Everand Logo

Welcome to Everand!

  • Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

    From $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

    Financial Institution Advantage and the Optimization of Information Processing
    Financial Institution Advantage and the Optimization of Information Processing
    Financial Institution Advantage and the Optimization of Information Processing
    Ebook376 pages3 hours

    Financial Institution Advantage and the Optimization of Information Processing

    By Sean C. Keenan

    ()

    Read preview

    About this ebook

    A PROVEN APPROACH FOR CREATING and IMPLEMENTING EFFECTIVE GOVERNANCE for DATA and ANALYTICS

    Financial Institution Advantage and the Optimization of Information Processing offers a key resource for understanding and implementing effective data governance practices and data modeling within financial organizations. Sean Keenan—a noted expert on the topic—outlines the strategic core competencies, includes best practices, and suggests a set of mechanisms for self-evaluation. He shows what it takes for an institution to evaluate its information processing capability and how to take the practical steps toward improving it.

    Keenan outlines the strategies and tools needed for financial institutions to take charge and make the much-needed decisions to ensure that their firm's information processing assets are effectively designed, deployed, and utilized to meet the strict regulatory guidelines.

    This important resource is filled with practical observations about how information assets can be actively and effectively managed to create competitive advantage and improved financial results. Financial Institution Advantage and the Optimization of Information Processing also includes a survey of case studies that highlight both the positive and less positive results that have stemmed from institutions either recognizing or failing to recognize the strategic importance of information processing capabilities.
    LanguageEnglish
    PublisherWiley
    Release dateFeb 3, 2015
    ISBN9781119053224
    Financial Institution Advantage and the Optimization of Information Processing

    Related to Financial Institution Advantage and the Optimization of Information Processing

    Titles in the series (79)

    View More
    View More

    Related ebooks

    Business For You

    View More
    View More

    Related podcast episodes

    Related articles

    • UNLIMITED

      How to Profit From ETFs

      Jul 29, 2021

      Exchange-traded funds have never been hotter. Investors are pouring a record amount of money into ETFs, which hold baskets of securities like mutual funds do but trade like stocks. “It’s just explosive growth,” says Armando Senra, head of iShares Ame

      8 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      PODCAST: Oh Unlucky Heirs with Tim Steffen

      Oct 5, 2021

      Apple Podcasts | Google Podcasts | Spotify | Overcast | RSS David Muhlbaum: People usually get sympathy when someone close to them dies. If that someone named them in the will, they also get, well, curiosity, sometimes maybe even envy. They don't usu

      22 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      Negotiating Your Contract

      Apr 10, 2019

      FOR many writers, an agent agreement or publishing contract can be an elusive thing. As with four-leaf clovers, having one in your hand can feel like a matter of luck as much as hard work and perseverance. Because of the dismaying odds and long years

      6 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      Cybersecurity And Travel

      Aug 10, 2021

      Cybersecurity And Travel
      8 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      From The Editor-in-chief..

      Apr 1, 2022

      From The Editor-in-chief..
      2 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      The Bitcoin Bubble Will Burst, Just Wait

      Feb 26, 2018

      If you invested in the markets circa 1999, it is hard to observe the Bitcoin mania and not experience the feeling that you've seen this movie before and know how it will end -- in losses and tears. The Internet was a great idea that convinced a lot o

      3 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      Memo to JPMorgan Chase Shareholders: Stop Banking on Climate Chaos

      Apr 13, 2023

      Now that we have your attention, vote in favor of JPMorgan Chase phasing out financing fossil fuel expansion.

      5 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      Rebuilding Rbl Bank

      Jul 8, 2022

      Rebuilding Rbl Bank
      11 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      How Credit Cards Work

      Feb 4, 2022

      How Credit Cards Work
      1 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      Exports Ban Leads To Mass Layoffs

      Dec 1, 2022

      After two decades of booming, the hi-tech sector in the United States is now going through a harsh downturn, leading to massive job cuts in a lot of tech firms. According to Crunchbase, a data provider, by mid-November, a workforce of more than 67,00

      2 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      A Low-risk, High-reward Approach

      Mar 25, 2021

      A Low-risk, High-reward Approach
      4 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      Hackers For Hire

      Sep 10, 2018

      Hackers For Hire
      10 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      In Bitcoin I trust

      Mar 19, 2021

      In Bitcoin I trust
      4 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      Provide Equity, Not Debt

