Vyetnam urushi

Sanalar	1-noyabr,1955 - 15-may, 1975
Urush yeri	Shimoliy Vyetnam, Janubiy Vyetnam, Kambodja, Laos
Natija	Shimoliy Vyetnam g'alabasi. Vyetnamdan AQShni olib chiqilishi; Janubiy Vyetnam Shimoliy Vyetnamga qo'shiladi; Kambodja va Laosda sotsialistik boshqaruv;

Vyetnam urushi; vyetnamcha: Chiến tranh Việt Nam
	Sovuq urush
	Fayl:VNWarMontage.png;
Sanalar	1-noyabr,1955 - 15-may, 1975
Urush yeri	Shimoliy Vyetnam, Janubiy Vyetnam, Kambodja, Laos
Natija	Shimoliy Vyetnam g'alabasi. Vyetnamdan AQShni olib chiqilishi; Janubiy Vyetnam Shimoliy Vyetnamga qo'shiladi; Kambodja va Laosda sotsialistik boshqaruv;
Raqiblar
	Janubiy Vyetnam; AQSh; Janubiy Koreya; Tailand; Avstraliya; Yangi Zelandiya; Kambodja Respublikasi; Laos Qirolligi; Filippin Qoʻllab-quvvatlovchilar:; Tayvan; Kanada; Germaniya Federativ Respublikasi; Birlashgan Qirollik; Eron; Ispaniya; Malayziya
Yoʻqotishlar
Janubiy Vyetnam ; 220,357-316,000 murda, 1,170,000 yarador ; AQSh ; 58,220 murda, 303,635 yarador, 1,687 yoʻqotish ; Janubiy Koreya ; 5,099 murda, 10,962 yarador, 4 yoʻqotish ; Avstraliya ; 521 murda, 3,000 yarador ; Yangi Zelandiya ; 37 murda, 187 yarador; Tailand; 1,351 marda; Laos Qirolligi; 30,000 murda, yaradorlarning soni nomaʼlum. Jami murdalar: 315,384-412,000; Jami yaradorlar: 1,490,000+	Shimoliy Vyetnam & Vietkong; 1,176,000 murda/yoʻqotish (eng yuqori baho), 600,000+ yarador ; Xitoy ; 1,446 ölü, 4,200 yarador; Sovet Ittifoqi; 16 murda Jami murdalar: 1,177,462 (eng yuqori baho); Jami yaradorlar: 604,200+
	Vyetnam fuqarolik oʻlimlari (ikki tomondan): ~2,000,000; Kambodja fuqarolik oʻlimlari (ikki tomondan): 700,000-1,000,000; Laos fuqarolik oʻlimlari (ikki tomondan): ~50,000
Umumiy yoʻqotishlar
	~2,750,000 — 3,050,000;

Vyetnam urushi (vyetnamcha: Chiến tranh Việt Nam; Ikkinchi Hindixitoy urushi nomi bilan ham tanilgan) 1955-yil 1-noyabrdan to Saygon qulagunigacha, yaʼni 1975-yil 30-aprelgacha Vyetnam, Laos va Kambodja davlatlarida boʻlgan mojarodir. Bu urush Hindixitoy urushlarining ikkinchisi boʻlib, rasmiy ravishda Shimoliy Vyetnam va Janubiy Vyetnam oʻrtasidagi urush hisoblanadi. Shimoliy Vyetnam Sovet Ittifoqi, Xitoy va boshqa kommunistik ittifoqchilar tomonidan qoʻllab-quvvatlangan bo'lsa, Janubiy Vyetnam esa AQSh, Janubiy Koreya, Filippin, Avstraliya, Tailand va boshqa antikommunistik ittifoqchilar tomonidan qoʻllab-quvvatlangan.

