Codebase vs. Codecov vs. Python vs. Unlambda Comparison Chart

Develop healthier code. Improve your code review workflow and quality. Codecov provides highly integrated tools to group, merge, archive, and compare coverage reports. Free for open source. Plans starting at $10/user per month. Ruby, Python, C++, Javascript, and more. Plug and play into any CI product and workflow. No setup required. Automatic report merging for all CI and languages into a single report. Get custom statuses on any group of coverage metrics. Review coverage reports by project, folder and type test (unit tests vs integration tests). Detailed report commented directly into your pull request. Codecov is SOC 2 Type II certified, which means a third-party audits and attests to our practices to secure our systems and your data.

Unlambda is a programming language. Nothing remarkable there. The originality of Unlambda is that it stands as the unexpected intersection of two marginal families of languages. Functional programming languages, of which the canonical representative is Scheme (a Lisp dialect). This means that the basic object manipulated by the language (and indeed the only one as far as Unlambda is concerned) is the function. Rather, Unlambda uses a functional approach to programming: the only form of objects it manipulates are functions. Each function takes a function as an argument and returns a function. Apart from a binary “apply” operation, Unlambda provides several built-in functions (the most important ones being the K and S combinators). User-defined functions can be created, but not saved or named, because Unlambda does not have any variables.