Solid State Physics

Solid State Physics Chetan Nayak Physics 140a Franz 1354; M, W 11:00-12:15 Office Hour: TBA; Knudsen 6-130J Section: MS 7608; F 11:00-11:50 TA: Sumanta Tewari University of California, Los Angeles September 2000 Contents 1 What is Condensed Matter Physics? 1.1 Length, time, energy scales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.2 Microscopic Equations vs. States of Matter, Phase Transitions, Critical 1 1 Points . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 1.3 Broken Symmetries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 1.4 Experimental probes: X-ray scattering, neutron scattering, NMR, thermodynamic, transport . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 1.5 The Solid State: metals, insulators, magnets, superconductors . . . . 4 1.6 Other phases: liquid crystals, quasicrystals, polymers, glasses . . . . . 5 2 Review of Quantum Mechanics 7 2.1 States and Operators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 2.2 Density and Current . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 2.3 δ-function scatterer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 2.4 Particle in a Box . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 2.5 Harmonic Oscillator . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 2.6 Double Well . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 2.7 Spin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 2.8 Many-Particle Hilbert Spaces: Bosons, Fermions . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 3 Review of Statistical Mechanics 18 ii 3.1 Microcanonical, Canonical, Grand Canonical Ensembles . . . . . . . . 18 3.2 Bose-Einstein and Planck Distributions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 3.2.1 Bose-Einstein Statistics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 3.2.2 The Planck Distribution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 3.3 Fermi-Dirac Distribution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 3.4 Thermodynamics of the Free Fermion Gas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 3.5 Ising Model, Mean Field Theory, Phases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 4 Broken Translational Invariance in the Solid State 30 4.1 Simple Energetics of Solids . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 4.2 Phonons: Linear Chain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 4.3 Quantum Mechanics of a Linear Chain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 4.3.1 Statistical Mechnics of a Linear Chain . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 4.4 Lessons from the 1D chain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 4.5 Discrete Translational Invariance: the Reciprocal Lattice, Brillouin Zones, Crystal Momentum . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 4.6 Phonons: Continuum Elastic Theory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 4.7 Debye theory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 4.8 More Realistic Phonon Spectra: Optical Phonons, van Hove Singularities 46 4.9 Lattice Structures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 4.9.1 Bravais Lattices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 4.9.2 Reciprocal Lattices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 4.9.3 Bravais Lattices with a Basis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 4.10 Bragg Scattering . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 5 Electronic Bands 57 5.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 5.2 Independent Electrons in a Periodic Potential: Bloch’s theorem . . . 57 iii 5.3 Tight-Binding Models . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59 5.4 The δ-function Array . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64 5.5 Nearly Free Electron Approximation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 5.6 Some General Properties of Electronic Band Structure . . . . . . . . 68 5.7 The Fermi Surface . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 5.8 Metals, Insulators, and Semiconductors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71 5.9 Electrons in a Magnetic Field: Landau Bands . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74 5.9.1 79 The Integer Quantum Hall Effect . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iv Chapter 1 What is Condensed Matter Physics? 1.1 Length, time, energy scales We will be concerned with: • ω, T ≪ 1eV • |xi − xj |, 1q ≫ 1Å as compared to energies in the M eV for nuclear matter, and GeV or even T eV , in particle physics. The properties of matter at these scales is determined by the behavior of collections of many (∼ 1023 ) atoms. In general, we will be concerned with scales much smaller than those at which gravity becomes very important, which is the domain of astrophysics and cosmology. 1 2 Chapter 1: What is Condensed Matter Physics? 1.2 Microscopic Equations vs. States of Matter, Phase Transitions, Critical Points Systems containing many particles exhibit properties which are special to such systems. Many of these properties are fairly insensitive to the details at length scales shorter than 1Å and energy scales higher than 1eV – which are quite adequately described by the equations of non-relativistic quantum mechanics. Such properties are emergent. For example, precisely the same microscopic equations of motion – Newton’s equations – can describe two different systems of 1023 H2 O molecules. X d2~xi ~ i V (~xi − ~xj ) m 2 =− ∇ dt j6=i (1.1) Or, perhaps, the Schrödinger equation:  − 2 h̄ X 2m i ∇2i + X i,j  V (~xi − ~xj ) ψ (~x1 , . . . , ~xN ) = E ψ (~x1 , . . . , ~xN ) (1.2) However, one of these systems might be water and the other ice, in which case the properties of the two systems are completely different, and the similarity between their microscopic descriptions is of no practical consequence. As this example shows, many-particle systems exhibit various phases – such as ice and water – which are not, for the most part, usefully described by the microscopic equations. Instead, new low-energy, long-wavelength physics emerges as a result of the interactions among large numbers of particles. Different phases are separated by phase transitions, at which the low-energy, long-wavelength description becomes non-analytic and exhibits singularities. In the above example, this occurs at the freezing point of water, where its entropy jumps discontinuously. Chapter 1: What is Condensed Matter Physics? 1.3 3 Broken Symmetries As we will see, different phases of matter are distinguished on the basis of symmetry. The microscopic equations are often highly symmetrical – for instance, Newton’s laws are translationally and rotationally invariant – but a given phase may exhibit much less symmetry. Water exhibits the full translational and rotational symmetry of of Newton’s laws; ice, however, is only invariant under the discrete translational and rotational group of its crystalline lattice. We say that the translational and rotational symmetries of the microscopic equations have been spontaneously broken. 1.4 Experimental probes: X-ray scattering, neutron scattering, NMR, thermodynamic, transport There are various experimental probes which can allow an experimentalist to determine in what phase a system is and to determine its quantitative properties: • Scattering: send neutrons or X-rays into the system with prescribed energy, momentum and measure the energy, momentum of the outgoing neutrons or X-rays. • NMR: apply a static magnetic field, B, and measure the absorption and emission by the system of magnetic radiation at frequencies of the order of ωc = geB/m. Essentially the scattering of magnetic radiation at low frequency by a system in a uniform B field. • Thermodynamics: measure the response of macroscopic variables such as the energy and volume to variations of the temperature, pressure, etc. Chapter 1: What is Condensed Matter Physics? 4 • Transport: set up a potential or thermal gradient, ∇ϕ, ∇T and measure the electrical or heat current ~j, ~jQ . The gradients ∇ϕ, ∇T can be held constant or made to oscillate at finite frequency. 1.5 The Solid State: metals, insulators, magnets, superconductors In the solid state, translational and rotational symmetries are broken by the arrangement of the positive ions. It is precisely as a result of these broken symmetries that solids are solid, i.e. that they are rigid. It is energetically favorable to break the symmetry in the same way in different parts of the system. Hence, the system resists attempts to create regions where the residual translational and rotational symmetry groups are different from those in the bulk of the system. The broken symmetry can be detected using X-ray or neutron scattering: the X-rays or neutrons are scattered by the ions; if the ions form a lattice, the X-rays or neutrons are scattered coherently, forming a diffraction pattern with peaks. In a crystalline solid, discrete subgroups of the translational and rotational groups are preserved. For instance, in a cubic lattice, rotations by π/2 about any of the crystal axes are symmetries of the lattice (as well as all rotations generated by products of these). Translations by one lattice spacing along a crystal axis generate the discrete group of translations. In this course, we will be focussing on crystalline solids. Some examples of noncrystalline solids, such as plastics and glasses will be discussed below. Crystalline solids fall into three general categories: metals, insulators, and superconductors. In addition, all three of these phases can be further subdivided into various magnetic phases. Metals are characterized by a non-zero conductivity at T = 0. Insulators have vanishing conductivity at T = 0. Superconductors have infinite conductivity for Chapter 1: What is Condensed Matter Physics? 5 T < Tc and, furthermore, exhibit the Meissner effect: they expel magnetic fields. In a magnetic material, the electron spins can order, thereby breaking the spinrotational invariance. In a ferromagnet, all of the spins line up in the same direction, thereby breaking the spin-rotational invariance to the subgroup of rotations about this direction while preserving the discrete translational symmetry of the lattice. (This can occur in a metal, an insulator, or a superconductor.) In an antiferromagnet, neighboring spins are oppositely directed, thereby breaking spin-rotational invariance to the subgroup of rotations about the preferred direction and breaking the lattice translational symmetry to the subgroup of translations by an even number of lattice sites. Recently, new states of matter – the fractional quantum Hall states – have been discovered in effectively two-dimensional systems in a strong magnetic field at very low T . Tomorrow’s experiments will undoubtedly uncover new phases of matter. 1.6 Other phases: liquid crystals, quasicrystals, polymers, glasses The liquid – with full translational and rotational symmetry – and the solid – which only preserves a discrete subgroup – are but two examples of possible realizations of translational symmetry. In a liquid crystalline phase, translational and rotational symmetry is broken to a combination of discrete and continuous subgroups. For instance, a nematic liquid crystal is made up of elementary units which are line segments. In the nematic phase, these line segments point, on average, in the same direction, but their positional distribution is as in a liquid. Hence, a nematic phase breaks rotational invariance to the subgroup of rotations about the preferred direction and preserves the full translational invariance. Nematics are used in LCD displays. Chapter 1: What is Condensed Matter Physics? 