Playwright vs Selenium: Which to choose in 2025

Know the core difference between Playwright & Selenium and when to use which for web browser automation

Guide Banner Image
Home Guide Playwright vs Selenium: Which to choose in 2025

Playwright vs Selenium: Which to choose in 2025

Cross-browser testing is essential to ensure seamless user experiences across devices and browsers. While Selenium has been a popular choice for automated browser testing, tools like Playwright offer newer features and faster performance.

Overview

Playwright and Selenium are popular automation frameworks for web testing, each offering unique strengths. While Selenium is a long-established tool with broad language support and a large community, Playwright provides faster execution, modern features, and better handling of dynamic web elements.

Difference between Playwright and Selenium

  • Launch and Modernity: Selenium is mature, having been around since 2004, whereas Playwright is newer, introduced in 2019 to meet modern testing needs.
  • Browser Support: Playwright supports Chromium, Firefox, and WebKit with a unified API; meanwhile, Selenium supports more browsers but requires separate drivers for each.
  • Speed and Performance: Playwright runs tests faster due to native browser control; however, Selenium tends to be slower because of its older architecture.
  • Handling Dynamic Content: Playwright handles dynamic content efficiently with automatic waits, whereas Selenium relies on manual waits, which can cause flaky tests.
  • Setup and Ease of Use: Playwright offers a simpler and quicker setup, whereas Selenium’s setup is more complex due to multiple drivers and configurations.

This article covers Playwright vs Selenium in detail to help you choose the most appropriate framework for your website test automation.

Playwright vs Selenium Comparison

Below are the key differences between Playwright and Selenium

CriteriaPlaywrightSelenium
LanguageSupports multiple languages such as JavaScript, Java, Python, and .NET C#Supports multiple languages such as Java, Python, C#, Ruby, Perl, PHP, and JavaScript
Ease of InstallationEasy to InstallEasy to Install
Test Runner Frameworks SupportedMocha, Jest, JasmineSelenium is a library and can be used with Test runners like JUnit, TestNG, NUnit etc.
Trace ViewerComes with Trace viewer to run and debug tests which is very convenient and Powerful toolNo Such features and depends completely on Test Runner to debug and execute tests
PrerequisitesNodeJS should be installedJava, Eclipse IDE, SeleniumStandalone Server, Client Language Bindings, and Browser Drivers should be installed
Operating Systems SupportedWindows, Linux, and Mac OSWindows, Linux, Solaris, and Mac OS
Open SourceOpen Source and FreeOpen Source and Free
ArchitectureHeadless Browser with event-driven architectureLayered Architecture based on JSON Wire Protocol but also support Headless Browsers
Browsers SupportedChromium, Firefox, and WebKitChrome, Firefox, IE, Edge, Opera, Safari, and more
SupportSince Playwright is fairly new, the support from the community is limited as compared to SeleniumProvides commercial support for its users via its sponsors in Selenium Ecosystem and self-support documents. Strong community support from professionals across the world
Real Devices SupportSupports real device clouds and remote serversSupports real device clouds and remote servers

What is Playwright?

Playwright is an open-source, Node.js-based framework developed by Microsoft for end-to-end testing of web applications. It enables automation of browser interactions across multiple browsers, including Chrome, Firefox, and WebKit, making it ideal for cross-browser testing.

Created by the team behind Puppeteer (Google’s headless browser testing framework for Chrome), Playwright extends its capabilities by supporting a wider range of browsers and platforms, including Windows, Linux, and macOS. It integrates smoothly with CI/CD pipelines and popular testing frameworks like Jest, Jasmine, and Mocha.

Playwright also supports multiple programming languages such as JavaScript, Python, Java, and C#, offering flexibility to QA teams. Its powerful features, like auto-wait for elements, parallel testing with browser contexts, and built-in actionability checks, make it a robust solution for testing complex web applications with speed, accuracy, and reliability.

Key Features of Playwright

Playwright offers a range of powerful features designed to simplify and enhance cross-browser testing, especially for complex applications:

  • Wide Cross-Browser Coverage: This tool is useful for testing complex applications, as it supports multiple browsers and is accurate and fast.
  • End-to-End Testing API: It provides a high-level API for controlling headless browsers seamlessly.
  • Auto-Wait Mechanism: Automatically waits for the UI to be ready, reducing the need for explicit wait code.
  • Flexible Testing Capabilities: Supports a wide range of complex scenarios for comprehensive testing.
  • Reliable Auto-Wait Checks: Performs checks like Attached, Visible, Stable, Receive Events, and Enabled before executing actions to ensure accuracy.
  • Parallel Test Execution: Supports simultaneous testing through isolated Browser Contexts, improving scalability.
  • Efficient Resource Usage: Uses a single browser instance to create multiple concurrent contexts that scale based on testing volume.

