Guest talk given at the University of Copenhagen 26 March, 2015. I render the notion and typological validity of the so called Second-Position Phenomena, i.e. principles of linearization sensitive to the distance from the clausal (or...
moreGuest talk given at the University of Copenhagen 26 March, 2015.
I render the notion and typological validity of the so called Second-Position Phenomena, i.e. principles of linearization sensitive to the distance from the clausal (or phrasal) left edge rather than to the type of the preceding syntactic category.
The most famous syntactic constraint of this type is Wackernagel’s law (CL2) , a principle predicting clausal-second position of clustering clitics, i.e. weak stressed elements forming clusters. In my talk, I’ll propose a classification of word order systems with clustering clause-level clitics attested in genetically not related worlds language’s, including Slavic languages from the Indo-European family, and discuss the triggers and parameters of clitic-external ordering and clitic-internal ordering.
Another well-known syntactic constraint is the Verb-Second constraint (V2), in its canonic form attested in Germanic languages (except for Gothic, English, Old English and Elder Futhark) and Kashmiri. The interest to V2 languages has been revoked by the revival of the so called sentence cartography, which is a universalist version of the Template analysis proposed in 1930-1950s by the structuralists from the Prague and Copenhagen Linguistic Circles (Da. : sætningsskemaet). I argue against broad definitions of V2 and deny the existence of the so called ‘partial V2 languages’, ‘residual V2 languages’ etc., where structures overtly resembling V2 are attested only in one part of declarative clauses.
I claim that neither CL2 nor V2 are principles of Universal Grammar. They are ‘shallow’ constraints of narrow syntax, specific for classes of world’s languages. I’ll discuss syntactic, prosodic and information structure mechanisms, which trigger second-position phenomena, in particular, the so called verb movement and constraints on the cooccurrence of syntactic categories (Comp vs V, Comp vs CL, V vs CL, Comp vs Wh-words etc).
Literature
Beninca, Paola & Poletto, Cecilia. Topic, Focus, and V2. In: L.Rizzi (ed.).The Structure of CP and IP: Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax. Oxford. 2004. P. 52-75.
Bech, Kristin & Salvesen, Christine Meklenborg. Preverbal word order in Old English and Old French. In: Information Structure and Syntactic Change in Germanic and Romance Languages. 2014. Pp. 233 – 269.
Bhatt, Rakesh M. Verb movement and the syntax of Kashmiri. Dordrecht. 1999.
Cardinaletti, Anna & Michal Starke. The Typology of Structural Deficiency: A Case Study of the Three Classes of Pronouns. In: H.van Riemdijk (ed.) Clitics in the Languages of Europe. Berlin, 1999. Pp. 145-233.
Cysouw, Michael. 2005. Morphology in the wrong place. A survey of preposed enclitics. In Wolfgang U. Dressler (ed.) Morphology and its Demarcations, 17-37. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Delbrck, Berthold. Germanische Syntax, Bd.II. Zur Stellung des Verbums. Leipzig, 1911. 76 S.
Diderichsen, Poul. Stningsbygningen i Skaanske Lov. Fremstillet som grundlag for en rationel dansk Syntaks // Acta Philologica Scandinavica 15, Kbenhavn, 1941.
Diderichsen, Poul. Elementr Dansk Grammatik. Kbenhavn, 31976 (11946).
Faarlund J.T., Vannebo K.I., Lie S. Norsk referansegrammatikk. Universitetsforlaget, Oslo, 1997. 1223 p.
Golston Chris & Brian Agbayani. Second position is first-position: Wackernagel’s Law and the role of clausal conjunction. Indogermanische Forschungen 115 (2010). 1-21.
Holmberg, Anders & Platzack, Christer. The Role of Inflection in Scandinavian Syntax. Oxford. 1995.Legendre, Geraldine. Masked second-position effects and the linearization of functional features. In: Optimality-theoretic syntax. Cambridge. 2001. Pp. 241-277.
Holmberg, Anders. Verb Second. In: Syntax – an International Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Research, T.Kiss & A.Alexiadou (eds.). Berlin: De Gruyter, 2012.
Lambrecht, Knud. Information Structure and Sentence Form. Cambridge. 1994.
Lyutikova, Ekaterina & Sergej Tatevosov. The clause internal left edge: Exploring the preverbal position in Ossetian // ICIL3, September 11-13, Paris, 2013.
Pollock J. Y. Verb Movement, Universal Grammar, and the structure of NP // Linguistic inquiry 20 (1989), 365-424.
Roberts, Ian. Phases, Head-movement and Second-Position Effects. In: Phases developing the Framework. Angel E. Gallego (ed.). Berlin: De Gruyter, 2012, 385-440.
Rizzi, Luigi. The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery. In: Elements of Grammar: Handbook of Generative Syntax. Dordrecht. 1997. Pp. 281-337.
Vikner, Sten. Verb Movement and Expletive Subjects in the Germanic Languages // Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax. New York, Oxford. Oxford University Press. 1995.
Wackernagel, Jakob. ber ein Gesetz der indogermanischer Wortstellung // Wackernagel J. Kleine Schriften. Bd. I, Basel, 1953, 1-103.
Wanner, Dieter. Second Position Clitics in Medieval Romance. In: Approaching Second: Second Position Clitics and Related Phenomena. A.L.Halpern & A.M.Zwicky (eds.). Stanford. 1996. Pp. 537-578.
Zimmerling, Anton. Typological Scandinavian syntax. (In Russian). Moscow. 2002.
Zimmerling, Anton. Slavic word order systems from the viewpoint of formal typology. (In Russian) Moscow. 2013.
Zimmerling, Anton, Kosta, Peter. Slavic clitics: a typology. STUF – Language Typology and Universals. Vol. 66. No 2. 2013. Pp. 178-214.