6 In a smectic phase, on the other hand, the line segments arrange themselves into layers, thereby partially breaking the translational symmetry so that discrete translations perpendicular to the layers and continuous translations along the layers remain unbroken. In the smectic-A phase, the preferred orientational direction is the same as the direction perpendicular to the layers; in the smectic-C phase, these directions are different. In a hexatic phase, a two-dimensional system has broken orientational order, but unbroken translational order; locally, it looks like a triangular lattice. A quasicrystal has rotational symmetry which is broken to a 5-fold discrete subgroup. Translational order is completely broken (locally, it has discrete translational order). Polymers are extremely long molecules. They can exist in solution or a chemical reaction can take place which cross-links them, thereby forming a gel. A glass is a rigid, ‘random’ arrangement of atoms. Glasses are somewhat like ‘snapshots’ of liquids, and are probably non-equilibrium phases, in a sense. Chapter 2 Review of Quantum Mechanics 2.1 States and Operators A quantum mechanical system is defined by a Hilbert space, H, whose vectors, ψ E are associated with the states of the system. A state of the system is represented by E the set of vectors eiα ψ . There are linear operators, Oi which act on this Hilbert space. These operators correspond to physical observables. Finally, there is an inner E E D E product, which assigns a complex number, χ ψ , to any pair of states, ψ , χ . A E state vector, ψ gives a complete description of a system through the expectation D E E D E values, ψ Oi ψ (assuming that ψ is normalized so that ψ ψ = 1), which would be the average values of the corresponding physical observables if we could measure E them on an infinite collection of identical systems each in the state ψ . The adjoint, O† , of an operator is defined according to D χ  Oψ E = D χ O† E  ψ E (2.1) E In other words, the inner product between χ and O ψ is the same as that between E E O† χ and ψ . An Hermitian operator satisfies O = O† 7 (2.2) 8 Chapter 2: Review of Quantum Mechanics while a unitary operator satisfies OO† = O† O = 1 (2.3) eiO (2.4) If O is Hermitian, then is unitary. Given an Hermitian operator, O, its eigenstates are orthogonal, D E D E D λ′ O λ = λ λ ′ λ = λ′ λ′ λ For λ 6= λ′ , D E (2.5) E λ′ λ = 0 (2.6) If there are n states with the same eigenvalue, then, within the subspace spanned by these states, we can pick a set of n mutually orthogonal states. Hence, we can use E E the eigenstates λ as a basis for Hilbert space. Any state ψ can be expanded in the basis given by the eigenstates of O: E ψ = X cλ λ λ E (2.7) with D cλ = λ ψ E (2.8) A particularly important operator is the Hamiltonian, or the total energy, which we will denote by H. Schrödinger’s equation tells us that H determines how a state of the system will evolve in time. ih̄ E ∂ E ψ =Hψ ∂t (2.9) If the Hamiltonian is independent of time, then we can define energy eigenstates, E HE =EE E (2.10) 9 Chapter 2: Review of Quantum Mechanics which evolve in time according to: Et E E E(t) = e−i h̄ E(0) (2.11) An arbitrary state can be expanded in the basis of energy eigenstates: E ψ = X ci Ei i E (2.12) It will evolve according to: E ψ(t) = X cj e−i Ej t h̄ Ej j E (2.13) For example, consider a particle in 1D. The Hilbert space consists of all continuous complex-valued functions, ψ(x). The position operator, x̂, and momentum operator, p̂ are defined by: x̂ · ψ(x) ≡ x ψ(x) ∂ p̂ · ψ(x) ≡ −ih̄ ψ(x) ∂x (2.14) The position eigenfunctions, x δ(x − a) = a δ(x − a) (2.15) are Dirac delta functions, which are not continuous functions, but can be defined as the limit of continuous functions: x2 1 δ(x) = lim √ e− a2 a→0 a π (2.16) The momentum eigenfunctions are plane waves: −ih̄ ∂ ikx e = h̄k eikx ∂x (2.17) Expanding a state in the basis of momentum eigenstates is the same as taking its Fourier transform: ψ(x) = 1 dk ψ̃(k) √ eikx −∞ 2π Z ∞ (2.18) Chapter 2: Review of Quantum Mechanics 10 where the Fourier coefficients are given by: 1 Z∞ dx ψ(x) e−ikx ψ̃(k) = √ −∞ 2π (2.19) h̄2 ∂ 2 H=− 2m ∂x2 (2.20) If the particle is free, then momentum eigenstates are also energy eigenstates: Ĥeikx = h̄2 k 2 ikx e 2m (2.21) If a particle is in a Gaussian wavepacket at the origin at time t = 0, x2 1 ψ(x, 0) = √ e− a2 a π (2.22) Then, at time t, it will be in the state: 1 2 2 h̄k2 t a 1 Z∞ dk √ e−i 2m e− 2 k a eikx ψ(x, t) = √ π 2π −∞ 2.2 (2.23) Density and Current Multiplying the free-particle Schrödinger equation by ψ ∗ , ψ ∗ ih̄ ∂ h̄2 ∗ ∂ 2 ψ=− ψ ψ ∂t 2m ∇2 (2.24) and subtracting the complex conjugate of this equation, we find    ∂ ih̄ ~  ∗ ~ ~ ∗ ψ ∇ · ψ ∇ψ − ∇ψ (ψ ∗ ψ) = ∂t 2m (2.25) This is in the form of a continuity equation, ∂ρ ~ · ~j =∇ ∂t The density and current are given by: ρ = ψ∗ψ (2.26) 11 Chapter 2: Review of Quantum Mechanics ~j =    ih̄  ∗ ~ ~ ∗ ψ ψ ∇ψ − ∇ψ 2m (2.27) The current carried by a plane-wave state is: ~j = h̄ ~k 1 2m (2π)3 2.3 (2.28) δ-function scatterer H=− ψ(x) = h̄2 ∂ 2 + V δ(x) 2m ∂x2    eikx + Re−ikx   T eikx T = R = if x < 0 (2.29) (2.30) if x > 0 1 mV h̄2 k mV i h̄2 k mV − h̄2 k 1− i 1 i (2.31) There is a bound state at: ik = 2.4 mV h̄2 (2.32) Particle in a Box Particle in a 1D region of length L: H=− h̄2 ∂ 2 2m ∂x2 (2.33) ψ(x) = Aeikx + Be−ikx (2.34) has energy E = h̄2 k 2 /2m. ψ(0) = ψ(L) = 0. Therefore, nπ ψ(x) = A sin x L   (2.35) 12 Chapter 2: Review of Quantum Mechanics for integer n. Allowed energies En = h̄2 π 2 n2 2mL2 (2.36) In a 3D box of side L, the energy eigenfunctions are: ny π nz π nx π x sin y sin z ψ(x) = A sin L L L       (2.37) and the allowed energies are:  h̄2 π 2  2 2 2 En = n + n + n x y z 2mL2 2.5 (2.38) Harmonic Oscillator 1 h̄2 ∂ 2 + kx2 H=− 2 2m ∂x 2 Writing ω = q (2.39) k/m, p̃ = p/(km)1/4 , x̃ = x(km)1/4 , H=  1  2 ω p̃ + x̃2 2 (2.40) [p̃, x̃] = −ih̄ (2.41) Raising and lowering operators: √ a = (x̃ + ip̃) / 2h̄ √ a† = (x̃ − ip̃) / 2h̄ (2.42) Hamiltonian and commutation relations: 1 H = h̄ω a a + 2 [a, a† ] = 1  † The commutation relations, [H, a† ] = h̄ωa†  (2.43) 13 Chapter 2: Review of Quantum Mechanics [H, a] = −h̄ωa (2.44) imply that there is a ladder of states, Ha† |Ei = (E + h̄ω) a† |Ei Ha|Ei = (E − h̄ω) a|Ei (2.45) This ladder will continue down to negative energies (which it can’t since the Hamiltonian is manifestly positive definite) unless there is an E0 ≥ 0 such that a|E0 i = 0 (2.46) Such a state has E0 = h̄ω/2. We label the states by their a† a eigenvalues. We have a complete set of H eigenstates, |ni, such that 1 H|ni = h̄ω n + |ni 2   (2.47) and (a† )n |0i ∝ |ni. To get the normalization, we write a† |ni = cn |n + 1i. Then, |cn |2 = hn|aa† |ni = n+1 (2.48) Hence, a† |ni = a|ni = 2.6 √ √ n + 1|n + 1i n|n − 1i (2.49) Double Well h̄2 ∂ 2 + V (x) H=− 2m ∂x2 (2.50) 14 Chapter 2: Review of Quantum Mechanics where V (x) = Symmetrical solutions:     ∞    if |x| > 2a + 2b 0       V0 if b < |x| < a + b if |x| < b    A cos k ′ x with if |x| < b ψ(x) =  (2.51)  cos(k|x| − φ) if b < |x| < a + b ′ k = s k2 − 2mV0 h̄2 (2.52) The allowed k’s are determined by the condition that ψ(a + b) = 0:  φ= n+ 1 π − k(a + b) 2  (2.53) the continuity of ψ(x) at |x| = b: A= cos (kb − φ) cos k ′ b (2.54) and the continuity of ψ ′ (x) at |x| = b: k tan  n+ 1 π − ka = k ′ tan k ′ b 2   (2.55) If k ′ is imaginary, cos → cosh and tan → i tanh in the above equations. Antisymmetrical solutions: ψ(x) =    A sin k ′ x if |x| < b (2.56)   sgn(x) cos(k|x| − φ) if b < |x| < a + b The allowed k’s are now determined by 1 φ= n+ π − k(a + b) 2  A=  cos (kb − φ) sin k ′ b (2.57) (2.58) 15 Chapter 2: Review of Quantum Mechanics k tan  n+ 1 π − ka = − k ′ cot k ′ b 2   (2.59) Suppose we have n wells? Sequences of eigenstates, classified according to their eigenvalues under translations between the wells. 2.7 Spin The electron carries spin-1/2. The spin is described by a state in the Hilbert space: α|+i + β|−i (2.60) spanned by the basis vectors |±i. Spin operators: sx = sy = sz  1   2 0 1  0  1 1   2 1  =  2 i 0  1  0   −i  0   0  −1 Coupling to an external magnetic field:  ~ Hint = −gµB ~s · B (2.61) (2.62) States of a spin in a magnetic field in the ẑ direction: g H|+i = − µB |+i g2 H|−i = µB |−i 2 2.8 (2.63) Many-Particle Hilbert Spaces: Bosons, Fermions When we have a system with many particles, we must now specify the states of all of the particles. If we have two distinguishable particles whose Hilbert spaces are 16 Chapter 2: Review of Quantum Mechanics spanned by the bases E (2.64) E (2.65) i, 1 and α, 2 Then the two-particle Hilbert space is spanned by the set: E E E i, 1; α, 2 ≡ i, 1 ⊗ α, 2 (2.66) Suppose that the two single-particle Hilbert spaces are identical, e.g. the two particles are in the same box. Then the two-particle Hilbert space is: E E E i, j ≡ i, 1 ⊗ j, 2 (2.67) E E If the particles are identical, however, we must be more careful. i, j and j, i must be physically the same state, i.e. E E (2.68) E (2.69) i, j = eiα j, i Applying this relation twice implies that E i, j = e2iα i, j so eiα = ±1. The former corresponds to bosons, while the latter corresponds to fermions. The two-particle Hilbert spaces of bosons and fermions are respectively spanned by: E E (2.70) E E (2.71) i, j + j, i and i, j − j, i The n-particle Hilbert spaces of bosons and fermions are respectively spanned by: X π iπ(1) , . . . , iπ(n) E (2.72) 17 Chapter 2: Review of Quantum Mechanics and X π (−1)π iπ(1) , . . . , iπ(n) E (2.73) In position space, this means that a bosonic wavefunction must be completely symmetric: ψ(x1 , . . . , xi , . . . , xj , . . . , xn ) = ψ(x1 , . . . , xj , . . . , xi , . . . , xn ) (2.74) while a fermionic wavefunction must be completely antisymmetric: ψ(x1 , . . . , xi , . . . , xj , . . . , xn ) = −ψ(x1 , . . . , xj , . . . , xi , . . . , xn ) (2.75) Chapter 3 Review of Statistical Mechanics 3.1 Microcanonical, Canonical, Grand Canonical Ensembles In statistical mechanics, we deal with a situation in which even the quantum state of the system is unknown. The expectation value of an observable must be averaged over: hOi = X i wi hi |O| ii (3.1) where the states |ii form an orthonormal basis of H and wi is the probability of being in state |ii. The wi ’s must satisfy a basis-independent form: P wi = 1. The expectation value can be written in hOi = T r {ρO} where ρ is the density matrix. In the above example, ρ = P wi = 1, i.e. that the probabilities add to 1, is: T r {ρ} = 1 (3.2) i wi |iihi|. P The condition, (3.3) We usually deal with one of three ensembles: the microcanonical emsemble, the canonical ensemble, or the grand canonical ensemble. In the microcanonical ensemble, 18 19 Chapter 3: Review of Statistical Mechanics we assume that our system is isolated, so the energy is fixed to be E, but all states with energy E are taken with equal probability: ρ = C δ(H − E) (3.4) C is a normalization constant which is determined by (3.3). The entropy is given by, S = − ln C (3.5) In other words,  S(E) = ln # of states with energy E  (3.6) Inverse temperature, β = 1/(kB T ): β≡ ∂S ∂E ! (3.7) V Pressure, P : P ≡ kB T ∂S ∂V ! (3.8) E where V is the volume. First law of thermodynamics: ∂S ∂S dE + dV ∂E ∂V (3.9) dE = kB T dS − P dV (3.10) F = E − kB T S (3.11) dF = −kB S dT − P dV (3.12) dS = Free energy: Differential relation: or, 1 S=− kB ∂F ∂T ! V (3.13) 20 Chapter 3: Review of Statistical Mechanics ∂F P =− ∂V ! (3.14) T while E = F + kB T S ! ∂F = F −T ∂T V ∂ F = −T2 ∂T T (3.15) In the canonical ensemble, we assume that our system is in contact with a heat reservoir so that the temperature is constant. Then, ρ = C e−βH (3.16) It is useful to drop the normalization constant, C, and work with an unnormalized density matrix so that we can define the partition function: Z = T r {ρ} (3.17) e−βEa (3.18) or, Z= X a The average energy is: 1X Ea e−βEa Z a ∂ = − ln Z ∂β ∂ ln Z = − kB T 2 ∂T E = (3.19) Hence, F = −kB T ln Z (3.20) The chemical potential, µ, is defined by µ= ∂F ∂N (3.21) 21 Chapter 3: Review of Statistical Mechanics where N is the particle number. In the grand canonical ensemble, the system is in contact with a reservoir of heat and particles. Thus, the temperature and chemical potential are held fixed and ρ = C e−β(H−µN ) (3.22) We can again work with an unnormalized density matrix and construct the grand canonical partition function: Z= X e−β(Ea −µN ) (3.23) ∂ ln Z ∂µ (3.24) N,a The average number is: N = −kB T while the average energy is: E=− 3.2 3.2.1 ∂ ∂ ln Z + µkB T ln Z ∂β ∂µ (3.25) Bose-Einstein and Planck Distributions Bose-Einstein Statistics For a system of free bosons, the partition function Z= X e−β(Ea −µN ) (3.26) Ea ,N can be rewritten in terms of the single-particle eigenstates and the single-particle energies ǫi : Ea = n0 ǫ0 + n1 ǫ1 + . . . Z = X e−β ( P {ni } = Y X i ni n ǫ −µ i i i P n i i −β(ni ǫi −µni ) e (3.27) ) ! 22 Chapter 3: Review of Statistical Mechanics = Y i 1 (3.28) 1 − e−β(ǫi −µ) hni i = 1 (3.29) eβ(ǫi −µ) − 1 The chemical potential is chosen so that N = X i = hni i 1 X eβ(ǫi −µ) X hni i ǫi i (3.30) −1 The energy is given by E = i = X i ǫi β(ǫ −µ) e i (3.31) −1 N is increased by increasing µ (µ ≤ 0 always). Bose-Einstein condensation occurs when N> X i6=0 hni i (3.32) In such a case, hn0 i must become large. This occurs when µ = 0. 