Everand Logo

Welcome to Everand!

  • Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

    From $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

    Morality: Restoring the Common Good in Divided Times
    Morality: Restoring the Common Good in Divided Times
    Morality: Restoring the Common Good in Divided Times
    Audiobook14 hours

    Morality: Restoring the Common Good in Divided Times

    Written by Jonathan Sacks

    Narrated by Jonathan Sacks

    4.5/5

    ()

    About this audiobook

    A distinguished religious leader's stirring case for reconstructing a shared framework of virtues and values.

    With liberal democracy embattled, public discourse grown toxic, family life breaking down, and drug abuse and depression on the rise, many fear what the future holds.

    In Morality, respected faith leader and public intellectual Jonathan Sacks traces today's crisis to our loss of a strong, shared moral code and our elevation of self-interest over the common good. We have outsourced morality to the market and the state, but neither is capable of showing us how to live. Sacks leads readers from ancient Greece to the Enlightenment to the present day to show that there is no liberty without morality and no freedom without responsibility, arguing that we all must play our part in rebuilding a common moral foundation.

    A major work of moral philosophy, Morality is an inspiring vision of a world in which we can all find our place and face the future without fear.

    LanguageEnglish
    PublisherHachette Audio
    Release dateSep 1, 2020
    ISBN9781549104848
    Morality: Restoring the Common Good in Divided Times
    Author

    Jonathan Sacks

    Rabbi Lord Jonathan Sacks is former Chief Rabbi of the United Kingdom and the Commonwealth.

    Related to Morality

    Related audiobooks

    History & Theory For You

    View More
    View More

    Related podcast episodes

    Related articles

    • UNLIMITED

      Don’t Call Donald Trump a Fascist

      Jan 21, 2020

      Don’t Call Donald Trump a Fascist
      14 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      In The Mood To Change The World

      Sep 10, 2020

      In The Mood To Change The World
      6 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      Liberalism, More or Less

      Jul 11, 2022

      Liberalism, More or Less
      6 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      Populism Is Meaningless

      Mar 14, 2020

      Populism Is Meaningless
      7 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      I Was A Teenage Marxist

      Jun 2, 2021

      Epidemic is a useful term, and not only in medicine. An infection that strikes suddenly and induces panic: that is a good way of describing other, non-medical diseases. Today, we are in the grip of just such an epidemic: wokery. It too is inducing wi

      3 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      Going It Alone Isn’t An Option

      Mar 27, 2020

      Going It Alone Isn’t An Option
      3 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      Mad as Hell

      Aug 11, 2021

      Mad as Hell
      21 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      The Liberal Disorder

      Sep 25, 2022

      The Liberal Disorder
      4 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      Culture Clash

      Jan 12, 2021

      Culture Clash
      4 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      Don’t Turn Inward

      Nov 13, 2024

      Don’t Turn Inward
      6 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      The Power of “We”

      Dec 4, 2020

      The Power of “We”
      3 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      The Power of “We”

      Dec 4, 2020

      The Power of “We”
      3 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      Civilization Over Nation

      Feb 4, 2023

      Civilization Over Nation
      3 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      Civilization Over Nation

      Feb 3, 2023

      Civilization Over Nation
      3 min read

    • UNLIMITED

      Wait, Wasn’t Peter Thiel a Libertarian?

      Jun 19, 2020

      ELEVEN DAYS AFTER the first case of an American suffering from COVID-19 was reported, an essayist at an online journal run by the Claremont Institute—whose stated purpose is to “restore the principles of the American Founding to their rightful, preem

      16 min read

    Related categories

    Reviews for Morality

    4.5/5

    18 ratings2 reviews

    What did you think?

    Tap to rate

    Review must be at least 10 words

    • 3/5
      One of the advantages of an e-reader is that you can perfectly check how many times a certain word occurs in a book. In this case, Jonathan Sacks uses the word 'morality' more than 500 times, roughly twice per page. He literally slaps you in the face with it. There is nothing wrong with that, unless the author does not properly explain what he means by that word. And that is somewhat the case here.

      Jonathan Sacks (1948-2020) was a prominent voice in the field of societal responsibility. For decades he was Chief Rabbi of the Jewish Community in the United Kingdom, and in that capacity also a member of the House of Lords. In other words, someone who was constantly acting on the public stage. And that is clearly noticeable in this book, where he examines the loss of a common morality in our modern society. Using a striking image he speaks of a 'cultural climate change': universal moral values have given way to relativism and 'devaluation' of the common good.

      Sacks analyzes how it has come to this, in a very detailed argument, where the emphasis is on the bad consequences of individualism gone too far, and with the cultural revolution of the 1960s and postmodernism in a leading role. He occasionally suggests that the loss of a common moral pedestal threatens to degenerate into decadence and decay, with the obligatory reference to the end of the Roman Empire. Sacks clearly couldn’t avoid the dangerous cliff of the clichés. Moreover, this example makes it clear that he primarily has in mind the social, unifying function of morality. In that sense, his concept of morality is closely related to Emile Durkheim's concept of religion. Hence the suggestion by some reviewers that the title of this book should have been on what is now the subtitle, namely 'restoring the common good in divided times'. By the way, the term 'common good' only appears about 80 times.

      It should therefore come as no surprise that at the end of his book Sacks argues for a new covenant, a commitment by citizens in a society to appreciate that collective good, to respect other opinions and try to look for the middle ground, knowing that our society has become far more complex and diverse than, say, 100 years ago: “We can no longer build national identity on religion or ethnicity or culture. But we can build it on covenant. A covenantal politics would speak of how, as a polity, an economy and culture, our fates are bound together. We benefit from each other. And because this is so, we should feel bound to benefit one another. It would speak about the best of our traditions, and how they are a heritage we are charged with honouring and handing on to future generations. It would be warmly inclusive. A nation is enlarged by its new arrivals who carry with them gifts from other places and other traditions. It would acknowledge that, yes, we have differences of opinion and interest, and sometimes that means favouring one side over another. But we will never do so without giving every side a voice and a respectful hearing. The politics of covenant does not demean or ridicule opponents. It honours the process of reasoning together. It gives special concern to those who most need help, and special honour to those who most give help.”

      Of course, I can only adhere to such a plea against polarization; it is a necessary condition to help to build up a rightful society. But at the same time it isn't a sufficient one, it’s very clear that it stops short of offering real and helpful proposals to reach that middle ground, of offering a positive project. In other words, Sacks’ discourse remains stuck in vagueness, only pleading for a general kind of tolerance. So, despite its commendable perspective and its discussion of pertinent issues of our society, this book did not live up to its expectations. Maybe that’s also because it also leaves a lot to be desired in terms of form: at various times you seem to be reading a general intellectual treatise, a collection of interesting but divergent reflections, rather than a book focused on a central topic.
    • 4/5
      Read this if you share Sacks' (and my) concern for the real and imminent threat to the norms of society and democracy that have served us reasonably well for the past century.
      My one negative about this moving and readable book is that Sacks focuses too much on the USA experience and fails to note the significant differences between the USA and the UK. While we (UK) do have a distressing tendency to follow where America leads, I believe we still have time on this side of the pond to notice and avoid the dire depths to which discourse has sunk 'over there'.