      May 14, 2020

      Provide Equity, Not Debt
      4 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      The Market For Green Finance Is Growing Globally

      Mar 6, 2021

      CLIMATE change is no longer a future threat – it has already had a devastating impact on the financial sector. However, it also presents opportunities for investors. Financial institutions are exposed to the physical risks associated with more freque

      2 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      The Trust Revolution: How the Digitalization of Trust Will Revolutionize Business and Government

      Jul 1, 2020

      By M. Todd Henderson and Salen Churi New York: Cambridge University Press, 2019. Pp. xvii, 215. $29.99 paperback. The Trust Revolution provides an account of the role that trust plays in improving human conditions and of how technology can shape that

      6 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      Investing As A Social Activity

      Sep 1, 2022

      Nobel Laureate Robert Schiller has referred to investing as ‘a social activity.’ Why is that, and do you agree with him? Yes, although ‘active investing’ is more prone to social influence than ‘passive investing.’ Passive investing is typified by a b

      6 min read

    Related categories

    Reviews for Financial Institution Advantage and the Optimization of Information Processing

    0 ratings

    0 ratings0 reviews

    What did you think?

    Tap to rate

    Review must be at least 10 words

      Book preview

      Financial Institution Advantage and the Optimization of Information Processing - Sean C. Keenan

      For Sage & Coleman.

      Introduction

      At its most basic level, a financial institution is composed of four things: a brand, a collection of personnel, some physical assets, and analytic (information) assets. The last category includes things like data, data processing capabilities, statistical models of various kinds, and other analytic and reporting capabilities. This categorical breakdown is simplistic, and not exactly clean. For example, there is an overlap between physical assets and data processing capabilities: Are the computers themselves physical assets or information assets? Overlap also exists between personnel and analytic methods: Does a buy or sell decision stem from an analytic method or from a person who makes buy and sell decisions? In spite of this lack of clarity, using this categorization—even in its most simplistic form—can help to frame the crucial underlying competitive issues facing financial institutions today. These issues can be summarized as follows:

      If you have a strong brand, great, try to preserve it. If not, try to build one. But how?

      If you have great personnel, great, try to retain them. If not, try to attract them. But how?

      Physical assets are highly fungible, depreciate rapidly, and matter little, except insofar as they contribute to brand strength and the ability to attract and retain talent.

      Information assets, actively and effectively managed, create competitive advantages and improved financial results. This helps to build brand strength and attract top talent.

      Under this simple view, a financial institution that wants to be more competitive and more successful needs to focus assiduously on more effective management of information assets, including data acquisition and information processing. The goal of this book is not to describe the ideal state for any particular aspect of any business process within an actual financial institution. Rather, its goal is to suggest a prioritization of certain capabilities as critical strategic core competencies, provide some thoughts about better (if not best) practices, and to suggest a set of mechanisms for self-evaluation. In other words, how does an institution evaluate its information processing capability and take practical steps toward improving it?

      Nearly every month the media report cases of major blunders by financial institutions in trading, reporting of financial information, and mishandling of customer information, along with censures from regulators caused by failures in data management or information processing. While these high-profile events may be signaling something about the capabilities of specific firms or about the average level of capability within the industry as a whole (raising concerns about the potential frequency of future costly gaffes), the underlying issue is not about the cost of isolated blunders. Instead, it is about the efficiency and effectiveness of the tens of thousands of tasks that financial institutions need to perform every day in order to earn their right to exist. The deeper question that ought to be asked by investors, managers, and other market participants is how well can these institutions develop, market, and manage financial products and services relative to their peers, given that these activities are critically dependent on information processing capabilities?

      Importantly, financial institutions need not only be concerned about direct competition from more capable peers. They also need to be concerned about encroachment from more capable firms in tangential or even unrelated industries. One obvious threat is from firms whose core competency is squarely in Big Data management and information processing generally. These would include firms like Amazon, Yahoo, and Google, but even firms with other closely related strengths, such as logistics, can be threats to financial institutions that fall behind. For a powerful example, see Wal-Mart Dives Deeper in Banking, Wall Street Journal, April 18, 2014. To cite another example, Facebook now boasts more than 1.3 billion customers (it reported it had 20 million in 2007 and 200 million in 2009), and it is said that the company has more information about its customer base than any firm in history. How difficult would it be for Facebook, assuming it was committed to that strategy, to launch Facebank? And how might that development further change the competitive landscape for financial services? The answer to the former question may already be known. According to American Banker, an Accenture-conducted survey in March of 2014 of 3,846 bank customers in North America revealed that:

      Almost half (46 percent) of consumers aged 18 to 34 said that if PayPal offered banking services, they would want to use them. About 40 percent said the same about Google and 37 percent favored Amazon… AlixPartners asked 1,249 smartphone and tablet-using customers at the end of 2013 which providers they would most want to use for a digital wallet (defined as a tool that stores payment card numbers and loyalty, gift card, reward, coupon, and discount information). Close to half (46 percent) would want one from PayPal, 19 percent from Google. Half (50 percent) said they would want their primary bank to provide the service.¹

      At the same time, online microcredit and peer-to-peer lending platforms, which are also capable of eating into bank market share, have been growing and multiplying at a rapid rate. There were reportedly 33 of such platforms that were active in 2010, up from one in 2005 (the first true peer-to-peer online lending platform was Zopa). Summarized by Bachman et al. (2011),

      In this kind of lending model the mediation of financial institutions is not required…P2P lending is a way to receive a loan without a financial institution involved in the decision process and might also be a possibility to receive better conditions than in the traditional banking system.²

      In 2012 the peer-to-peer online lending industry volume was over $50 million in new loans per month, and in mid-2012 total loan volume passed the $1 billion mark.³ At what level of volume and transaction size, or at what expansion of transactor scope, might these platforms be in a position to seriously encroach upon traditional financial institutions? And more to the point, what things are these traditional institutions not doing today that is helping to foster the growth of these financial services alternatives?

      It is a somewhat puzzling irony that in the financial services sector, corporate leaders who are otherwise bold and self-confident, and whose success is founded on their ability to make daring, large, long-range decisions for the firm seem all too often unable or unwilling to make similarly bold and similarly important decisions about how their firm's information processing assets are designed, deployed, and utilized. Antiquated and patchwork data systems, along with obsolete and feature-starved process applications, can seriously undermine the competitive position of a financial institution. In many cases in which bold, long-range planning decisions are desperately needed, institutions fail to prioritize major improvements to their information processing capabilities, and this failure to prioritize can be the primary constraint on progress toward a more holistic and capable information processing infrastructure. Evidently, as we will argue, in this industry so dependent on superior information processing, institutions seem to be weak in assessing where the current investment trade-offs are, where they are headed, and how fast they are changing. One symptom of this state of affairs is the enormous difficulty and expense that firms have experienced in trying to meet post-crisis regulatory requirements, such as Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (CCAR). Replacing antiquated legacy capabilities and taking a more deliberate and holistic approach to information processing means not only restructuring or replacing physical data processing and analytic resources, it also means creating an organizational structure to match that modernized business model. This means that the overall strategic direction must be identified, that the underlying physical infrastructure must be aligned with that vision, and that a plan to match personnel with that model must be developed and communicated throughout the organization.

      This book seeks to provide context, as well as analytic and anecdotal support, for the simple characterization described above—that to be more successful and more competitive, financial institutions need to focus on information processing as the core competency. It seeks to provide some organization and definitions of terms and ideas embedded in the concept of management of information assets, primarily surrounding data and information processing and statistical modeling. The goal of this exercise is to make the relationship between firm organization around these functions and overall firm strategy and performance more stark. Finally, the book provides practical observations about how information assets can be actively and effectively managed to create competitive advantage and improved financial results. Toward the end of the book we survey some case studies that highlight some of the positive and less positive results that have stemmed from institutions either recognizing or failing to recognize the strategic importance of information processing capabilities.

      Notes

      ¹ Penny Crosman, How Banks Can Win Back ‘Mind Share’ from PayPal, Google, Amazon, American Banker, May 30, 2014, 10.

      ² Alexander Bachman, Alexander Becker, Daniel Buerkner, Michael Hilker, Frank Kock, Mark Lehmann, and Phillip Tiburtius, Online Peer-to-Peer Lending—A Literature Review, Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce 16, no. 2 (August 2011).

      ³ Peter Renton, Peer-to-Peer Lending Crosses $1 Billion in Loans Issued, TechCrunch (website), May 29, 2012, http://techcrunch.com/2012/05/29/peer-to-peer-lending-crosses-1-billion-in-loans-issued.