3.2.2 The Planck Distribution Suppose N is not fixed, but is arbitrary, e.g. the numbers of photons and neutrinos are not fixed. Then there is no Lagrange multiplier µ and hni i = 1 eβǫi − 1 (3.33) Consider photons (two polarizations) in a cavity of side L with ǫk = h̄ωk = h̄ck and k= E = 2 2π (mx , my , mz ) L X mx ,my ,mz D ωmx ,my ,mz nmx ,my ,mz (3.34) E (3.35) Chapter 3: Review of Statistical Mechanics 23 We can take the thermodynamic limit, L → ∞, and convert the sum into an integral. Since the allowed ~k’s are 2π L (mx , my , mz ), the ~k-space volume per allowed ~k is (2π)3 /L3 . Hence, we can take the infinite-volume limit by making the replacement: X 1 X ~ f (k) (∆~k)3 3 ~ (∆k) k L3 Z 3~ ~ = d k f (k) (2π)3 f (~k) = k (3.36) Hence, d3 k h̄ωk (2π)3 eβh̄ωk − 1 0 Z kmax 3 h̄ck dk = 2V 3 βh̄ck (2π) e −1 0 Z βh̄ckmax 3 4 V kB x dx 4 = T π 2 (h̄c)3 ex − 1 0 E = 2V For βh̄ckmax ≫ 1, E= and For βh̄ckmax ≪ 1 , Z kmax Z ∞ 3 4 x dx V kB 4 T 2 3 π (h̄c) 0 ex − 1 Z ∞ 3 4 4V kB x dx 3 CV = 2 T 3 π (h̄c) 0 ex − 1 E= 3 V kmax kB T 3π 2 (3.37) (3.38) (3.39) (3.40) and 3 V kmax kB CV = 3π 2 3.3 (3.41) Fermi-Dirac Distribution For a system of free fermions, the partition function Z= X Ea ,N e−β(Ea −µN ) (3.42) 24 Chapter 3: Review of Statistical Mechanics can again be rewritten in terms of the single-particle eigenstates and the single-particle energies ǫi : Ea = n0 ǫ0 + n1 ǫ1 + . . . (3.43) ni = 0, 1 (3.44) but now so that Z = X e−β ( P {ni } = Y i =   1 X ni =0 Y n ǫ −µ i i i P )  e−β(ni ǫi −µni )  1 + e−β(ǫi −µ) i hni i = n i i  1 eβ(ǫi +µ) +1 (3.45) (3.46) The chemical potential is chosen so that N= X i 1 eβ(ǫi +µ) + 1 (3.47) The energy is given by E= X i 3.4 ǫi β(ǫ +µ) e i +1 (3.48) Thermodynamics of the Free Fermion Gas Free electron gas in a box of side L: h̄2 k 2 ǫk = 2m (3.49) 2π (mx , my , mz ) L (3.50) with k= 25 Chapter 3: Review of Statistical Mechanics Then, taking into account the 2 spin states, E = X 2 D ǫmx ,my ,mz nmx ,my ,mz mx ,my ,mz = 2V Z 0 kmax d3 k (2π)3 (3.51) N = 2V Z kmax 0 At T = 0, 1 β  h̄2 k2 −µ 2m  d3 k (2π)3 β e  h̄2 k2 2m  h̄2 k2 −µ 2m E +1 1 β e  h̄2 k2 −µ 2m  +1 h̄2 k 2 =θ µ− 2m ! (3.52) (3.53) +1 e All states with energies less than µ are filled; all states with higher energies are empty. We write kF = √ 2mµT =0 , ǫF = µT =0 h̄ Z kF 3 kF3 dk N = =2 V (2π)3 3π 2 0 Z kF 3 E d k h̄2 k 2 = 2 V (2π)3 2m 0 2 5 1 h̄ kF = π 2 10m 3N = ǫF 5 V 2 Z 3 1 1 m2 22 Z d3 k = 2 3 dǫ ǫ 2 3 (2π) π h̄ (3.54) (3.55) (3.56) (3.57) For kB T ≪ eF , N V 3 1 1 1 m2 22 Z ∞ 2 dǫ ǫ = 3 eβ(ǫ−µ) +1 π 23h̄ 1 0 3 1 3 1 Z   Z µ 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 m2 22 Z ∞ m 2 1 m 2 µ 1 2 2 −1 + 2 3 = dǫ ǫ + 2 3 dǫ ǫ dǫ ǫ 2 β(ǫ−µ) 3 β(ǫ−µ) 2 e +1 e +1 π h̄ 0 π h̄ 0 π h̄ µ 26 Chapter 3: Review of Statistical Mechanics 3 3 1 3 1 1 1 (2m) 2 3 m 2 2 2 Z µ 1 1 m2 22 Z ∞ 2 − 2 2 dǫ ǫ dǫ ǫ = µ + 3 3 3 e−β(ǫ−µ) + 1 eβ(ǫ−µ) + 1 3π 2 h̄ π 2 h̄ 0 π 2 h̄ µ 3 1 Z 3    ∞ 1 1 kB T dx (2m) 2 3 m 2 2 2 −βµ 2 − (µ − k T x) 2 2 + µ = + O e (µ + k T x) B B 3π 2 h̄3 π 2 h̄3 0 ex + 1     3 ∞ 3 3 Z ∞ 2n−1 Γ 3 x (2m) 2 3 (2m) 2 X 1 2    µ2 + 2 3 (kB T )2n µ 2 −2n dx x = (2n − 1)! Γ 5 − 2n 0 e +1 3π 2 h̄3 π h̄ n=1 2 3 with  3 (2m) 2 3  2 1+ = 3 µ 2 2 3π h̄ kB T µ !2    I1 + O T 4  Ik = Z ∞ 0 dx (3.58) xk ex + 1 (3.59) We will only need π2 I1 = 12 (3.60) Hence,  kB T µ !2  kB T µ = ǫ F 1 − ǫF !2  kB T ǫF 3 (ǫF ) = µ 1 + 2 3 2 3 2 To lowest order in T , this gives: π2 = ǫ F 1 − 12 3 1    I1 + O T 4  (3.61)  I1 + O(T 4 ) !2  + O(T 4 ) (3.62) 3 m2 22 Z ∞ E 1 2 dǫ ǫ = 3 β(ǫ−µ) V e 3 1+ 1 π 23h̄ 1 0 3 1   Z µ 2 2 3 3 3 m 2 1 m2 22 Z µ 1 m2 22 Z ∞ 2 2 = dǫ ǫ + 2 3 dǫ ǫ dǫ ǫ 2 β(ǫ−µ) −1 + 2 3 3 β(ǫ−µ) 2 e +1 e +1 π h̄ 0 π h̄ 0 π h̄ µ 3 1 3 3 1 3 3 1 (2m) 2 5 m 2 2 2 Z µ m2 22 Z ∞ 1 dǫ ǫ 2 −β(ǫ−µ) dǫ ǫ 2 β(ǫ−µ) µ2 − 2 3 = + 2 3 e +1 e +1 5π 2 h̄3 π h̄ 0 π h̄ µ 3 1 Z 3     ∞ 3 3 kB T dx (2m) 2 5 m 2 2 2 −βµ 2 − (µ − k T x) 2 2 + (µ + k T x) + O e µ = B B 5π 2 h̄3 π 2 h̄3 0 ex + 1     3 3 ∞ 5 Z ∞ 2n−1 Γ 5 x (2m) 2 5 (2m) 2 X 1 2    = µ2 + 2 3 dx x (kB T )2n µ 2 −2n (2n − 1)! Γ 7 − 2n 0 e +1 5π 2 h̄3 π h̄ n=1 2 27 Chapter 3: Review of Statistical Mechanics  3 (2m) 2 5  15 2 = 1+ 3µ 2 2 5π h̄  5π 2 3N ǫF 1 + = 5 V 12 kB T µ kB T ǫF !2 !2 4  I1 + O(T )  + O(T 4 ) (3.63) Hence, the specific heat of a gas of free fermions is: CV = kB T π2 N kB 2 ǫF (3.64) Note that this can be written in the more general form: CV = (const.) · kB · g (ǫF ) kB T (3.65) The number of electrons which are thermally excited above the ground state is ∼ g (ǫF ) kB T ; each such electron contributes energy ∼ kB T and, hence, gives a specific heat contribution of kB . Electrons give such a contribution to the specific heat of a metal. 3.5 Ising Model, Mean Field Theory, Phases Consider a model of spins on a lattice in a magnetic field: H = −gµB B X i Siz ≡ 2h X Siz (3.66) i with Siz = ±1/2. The partition function for such a system is: h Z = 2 cosh kB T !N (3.67) The average magnetization is: Siz = h 1 tanh 2 kB T (3.68) The susceptibility, χ, is defined by χ= ∂ X z S ∂h i i ! h=0 (3.69) 28 Chapter 3: Review of Statistical Mechanics For free spins on a lattice, χ= 1 1 N 2 kB T (3.70) A susceptibility which is inversely proportional to temperature is called a Curie sucseptibility. In problem set 3, you will show that the susceptibility is much smaller for a system of electrons. Now consider a model of spins on a lattice such that each spin interacts with its neighbors according to: H=− 1X z z JS S 2 hi,ji i j (3.71) This Hamiltonian has a symmetry Siz → −Siz (3.72) For kB T ≫ J, the interaction between the spins will not be important and the susceptibility will be of the Curie form. For kB T < J, however, the behavior will be much different. We can understand this qualitatively using mean field theory. Let us approximate the interaction of each spin with its neighbors by an interaction with a mean-field, h: X H=− with h given by h= X i hSiz (3.73) i JhSiz i = JzhSiz i (3.74) where z is the coordination number. In this field, the partition function is just 2 cosh kBhT and h kB T (3.75) JzhS z i kB T (3.76) hS z i = tanh Using the self-consistency condition, this is: hS z i = tanh Chapter 3: Review of Statistical Mechanics 29 For kB T < Jz, this has non-zero solutions, S z 6= 0 which break the symmetry Siz → −Siz . In this phase, there is a spontaneous magnetization. For kB T > Jz, there is only the solution S z = 0. In this phase the symmetry is unbroken and the is no spontaneous magnetization. At kB T = Jz, there is a critical point at which a phase transition occurs. Chapter 4 Broken Translational Invariance in the Solid State 4.1 Simple Energetics of Solids Why do solids form? The Hamiltonian of the electrons and ions is: H= X p2i i 2me + X Pa2 a 2M + X Z 2 e2 X Ze2 e2 + − i>j |ri − rj | i,a |ri − Rb | a>b |Ra − Rb | X (4.1) ~a → R ~ a + ~a. However, the energy It is invariant under the symmetry, ~ri → ~ri + ~a, R can usually be minimized by forming a crystal. At low enough temperature, this will win out over any possible entropy gain in a competing state, so crystallization will occur. Why is the crystalline state energetically favorable? This depends on the type of crystal. Different types of crystals minimize different terms in the Hamiltonian. In molecular and ionic crystals, the potential energy is minimized. In a molecular crystal, such as solid nitrogen, there is a van der Waals attraction between molecules caused by polarization of one by the other. The van der Waals attraction is balanced by short-range repulsion, thereby leading to a crystalline ground state. In an ionic crystal, such as NaCl, the electrostatic energy of the ions is minimized (one must be careful to take into account charge neutrality, without which the electrostatic 30 Chapter 4: Broken Translational Invariance in the Solid State 31 energy diverges). In covalent and metallic crystals, crystallization is driven by the minimization of the electronic kinetic energy. In a metal, such as sodium, the kinetic energy of the electrons is lowered by their ability to move throughout the metal. In a covalent solid, such as diamond, the same is true. The kinetic energy gain is high enough that such a bond can even occur between just two molecules (as in organic chemistry). The energetic gain of a solid is called the cohesive energy. 4.2 Phonons: Linear Chain 4.3 Quantum Mechanics of a Linear Chain As a toy model of a solid, let us consider a linear chain of masses m connected by springs with spring constant B. Suppose that the equilibrium spacing between the ~ j, masses is a. The equilibrium positions define a 1D lattice. The lattice ‘vectors’, R are defined by: ~ j = ja R (4.2) ~ and R ~ ′ are lattice vectors, They connect the origin to all points of the lattice. If R ~ +R ~ ′ are also lattice vectors. A set of basis vectors is a minimal set of vectors then R which generate the full set of lattice vectors by taking linear combinations of the basis vectors. In our 1D lattice, a is the basis vector. Let ui be the displacement of the ith mass from its equilibrium position and let pi be the corresponding momentum. Let us assume that there are N masses, and let’s impose a periodic boundary condition, ui = ui+N . The Hamiltonian for such a system is: H= 1 X 2 1 X pi + B (ui − ui+1 )2 2m i 2 i (4.3) 32 Chapter 4: Broken Translational Invariance in the Solid State Let us use the Fourier transform representation: 1 X uj = √ uk eikja N k 1 X pk eikja pj = √ N k (4.4) As a result of the periodic boundary condition, the allowed k’s are: k= 2πn Na (4.5) We can invert (4.4): 1 X ik′ ja 1 XX ′ √ uk ei(k−k )ja uj e = N k j N j 1 X ik′ ja √ uj e = uk ′ N j (4.6) Note that u†k = u− k, p†k = p− k since u†j = uj , p†j = pj . They satisfy the commutation relations: 1 X ikja ik′ j ′ a e e [pj , uj ′ ] N j,j ′ 1 X ikja ik′ j ′ a = e e − ih̄δjj ′ N j,j ′ 1 X i(k−k′ )ja = −ih̄ e N j = −ih̄δkk′ [pk , uk′ ] = (4.7) Hence, pk and uk′ commute unless k = k ′ . The displacements described by uk are the same as those described by uk+ 2πm for a any integer n: 2πm 1 X uk+ 2πm = √ uj e−i(k+ a )ja a N j 1 X = √ uj e−ikja N j = uk (4.8) 33 Chapter 4: Broken Translational Invariance in the Solid State Hence, k≡k+ 2πm a (4.9) Hence, we can restrict attention to n = 0, 1, . . . , N − 1 in (4.5). The Hamiltonian can be rewritten: H= X 1 k ka pk p−k + 2B sin 2m 2 !2 uk u−k (4.10) Recalling the solution of the harmonic oscillator problem, we define: ak = a†k =   !2  41 1  ka   √  4mB sin uk +  2 2h̄   i  4mB sin ka 2   !2  41 ka 1   u−k − √  4mB sin  2 2h̄  i  4mB sin (Recall that u†k = u−k , p†k = p−k .) which satisfy:   p  2  14 k  ka 2   p   2  14 −k  [ak , a†k ] = 1 (4.11) (4.12) Then: H= X h̄ωk k with B ωk = 2 m   a†k ak  21 1 + 2 sin  ka 2 (4.13) (4.14) Hence, the linear chain is equivalent to a system of N independent harmonic oscillators. Its thermodynamics can be described by the Planck distribution. The operators a†k , ak are said to create and annihilate phonons. We say that a E state ψ with E a†k ak ψ = Nk ψ E (4.15) has Nk phonons of momentum k. Phonons are the quanta of lattice vibrations, analogous to photons, which are the quanta of oscillations of the electromagnetic field. 34 Chapter 4: Broken Translational Invariance in the Solid State Observe that, as k → 0, ωk → 0: ωk→0 = = Ba m/a Ba ρ !1 2 !1 k 2 k (4.16) The physical reason for this is simple: an oscillation with k = 0 is a uniform translation of the linear chain, which costs no energy. Note that the reason for this is that the Hamiltonian is invariant under translations ui → ui + λ. However, the ground state is not: the masses are located at the points xj = ja. Translational invariance has been spontaneously broken. Of course, it could just as well be broken with xj = ja + λ and, for this reason, ωk → 0 as k → 0. An oscillatory mode of this type is called a Goldstone mode. Consider now the case in which the masses are not equivalent. Let the masses alternate between m and M . As we will see, the phonon spectra will be more complicated. Let a be the distance between one m and the next m. The Hamiltonian is: H= X 1 i 2m p21,i 1 2 1 1 + p2,i + B (u1,i − u2,i )2 + B (u2,i − u1,i+1 )2 2M 2 2  (4.17) The equations of motion are: d2 u1,i = −B [(u1,i − u2,i ) − (u2,i−1 − u1,i )] dt2 d2 M 2 u2,i = −B [(u2,i − u1,i ) + (u2,i − u1,i+1 )] dt m (4.18) Going again to the Fourier representation, α = 1, 2 1 X uα,j = √ uα,k eikja N k (4.19) Where the allowed k’s are: k= 2π n N (4.20) 35 Chapter 4: Broken Translational Invariance in the Solid State if there are 2N masses. As before, uα,k = uα,k+ 2πn (4.21) a    2 m dtd 2 0 d2 0 M dt2   u1,k    2  − mωk  0 0 u2,k − M ωk2   ika −B 1+e  − B 1 + e−ika    2B  = Fourier transforming in time:     2B    u1,k    u2,k    1 Observe that 2 ω± =B  (4.22)  u1,k   2B − B 1 + eika   =    u2,k 2B − B 1 + e−ika u1,k   (4.23) u2,k  (4.24) This eigenvalue equation has the solutions:   M + 1 ± m − ωk→0 v u u 1 t M 1 m + 2 − Ba 2(m + M )/a = 4 ka sin nM 2 !1 !2   2 k (4.25) This is the acoustic branch of the phonon spectrum in which m and M move in phase. As k → 0, this is a translation, so ωk− → 0. Acoustic phonons are responsible for sound. Also note that − ωk=π/a 2B = M   12 (4.26) Meanwhile, ω + is the optical branch of the spectrum (these phonons scatter light), in which m and M move in opposite directions. + ωk→0 = s 1 1 2B + m M + ωk=π/a  2B = m    12 (4.27) (4.28) so there is a gap in the spectrum of width ωgap 2B = m   21 2B − M   12 (4.29) 36 Chapter 4: Broken Translational Invariance in the Solid State Note that if we take m = M , we recover the previous results, with a → a/2. This is an example of what is called a lattice with a basis. Not every site on the chain is equivalent. We can think of the chain of 2N masses as a lattice with N sites. Each lattice site has a two-site basis: one of these sites has a mass m and the other has a mass M . Sodium Chloride is a simple subic lattice with a two-site basis: the sodium ions are at the vertices of an FCC lattice and the chlorine ions are displaced from them. 4.3.1 Statistical Mechnics of a Linear Chain Let us return to the case of a linear chain of masses m separated by springs of force constant B, at equilibrium distance a. The excitations of this system are phonons which can have momenta k ∈ [−π/a, π/a] (since k ≡ k + 2πm ), a corresponding to energies B h̄ωk = 2 m   21 sin ka 2 (4.30) Phonons are bosons whose number is not conserved, so they obey the Planck distribution. Hence, the energy of a linear chain at finite temperature is given by: h̄ωk −1 k Z π dk h̄ωk a = L −π βh̄ω (2π) e k − 1 a E = X eβh̄ωk (4.31) Changing variables from k to ω, √ dω h̄ω L Z 4B/m 2 q E = 2· βh̄ω 2π 0 a 4B − ω 2 e −1 m √ h̄ω 2N Z 4B/m dω q = βh̄ω 4B 2 π 0 −1 −ω e m √ Z 2N (kB T )2 βh̄ 4B/m x dx 1 r =   2 ex − 1 π h̄ 0 x 4B − m βh̄ (4.32) 37 Chapter 4: Broken Translational Invariance in the Solid State q In the limit kB T ≪ h̄ 4B/m, we can take the upper limit of integration to ∞ and drop the x-dependent term in the square root in the denominator of the integrand: E = N π (4.33) r m (kB T )2 Z ∞ x dx 4B h̄ 0 ex − 1 Hence, Cv ∼ T at low temperatures. q In the limit kB T ≫ h̄ 4B/m, we can approximate ex ≈ 1 + x: 2N (kB T )2 Z βh̄ E = π h̄ 0 √ dx 4B/m r = N kB 4B m −  x βh̄ 2 (4.34) In the intermediate temperature regime, a more careful analysis is necessary. In q particular, note that the density of states, 1/ 4B m − ω 2 diverges at ω = q 4B/m; this is an example of a van Hove singularity. If we had alternating masses on springs, then the expression for the energy would have two integrals, one over the acoustic modes and one over the optical modes. 