Context: Although epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)- and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-directed therapies are not approved for patients with early-stage non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), many institutions perform EGFR and ALK testing for all patients with NSCLC at the time of initial diagnosis. Current consensus guidelines recommend EGFR testing and suggest ALK testing at the time of initial diagnosis for patients with advanced disease.
Objectives: To examine the cost and clinical impact of EGFR and ALK testing of patients with early-stage NSCLC.
Design: Records from all patients with a diagnosis of NSCLC made on a nonresection specimen at our institution during a single calendar year (2012) were reviewed, and a cost analysis was performed.
Results: Of 133 total patients, 47 (35%) had early-stage (stage I or II) disease and 86 (65%) had locally advanced (stage III) or advanced (stage IV) disease at presentation. Eight of 47 patients with early-stage disease (17%) had progression/recurrence during 18 to 30 months of follow-up, 6 of 8 (75%) of whom had pathologic confirmation of progression/recurrence. The estimated additional cost of EGFR and ALK testing for all newly diagnosed patients with NSCLC at our institution is $75,200 per year, compared to testing only patients with locally advanced and advanced-stage disease.
Conclusions: The cost of universal molecular testing of NSCLC is substantial. EGFR and ALK testing of patients with early-stage disease appears to have negligible clinical impact, as most patients do not have disease recurrence/progression. Those whose disease recurs/progresses typically undergo rebiopsy. Our findings do not support the practice of universal EGFR and ALK testing in NSCLC at the time of initial diagnosis.