Last June, more than two years after his father-in-law assigned him the task of bringing peace to the Middle East, Jared Kushner held a big kickoff conference in Bahrain to unveil the economic portion of his plan—and it did not go well. For starters, Palestinian leadership boycotted the entire event, feeling that the plan was missing a few key details, such as, just as an example, solutions for control of the West Bank and Palestinian statehood. Kushner, ever the real estate agent, gave a speech in which he spoke of transforming the Gaza Strip into a tourist destination, failing to mention Israel and Egypt’s 12-year blockade of the Hamas-controlled territory, in addition to Israel’s 52-year-long occupation of the West Bank, which restricts trade and labor movements. When the Boy Prince of New Jersey touched on politics, it was to offer the savvy take that if everyone just stopped “doing terrorism,” it would “allow for much faster flow of goods and people.” Not surprisingly, the whole thing was panned by experts, one of whom described Kushner’s plan as “the Monty Python sketch of Israeli-Palestinian peace initiatives.” Undeterred, Kushner got on a call with Arab and Israeli reporters and, putting on his salesman cap, explained that his vision was 100% workable if Palestinian leadership would stop being so “hysterical and stupid.”
Was this the greatest way to convince people to get on board? Probably not! Yet, incredibly, Kushner apparently thought it was exactly the right approach, and we know this because on Tuesday, after the White House unveiled its full vision for peace in the Middle East—which calls for no evacuation of settlements, limits Palestinian presence in Jerusalem, and includes no path to statehood beyond the vague mention of a “future State of Palestine”—he repeated it again, except this time he cranked the a-hole from a 12 to a 45.
Appearing on CNN, Kushner told Christiane Amanpour that critics of his plan—of which there are a comically huge number—must “divorce [themselves] from all of the history” and focus on the deal he has outlined for them. And speaking of history, Kushner posited that if this whole thing fails, it’s not going to be because a glorified slumlord somehow didn’t get it right but because Palestinians are morons who don’t know what’s good for them. Sayeth Kushner:
Don’t worry, there’s footage of Kushner making this statement, so it can be played back for all eternity:
X content
This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.
Oh, and lest anyone start dredging up that tired argument that maybe a guy who has screwed up nearly every job his father has ever given him or paid for him to land, and who couldn’t obtain a security clearance without his wife begging her dad for it, wasn’t qualified to take on this project in the first place, KNOW THIS:
X content
This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.
Also, this:
X content
This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.
No further questions.
If you would like to receive the Levin Report in your inbox daily, click here to subscribe.
Report: The White House Is trying to shutdown Bolton’s book
It’s almost as though they’re worried it contains incredibly incriminating information that could proves the president’s guilt. Per CNN:
After the Times published its account of the book, Trump lashed out at Bolton on Twitter claiming he never said the aid was tied to investigations, a statement that can likely be considered another one of his patented lies. He also insisted Democrats never asked Bolton to testify, which obviously isn’t true at all. In related news, the White House is currently devising a plan to keep Bolton quiet, should Democrats secure the necessary votes to hear from witnesses.
Republicans confident they can get this thing wrapped up before the weekend
Why wait ’til next week to acquit a guilty man when they can fast-track it now?
“I’ve heard enough,” Barrasso said, adding: “I’m ready to vote on final judgment. This has been fully partisan, fully political.” Mitt Romney, who reportedly “made a strong pitch” to hear from witnesses during a closed-door lunch on Monday, maintained he would vote to hear from relevant parties but was unsure which other Republicans would join him. “I’m sure there’ll be others,” he said. “How many there will be on my side of the aisle, I just don’t know.”
Nothing to see here
X content
This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.
Elsewhere!
75% of Americans support calling witnesses—but maybe not the same witnesses (Washington Post)
Jeff Bezos’s iPhone had Apple’s state-of-the-art security, and that may have helped its alleged hackers (Washington Post)
Goldman Sachs vows to slash traders in first-ever investor meeting (NYP)
Anti-human-trafficking groups refuse to attend Ivanka Trump’s White House summit (Washington Post)
Is Bitcoin Gold Rush 2.0 Just Around the Corner? (Hive)
Facebook Growth Slows, Prompting Concerns Company Has Peaked (Bloomberg)
A Disturbing Number of People Think Coronavirus Is Related to Corona Beer (Vice)
“Men who own Mercedes and BMWs are more likely to be assholes” (Fast Company)
Rescued owl was “too fat to fly,” Suffolk sanctuary says (BBC)
— Is the DOJ’s Hillary Clinton investigation a bust?
— Do the Russians really have information on Mitch McConnell?
— The mystery of the Trump chaos trades, Iran/Mar-a-Lago edition
— Why Trump has a huge advantage over Dems with low-information voters
— The Obamoguls: propelled by still-potent political hope, Barack and Michelle have gone multiplatform
— New evidence suggests disturbing scheme by Trump’s Ukraine goons against Marie Yovanovitch
— From the Archive: The death and mysteries in Geneva of Edouard Stern
Looking for more? Sign up for our daily Hive newsletter and never miss a story.