4.4 Lessons from the 1D chain In the course of our analysis of the 1D chain, we developed the following strategy, which we will apply to crystals more generally in subsequent sections. • Expand the Hamiltonian to Quadratic Order • Fourier transform the Hamiltonian into momentum space • Identify the Brillouin zone (range of distinct ~ks) • Rewrite the Hamiltonian in terms of creation and annihilation operators 38 Chapter 4: Broken Translational Invariance in the Solid State • Obtain the Spectrum • Compute the Density of States • Use the Planck distribution to obtain the thermodynamics of the vibrational modes of the crystal. 4.5 Discrete Translational Invariance: the Reciprocal Lattice, Brillouin Zones, Crystal Momentum Note that, in the above, momenta were only defined up to 2πn . a The momenta 2πn a form a lattice in k-space, called the reciprocal lattice. This is true of any function which, like the ionic discplacements, is a function defined at the lattice sites. For   ~ , defined on an arbitrary lattice, the Fourier transform such a function, f R f˜ ~k =   X ~ ~ ~ eik·R f R   R (4.35) satisfies ~ f˜ ~k = f˜ ~k + G     (4.36) ~ is in the set of reciprocal lattice vectors, defined by: if G ~ ~ ~ eiG·R = 1 , for all R (4.37) The reciprocal lattice vectors also form a lattice since the sum of two reciprocal lattice vectors is also a reciprocal lattice vector. This lattice is called the reciprocal lattice or dual lattice. In the analysis of the linear chain, we restricted momenta to |k| < π/a to avoid double-counting of degrees of freedom. This restricted region in k-space is an example 39 Chapter 4: Broken Translational Invariance in the Solid State of a Brillouin zone (or a first Brillouin zone). All of k-space can be obtained by translating the Brillouin zone through all possible reciprocal lattice vectors. We could have chosen our Brillouin zone differently by taking 0 < k < 2π/a. Physically, there is no difference; the choice is a matter of convenience. What we need is a set of points in k space such that no two of these points are connected by a reciprocal lattice vector and such that all of k space can be obatained by translating the Brillouin zone through all possible reciprocal lattice vectors. We could even choose a Brillouin zone which is not connected, e.g. 0 < k < π/a. or 3π/a < k < 4π/a. Later, we will consider solids with a more complicated lattice structure than our linear chain. Once again, phonon spectra will be defined in the Brillouin zone. Since ~ , the phonon modes outside of the Brillouin zone are not physically f˜ ~k = f˜ ~k + G     distinct from those inside. One way of defining the Brillouin zone for an arbitrary lattice is to take all points in k space which are closer to the origin than to any other point of the reciprocal lattice. Such a choice of Brillouin zone is also called the Wigner-Seitz cell of the reciprocal lattice. We will discuss this in some detail later but, for now, let us consider the case of a cubic lattice. The lattice vectors of a cubic lattice of side a are: ~ n1 ,n2 ,n3 = a (n1 x̂ + n2 ŷ + n3 ẑ) R (4.38) The reciprocal lattice vectors are: ~ m1 ,m2 ,m3 = 2π (m1 x̂ + m2 ŷ + m3 ẑ) G a (4.39) The reciprocal lattice vectors also form a cubic lattice. The first Brillouin zone (Wigner-Seitz cell of the reciprocal lattice) is given by the cube of side 2π a centered at the origin. The volume of this cube is related to the density according to: 1 Nions d3 k = 3 = 3 a V B.Z. (2π) Z (4.40) As we have noted before, the ground state (and the Hamiltonian) of a crystal is invariant under the discrete group of translations through all lattice vectors. Whereas Chapter 4: Broken Translational Invariance in the Solid State 40 full translational invariance leads to momentum conservation, lattice translational symmetry leads to the conservation of crystal momentum – momentum up to a reciprocal lattice vector. (See Ashcroft and Mermin, appendix M.) For instance, in a collision between phonons, the difference between the incoming and outgoing phonon momenta can be any reciprocal lattice vector, G. Physically, one may think of the missing momentum as being taken by the lattice as a whole. This concept will also be important when we condsider the problem of electrons moving in the background of a lattice of ions. 4.6 Phonons: Continuum Elastic Theory Consider the lattice of ions in a solid. Suppose the equilibrium positions of the ions are ~ i . Let us describe small displacements from these sites by a displacement the sites R ~ i ). We will imagine that the crystal is just a system of masses connected by field ~u(R springs of equilibrium length a. Before considering the details of the possible lattice structures of 2D and 3D crystals, let us consider the properties of a crystal at length scales which are much larger than the lattice spacing; this regime should be insensitive to many details of the lattice. At length scales much longer than its lattice spacing, a crystalline solid ~ i ) by ~u(~r) (i.e. we replace the can be modelled as an elastic medium. We replace ~u(R ~ i , by a continuous variable, ~r). Such an approximation is valid at lattice vectors, R length scales much larger than the lattice spacing, a, or, equivalently, at wavevectors q ≪ 2π/a. In 1D, we can take the continuum limit of our model of masses and springs: H = = !2 1 X 1 X dui + B (ui − ui+1 )2 m 2 dt 2 i i !2 X  ui − ui+1 2 1 1 m X dui + Ba a a 2 a i dt 2 a i 41 Chapter 4: Broken Translational Invariance in the Solid State → Z  1 du dx  ρ 2 dt !2 1 du + B 2 dx !2   (4.41) where ρ is the mass density and B is the bulk modulus. The equation of motion, d2 u d2 u = B dt2 dx2 (4.42) has solutions u(x, t) = X uk ei(kx−ωt) (4.43) k with v u uB ω=t k (4.44) ρ The generalization to a 3D continuum elastic medium is:   ~ · ~u + µ∇2~u ~ ∇ ρ∂t2~u = (µ + λ) ∇ (4.45) where ρ is the mass density of the solid and µ and λ are the Lamé coefficients. Under a dilatation, ~u(~r) = α~r, the change in the energy density of the elastic medium is α2 (λ + 2µ/3)/2; under a shear stress, ux = αy, uy = uz = 0, it is α2 µ/2. In a crystal – which has only a discrete rotational symmetry – there may be more parameters than just µ and λ, depending on the symmetry of the lattice. In a crystal with cubic symmetry, for instance, there are, in general, three independent parameters. We will make life simple, however, and make the approximation of full rotational invariance. The solutions are, ~ ~u(~r, t) = ~ǫ ei(k·~r−ωt) (4.46) where is ~ǫ a unit polarization vector, satisfy −ρω 2~ǫ = − (µ + λ) ~k ~k · ~ǫ − µk 2~ǫ   (4.47) For longitudinally polarized waves, ~k = k~ǫ, ωkl s =± 2µ + λ k ≡ ±vl k ρ (4.48) 42 Chapter 4: Broken Translational Invariance in the Solid State while transverse waves, ~k · ~ǫ = 0 have ωkt s =± µ k ≡ ±vs k ρ (4.49) Above, we introduced the concept of the polarization of a phonon. In 3D, the displacements of the ions can be in any direction. The two directions perpendicular to ~k are called transverse. Displacements along ~k are called longitudinal. The Hamiltonian of this system, H= Z d3 r    1  ˙ 2 1 ~ · ~u 2 − 1 µ ~u · ∇2~u ρ ~u + (µ + λ) ∇ 2 2 2  (4.50) can be rewritten in terms of creation and annihilation operators, ak,s a†k,s " # 1 √ ρ ρωk,s ~ǫs · ~uk + i ~ǫs · ~u˙ k = √ ωk,s 2h̄ " # s ρ 1 √ = √ ~ǫs · ~u˙ −k ρωk,s ~ǫs · ~u−k − i ωk,s 2h̄ s (4.51) as H= X h̄ωk,s k,s  a†k,s ak,s 1 + 2  (4.52) Inverting the above definitions, we can express the displacement ~u(r) in terms of the creation and annihilation operators: ~u(~r) = X k,s s   ~ h̄ ~ǫ a~k,s + a†−~k,s eik·~r s s 2ρV ωk (4.53) s = 1, 2, 3 corresponds to the longitudinal and two transverse polarizations. Acting with ~uk either annihilates a phonon of momentum k or creates a phonon of momentum −k. The allowed ~k values are determined by the boundary conditions in a finite system. For periodic boundary conditions in a cubic system of size V = L3 , the allowed ~k’s are 2π L (n1 , n2 , n3 ). Hence, the ~k-space volume per allowed ~k is (2π)3 /V . Hence, we can take the infinite-volume limit by making the replacement: X k f (~k) = 1 X ~ f (k) (∆~k)3 3 ~ (∆k) k Chapter 4: Broken Translational Invariance in the Solid State V Z 3~ ~ = d k f (k) (2π)3 4.7 43 (4.54) Debye theory Since a solid can be modelled as a collection of independent oscillators, we can obtain the energy in thermal equilibrium using the Planck distribution function: E=V h̄ωs (k) d3 k B.Z. (2π)3 eβh̄ωs (k) − 1 XZ s (4.55) where s = 1, 2, 3 are the three polarizations of the phonons and the integral is over the Brillouin zone. This can be rewritten in terms of the phonon density of states, g(ω) as: E=V ∞ Z 0 dω g(ω) h̄ω eβh̄ω − 1 (4.56) where g(ω) = d3 k δ (ω − ωs (k)) B.Z. (2π)3 XZ s (4.57) The total number of states is given by: Z 0 ∞ dω g(ω) = Z ∞ 0 dω d3 k δ (ω − ωs (k)) B.Z. (2π)3 XZ s d3 k = 3 B.Z. (2π)3 Nions = 3 V Z (4.58) The total number of normal modes is equal to the total number of ion degrees of freedom. For a continuum elastic medium, there are two transverse modes with velocity vt and one longitudinal mode with velocity vl . In the limit that the lattice spacing is Chapter 4: Broken Translational Invariance in the Solid State 44 very small, a → 0, we expect this theory to be valid. In this limit, the Brillouin zone is all of momentum space, so d3 k (2δ (ω − vt k)) + δ (ω − vl k))) (2π)3 ! 2 1 1 + ω2 = 2π 2 vt3 vl3 gCEM (ω) = Z (4.59) In a crystalline solid, this will be a reasonable approximation to g(ω) for kB T ≪ h̄vt /a where the only phonons present will be at low energies, far from the Brillouin zone boundary. At high temperatures, there will be thermally excited phonons near the Brillouin zone boundary, where the spectrum is definitely not linear, so we cannot use the continuum approximation. In particular, this g(ω) does not have a finite integral, which violates the condition that the integral should be the total number of degrees of freedom. A simple approximation, due to Debye, is to replace the Brillouin zone by a sphere of radius kD and assume that the spectrum is linear up to kD . In other words, Debye assumed that:    gD (ω) =  3 2π 2 v 3  0 ω2 if ω < ωD if ω > ωD Here, we have assumed, for simplicity, that vl = vt and we have written ωD = vkD . ωD is chosen so that Z ∞ Nions dω g(ω) = 3 V Z0ωD 3 = dω 2 3 ω 2 2π v 0 3 ωD = 2π 2 v 3 (4.60) i.e.  ωD = 6π 2 v 3 Nions /V With this choice, E = V Z 0 ωD dω 1 3 h̄ω 3 ω 2 βh̄ω 2 3 2π v e −1 (4.61) Chapter 4: Broken Translational Invariance in the Solid State = V x3 3(kB T )4 Z βh̄ωD dx ex − 1 2π 2 v 3 h̄3 0 45 (4.62) In the low temperature limit, βh̄ωD → ∞, we can take the upper limit of the integral to ∞ and: The specific heat is: x3 3(kB T )4 Z ∞ dx E≈V ex − 1 2π 2 v 3 h̄3 0 CV ≈ T 3 " # Z ∞ 4 12kB x3 V dx x e −1 2π 2 v 3 h̄3 0 (4.63) (4.64) The T 3 contribution to the specific heat of a solid is often the most important contribution to the measured specific heat. For T → ∞, 3(kB T )4 Z βh̄ωD dx x2 2π 2 v 3 h̄3 0 3 ωD kB T = V 2π 2 v 3 = 3Nions kB T E ≈ V (4.65) so CV ≈ 3Nions kB (4.66) The high-temperature specific heat is just kB /2 times the number of degrees of freedom, as in classical statistical mechanics. At high-temperature, we were guaranteed the right result since the density of states was normalized to give the correct total number of degrees of freedom. At low-temperature, we obtain a qualitatively correct result since the spectrum is linear. To obtain the exact result, we need to allow for longitudinal and transverse velocities     which depend on the direction, vt k̂ , vl k̂ , since rotational invariance is not present. Debye’s formula interpolates between these well-understood limits. We can define θD by kB θD = h̄ωD . For lead, which is soft, θD ≈ 88K, while for diamond, which is hard, θD ≈ 1280K. Chapter 4: Broken Translational Invariance in the Solid State 4.8 46 More Realistic Phonon Spectra: Optical Phonons, van Hove Singularities Although Debye’s theory is reasonable, it clearly oversimplifies certain aspects of the physics. For instance, consider a crystal with a two-site basis. Half of the phonon modes will be optical modes. A crude approximation for the optical modes is an Einstein spectrum: gE (ω) = Nions δ(ω − ωE ) 2 (4.67) In such a case, the energy will be: x3 3(kB T )4 Z βh̄ωmax h̄ωE Nions dx E=V +V 3 x βh̄ω 2 3 e −1 2 e E −1 2π v h̄ 0 (4.68) with ωmax chosen so that 3 ω3 Nions = max 2 2π 2 v 3 (4.69) Another feature missed by Debye’s approximation is the existence of singularities in the phonon density of states. Consider the spectrum of the linear chain: B ω(k) = 2 m   21 sin ka 2 (4.70) The minimum of this spectrum is at k = 0. Here, the density of states is well described by Debye theory which, for a 1D chain predicts g(ω) ∼ const.. The maximum is at k = π/a. Near the maximum, Debye theory breaks down; the density of states is singular: g(ω) = 2 1 q 2 πa ωmax − ω2 (4.71) In 3D, the singularity will be milder, but still present. Consider a cubic lattice. The spectrum can be expanded about a maximum as:  ω(k) = ωmax − αx (kxmax − kx )2 − αy kymax − ky 2 − αz (kzmax − kz )2 (4.72) Chapter 4: Broken Translational Invariance in the Solid State 47 Then (6 maxima; 1/2 of each ellipsoid is in the B.Z.) Z ωmax dω g(ω)   V 1 vol. of ellipsoid = 6· · 2 (2π)3 3 V 4 (ωmax − ω) 2 = 3 π (2π)3 3 (αx αy αz ) 21 G(ω) ≡ ω (4.73) Differentiating: 1 3V (ωmax − ω) 2 g(ω) = 2 4π (αx αy αz ) 21 (4.74) ~ k ω(k) = 0, but the In 2D and 3D, there can also be saddle points, where ∇ eigenvalues of the second derivative matrix have different signs. At a saddle point, the phonon spectrum again has a square root singularity. van Hove proved that every 3D phonon spectrum has at least one maximum and two saddle points (one with one negative eigenvalue, one with two negative eigenvalues). To see why this might be true, draw the spectrum in the full k-space, repeating the Brillouin zone. Imagine drawing lines connecting the minima of the spectrum to the nearest neighboring minima (i.e. from each copy of the B.Z. to its neighbors). Imagine doing the same with the maxima. These lines intersect; at these intersections, we expect saddle points. 