      Acknowledgments

      Those who deserve special thanks include Brian Peters, Karen Schneck, Andrew Clyne, Mark Almeida, Hsiu-Mei Chang, and Gordon Cooper for various contributions, edits, and moral support; Jorge Sobehart for teaching me about information entropy and many other things; and to all my wonderful and brilliant colleagues at AIG. And to Sarah Kate Venison who provided encouragement all along the way. The multitude of remaining errors and defects are of course my own.

      Chapter 1

      Financial Institutions as Information Processors

      Financial Institutions' RAISON D'ÊTRE

      Economic literature includes a rich debate on why firms exist as they do—the main question being why firm boundaries are defined in the ways that we observe. Certain types of activities that could remain in-house are routinely outsourced, while many activities with the potential to be outsourced remain internal to the firm. Mergers, acquisitions, and divestitures do exhibit certain patterns with respect to how firms believe their own boundaries ought to be defined, but these patterns are by no means exhaustive nor are their outcomes obviously probative. Some corporate restructurings are metamorphic and highlight the question of what makes a financial institution a financial institution. For example, in 1987 Greyhound Corp., a bus line company since 1929, spun off its bus line operating units so that it could focus on its core business of financial services. To even think about which firms should be defined as belonging to the financial services sector we need to have some practical mechanism or criteria for inclusion. Theoretically we could simply enumerate a comprehensive list of financial services and products, and include firms that engage in this set of activities. With a boundary so constructed, we would have an identified set of institutions to analyze. But does that boundary really exist or is it helpful even as an abstraction? Retail sales finance is one of the largest and most obvious types of boundary blurring, often occurring at the direct expense of banks and retail credit suppliers. Captive finance subsidiaries for manufacturing firms are also common and the obvious complementarity between manufacturing goods and financing their sale seems to suggest that the latter function can be effectively internalized. But while the economic incentive to encroach on the boundaries of financial services seems to be predominantly one way—that is, we have not heard of things like mortgage institutions directly engaging in home construction—no hard and fast rule seems to apply.

      There are well-known cases of captive finance companies whose financial services activities grew beyond financing the parent's manufactured products—in one case so much so that the entity became a systemically significant financial institution in its own right with only remnant relationships between their financing activities and the financing of the parent's products. Are there economic principles that would allow us to explain why, and the extent to which (for example) auto sales and lease financing are or are not more thoroughly internalized within auto manufacturers? While to economists the answer is surely yes (what area of human endeavor do economists feel cannot be explained by economics?), it seems clear that management teams at financial institutions themselves do not recognize or embrace such principles. For if they believed they understood the principles that define why the financial institution exists, they would surely leverage those same principles to establish firms that function better overall.

      Rather than try to tackle this broader problem head on, in this book we simply focus on the kinds of firms that dominate the financial services industry landscape: banks and insurance companies. We leave it to the reader to consider whether or not the observations made also apply to any specific firm or subset of firms with financial sector exposure or activities. A number of factors characterize the financial services industry in a way that might help us better understand why financial institutions exist in the way they do, and how they can improve their economic strength and competitive positions.

      Low Barriers to Entry

      Over the bulk of the financial industry's long history, practical barriers to entry in banking and insurance were quite high. In the modern era this was primarily due to regulatory and licensing requirements, but also due to consumer preferences for brand stability and stature. Over the past 100 years or so great banking and insurance industry firms were founded on brand strength, and their ability to attract depositors and policy holders was their primary determinant of growth. However, those barriers began to erode during the twentieth century as cultural changes and an increasing dependence on technology changed both the supply and demand sides of financial services markets. Changing regulatory requirements produced periods that alternated between stimulating and dampening bank and insurance company formation as well as merger activity, which is beyond the scope of this book to either document or survey. What is important is that evidence can be presented to support the claim of low barriers to entry.

      Interestingly, the aggregate data does not show an upward trend in the number of operating financial institutions. For banks, the total number of operating institutions in the United States hovered around 14,000 for the nearly 20 years between the early 1960s and the early 1980s. Then, after the savings and loan crisis began to unfold, the total number of banks began to drop—a trend that continues to this day, with the number of banks dropping by more than 50 percent from its 1980s total to fewer than 6,000 in 2013 (see Figure 1.1). However, looking only at the total number of institutions does not tell the whole story. In particular, the stability of the total number of institutions during that 20-year period between the 1960s and the 1980s reflected an offset between periods of great consolidation through mergers and acquisitions that reduced the total and periods of rapid entry of new institutions—particularly savings and loans associations, prior to the S&L crisis. Overall, entry into the banking sector has remained brisk and steady, despite the stable, then declining, count totals. Hubert Janicki and Edward Prescott observed that, Despite the large number of banks that have exited the industry over the last 45 years, there has been a consistent flow of new bank entries, and calculated the average annual entry rate at about 1.5 percent of operating banks. The authors further observe that, It is striking that despite the huge number of bank exits starting in the 1980s, entry remained strong throughout the entire period. Interestingly, it is virtually uncorrelated with exit. For example, the correlation between exit and entry for the 1985–2005 period is only –0.07.¹