How to run Playwright tests

While Playwright launches browsers in the headless mode by default, it can also run the browsers in headful mode. By passing a flag, when the browser is launched, Playwright can be used to run browsers in headful mode for tests.

The following code can be used to launch a headful browser:

const { chromium } = require('playwright'); 

//to launch the headful browser for firefox and webkit, replace chromium by firefox and webkit

const browser = await chromium.launch({ headless: false });

For Linux systems, xvfb is essential for launching headful browsers. Since xvfb is pre-installed in Docker Image and Github Action, running xvfb before the Node.js command allows the browsers to run in the headful mode.

xvfb-run node index.js

What is Selenium?

Selenium is an open-source automation testing suite that is widely used for the automation testing of web applications. It automates browsers and interacts with UI elements to replicate user actions to test whether a web application is functioning as expected.

Through its single interface, the Selenium framework allows the tester to write test scripts in different languages such as Java, Ruby, Perl, C#, NodeJS, Python, and PHP, offering flexibility.

Selenium supports a wide range of browsers and their different versions to enable cross browser testing of web applications.

It is the most popular framework to test websites and ensure seamless and consistent user experiences across different browser and device combinations.

That is why Selenium is one of the most trusted automated testing suites in the software industry.

Key Features of Selenium

Selenium is a widely trusted and popular automated testing framework known for its extensive browser support and flexibility:

  • Browser Compatibility: Selenium supports a wide range of browsers and their various versions, enabling thorough cross-browser testing of web applications.
  • Popular and Trusted Framework: It is one of the most popular tools for testing websites, ensuring consistent and seamless user experiences across different browsers and devices.
  • Robust Community and Ecosystem: With a large and active community, Selenium offers extensive resources, plugins, and integrations to enhance testing capabilities.
  • Multi-Language Support: Selenium allows test scripts to be written in multiple programming languages such as Java, Python, C#, Ruby, and JavaScript, providing flexibility to testers.
  • Flexible Integration: It can be integrated with numerous testing frameworks and CI/CD tools, supporting smooth automation workflows.
  • Cross-Platform Support: Selenium works on major operating systems, including Windows, macOS, and Linux, allowing versatile test environment setups.

How to run Selenium Tests

Selenium launches browsers in headed mode by default, you can also launch the browser in headless mode by passing the arguments to chromeoptions().

Example to launch browser in headed mode

WebDriver driver = new ChromeDriver(options);
driver.get("https://www.bstackdemo.com/")

Example to launch browser in headless mode

ChromeOptions options = new ChromeOptions();

options.addArguments("--headless=new");
WebDriver driver = new ChromeDriver(options);
driver.get("https://www.bstackdemo.com/");

First initialize an object of ChromeOptions() and then add the argument “–headless=new” which is then passed to ChromeDriver.

BrowserStack Automate Banner

Key Differences in Playwright vs Selenium: Explained

Selenium and Playwright are both powerful web automation tools, but they differ in architecture, speed, browser support, and community adoption. While Selenium has been the industry standard for years, Playwright offers modern features and faster execution.

Choosing between them depends on your testing needs, such as language support, execution speed, and real device testing. Below are the key differences:

  • Architecture: Selenium uses the WebDriver API and HTTP requests, while Playwright relies on a persistent WebSocket connection, making it faster and more efficient.
  • Browser Support: Selenium supports a wider range of browsers, including Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, and Opera, whereas Playwright supports Chromium, Firefox, and WebKit.
  • Execution Speed: Playwright’s WebSocket-based communication reduces latency and speeds up test execution, whereas Selenium’s HTTP-based approach can be slower.
  • Language Support: Selenium supports Java, Python, C#, Ruby, PHP, and JavaScript, while Playwright primarily supports JavaScript, TypeScript, Python, C#, and Java.
  • Real Device Testing: Selenium integrates with real device clouds for mobile and desktop testing, whereas Playwright primarily offers native mobile emulation with limited real device support.
  • Headless Testing: Playwright is designed with built-in headless browser support, whereas Selenium requires additional configuration for headless execution.
  • Community and Ecosystem: Selenium has a larger, well-established community with extensive documentation, while Playwright, being newer, has a smaller but rapidly growing community.
  • Test Runner and Frameworks: Selenium supports popular frameworks like JUnit, TestNG, and WebDriverIO, while Playwright is commonly used with Jest, Mocha, and Vitest.
  • Integration with CI/CD: Both Selenium and Playwright integrate with CI/CD tools, but Playwright offers more seamless integration with modern DevOps workflows.
  • Ease of Setup: Selenium requires setting up browser drivers and language bindings, whereas Playwright has a simpler setup with built-in browser binaries.

Playwright vs Selenium: Which to choose?