4.9 Lattice Structures Thus far, we have focussed on general properties of the vibrational physics of crystalline solids. Real crystals come in a variety of different lattice structures, to which we now turn our attention. Chapter 4: Broken Translational Invariance in the Solid State 4.9.1 48 Bravais Lattices Bravais lattices are the underlying structure of a crystal. A 3D Bravais lattice is ~ defined by the set of vectors R n ~ = n1~a1 + n2~a2 + n3~a3 ; ni ∈ Z ~ R R o (4.75) where the vectors ~ai are the basis vectors of the Bravais lattice. (Do not confuse with a lattice with a basis.) Every point of a Bravais lattice is equivalent to every other point. In an elemental crystal, it is possible that the elemental ions are located at the vertices of a Bravais lattice. In general, a crystal structure will be a Bravais lattice with a basis. The symmetry group of a Bravais lattice is the group of translations through the lattice vectors together with some discrete rotation group about (any) one of the lattice points. In the problem set (Ashcroft and Mermin, problem 7.6) you will show that this rotation group can only have 2-fold, 3-fold, 4-fold, and 6-fold rotation axes. There are 5 different types of Bravais lattice in 2D: square, rectangular, hexagonal, oblique, and body-centered rectangular. There are 14 different types of Bravais lattices in 3D. The 3D Bravais lattices are discussed in are described in Ashcroft and Mermin, chapter 7 (pp. 115-119). We will content ourselves with listing the Bravais lattices and discussing some important examples. Bravais lattices can be grouped according to their symmetries. All but one can be obtained by deforming the cubic lattices to lower the symmetry. • Cubic symmetry: cubic, FCC, BCC • Tetragonal: stretched in one direction, a × a × c; tetragonal, centered tetragonal • Orthorhombic: sides of 3 different lengths a × b × c, at right angles to each other; orthorhombic, base-centered, face-centered, body-centered. 49 Chapter 4: Broken Translational Invariance in the Solid State • Monoclinic: One face is a parallelogram, the other two are rectangular; monoclinic, centered monoclinic. • Triclinic: All faces are parallelograms. • Trigonal: Each face is an a × a rhombus. • Hexagonal: 2D hexagonal lattices of side a, stacked directly above one another, with spacing c. Examples: • Simple cubic lattice: ~ai = a x̂i . • Body-centered cubic (BCC) lattice: points of a cubic lattice, together with the centers of the cubes ∼ = interpenetrating cubic lattices offset by 1/2 the bodydiagonal. ~a1 = a x̂1 , ~a2 = a x̂2 , ~a3 = a (x̂1 + x̂2 + x̂3 ) 2 (4.76) Examples: Ba, Li, Na, Fe, K, Tl • Face-centered cubic (FCC) lattice: points of a cubic lattice, together with the centers of the sides of the cubes, ∼ = interpenetrating cubic lattices offset by 1/2 a face-diagonal. ~a1 = a (x̂2 + x̂3 ) , 2 ~a2 = a (x̂1 + x̂3 ) , 2 ~a3 = a (x̂1 + x̂2 ) 2 (4.77) Examples: Al, Au, Cu, Pb, Pt, Ca, Ce, Ar. • Hexagonal Lattice: Parallel planes of triangular lattices. ~a1 = a x̂1 , ~a2 =  √ a  x̂1 + 3 x̂2 , 2 ~a3 = c x̂3 (4.78) 50 Chapter 4: Broken Translational Invariance in the Solid State Bravais lattices can be broken up into unit cells such that all of space can be recovered by translating a unit cell through all possible lattice vectors. A primitive unit cell is a unit cell of minimal volume. There are many possible choices of primitive unit cells. Given a basis, ~a1 , ~a2 , ~a3 , a simple choice of unit cell is the region: o n ~r ~r = x1~a1 + x2~a2 + x3~a3 ; xi ∈ [0, 1] (4.79) The volume of this primitive unit cell and, thus, any primitive unit cell is: ~a1 · ~a2 × ~a3 (4.80) An alternate, symmetrical choice is the Wigner-Seitz cell: the set of all points which are closer to the origin than to any other point of the lattice. Examples: Wigner-Seitz for square=square, hexagonal=hexagon (not parallelogram), oblique=distorted hexagon, BCC=octohedron with each vertex cut off to give an extra square face (A+M p.74). 4.9.2 Reciprocal Lattices If ~a1 , ~a2 , ~a3 span a Bravais lattice, then ~a2 × ~a3 ~a1 · ~a2 × ~a3 ~a3 × ~a1 = 2π ~a1 · ~a2 × ~a3 ~a1 × ~a2 = 2π ~a1 · ~a2 × ~a3 ~b1 = 2π ~b2 ~b3 (4.81) span the reciprocal lattice, which is also a bravais lattice. ~ The reciprocal of the reciprocal lattice is the set of all vectors ~r satisfying eiG·~r = 1 ~ i.e. it is the original lattice. for any recprocal lattice vector G, As we discussed above, a simple cubic lattice spanned by ax̂1 , ax̂2 , ax̂3 (4.82) Chapter 4: Broken Translational Invariance in the Solid State 51 has the simple cubic reciprocal lattice spanned by: 2π x̂2 , a 2π x̂1 , a 2π x̂3 a (4.83) An FCC lattice spanned by: a (x̂2 + x̂3 ) , 2 a (x̂1 + x̂3 ) , 2 a (x̂1 + x̂2 ) 2 (4.84) has a BCC reciprocal lattice spanned by: 4π 1 (x̂2 + x̂3 − x̂1 ) , a 2 4π 1 (x̂1 + x̂3 − x̂2 ) , a 2 4π 1 (x̂1 + x̂2 − x̂3 ) (4.85) a 2 Conversely, a BCC lattice has an FCC reciprocal lattice. The Wigner-Seitz primitive unit cell of the reciprocal lattice is the first Brillouin zone. In the problem set (Ashcroft and Mermin, problem 5.1), you will show that the Brillouin zone has volume (2π)3 /v if the volume of the unit cell of the original lattice is v. The first Brillouin zone is enclosed in the planes which are the perpendicular bisectors of the reciprocal lattice vectors. These planes are called Bragg planes for reasons which will become clear below. 4.9.3 Bravais Lattices with a Basis Most crystalline solids are not Bravais lattices: not every ionic site is equivalent to every other. In a compound this is necessarily true; even in elemental crystals it is often the case that there are inequivalent sites in the crystal structure. These crystal structures are lattices with a basis. The classification of such structures is discused in Ashcroft and Mermin, chapter 7 (pp. 119-126). Again, we will content ourselves with discussing some important examples. • Honeycomb Lattice (2D): A triangular lattice with a two-site basis. The triangular lattice is spanned by: ~a1 =  a √ 3 x̂1 + 3 x̂2 , 2 √ ~a2 = a 3 x̂1 (4.86) 52 Chapter 4: Broken Translational Invariance in the Solid State The two-site basis is: 0, a x̂2 (4.87) Example: Graphite • Diamond Lattice: FCC lattice with a two-site basis: The two-site basis is: 0, a (x̂1 + x̂2 + x̂3 ) 4 (4.88) Example: Diamond, Si, Ge • Hexagonal Close-Packed (HCP): Hexagonal lattice with a two-site basis: 0, a c a x̂1 + √ x̂2 + x̂3 2 2 2 3 (4.89) Examples: Be,Mg,Zn, . . . . • Sodium Chloride: Cubic lattice with Na and Cl at alternate sites ∼ = FCC lattice with a two-site basis: 0, a (x̂1 + x̂2 + x̂3 ) 2 (4.90) Examples: NaCl,NaF,KCl 4.10 Bragg Scattering One way of experimentally probing a condensed matter system involves scattering a photon or neutron off the system and studying the energy and angular dependence of the resulting cross-section. Crystal structure experiments have usually been done with X-rays. Let us first examine this problem intuitively and then in a more systematic fashion. Consider, first, elastic scattering of X-rays. Think of the X-rays as photons which can take different paths through the crystal. Consider the case in which ~k is the Chapter 4: Broken Translational Invariance in the Solid State 53 wavevector of an incoming photon and ~k ′ is the wavevector of an outgoing photon. Let us, furthermore, assume that the photon only scatters off one of the atoms in the crystal (the probability of multiple scattering is very low). This atom can be any one of the atoms in the crystal. These different scattring events will interfere constructively if the path lengths differ by an integer number of wavelengths. The ~ as compared to an atom at the extra path length for a scattering off an atom at R, origin is: ~ · ~k − ~k ′ ~ · ~k + −R ~ · ~k ′ = R R     (4.91) ~ then scattering interferes If this is an integral multiple of 2π for all lattice vectors R, constructively. By definition, this implies that ~k − ~k ′ must be a reciprocal lattice vector. For elastic scatering, |~k| = |~k ′ |, so this implies that there is a reciprocal lattic ~ of magnitude vector G ~ = 2|~k| sin θ G (4.92) where θ is the angle between the incoming and outgoing X-rays. To rederive this result more formally, let us assume that our crystal is in thermal equilibrium at inverse temperature β and that photons interact with our crystal via the Hamiltonian H ′ . Suppose that photons of momentum ~ki , and energy ωi are scattered by our system. The differential cross-section for the photons to be scattered into a solid angle dΩ centered about ~kf and into the energy range between ωf ± dω is: E X kf D d2 σ ~kf ; m |H ′ | ~ki ; n 2 e−βEn δ (ω + En − Em ) = dΩ dω m,n ki (4.93) where ω = ωi − ωf and n and m label the initial and final states of our crystal. Let ~q = ~kf − ~ki . Let us assume that the interactions between the photon and the ions in our system is of the form: H′ = X R     ~ + ~u R ~ U ~x − R (4.94) 54 Chapter 4: Broken Translational Invariance in the Solid State Then ~kf ; m |H ′ | ~ki ; n D E = = = = *    X  1 ~ + ~u R ~ d ~x ei~q·~x m U ~x − R n V R * + 1 X −i~q·(R+~ ~ )) ~ u(R e m n Ũ (~q) V R    1 X −i~q·R~ ~ m e−i~q·~u(R) n Ũ (~q) e V # " R E 1 X −i~q·R~ D e m e−i~q·~u(0) n Ũ (~q) V R Z 3 + (4.95) Let us consider, first, the case of elastic scattering, in which the state of the crystal E does not change. Then |ni = |m , |ki | = |kf | ≡ k, |q| = 2k sin 2θ , and: ~kf ; n |H | ~ki ; n D ′ E " = # 1 X −i~q·R~ D −i~q·~u(0) E n Ũ (~q) e n e V R (4.96) Let us focus on the sum over the lattice: X 1 X −i~q·R~ e = δq~,G~ V R R.L.V. G (4.97) The sum is 1 if ~q is a reciprocal lattice vector and vanishes otherwise. The scattering cross-section is given by: E2 D X 2 d2 σ Ũ (~q) e−βEn n e−i~q·~u(0) n = dΩdω n " X R.L.V. G δq~,G~ # (4.98) In other words, the scattering cross-section is peaked when the photon is scattered ~ For elastic scattering, this requires through a reciprocal lattice vector ~kf = ~ki + G.  2 ~ki ~ = ~ki + G 2 (4.99)  2 ~ = −2 ~ki · G (4.100)  or, ~ G This is called the Bragg condition. It is satisfied when the endpoint of ~k is on a Bragg plane. When it is satisfied, Bragg scattering occurs. Chapter 4: Broken Translational Invariance in the Solid State 55 When there is structure within the unit cell, as in a lattice with a basis, the formula is slightly more complicated. We can replace the photon-ion interaction by: H′ = XX R b ~ + ~b + ~u(R ~ + ~b) Ub ~x − R    (4.101) Then, is replaced by 1 X −i~q·R~ e Ũ (~q) V R (4.102) 1 X −i~q·R~ fq e V R (4.103) where fq = X Ub (~x) e−i~q·~x (4.104) b As a result of the structure factor, fq , the scattering amplitude need not have a peak at every reciprocal lattic vector, ~q. Of course, the probability that the detector is set up at precisely the right angle ~ is very low. Hence, these experiments are usually done with to receive ~kf = ~ki + G a powder so that there will be Bragg scattering whenever 2k sin 2θ = |G|. By varying θ, a series of peaks are seen at, e.g. π/6, π/4, etc., from which the reciprocal lattice vectors are reconstructed.  