      c01f001

      Figure 1.1 Total Commercial Banks in the United States

      Source: Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED); Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.

      Technical Core Products and Services Offered (Financial Intermediation and Disintermediation and Risk Pooling)

      Janicki and Prescott also observe how market share can shift dramatically. They note that of the top ten banks in 1960 (by asset size), only three are still in the top ten.

      Part of this is due to M&A (mergers and acquisitions) activity. But part of it reflects the fact that the product and service sets, based on intermediation and disintermediation and risk pooling, are technical in nature, and as trends in the underlying technologies change, firms have a great opportunity to innovate effectively and gain market share, or fail to innovate effectively and lose market share. What Figure 1.1 does show clearly is that while barriers to entry may be low, barriers to exit are even lower. Failure to stay abreast of technological innovations, as well as the adoption of so-called innovations that misrepresent true risk-adjusted returns, has been causing the number of operating banks to shrink by about 280 per year since 1984. Some of the innovations that led to distorted risk assessments include mortgage-backed securities and complex, illiquid types of derivatives (there are others). But while distorted risk assessments have historically been blamed on personal mismanagement and a culture of greed, these explanations offer little in the way of economic underpinnings and cannot explain the disappearance of nearly 8,600 banks over a 30-year period. The main culprit is that decision makers within these firms have been provided with poor information, insufficient information, and, in many cases, misinformation, and the main cause for this is that these firms were manifestly poor at information management and creation. While the S&L crisis triggered the largest number of bank closures, the bursting of the tech and housing bubbles, and the ensuing liquidity crisis of 2008, also forced many institutions to close. And in far more cases, institutions that did not fail saw their profitability greatly reduced by inefficiencies, losses, and fines—most of which could have been avoided with the appropriate amount of investment in system architecture and process redesign. Recent examples of significant regulatory fines related to information processing failures include:

      $25 billion: Wells Fargo, JPMorgan Chase, Citigroup, Bank of America, Ally Financial (2012)

      $13 billion: JPMorgan Chase (2013)

      $9.3 billion: Bank of America, Wells Fargo, JPMorgan Chase, and 10 others (2013)

      $8.5 billion: Bank of America (June 2011)

      $2.6 billion: Credit Suisse (May 2014)

      $1.9 billion: HSBC (2012)

      $1.5 billion: UBS (2012)

      Taken together, these historical facts show how even very large financial institutions can suffer or even cease to exist if they fail to embrace technological innovation, or embrace it without a commensurate investment in the information management capability required to effectively evaluate risk. Thus, the stylized facts that should concern current financial institutions are:

      Firms entering the market, particularly those entering with some technological advantage, are a threat.

      Excessive risk taking based on impaired risk assessments (often the result of technological innovation without the supporting information flow) is a threat.

      The likelihood that any firm succumbing to these threats will be expelled from the market is high.

      Poor information management itself has causes. In some cases, the underlying causes may have included a regulatory (and rating agency) arbitrage in which financial institutions were incented to do the minimum while benefiting from things like deposit insurance (an explicit stamp of approval from regulatory authorities) and high public ratings from rating agencies, or even the implicit stamp of approval that comes purely from compliance and the absence of regulatory censure. But more importantly and more generally, low industry standards for excellence in information processing have meant the absence of competitive pressures to innovate and excel. This environment, which has persisted for decades, is now coming to an end.

      Cultural Issues

      While identifying more effective management of information assets as a key strategic objective for the firm is a good first step, implementing an effective strategic management process is not without challenges within a modern financial institution. Among those are serious cultural and organizational challenges that can work against the development and deployment of an integrated approach to information management. One such challenge is so pervasive and so constraining that it deserves special consideration. Within the broader fabric of corporate culture, there lies

      Enjoying the preview?
      Page 1 of 1