Mary Louise Pratt is a Silver Professor and Professor of Spanish and Portuguese Languages and Literatures at New York University.

Her first book, Toward a Speech Act Theory of Literary Discourse, made an important contribution to critical theory by demonstrating that the foundation of written literary narrative can be seen in the structure of Oral Narrative. In it Pratt uses the research of William Labov to show that all narratives contain common structures that can be found in both literary and oral narratives.

In her more recent research, Pratt has studied what she calls contact zones - areas which allow the intermingling of two or more cultures.

Changing public discourse about language acquisition [link]

As a part of the appointment, each Silver professor must write a Silver dialogue, an essay discussing a major issue in his or her field. Pratt used her essay to discuss the obstacles and possible solutions for promoting language learning in America. Pratt frames her argument with an anecdote from a multicultural wedding:

IT WAS a fancy California a big Bay Area hotel. The groom's family spoke Urdu, and the bride's spoke Gujarati and Urdu. Both were practicing Muslims, but she was from southern California, sometimes regarded by northerners as too laid-back. The groom was attended by his two best friends from high school, one of Mexican- Jewish-Anglo parentage and the other of Chinese and Japanese descent via Hawai'i and Sacramento.^[1]

Pratt uses the wedding as a segue to expose American myths about language. Pratt systematically challenges four common misconceptions about language learning: the willing rejection of heritage languages by immigrants, American hostility to multilingualism, the limit of second language learning to early childhood, and the need of language expertise solely for national security. With each misconception Pratt shows how these factors have come together to create a resistance to language learning that has helped cause the national security crisis that the Critical Language Institutes are trying to solve.

Pratt shows hope for changing the public discourse and outlines four ideas that need to be promoted in order to encourage language acquisition in America. Pratt sees a need to correct ideas about mono- and multilingualism. Americans need to be shown that monolingualism is a handicap and that relying on others willingness to learn English will simply limit transcultural communication to "all but the most limited and scripted" exchanges ^[2] Pratt also calls more encouragement of heritage language learning and using local non-English linguistic communities to fulfill needs in language learning and transcultural understanding. Along with using heritage communities, Pratt wants to see educators place more emphasis on advanced language competency and create a pipeline to encourage those who are skilled in language acquisition. In order to bring about these changes, she calls on her fellow academics and other LEPs (linguistically endowed persons) to change how we discuss language learning in American public discourse.

Works by Pratt [link]

• Toward a Speech Act Theory of Literary Discourse. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. 1977. ISBN 0-253-37006-X. 

• Mary Louise Pratt (1991). "Arts of the Contact Zone" (pdf). Profession (New York: MLA) 91: 33–40. https://www.class.uidaho.edu/thomas/English_506/Arts_of_the_Contact_Zone.pdf. "archived at University of Idaho, English 506, Rhetoric and Composition: History, Theory, and Research" 
  • Petrosky, Anthony; ed. David Bartholomae and Anthony Petroksky (1999). Ways of Reading (5th ed.). New York: Bedford/St. Martin’s. ISBN 978-0-312-45413-5. "An anthology including Arts of the Contact Zone" 

• Imperial Eyes: Travel Writing and Transculturation. London: Routledge. 1992. ISBN 0-415-02675-X. 

• Critical Passions: Selected Essays. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. 1999. ISBN 0-8223-2248-X. 

• Nomadías (2000). Des-escribir a Pinochet: desbaratando la cultura del miedo en Chile. Santiago: Universidad de Chile, Facultad de Filosofia y Humanidades. 

References [link]