Since |k| ∼ |G| ∼ 1Å −1 , the energy of the incoming photons is ∼ h̄ck ∼ 104 eV which is definitely in the X-ray range. Thus far, we have not looked closely at the factor: D m e−i~q·~u(0) n E 2 (4.105) This factor results from the vibration of the lattice due to phonons. In elastic scattering, the amplitude of the peak will be reduced by this factor since the probability of the ions forming a perfect lattice is less than 1. The inelastic amplitude will contain contributions from processes in which the incoming photon or neutron creates a Chapter 4: Broken Translational Invariance in the Solid State 56 phonon, thereby losing some energy. By measuring inelastic neutron scattering (for which the energy resolution is better than for X-rays), we can learn a great deal about the phonon spectrum. Chapter 5 Electronic Bands 5.1 Introduction Thus far, we have ignored the dynamics of the elctrons and focussed on the ionic vibrations. However, the electrons are important for many properties of solids. In metals, the specific heat is actually CV = γT + αT 3 . The linear term is due to the electrons. Electrical conduction is almost always due to the electrons, so we will need to understand the dynamics of electrons in solids in order to compute, for instance, the conductivity σ(T, ω). In order to do this, we will need to understand the quantum mechanics of electrons in the periodic potential due to the ions. Such an analysis will enable us to understand some broad features of the electronic properties of crystalline solids, such as the distinction between metals and insulators. 5.2 Independent Electrons in a Periodic Potential: Bloch’s theorem Let us first neglect all interactions between the electrons and focus on the interactions between each electron and the ions. This may seem crazy since the inter-electron 57 58 Chapter 5: Electronic Bands interaction isn’t small, but let us make this approximation and proceed. At some level, we can say that we will include the electronic contribution to the potential in some average sense so that the electrons move in the potential created by the ions and by the average electron density (of course, we shoudld actually do this selfconsistently). Later, we will see why this is sensible. When the electrons do not interact with each other, the many-electron wavefunction can be constructed as a Slater determinant of single-electron wavefunctions. Hence, we have reduced the problem to that of a single electron moving in a lattice of ions. The Hamiltonian for such a problem is: h̄2 2 X ~ − ~u(R)) ~ H=− ∇ + V (~x − R 2m R (5.1) ~ expanding in powers of ~u(R), H=− X h̄2 2 X ~ (~x − R) ~ · ~u(R) ~ + ... ~ − ∇V ∇ + V (~x − R) 2m R R (5.2) The third term and the . . . are electron-phonon interaction terms. They can be treated as a perturbation. We will focus on the first two terms, which describe an electron moving in a periodic potential. This highly simplified problem already contains much of the qualitative physics of a solid. Let us begin by proving an important theorem due to Bloch. ~ = V (~r) for all lattice vectors R ~ of some given Bloch’s Theorem: If V (~r + R) lattice, then for any solution of the Schrödinger equation in this potential, h̄2 2 ∇ ψ(~r) + V (~r)ψ(~r) = Eψ(~r) − 2m (5.3) there exists a ~k such that ~ = ei~k·R~ ψ(~r) ψ(~r + R) (5.4) Proof: Consider the lattice translation operator TR which acts according to ~ TR χ(~r) = χ(~r + R) (5.5) 59 Chapter 5: Electronic Bands Then ~ TR Hχ(~r) = HTR χ(~r + R) (5.6) i.e. [TR , H] = 0. Hence, we can take our energy eigenstates to be eigenstates of TR . Hence, for any energy eigenstate ψ(~r), ~ TR ψ(~r) = c(R)ψ(~ r) (5.7) The additivity of the translation group implies that, ~ R ~ ′ ) = c(R ~ +R ~ ′) c(R)c( (5.8) Hence, there is some k such that ~ ~ ~ = eik·R c(R) (5.9) ~ ~ ~ is a reciprocal lattice vector, we can always take ~k to be in the Since eiG·R = 1 if G first Brillouin zone. 5.3 Tight-Binding Models Let’s consider a very simple model of a 1D solid in which we imagine that the atomic nuclei lie along a chain of spacing a. Consider a single ion and focus on two of its electronic energy levels. In real systems, we will probably consider s and d orbitals, but this is not important here; in our toy model, these are simply two electronic states which are localized about the atomic nucleus. We’ll call them |1i and |2i, with energies ǫ01 and ǫ02 . Let’s further imagine that the splitting ǫ02 − ǫ01 between these levels is large. Now, when we put this atom in the linear chain, there will be some overlap between these levels and the corresponding energy levels on neighboring atoms. We can model such a system by the Hamiltonian: H= X R  ǫ10 |R, 1ihR, 1| + ǫ20 |R, 2ihR, 2| − X R,R′ n.n (t1 |R, 1ihR′ , 1| + t2 |R, 2ihR′ , 2|) (5.10) 60 Chapter 5: Electronic Bands We have assumed that t1 is the amplitude for an electron at |R, 1i to hop to |R′ , 1i, and similarly for t2 . For simplicity, we have ignored the possibility of hopping from |R, 1i to |R′ , 2i, which is unimportant anyway when ǫ0 is large. The eigenstates of this Hamiltonian are: |k, 1i = with energy X R eikR |R, 1i ǫ1 (k) = ǫ01 − 2t1 cos ka (5.11) (5.12) and |k, 2i = with energy X R eikR |R, 2i ǫ2 (k) = ǫ02 − 2t2 cos ka (5.13) (5.14) Note, first, that k lives in the first Brillouin zone since |k, ii ≡ k + 2πn E ,i a (5.15) Now, observe that the two atomic energy levels have broadened into two energy bands. There is a band gap between these bands of magnitude ǫ02 − ǫ01 − 2t1 − 2t2 . This is a characteristic feature of electronic states in a periodic potential: the states break up into bands with energy gaps separating the bands. How many states are there in each band? As we discussed in the context of phonons, there are as many allowed k’s in the Brillouin zone as there are ions in the crystal. Let’s repeat the argument. The Brillouin zone has k-space extent 2π/a. In a finite-size system of length L with periodic boundary conditions, allowed k’s are of the form 2πn/L where n is an integer. Hence, there are L/a = Nions allowed k’s in the Brillouin zone. (This argument generalizes to arbitrary lattices in arbitrary dimension.) Hence, there are as many states as lattice sites. Each state can be filled by one up-spin electon and one down-spin electron. Hence, if the atom is monovalent Chapter 5: Electronic Bands 61 – i.e. if there is one electron per site – then, in the ground state, the lower band, |k, 1i is half-filled and the upper band is empty. The Fermi energy is at ǫ01 . The Fermi momentum (or, more properly, Fermi crystal momentum) is at ±π/2a. At low temperature, the fact that there is a gap far away from the Fermi momentum is unimportant, and the Fermi sea will behave just like the Fermi sea of a free Fermi gas. In particular, there is no energy gap in the many-electron spectrum since we can always excite an electron from a filled state just below the Fermi surface to one of the unfilled states just above the gap. For instance, the electronic contribution to the specific heat will be CV ∼ T . The difference is that the density of states will be different from that of a free Fermi gas. In situations such as this, when a band is partially filled, the crystal is (almost always) a metal. (Sometimes inter-electron interactions can make such a system an insulator.) If there are two electrons per lattice site, then the lower band is filled and the upper band is empty in the ground state. In such a case, there is an energy gap Eg = ǫ02 − ǫ01 − 2t1 − 2t2 between the ground state and the lowest excited state which necessarily involves exciting an electron from the lower band to the upper band. Crystals of this type, which have no partially filled bands, are insulators. The electronic contribution to the specific heat will be suppressed by a factor of e−Eg /T . Note that the above tight-binding model can be generalized to arbitrary dimension of lattice. For instance, a cubic lattice with one orbital per site has tight-binding spectrum: ǫ(k) = −2t (cos kx a + cos ky a + cos kz a) (5.16) Again, if there is one electron per site, the band will be half-filled (and metallic); if there are two electrons per site the band will be filled (and insulating). The model which we have just examined is grossly oversimplified but can, nevertheless, be justified, to an extent. Let us reconsider our lattice of atoms. 62 Chapter 5: Electronic Bands Electronic orbitals of an isolated atom: ϕn (~r) with energies ǫn : (5.17) h̄2 2 ∇ ϕn (~r) + V (~r)ϕn (~r) = ǫn ϕn (~r) 2m (5.18) X h̄2 2 ~ ψk (~r) = ǫ(k)ψk (~r) ∇ ψk (~r) + V (~r + R) 2m R (5.19) − We now want to solve: − Let’s try the ansatz: ψk (~r) = X ~ ~ ~ cn eik·R ϕn (~r + R) (5.20) R,n which satisfies Bloch’s theorem. Substituting into Schrödinger’s equation and taking the matrix element with ϕm , we get:  2 h̄ d3 r ϕ∗m (~r) − 2m ∇2 + R P R′  ~ = ~ ′ ) PR,n cn ei~k·R~ ϕn (~r + R) V (~r + R ǫ(k) d3 r ϕ∗m (~r) R R,n cn P ~ ~ ~ (5.21) eik·R ϕn (~r + R) Let’s write X h̄2 2 X h̄2 2 ′ ~ + ~ ~ ′) − ∇ + V (~r + R ) = − ∇ + V (~r + R) V (~r + R 2m 2m R′ R′ 6=R = Hat,R + ∆VR (r) (5.22) Then, we have Z d3 r ϕ∗m (~r) X R,n X ~ ~ ~ = ǫ(k) cn eik·R (Hat,R + ∆VR (r)) ϕn (~r + R) R,n ~ ~ cn ǫn eik·R Z ~ + d3 r ϕ∗m (~r)ϕn (~r + R) X ~ ~ cn eik·R R,n ǫ(k)cm + ǫ(k) Z X Z d3 r ϕ∗m (~r) X ~ ~ ~ cn eik·R ϕn (~r + R) R,n ~ = d3 r ϕ∗m (~r)∆VR (r)ϕn (~r + R) R6=0,n ~ i~k·R e cn Z ~ (5.24) d3 r ϕ∗m (~r)ϕn (~r + R) (5.23) 63 Chapter 5: Electronic Bands c m ǫm + ~ i~k·R R6=0,n cn ǫn e P R ~ + d3 r ϕ∗m (~r)ϕn (~r + R) ~ i~k·R R,n cn e P R ~ = d3 r ϕ∗m (~r) [∆VR (r)] ϕn (~r + R) ǫ(k)cm + ǫ(k) ~ i~k·R cn R6=0,n e P R ~ (5.25) d3 r ϕ∗m (~r)ϕn (~r + R) Writing: ~ = αmn (R) Z ~ = − γmn (R) ~ d3 r ϕ∗m (~r)ϕn (~r + R) Z ~ d3 r ϕ∗m (~r) [∆VR (r)] ϕn (~r + R) (5.26) We have: cm (ǫm − ǫ(k)) + X R6=0,n ~ ~ ~ = cn (ǫn − ǫ(k)) eik·R αmn (R) X ~ ~ ~ cn eik·R γmn (R) (5.27) R,n ~ and γmn (R) ~ are exponentially small, ∼ e−R/a0 . In particular, αmn (R) ~ Both αmn (R) ~ are much larger for nearest neighbors than for any other sites, so let’s and γmn (R) ~ n.n. ), γmn = γmn (R ~ n.n. ), neglect the other matrix elements and write αmn = αmn (R vmn = γmn (0). In problem 2 of problem set 7, so may make these approximations. Suppose that we make the approximation that the lth orbital is well separated in ~ and γln (R) ~ for n 6= l. We write energy from the others. Then we can neglect αln (R) β = vll . Focusing on the m = l equation, we have: (ǫl − ǫ(k)) + αll (ǫl − ǫ(k)) X ~ ~ eik·R = β + γll X ~ ~ eik·R (5.28) Rn.n. Rn.n. Hence, ~ ~ β + γll Rn.n. eik·R (5.29) ǫ(k) = ǫl − P 1 + αll Rn.n. ei~k·R~ If we neglect the α’s and retain only the γ’s, then we recover the result of our P phenomenological model. For instance, for the cubic lattice, we have: ǫ(k) = [ǫl − β] − 2γll [cos kx a + cos ky a + cos kz a] (5.30) Tight-binding models give electronic wavefunctions which are a coherent superposition of localized atomic orbitals. Such wavefunctions have very small amplitude 64 Chapter 5: Electronic Bands in the interstitial regions between the ions. Such models are valid, as we have seen, when there is very little overlap between atomic wavefunctions on neighboring atoms. In other words, a tight-binding model will be valid when the size of an atomic orbital is smaller than the interatomic distance, i.e. a0 ≪ R. In the case of core electrons, e.g. 1s, 2s, 2p, this is the case. However, this is often not the case for valence electrons, e.g. 3s electrons. Nevertheless, the tight-binding method is a simple method which gives many qualitative features of electronic bands. In the study of high-Tc superconductivity, it has proven useful for this reason. 