Manbalar

↑ ^1,0 ^1,1 ^1,2 ^1,3 ^1,4 ^1,5 „ALLIES OF THE REPUBLIC OF VIETNAM“. Qaraldi: 24-sentabr 2011-yil.
↑ „Chapter Three: 1957-1969 Early Relations between Malaysia and Vietnam“ (PDF). University of Malaya Student Repository. Qaraldi: 17-oktabr 2015-yil.
↑ „Tunku Abdul Rahman Putra Al-Haj (Profiles of Malaysia's Foreign Ministers)“ (PDF). Institute of Diplomacy and Foreign Relations (IDFR), Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Malaysia) (2008). — „The Tunku had been personally responsible for Malaya's partisan support of the South Vietnamese regime in its fight against the Vietcong and, in reply to a Parliamentary question on 6-fevral 1962-yil, he had listed all the used weapons and equipment of the Royal Malaya Police given to Saigon. These included a total of 45,707 single-barrel shotguns, 611 armoured cars and smaller numbers of carbines and pistols. Writing in 1975, he revealed that "we had clandestinely been giving 'aid' to Vietnam since early 1958. Published American archival sources now reveal that the actual Malaysian contributions to the war effort in Vietnam included the following: "over 5,000 Vietnamese officers trained in Malaysia; training of 150 U.S. soldiers in handling Tracker Dogs; a rather impressive list of military equipment and weapons given to Viet-Nam after the end of the Malaysian insurgency (for example, 641 armored personnel carriers, 56,000 shotguns); and a creditable amount of civil assistance (transportation equipment, cholera vaccine, and flood relief)". It is undeniable that the Government's policy of supporting the South Vietnamese regime with arms, equipment and training was regarded by some quarters, especially the Opposition parties, as a form of interfering in the internal affairs of that country and the Tunku's valiant efforts to defend it were not convincing enough, from a purely foreign policy standpoint.“. 16-oktabr 2015-yilda asl nusxadan arxivlangan. Qaraldi: 17-oktabr 2015-yil.

Ushbu maqola chaladir. Siz uni boyitib, Vikipediyaga yordam berishingiz mumkin.
Bu andozani aniqrogʻiga almashtirish kerak.

[ALLIES_OF_THE_REPUBLIC_OF_VIETNAM-1] 1,0 ^1,1 ^1,2 ^1,3 ^1,4 ^1,5 „ALLIES OF THE REPUBLIC OF VIETNAM“. Qaraldi: 24-sentabr 2011-yil.

[2] „Chapter Three: 1957-1969 Early Relations between Malaysia and Vietnam“ (PDF). University of Malaya Student Repository. Qaraldi: 17-oktabr 2015-yil.

[3] „Tunku Abdul Rahman Putra Al-Haj (Profiles of Malaysia's Foreign Ministers)“ (PDF). Institute of Diplomacy and Foreign Relations (IDFR), Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Malaysia) (2008). — „The Tunku had been personally responsible for Malaya's partisan support of the South Vietnamese regime in its fight against the Vietcong and, in reply to a Parliamentary question on 6-fevral 1962-yil, he had listed all the used weapons and equipment of the Royal Malaya Police given to Saigon. These included a total of 45,707 single-barrel shotguns, 611 armoured cars and smaller numbers of carbines and pistols. Writing in 1975, he revealed that "we had clandestinely been giving 'aid' to Vietnam since early 1958. Published American archival sources now reveal that the actual Malaysian contributions to the war effort in Vietnam included the following: "over 5,000 Vietnamese officers trained in Malaysia; training of 150 U.S. soldiers in handling Tracker Dogs; a rather impressive list of military equipment and weapons given to Viet-Nam after the end of the Malaysian insurgency (for example, 641 armored personnel carriers, 56,000 shotguns); and a creditable amount of civil assistance (transportation equipment, cholera vaccine, and flood relief)". It is undeniable that the Government's policy of supporting the South Vietnamese regime with arms, equipment and training was regarded by some quarters, especially the Opposition parties, as a form of interfering in the internal affairs of that country and the Tunku's valiant efforts to defend it were not convincing enough, from a purely foreign policy standpoint.“. 16-oktabr 2015-yilda asl nusxadan arxivlangan. Qaraldi: 17-oktabr 2015-yil.

[1]

[2]

[3]