From: Charlie M. <cw...@gm...> - 2006-02-27 01:57:47
|
They're just another option and it is personally preference at this point. I strongly suggest you skim this link: http://peak.telecommunity.com/DevCenter/PythonEggs - Charlie On 2/26/06, Alan G Isaac <ai...@am...> wrote: > On Wed, 22 Feb 2006, Charlie Moad apparently wrote: > > Notable notes: > > - Built against numpy-0.9.5 > > - A wealth of bugfixes > > http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=3D80706 > > I'm on Win32 with Python 2.4. > For this I see both an egg and an installer. > The installer is being downloaded 15 times as often. > What are the considerations? > > I thought the egg was the simpler choice: > can't it just be put on site-packages and that's that? > But I'm not very familiar with eggs. > Is the issue that one may wish to modify the source, > and the egg doesn't give direct access to that? > > Thank you, > Alan Isaac > > PS Is it true that with eggs you can have multiple versions > side by side and use them at will? > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting langua= ge > that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webc= ast > and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territor= y! > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D110944&bid=3D241720&dat= =3D121642 > _______________________________________________ > Matplotlib-users mailing list > Mat...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-users > |