5.4 The δ-function Array Let us now consider another simple toy-model of a solid, a 1D array of δ-functions: ∞ X h̄2 d2 − δ(x − na) ψ(x) = E ψ(x) + V 2m dx2 n=−∞ ! (5.31) Between the peaks of the δ functions, ψ(x) must be a superposition of the plane waves eiqx and e−iqx with energy E(q) = h̄2 q 2 /2m. Between x = 0 and x = a, ψ(x) = eiqx+iα + e−iqx−iα (5.32) with α complex. According to Bloch’s theorem, ψ(x + a) = eika ψ(x) (5.33) Hence, in the region between x = a and x = 2a,  ψ(x) = eika eiq(x−a)+iα + e−iq(x−a)−iα  (5.34) Note that k which determines the transformation property under a translation x → x + a is not the same as q, which is the ‘local’ momentum of the electron, which determines the energy. Continuity at x = a implies that cos(qa + α) = eika cos α (5.35) 65 Chapter 5: Electronic Bands or, tan α = cos qa − eika sin qa (5.36) Integrating Schrödinger’s equation from x = a − ǫ tox = a + ǫ, we have, sin(qa + α) − eika sin α = or, tan α = Combining these equations, 2ika e 2mV h̄2 q 2mV ika e cos α h̄2 q eika − sin qa cos qa − eika ! mV − 2 cos qa + 2 sin qa eika + 1 = 0 h̄ q (5.37) (5.38) (5.39) The sum of the two roots is cos ka: cos ka = cos(qa − δ) cos δ (5.40) where tan δ = h mV h̄2 q (5.41) i For each k ∈ − πa , πa , there are infinitely many roots q of this equation, qn (k). The energy spectrum of the nth band is: En (k) = h̄2 [qn (k)]2 2m (5.42) ±k have the same root qn (k) = qn (−k). Not all q’s are allowed. For instance, the values qa − δ = nπ are not allowed. These regions are the energy gaps between bands. Consider, for instance, k = π/a. cos(qa − δ) = cos δ (5.43) qa = π , π + 2δ (5.44) This has the solutions 66 Chapter 5: Electronic Bands For V small, the latter solution occurs at qa = π + E2 5.5 π π − E1 a a     2mV a . πh̄2 The energy gap is: π π 2mV a −E ≈ E + 2 a a πh̄ ≈ 2V /a     (5.45) Nearly Free Electron Approximation According to Bloch’s theorem, electronic wavefunctions can be expanded as: ψ(x) = X ~ ~ ck−G ei(k−G)·~x (5.46) G In the nearly free electron approximation, we assume that electronic wavefunctions are given by the superposition of a small number of plane waves. This approximation is valid, for instance, when the periodic potential is weak and contains a limited number of reciprocal lattice vectors. Let’s see how this works. Schrödinger’s equation in momentum space reads: X h̄2 k 2 − ǫ(~k) ck + ck−G VG = 0 2m G ! (5.47) Second-order perturbation theory tells us that (let’s assume that Vk = 0) ǫ(~k) = ǫ0 (~k) + |VG |2 ~ ~ ~ G6=0 ǫ0 (k) − ǫ0 (k − G) X (5.48) where h̄2 k 2 ǫ0 (~k) = (5.49) 2m Perturbation theory will be valid so long as the second term is small, i.e. so long as ~ |VG | ≪ ǫ0 (~k) − ǫ0 (~k − G) (5.50) For generic ~k, this will be valid if VG is small. The correction to the energy will   be O |VG |2 . However, no matter how small VG is, perturbation theory fails for degenerate states, h̄2 (k − G)2 h̄2 k 2 = 2m 2m (5.51) 67 Chapter 5: Electronic Bands or, when the Bragg condition is satisfied, ~ G2 = 2~k · G (5.52) In other words, perturbation theory fails when ~k is near a Brillouin zone boundary. Suppose that VG is very small so that we can neglect it away from the Brillouin zone boundaries. Near a zone boundary, we can focus on the reciprocal lattice vector ~ and ignore VG′ for G ~ = ~ ′ . We keep only ck and ck−G , where which it bisects, G 6 G ǫ0 (k) ≈ ǫ0 (k − G). We can thereby reduce Schrödinger’s equation to a 2 × 2 equation:   ǫ0 (~k) − ǫ(~k) ck + ck−G VG = 0  ~ − ǫ(~k − G) ~ ck−G + ck VG∗ = 0 ǫ0 (~k − G)  (5.53) ~ = ~ ′ can be handled by perturbation theory and, therefore, neglected in VG′ for G 6 G the small VG′ limit. In this approximation, the eigenvalues are: " 1 ~ ± ǫ0 (~k) + ǫ0 (~k − G) ǫ± (~k) = 2 r  2 ~ ǫ0 (~k) − ǫ0 (~k − G) 2 + 4|VG | # (5.54) At the zone boundary, the bands have been split by ǫ+ (~k) − ǫ− (~k) = 2 |VG | (5.55) ~ = ~ ′ are now handled perturbatively. The effects of VG′ for G 6 G To summarize, the nearly free electron approximation gives energy bands which are essentially free electron bands away from the Brillouin zone boundaries; near the Brillouin zone boundaries, where the electronic crystal momenta satisfy the Bragg condition, gaps are opened. Though intuitively appealing, the nearly free electron approximation is not very reasonable for real solids. Since VG ≈ 4πZe2 ∼ 13.6 eV G2 (5.56) 68 Chapter 5: Electronic Bands while ǫF ∼ 10eV , ~ |VG | ∼ ǫ0 (~k) − ǫ0 (~k − G) (5.57) and the nearly free electron approximation is not valid. 5.6 Some General Properties of Electronic Band Structure Much, much more can be said about electronic band structure. There are many approximate methods of obtaining energy spectra for more realistic potentials. We will content ourselves with two observations. Band Overlap. In 2D and 3D, bands can overlap in energy. As a result, both the first and second bands can be partially filled when there are two electrons per site. Consider, for instance, a weak periodic potential of rectangular symmetry: V (x, y) = Vx cos 2π 2π x + Vy cos x a1 a2 (5.58) with Vx,y very small and a1 ≫ a2 . Using the nearly free electron approximation, we have a spectrum which is essentially a free-electron parabola, with small gaps opening at the zone boundary. Since the Brillouin zone is much shorter in the kx direction, the Fermi sea will cross the zone boundary in this direction, but not in the ky -direction. Hence, there will be empty states in the first Brillouin zone, near (0, ±πa2 ) and occupied states in the second Brillouin zone, near (±πa1 , 0). This is a general feature of 2D and 3D bands. As a result, a solid can be metallic even when it has two electrons per unit cell. van Hove singularities. A second feature of electronic energy spectra is the existence of van Hove singularities. They are singularities in the electronic density of states, g(ǫ) Z dǫ g(ǫ) f (ǫ) = Z d3 k f (ǫ(k)) (2π)3 (5.59) 69 Chapter 5: Electronic Bands They occur for precisely the same reason as in the case of phonon spectra – as a result of the lattice periodicity. Consider the case of a tight-binding model on the square lattice with nearestneighbor hopping only. ǫ(k) = −2t (cos kx a + cos ky a) (5.60) ~ k ǫ(k) = 2ta (sin kx a + sin ky a) ∇ (5.61) The density of states is given by: g(ǫ) = 2 Z d2 k δ (ǫ − ǫ(k)) (2π)2 (5.62) Let’s change variables in the integral on the right to E and S which is the arc length around an equal energy contour ǫ = ǫ(k): 1 Z dE δ (ǫ − E) g(ǫ) = dS 2 ~ k ǫ(k) 2π ∇ 1 Z 1 = dS 2 ~ k ǫ(k) 2π ∇ (5.63) The denominator on the right-hand-side vanishes at the minimum of the band, ~k = (0, 0), the maxima ~k = (±π/a, ±π/a) and the saddle points ~k = (±π/a, 0), (0, ±π/a). At the latter points, the density of states will have divergent slope. 5.7 The Fermi Surface The Fermi surface is defined by ǫn (k) = µ (5.64) By the Pauli principle, it is the surface in the Brillouin zones which separates the occupied states, ǫn (k) < µ, inside the Fermi surface from the unoccupied states ǫn (k) > µ outside the Fermi surface. All low-energy electronic excitations involve holes just below the Fermi surface or electrons just above it. Metals have a Fermi 70 Chapter 5: Electronic Bands surface and, therefore, low-energy excitations. Insulators have no Fermi surface: µ lies in a band gap, so there is no solution to (5.64). In the low-density limit the Fermi surface is approximately circular (in 2D) or spherical (in 3D). Consider the 2D tight-binding model ǫ(k) = −2t (cos kx a + cos ky a) For ~k → 0,  ǫ(k) ≈ −4t + ta2 kx2 + kx2  (5.65) (5.66) Hence, for µ + 4t ≪ t, the Fermi surface is given by the circle: kx2 + kx2 = µ + 4t ta2 (5.67) Similarly, in the nearly free electron approximation, h̄2 k 2 X |VG |2 ǫ(~k) = + h̄2 (k−G)2 h̄2 k2 2m G6=0 2m − 2m (5.68) For µ → 0 and VG small, we can neglect the scond term, and, as in the free electron case, the Fermi surface is given by k= 1q 2mµ h̄ (5.69) Away from the bottom of a band, however, the Fermi surface can look quite different. In the tight-binding model, for instance, for µ = 0, the Fermi surface is the diamond kx ± ky = ±π/a. The chemical potential at zero temperature is usually called the Fermi energy, ǫF . The key measure of the number of low-lying states which are available to an electronic system is the density of states at the Fermi energy, g(ǫF ). When g(ǫF ) is large, the CV , σ, etc. are large; when g(ǫF ) is small, these quantities are small. 71 Chapter 5: Electronic Bands 5.8 Metals, Insulators, and Semiconductors Earlier we saw that, in order to compute the vibrational properties of a solid, we needed to determine the phonon spectra of the crystal. A characteristic feature of these phonon spectra is that there is always an acoustic mode with ω(k) ∼ k for k small. This mode is responsible for carrying sound in a solid, and it always gives a CVph ∼ T 3 contribution to the specific heat. In order to compute the electronic properties of a solid, we must similarly determine the electronic spectra. If we ignore the interactions between electrons, the electronic spectra are determined by the single-electron energy levels in the periodic potential due to the ions. These energy spectra break up into bands. When there is a partially filled band, there are low energy excitations, and the solid is a metal. There will be a CVel ∼ T electronic contribution to the specific heat, as in a free fermion gas. When all bands are either filled or completely empty, there is a gap between the many-electron ground state and the first excited state; the solid is an insulator and there is a negligible contribution to the low-temperature specific heat. Let us recall how this works. Once we have determined the electronic band structure, ǫn (k), we can determine the electronic density-of-states: d2 k δ (ǫ − ǫn (k)) B.Z. (2π)2 XZ g(ǫ) = 2 n (5.70) With the density-of-states in hand, we can compute the thermodynamics. In the limit kB T ≪ ǫ F , N V = = = Z ∞ Z0µ dǫ g(ǫ) 1 eβ(ǫ−µ) Z µ dǫ g(ǫ) + Z0ǫF dǫ g(ǫ) + +1  dǫ g(ǫ) Z0 µ 1 eZβ(ǫ−µ) µ dǫ g(ǫ) − +1 dǫ g(ǫ)  −1 + 1 e−β(ǫ−µ) Z ∞ µ dǫ g(ǫ) + Z ∞ 1 eβ(ǫ−µ) dǫ g(ǫ) +1 1 eβ(ǫ−µ) +1 +1 µ 0 ǫF Z ∞0   N kB T dx −βµ ≈ + (µ − ǫF ) g(ǫF ) + (g (µ + k T x) − g (µ − k T x)) + O e B B V ex + 1 0 72 Chapter 5: Electronic Bands ∞ X (kB T )n+1 (n) Z ∞ x2n−1 N dx x + (µ − ǫF ) g(ǫF ) + g (µ) V n! e +1 0 n=1 N + (µ − ǫF ) g(ǫF ) + (kB T )2 g ′ (ǫF ) I1 ≈ V = (5.71) with Ik = Z 0 ∞ xk dx x e +1 (5.72) We will only need I1 = π2 6 (5.73) Hence, to lowest order in T , (µ − ǫF ) g(ǫF ) ≈ −(kB T )2 g ′ (ǫF ) I1 (5.74) Meanwhile, E V = = Z ∞ Z0ǫF dǫ ǫ g(ǫ) 1 eβ(ǫ−µ) Z µ dǫ ǫ g(ǫ) + +1  Z µ dǫ ǫ g(ǫ) dǫ ǫ g(ǫ) + 1 eβ(ǫ−µ)  −1 + Z ∞ dǫ ǫ g(ǫ) 1 eβ(ǫ−µ) + 1Z µ ǫF 0 Z µ 0 ∞ 1 1 E0 dǫ ǫ g(ǫ) −β(ǫ−µ) dǫ ǫ g(ǫ) β(ǫ−µ) ≈ + (µ − ǫF ) ǫF g(ǫF ) − + V e +1 e +1 0 µ Z ∞ E0 kB T dx = (µ + kB T x) g (µ + kB T x) − + (µ − ǫF ) ǫF g(ǫF ) + V ex + 1 0 ! (µ − kB T x) g (µ − kB T x) ≈ E0 + (µ − ǫF ) ǫF g(ǫF ) + (kB T )2 [g (ǫF ) + ǫF g ′ (ǫF )] I1 V  + O e−βµ (5.76) Hence, the electronic contribution to the low-temperature specific heat of a crystalline solid is: CV π2 2 = k T g (ǫF ) V 3 B  (5.75) Substituting (5.74) into the final line of (5.75), we have: E E0 = + (kB T )2 g (ǫF ) I1 V V +1 (5.77) Chapter 5: Electronic Bands 73 In a metal, the Fermi energy lies in some band; hence g (ǫF ) is non-zero. In an insulator, all bands are either completely full or completely empty. Hence, the Fermi energy lies between two bands, and g (ǫF ) = 0. Each band contains twice as many single-electron levels (the factor of 2 comes from the spin) as there are lattice sites in the solid. Hence, an insulator must have an even number of electrons per unit cell. A metal will result if there is an odd number of electrons per unit cell (unless the electron-electron interactions, which we have neglected, are strong); as a result of band overlap, a metal can also result if there is an even number of electrons per unit cell. A semiconductor is an insulator with a small band gap. A good insulator will have a band gap of Eg ∼ 4eV. At room temperature, the number of electrons which will be excited out of the highest filled band and into the lowest empty band will be ∼ e−Eg /2kB T ∼ 10−35 which is negligible. Hence, the filled and empty bands will remain filled and empty despite thermal excitation. A semiconductor can have a band gap of order Eg ∼ 0.25 − 1eV. As a result, the thermal excitation of electrons can be as high as ∼ e−Eg /2kB T ∼ 10−2 . Hence, there will be a small number of carriers excited into the empty band, and some conduction can occur. Doping a semiconductor with impurities can enhance this. The basic property of a metal is that it conducts electricity. Some insight into electrical conduction can be gained from the classical equations of motion of a electron, i.e. Drude theory: 1 d ~r = p~ dt m d e p~ = −eE(~r, t) − p~ × B(~r, t) dt m (5.78) If we continue to treat the electric and magnetic fields classically, but treat the electrons in a periodic potential quantum mechanically, this is replaced by: d 1~ ~r = vn (k) = ∇ k ǫn (k) dt h̄ 74 Chapter 5: Electronic Bands h̄ d~ h̄ k = −eE(~r, t) − e vn (k) × B(~r, t) − ~k dt τ (5.79) The final term in the second equation is the scattering rate. It is caused by effects which we have neglected in our analysis thus far: impurities, phonons, and electronelectron interactions. Without these effects, electrons would accelerate forever in a constant electric field, and the conductivity would be infinite. As a result of scattering, σ is finite. Hence, a finite electric field leads to a finite current: ~j = XZ n d3 k 1 ~ ∇k ǫn (k) (2π)3 h̄ (5.80) Filled bands give zero contribution to the current since they vanish by integration by parts. Since an insulator has only filled or empty bands, it cannot carry current. Hence, it is not characterized by its conductivity but, instead, by its dielectric constant, ǫ. 5.9 Electrons in a Magnetic Field: Landau Bands In 1879, E.H. Hall performed an experiment designed to determine the sign of the current-carrying particles in metals. If we suppose that these particles have charge e (with a sign to be determined) and mass m, the classical equations of motion of charged particles in an electric field, E = Ex x̂ + Ey ŷ, and a magnetic field, B = Bẑ are: dpx = eEx − ωc py − px /τ dt dpy = eEy + ωc px − py /τ dt (5.81) where ωc = eB/m and τ is a relaxation rate determined by collisions with impurities, other electrons, etc. These are the equations which we would expect for free particles. In a crystalline solid, the momentum p~ must be replaced by the crystal momentum 75 Chapter 5: Electronic Bands and the velocity of an electron is no longer p~/m, but is, instead, ~ p ǫ(p) ~v (p) = ∇ (5.82) We won’t worry about these subtleties for now. In the systems which we will be considering, the electron density will be very small. Hence, the electrons will be close to the bottom of the band, where we can approximate: h̄2 k 2 + ... ǫ(k) = ǫ0 + 2mb (5.83) where mb is called the band mass. For instance, in the square lattice nearest-neighbor tight-binding model, ǫ(k) = −2t (cos kx a + cos ky a) ≈ −4t + ta2 k 2 + . . . Hence, mb = h̄2 2ta2 (5.84) (5.85) In GaAs, mb ≈ 0.07me . Once we replace the mass of the electron by the band mass, we can approximate our electrons by free electrons. Let us, following Hall, place a wire along the x̂ direction in the above magnetic fields and run a current, jx , through it. In the steady state, dpx /dt = dpy /dt = jy = 0, we must have Ex = m ne2 τ jx and Ey = − −e h Φ/Φ0 B jx = jx ne |e| e2 N (5.86) where n and N are the density and number of electrons in the wire, Φ is the magnetic flux penetrating the wire, and Φ0 = h/e is the flux quantum. Hence, the sign of the charge carriers can be determined from a measurement of the transverse voltage in a magnetic field. Furthermore, according to (5.86), the density of charge carriers – 76 Chapter 5: Electronic Bands Figure 5.1: ρxx and ρxy vs. magnetic field, B, in the quantum Hall regime. A number of integer and fractional plateaus can be clearly seen. This data was taken at Princeton on a GaAs-AlGaAs heterostructure. i.e. electrons – can be determined from the slope of the ρxy = Ey /jx vs B. At high temperatures, this is roughly what is observed. In the quantum Hall regime, namely at low-temperatures and high magnetic fields, very different behavior is found in two-dimensional electron systems. ρxy passes through a series of plateaus, ρxy = 1 h , ν e2 where ν is a rational number, at which ρxx vanishes, as may be seen in Figure 5.1. The quantization is accurate to a few parts in 108 , making this one of the most precise measurements of the fine structure constant, α = e2 , h̄c and, in fact, one of the highest precision experiments of any kind. Some insight into this phenomenon can be gained by considering the quantum mechanics of a single electron in a magnetic field. Let us suppose that the electron’s motion is planar and that the magnetic field is perpendicular to the plane. For now, we will assume that the electron is spin-polarized by the magnetic field and ignore the spin degree of freedom. The Hamiltonian, H= 1 (−ih̄∇ + e A)2 2m (5.87) takes the form of a harmonic oscillator Hamiltonian in the gauge Ax = −By, Ay = 0. (Here, and in what follows, I will take e = |e|; the charge of the electron is −e.) If we write the wavefunction φ(x, y) = eikx x φ(y), then: Hψ =  1 1 (eB y + h̄kx )2 + (−ih̄∂y )2 φ(y) eikx x 2m 2m  (5.88) The energy levels En = (n+ 12 )h̄ωc , called Landau levels, are highly degenerate because the energy is independent of k. To analyze this degeneracy, let us consider a system of size Lx × Ly . If we assume periodic boundary conditions, then the allowed kx 77 Chapter 5: Electronic Bands values are 2πn/Lx for integer n. The harmonic oscillator wavefunctions are centered at y = h̄k/(eB), i.e. they have spacing yn − yn−1 = h/(eBLx ). The number of these which will fit in Ly is eBLx Ly /h = BA/Φ0 . In other words, there are as many degenerate states in a Landau level as there are flux quanta. It is often more convenient to work in symmetric gauge, A = 12 B × r Writing z = x + iy, we have: z̄ h̄2 −2 ∂ − 2 H= m 4ℓ0 " ! z ∂¯ + 2 4ℓ0 ! 1 + 2 2ℓ0 # (5.89) with (unnormalized) energy eigenfunctions: |z|2 ψn,m (z, z̄) = z m − 2 4ℓ 0 Lm n (z, z̄)e (5.90) at energies En = (n + 12 )h̄ωc , where Lm n (z, z̄) are the Laguerre polynomials and ℓ0 = q h̄/(eB) is the magnetic length. Let’s concentrate on the lowest Landau level, n = 0. The wavefunctions in the lowest Landau level, m − ψn=0,m (z, z̄) = z e |z|2 4ℓ2 0 (5.91) are analytic functions of z multiplied by a Gaussian factor. The general lowest Landau level wavefunction can be written: − ψn=0,m (z, z̄) = f (z) e |z|2 4ℓ2 0 (5.92) The state ψn=0,m is concentrated on a narrow ring about the origin at radius rm = q ℓ0 2(m + 1). Suppose the electron is confined to a disc in the plane of area A. Then the highest m for which ψn=0,m lies within the disc is given by A = π rmmax , or, simply, mmax + 1 = Φ/Φ0 , where Φ = BA is the total flux. Hence, we see that in the thermodynamic limit, there are Φ/Φ0 degenerate single-electron states in the lowest Landau level of a two-dimensional electron system penetrated by a uniform magnetic flux Φ. The higher Landau levels have the same degeneracy. Higher Landau levels 78 Chapter 5: Electronic Bands can, at a qualitative level, be thought of as copies of the lowest Landau level. The detailed structure of states in higher Landau levels is different, however. Let us now imagine that we have not one, but many, electrons and let us ignore the interactions between these electrons. To completely fill p Landau levels, we need Ne = p(Φ/Φ0 ) electrons. Lorentz invariance tells us that if e2 n=p B h (5.93) e2 Ey h (5.94) e2 h (5.95) then jx = p i.e. σxy = p The same result can be found by inverting the semi-classical resistivity matrix, and substituting this electron number. Suppose that we fix the chemical potential, µ. As the magnetic field is varied, the energies of the Landau levels will shift relative to the chemical potential. However, so long as the chemical potential lies between two Landau levels (see figure 5.2), an integer number of Landau levels will be filled, and we expect to find the quantized Hall conductance, (5.95). These simple considerations neglected two factors which are crucial to the observation of the quantum Hall effect, namely the effects of impurities and inter-electron interactions.1 The integer quantum Hall effect occurs in the regime in which impurities dominate; in the fractional quantum Hall effect, interactions dominate. 1 2 We also ignored the effects of the ions on the electrons. The periodic potential due to the lattice has very little effect at the low densities relevant for the quantum Hall effect, except to replace the bare electron mass by the band mass. This can be quantitatively important. For instance, mb ≃ 0.07 me in GaAs. 2 The conventional measure of the purity of a quantum Hall device is the zero-field mobility, µ, which is defined by µ = σ/ne, where σ is the zero-field conductivity. The integer quantum Hall effect was first observed by von Klitzing, Pepper, and Dorda in Si mosfets with mobility ≈ 104 cm2 /Vs 79 Chapter 5: Electronic Bands Figure 5.2: (a) The density of states in a pure system. So long as the chemical potential lies between Landau levels, a quantized conductance is observed. (b) Hypothetical density of states in a system with impurities. The Landau levels are broadened into bands and some of the states are localized. The shaded regions denote extended states. (c) As we mention later, numerical studies indicate that the extended state(s) occur only at the center of the band. 5.9.1 The Integer Quantum Hall Effect Let us model the effects of impurities by a random potential in which non-interacting electrons move. Clearly, such a potential will break the degeneracy of the different states in a Landau level. More worrisome, still, is the possibility that some of the states might be localized by the random potential and therefore unable to carry any current at all. As a result of impurities, the Landau levels are broadened into bands and some of the states are localized. The possible effects of impurities are summarized in the hypothetical density of states depicted in Figure 5.2. Hence, we would be led to naively expect that the Hall conductance is less than e2 h p when p Landau levels are filled. In fact, this conclusion, though intuitive, is completely wrong. In a very instructive calculation (at least from a pedagogical standpoint), Prange analyzed the exactly solvable model of electrons in the lowest Landau level interacting with a single δ-function impurity. In this case, a single localized state, which carries no current, is formed. The current carried by each of the extended states is increased so as to exactly compensate for the localized state, and the conductance remains at the quantized value, σxy = e2 . h This calculation gives an important hint of the robustness of the quantization, but cannot be easily generalized to the physically relevant situation in which there is a random distribution of impurities. To understand while the fractional quantum Hall effect was first observed by Tsui, Störmer, and Gossard in GaAsAlGaAs heterostructures with mobility ≈ 105 cm2 /Vs. Today, the highest quality GaAs-AlGaAs samples have mobilities of ≈ 107 cm2 /Vs. Chapter 5: Electronic Bands 80 Figure 5.3: (a) The Corbino annular geometry. (b) Hypothetical distribution of energy levels as a function of radial distance. the quantization of the Hall conductance in this more general setting, we will turn to the beautiful arguments of Laughlin (and their refinement by Halperin), which relate it to gauge invariance. Let us consider a two-dimensional electron gas confined to an annulus such that all of the impurities are confined to a smaller annulus, as shown in Figure 5.3. Since, as an experimental fact, the quantum Hall effect is independent of the shape of the sample, we can choose any geometry that we like. This one, the Corbino geometry, is particularly convenient. States at radius r will have energies similar to to those depicted in Figure 5.3. Outside the impurity region, there will simply be a Landau level, with energies that are pushed up at the edges of the sample by the walls (or a smooth confining potential). In the impurity region, the Landau level will broaden into a band. Let us suppose that the chemical potential, µ, is above the lowest Landau level, µ > h̄ωc /2. Then the only states at the chemical potential are at the inner and outer edges of the annulus and, possibly, in the impurity region. Let us further assume that the states at the chemical potential in the impurity region – if there are any – are all localized. Now, let us slowly thread a time-dependent flux Φ(t) through the center of the annulus. Locally, the associated vector potential is pure gauge. Hence, localized states, which do not wind around the annulus, are completely unaffected by the flux. Only extended states can be affected by the flux. When an integer number of flux quanta thread the annulus, Φ(t) = pΦ0 , the flux can be gauged away everywhere in the annulus. As a result, the Hamiltonian in the annulus is gauge equivalent to the zero-flux Hamiltonian. Then, according 81 Chapter 5: Electronic Bands to the adiabatic theorem, the system will be in some eigenstate of the Φ(t) = 0 Hamiltonian. In other words, the single-electron states will be unchanged. The only possible difference will be in the occupancies of the extended states near the chemical potential. Localized states are unaffected by the flux; states far from the chemical potential will be unable to make transitions to unoccupied states because the excitation energies associated with a slowly-varying flux will be too small. Hence, the only states that will be affected are the gapless states at the inner and outer edges. Since, by construction, these states are unaffected by impurities, we know how they are affected by the flux: each flux quantum removes an electron from the inner edge and adds an electron to the outer edge. Then, so: I= R I dt = e and e2 V h R V dt = R dΦ dt = h/e, (5.96) Clearly, the key assumption is that there are no extended states at the chemical potential in the impurity region. If there were – and there probably are in samples that are too dirty to exhibit the quantum Hall effect – then the above arguments break down. Numerical studies indicate that, so long as the strength of the impurity potential is small compared to h̄ωc , extended states exist only at the center of the Landau band (see Figure 5.2). Hence, if the chemical potential is above the center of the band, the conditions of our discussion are satisfied. The other crucial assumption, emphasized by Halperin, is that there are gapless states at the edges of the system. In the special setup which we assumed, this was guaranteed because there were no impurities at the edges. In the integer quantum Hall effect, these gapless states are a one-dimensional chiral Fermi liquid. Impurities are not expected to affect this because there can be no backscattering in a totally chiral system. More general arguments, which we will mention in the context of the fractional quantum Hall effect, relate the existence of gapless edge excitations to gauge invariance. Chapter 5: Electronic Bands 82 One might, at first, be left with the uneasy feeling that these gauge invariance arguments are somehow too ‘slick.’ To allay these worries, consider the annulus with a wedge cut out, which is topologically equivalent to a rectangle. In such a case, some of the Hall current will be carried by the edge states at the two cuts (i.e. the edges which run radially at fixed azimuthal angle). However, probes which measure the Hall voltage between the two cuts will effectively couple these two edges leading, once again, to annular topology. Laughlin’s argument for exact quantization will apply to the fractional quantum Hall effect if we can show that the clean system has a gap. Then, we can argue that for an annular setup similar to the above there are no extended states at the chemical potential except at the edge. Then, if threading q flux quanta removes p electrons from the inner edge and adds p to the outer edge, as we would expect at ν = p/q, we would have σxy = p e2 . q h