Everand Logo

Welcome to Everand!

  • Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

    From $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

    The philosophy of B*rtr*nd R*ss*ll
    The philosophy of B*rtr*nd R*ss*ll
    The philosophy of B*rtr*nd R*ss*ll
    Ebook209 pages1 hour

    The philosophy of B*rtr*nd R*ss*ll

    By Philip E. B. Jordain

    ()

    Read preview
    LanguageEnglish
    PublisherArchive Classics
    Release dateNov 26, 2013
    The philosophy of B*rtr*nd R*ss*ll

    Related to The philosophy of B*rtr*nd R*ss*ll

    Related ebooks

    Related podcast episodes

    Reviews for The philosophy of B*rtr*nd R*ss*ll

    0 ratings

    0 ratings0 reviews

    What did you think?

    Tap to rate

    Review must be at least 10 words

      Book preview

      The philosophy of B*rtr*nd R*ss*ll - Philip E. B. Jordain

      The Project Gutenberg EBook of The philosophy of B*rtr*nd R*ss*ll, by Various

      This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with

      almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or

      re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included

      with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org

      Title: The philosophy of B*rtr*nd R*ss*ll

      Author: Various

      Editor: Philip E. B. Jordain

      Release Date: December 28, 2011 [EBook #38430]

      Language: English

      *** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE PHILOSOPHY OF B*RTR*ND R*SS*LL ***

      Produced by Adrian Mastronardi and the Online Distributed

      Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This file was

      produced from images generously made available by The

      Internet Archive/Canadian Libraries)

      THE PHILOSOPHY OF

      MR. B*RTR*ND R*SS*LL

      WITH AN APPENDIX OF LEADING

      PASSAGES FROM CERTAIN OTHER WORKS

      EDITED BY

      PHILIP E. B. JOURDAIN

      LONDON: GEORGE ALLEN & UNWIN LTD.

      RUSKIN HOUSE             40 MUSEUM STREET, W.C. 1

      CHICAGO: THE OPEN COURT PUBLISHING CO.

      First published in 1918

      (All rights reserved)

      EDITOR’S NOTE

      When Mr. B*rtr*nd R*ss*ll, following the advice of Mr. W*ll**m J*m*s, again got into touch with reality and in July 1911 was torn to pieces by Anti-Suffragists, many of whom were political opponents of Mr. R*ss*ll and held strong views on the Necessity of Protection of Trade and person, a manuscript which was almost ready for the press was fortunately saved from the flames on the occasion when a body of eager champions of the Sacredness of Personal Property burnt the late Mr. R*ss*ll’s house. This manuscript, together with some further fragments found in the late Mr. R*ss*ll’s own interleaved copy of his Prayer-Book of Free Man’s Worship, which was fortunately rescued with a few of the great author’s other belongings, was first given to the world in the Monist for October 1911 and January 1916, and has here been arranged and completed by some other hitherto undecipherable manuscripts. The title of the above-mentioned Prayer-Book, it may perhaps be mentioned, was apparently suggested to Mr. R*ss*ll by that of the Essay on The Free Man’s Worship in the Philosophical Essays (London, 1910, pp. 59-70[1]) of Mr. R*ss*ll’s distinguished contemporary, Mr. Bertrand Russell, from whom much of Mr. R*ss*ll’s philosophy was derived. And, indeed, the influence of Mr. Russell extended even beyond philosophical views to arrangement and literary style. The method of arrangement of the present work seems to have been borrowed from Mr. Russell’s Philosophy of Leibniz of 1900; in the selection of subjects dealt with, Mr. R*ss*ll seems to have been guided by Mr. Russell’s Principles of Mathematics of 1903; while Mr. R*ss*ll’s literary style fortunately reminds us more of Mr. Russell’s later clear and charming subtleties than his earlier brilliant and no less subtle obscurities. But, on the other hand, some important points of Mr. Russell’s doctrine, which first appeared in books published after Mr. R*ss*ll’s death, were anticipated in Mr. R*ss*ll’s notes, and these anticipations, so interesting for future historians of philosophy, have been provided by the editor with references to the later works of Mr. Russell. All editorial notes are enclosed in square brackets, to indicate that they were not written by the late Mr. R*ss*ll.

      At the present time we have come to take a calm view of the question so much debated seven years ago as to the legitimacy of logical arguments in political discussions. No longer, fortunately, can that intense feeling be roused which then found expression in the famous cry, Justice—right or wrong, and which played such a large part in the politics of that time. Thus it will not be out of place in this unimpassioned record of some of the truths and errors in the world to refer briefly to Mr. R*ss*ll’s short and stormy career. Before he was torn to pieces, he had been forbidden to lecture on philosophy or mathematics by some well-intentioned advocates of freedom in speech who thought that the cause of freedom might be endangered by allowing Mr. R*ss*ll to speak freely on points of logic, on the grounds, apparently, that logic is both harmful and unnecessary and might be applied to politics unless strong measures were taken for its suppression. On much the same grounds, his liberty was taken from him by those who remarked that, if necessary, they would die in defence of the sacred principle of liberty; and it was in prison that the greater part of the present work was written. Shortly after his liberation, which, like all actions of public bodies, was brought about by the combined honour and interests of those in authority, occurred his lamentable death to which we have referred above.

      Mr. R*ss*ll maintained that the chief use of implication in politics is to draw conclusions, which are thought to be true, and which are consequently false, from identical propositions, and we can see these views expressed in Chapters III and XIX of the present work. These chapters were apparently written before the Government, in the spring of 1910, arrived at the famous secret decision that only certain implications are permitted in discussion. Naturally the secret decision gave rise to much speculation among logicians as to which kinds of implication were barred, and Mr. R*ss*ll and Mr. Bertrand Russell had many arguments on the subject, which naturally could not be published at the time. However, after Mr. R*ss*ll’s death, successive prosecutions which were made by the Government at last made it quite clear that the opinion held by Mr. R*ss*ll was the correct one. There had been numerous prosecutions of people who, from true but not identical premisses, had deduced true conclusions, so that the possible legitimate forms of implication were reduced. Further, the other doubtful cases were cleared up in course of time by the prosecution of (1) members of the Aristotelian Society for deducing true conclusions from false premisses; (2) members of the Mind Association for deducing false conclusions from false premisses; and also by the attempted prosecution of an eminent lady for deducing true conclusions from identities. Fortunately this lady was able to defend herself successfully by pleading that one eminent philosopher believed them to be true—which, of course, means that the conclusions are false. Thus appeared the true nature of legitimate political arguments.

      [1] [This Essay is also reprinted in Mr. Russell’s Mysticism and Logic, London and New York, 1918, pp. 46-57.—

      Ed.

      ]

      Even a joke should have some meaning....

      (The Red Queen, T. L. G., p. 105).

      CONTENTS

      ABBREVIATIONS

      Enjoying the preview?
      Page 1 of 1