her especial glories, and of which she would present a shape

yearly to those whom she delighted to honour.  She wrote out the recipe

for this and gave it to my mother a year or two before she died, but we

could never make it as she did.  When we were children she used sometimes

to send her respects to my mother, and ask leave for us to come and take

tea with her.  Right well she used to ply us.  As for her temper, we

never met such a delightful old lady in our lives; whatever Mr Pontifex

may have had to put up with, we had no cause for complaint, and then Mr

Pontifex would play to us upon the organ, and we would stand round him

open-mouthed and think him the most wonderfully clever man that ever was

born, except of course our papa.

Mrs Pontifex had no sense of humour, at least I can call to mind no signs

of this, but her husband had plenty of fun in him, though few would have

guessed it from his appearance.  I remember my father once sent me down

to his workship to get some glue, and I happened to come when old

Pontifex was in the act of scolding his boy.  He had got the lad, a

pudding-headed fellow, by the ear and was saying, What?  Lost again - smothered o' wit.  (I believe it was the boy who was himself supposed

to be a wandering soul, and who was thus addressed as lost.)

Now, look here, my lad, he continued, "some boys are born stupid, and

thou art one of them; some achieve stupidity, that's thee again, Jim, thou

wast both born stupid and hast greatly increased thy birthright and

some" (and here came a climax during which the boy's head and ear were

swayed from side to side) "have stupidity thrust upon them, which, if it

please the Lord, shall not be thy case, my lad, for I will thrust

stupidity from thee, though I have to box thine ears in doing so," but I

did not see that the old man really did box Jim's ears, or do more than

pretend to frighten him, for the two understood one another perfectly

well.  Another time I remember hearing him call the village rat-catcher

by saying, Come hither, thou three-days-and-three-nights, thou,

alluding, as I afterwards learned, to the rat-catcher's periods of

intoxication; but I will tell no more of such trifles.  My father's face

would always brighten when old Pontifex's name was mentioned.  "I tell

you, Edward, he would say to me, old Pontifex was not only an able man,

but he was one of the very ablest men that ever I knew."

This was more than I as a young man was prepared to stand.  "My dear

father, I answered, what did he do?  He could draw a little, but could

he to save his life have got a picture into the Royal Academy exhibition?

He built two organs and could play the Minuet in Samson on one and the

March in Scipio on the other; he was a good carpenter and a bit of a

wag; he was a good old fellow enough, but why make him out so much abler

than he was?"

My boy, returned my father, "you must not judge by the work, but by the

work in connection with the surroundings.  Could Giotto or Filippo Lippi,

think you, have got

Enjoying the preview?
Page 1 of 1