Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) is a medical and veterinary treatment that uses low-level lasers or light-emitting diodes to alter cellular function. LLLT is controversial in mainstream medicine with ongoing research to determine whether there is a demonstrable effect at all. Also disputed are the ideal location of treatment (specifically whether LLLT is more appropriately used over nerves versus joints^[1]), dose, wavelength, timing, pulsing and duration.^[2] The effects of LLLT appear to be limited to a specified set of wavelengths of laser,^[3] and administering LLLT below the dose range does not appear to be effective.^[4]

Despite a lack of consensus over its ideal use, specific test and protocols for LLLT suggest it is effective in relieving short-term pain for rheumatoid arthritis,^[1] osteoarthritis,^[5] acute and chronic neck pain,^[6] tendinopathy,^[3][7] and possibly chronic joint disorders.^[4] The evidence for LLLT being useful in the treatment of low back pain,^[8][9] dentistry^[10][11] and wound healing is equivocal.^[12]

History [link]

In 1967 a few years after the first working laser was invented, Endre Mester in Semmelweis University in Budapest, Hungary experimented with the effects of lasers on skin cancer. While applying lasers to the backs of shaven mice, he noticed that the shaved hair grew back more quickly on the treated group than the untreated group.^[13]

Clinical applications [link]

LLLT has primarily been shown useful in the short-term treatment of acute pain caused by rheumatoid arthritis,^[1] osteoarthritis,^[5] tendinopathy,^[3][7] and possibly chronic joint disorders.^[4] LLLT has also been useful in the treatment of both acute and chronic neck pain.^[6] A Cochrane Library review concluded that low level laser therapy (LLLT) has insufficient evidence for treatment of nonspecific low back pain,^[8] a finding echoed in a later review of treatments for chronic low back pain.^[9] Though it has been suggested for decades that LLLT could be useful in speeding wound healing, the appropriate parameters (dose, type of laser, materials, wavelength, etc.) have not been identified.^[12] Similarly, the use of lasers to treat chronic periodontitis^[10] and to speed healing of infections around dental implants^[11] is suggested, but there is insufficient evidence to indicate a use superior to traditional practices ^[14].

Stephen Barrett, writing for Quackwatch, concluded there was evidence to support LLLT use for temporary pain relief, but "there's no reason to believe that they will influence the course of any ailment or are more effective than other forms of heat delivery."^[15]

Insurance company Cigna has reviewed the evidence for LLLT and concluded that it is still considered an experimental treatment therefore does not provide coverage for it.^[16]

Mechanism [link]

It is unclear how LLLT works. LLLT may reduce pain related to inflammation by lowering, in a dose-dependent manner, levels of prostaglandin E2, prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 2, interleukin 1-beta, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, the cellular influx of neutrophil granulocytes, oxidative stress, edema, and bleeding. The appropriate dose appears to be between 0.3 and 19 joules per square centimetre.^[17] Another mechanism may be related to stimulation of mitochondrion to increase the production of adenosine triphosphate resulting in an increase in reactive oxygen species, which influences redox signalling, affecting intracellular homeostasis or the proliferation of cells.^[18] The final enzyme in the production of ATP by the mitochondria, cytochrome c oxidase, does appear to accept energy from laser-level lights, making it a possible candidate for mediating the properties of laser therapy.^[19]

The effects of LLLT appear to be limited to a specified set of wavelengths of laser,^[3] and though more research is required to determine the ideal wavelengths, durations of treatment, dose and location of treatment (specifically whether LLLT is more appropriately used over nerves versus joints).^[1] Administering LLLT below the dose range does not appear to be effective.^[4] The factors of wavelength, effective dose, dose-rate effects, beam penetration, the role of coherence, and pulses (peak power and repetition rates) are still poorly understood in the clinical setting. The typical laser average power is in the range of 1-500 mW; some high-peak-power, short-pulse-width devices are in the range of 1-100 W with typical pulse-widths of 200 ns. The typical average beam irradiance then is 10 mW/cm² - 5 W/cm². The typical wavelength is in the range 600-1000 nm (red to near infrared), but some research has been done and products outside of this range are available.^[2]

See also [link]

• Photomedicine
• Light therapy
• Blood irradiation therapy

References [link]