Both Playwright and Selenium have advantages and limitations, which means choosing between them is subjective to the scenario they will be used for. It depends on the project requirements and the priorities to choose one among these two testing frameworks.

When to Use Selenium

  1. Wide Browser Compatibility: Selenium supports various browsers like Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Internet Explorer, Edge, and Opera. It is ideal for testing across multiple browsers, including older versions.
  2. Established and Mature Projects: Selenium is a well-established tool with a large community, extensive documentation, and numerous integrations. It is suitable for projects that need stability and extensive support.
  3. Language Flexibility: Selenium supports multiple programming languages such as Java, C#, Python, Ruby, and JavaScript. It is useful if your team has expertise in a specific language or needs to integrate tests into an existing project using a specific language.
  4. Existing Selenium Infrastructure: If your project already has a Selenium test suite and infrastructure, it may be more practical to continue using Selenium rather than switching to a new tool.

When to Use Playwright

  1. Testing Modern Web Applications: Playwright is designed to test modern web apps, supporting all modern rendering engines (Chromium, WebKit, and Firefox). It handles complex scenarios involving multiple tabs, frames, and web workers efficiently.
  2. Trace Viewer: Playwright Trace Viewer is a GUI tool that helps you explore recorded Playwright traces after the script has run. Traces are a great way for debugging your tests when they fail on CI. You can open traces locally or in your browser on trace.playwright.dev.
  3. Headless Browser Testing: Playwright has built-in support for headless browser testing, which is often faster and more efficient for CI/CD pipelines. While Selenium also supports headless mode, Playwright’s implementation is more streamlined.
  4. Handling Complex Interactions: Playwright offers advanced features such as automatic waiting, network interception, and support for multiple pages/tabs, making it easier to write tests for complex user interactions.
  5. Consistent API Across Browsers: Playwright’s API is consistent across all supported browsers, which simplifies cross-browser testing and maintenance.
  6. Parallel Test Execution: Playwright supports running tests concurrently across multiple browsers and contexts, making it faster and more efficient for large test suites unless like Selenium where we need to set up Selenium Grid to run the tests in parallel.

Talk to an Expert

Why Run Selenium and Playwright Tests on Real Devices

Here’s why you should run Selenium or Playwright Tests on Real Devices using BrowserStack Automate:

  • Diverse Environment Testing: It enables the execution of Selenium or Playwright tests across a broad selection of browsers and operating systems, eliminating the necessity for maintaining local testing infrastructure. This ensures consistent application performance across various platforms.
  • Concurrent Test Execution: By allowing simultaneous execution of multiple Selenium or Playwright test suites, BrowserStack Automate significantly cuts down on total testing time, facilitating quicker iterative feedback and accelerated deployment cycles.
  • CI/CD Integration: The platform seamlessly integrates with major continuous integration and delivery systems, including Jenkins, Travis CI, CircleCI, and GitHub Actions, automating the testing process within the development pipeline.
  • Diagnostic Tools for better debugging: BrowserStack provides comprehensive diagnostic capabilities, including detailed logs, screenshots, and video recordings of test sessions, aiding in the swift identification and resolution of issues.
  • Testing on Real Devices: Beyond simulated environments, BrowserStack also supports testing on real devices and browsers on the cloud, offering more precise and real-world test outcomes.
  • Customizable Test Execution: Users can tailor test executions to meet specific needs through BrowserStack’s user interface or APIs, enabling adaptable and controlled test runs.

Conclusion

Regardless of the chosen test automation framework, cross-browser testing remains essential. It is the only way to ensure that websites deliver a seamless and consistent user experience, no matter the device, browser, or OS used.

However, relying solely on emulators and simulators does not provide the accuracy of real user conditions. For both manual and automated testing, it is crucial to test websites and apps on real devices for reliable, comprehensive, and accurate results.

BrowserStack’s real device cloud offers instant, on-demand access to over 3500+ real browser and devices combinations. It also provides a scalable cloud Selenium Grid for automated testing, enabling faster execution through parallel testing.

With seamless integrations with popular CI/CD tools like Jira, Jenkins, TeamCity, and Travis CI, and built-in debugging tools to identify and resolve bugs quickly, BrowserStack helps teams deliver high-quality, user-friendly web experiences across every platform.

Useful Resources for Selenium

Methods, Classes, and Commands

Configuration

XPath

Locators and Selectors

Waits in Selenium

Frameworks in Selenium

Miscellaneous

Best Practices, Tips and Tricks

Design Patterns in Selenium: Page Object Model and Page Factory

Action Class

TestNG and Selenium

JUnit and Selenium

Use Cases

Types of Testing with Selenium

Useful Resources for Playwright

Tool Comparisons:

Try Automation Testing on Cloud

Tags
Playwright Selenium